Karmelo Anthony, Texas teen who snagged $600K in donations after he ‘stabbed football star to death,’ faces trial

[JoeB131]

Martin was NOT a child. He was a seventeen-year-old high school senior. At seventeen I was serving in the US Army during Vietnam. He was adult enough to ambush and attack Zimmerman and force him to the sidewalk and beat him. Those are FACTS established in court.

17. Still legally a child, required to go to school, unable to vote, enter into contracts, and, if you want to use the military as an example, unable to sign up for that without his parents' permission.

Beating someone with a five-foot-long skateboard isn't holding and point a revolver at someone isn't holding.

Again, they both sound like pretty reasonable actions when confronted with a maniac who just started shooting into a crowd.

 

[JoeB131]

No--Being a thug ,he just DID the murder.

So did Zimmerman, Rittenouse, and Reeves.

But they were white, so it was okay.

Holy shit, Reeves shot a guy who threw popcorn at him.

POPCORN.

Ruled totally justifiable by a jury.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Dumbass after slavery the Act did nothing for black folks, WTF are you talking about.

It was passed before the emancipation proclamation, you were responding to a question about AFTER the emancipation proclamtion you illiterate MORON,

You are really are one stupid racist

 

[San Souci]

So did Zimmerman, Rittenouse, and Reeves.

But they were white, so it was okay.

Holy shit, Reeves shot a guy who threw popcorn at him.

POPCORN.

Ruled totally justifiable by a jury.

Yeah. Right. I am sick of all the fake Paternalism. When thev News REPORTS "Gangs of YOUTHS" looting stores and swarming they always neglect to mention they are always Black Thugs.

 

[Soupnazi630]

17. Still legally a child, required to go to school, unable to vote, enter into contracts, and, if you want to use the military as an example, unable to sign up for that without his parents' permission.



Again, they both sound like pretty reasonable actions when confronted with a maniac who just started shooting into a crowd.

No one fired into a crowd you lying gas bag

 

[Soupnazi630]

So did Zimmerman, Rittenouse, and Reeves.

But they were white, so it was okay.

Holy shit, Reeves shot a guy who threw popcorn at him.

POPCORN.

Ruled totally justifiable by a jury.

Liar

 

[Soupnazi630]

It seems that I misspoke. It appears Anthony went into that tent to visit someone. That does happen in interscholastic events.

The Metcalf brothers did not have the authority to remove Anthony from that tent. If they felt he was out of place, they should have gone to a coach or an adult with such authority. Seems that your type wants to miss this fact.

Yes they did have that authority.

 

[IM2]

Hey, if you want to talk about a new form of slavery, let's talk about being a ward of the Democrat Party plantation.

The only plantation is Republican.

 

[IM2]

Yeah. Right. I am sick of all the fake Paternalism. When thev News REPORTS "Gangs of YOUTHS" looting stores and swarming they always neglect to mention they are always Black Thugs.

That's because they aren't always black thugs.

 

[JoeB131]

Rittenhouse shot an unarmed man (Rosenbaum) who was chasing him and, according to defense witnesses, attempting to seize his rifle. He then shot Huber and wounded Grosskreutz while being pursued by people who believed they were trying to stop an active shooter. The jury ultimately found those shootings legally justified as self-defense.

You mean the gun he illegally owned (being a minor from another state) that he crossed state lines to participate in a riot before he got into a confrontation with a homeless person and shot him, with the fatal shot being in his back when he was already down and no longer presented a threat?

Then he shot two other people who were trying to hold him for police. The police who let him walk past four of their cars even though he was carrying a gun down the street.

But justified as self-defense because he was white.

Keep in mind what started this riot. The Kenosha police shot a black man in the back when he was trying to get into his car and leave.

The grand jury found enough evidence to establish probable cause and send the case to trial. Whether that evidence ultimately proves guilt beyond a reasonable doubt is what the petit jury is now deciding.

I agree. So why no black people on the jury? Why did the prosecutors, in fact, eliminate all black jury members from the potential jury pool?

Now, truth to be told, I think this kid is guilty of manslaughter, not murder. But so were Rittenhouse, and Zimmerman, and Reeves. But they all got off on a "Stand your Ground"/Self-defense argument.

Translated — you’re just speculating and attempting to tie it to similar trials where the evidence, initiation of threat, circumstances and other key components are different.

Hardly speculating.

The only difference I see in these cases is that they are railroading a black kid when white people who did things that were FAR WORSE got passes because of their race and level of privilege.

 

[Soupnazi630]

You mean the gun he illegally owned (being a minor from another state) that he crossed state lines to participate in a riot before he got into a confrontation with a homeless person and shot him, with the fatal shot being in his back when he was already down and no longer presented a threat?

Then he shot two other people who were trying to hold him for police. The police who let him walk past four of their cars even though he was carrying a gun down the street.

But justified as self-defense because he was white.

Keep in mind what started this riot. The Kenosha police shot a black man in the back when he was trying to get into his car and leave.

View attachment 1266582Strop



I agree. So why no black people on the jury? Why did the prosecutors, in fact, eliminate all black jury members from the potential jury pool?

Now, truth to be told, I think this kid is guilty of manslaughter, not murder. But so were Rittenhouse, and Zimmerman, and Reeves. But they all got off on a "Stand your Ground"/Self-defense argument.


Hardly speculating.

The only difference I see in these cases is that they are railroading a black kid when white people who did things that were FAR WORSE got passes because of their race and level of privilege.

Stop with your out right lies. No one was shot when he was down.

He was righteously shot in self defense and no one was trying to hold him for the police

It was justified self defense and race had nothing to do with it.

Yes you are speculating andmaking up details from thin aur thus you are a dishonest liar.

None of those three used stand your ground

The blacks on the jury admitted to massive bias rheir dismassal had nothing to do with race

 

[IM2]

No--Being a thug ,he just DID the murder.

The 2 thugs were the Metcalf brothers, who did not have the authority to walk up to Anthony and demand that he leave. Those two thugs we asked not to touch Anthony, but one did not listen and decided he was going to get physical.

By all rights, Anthony should get off due to self-defense, but that's not going to happen because an all-white jury can't conceive that someone black could fear for their safety when someone white decides to get aggressive with them.

 

[Soupnazi630]

The 2 thugs were the Metcalf brothers, who did not have the authority to walk up to Anthony and demand that he leave. Those two thugs we asked not to touch Anthony, but one did not listen and decided he was going to get physical.

By all rights, Anthony should get off due to self-defense, but that's not going to happen because an all-white jury can't conceive that someone black could fear for their safety when someone white decides to get aggressive with them.

They did have that authroity.

Jarmela was the thug provoking a fight.

He did not ask them not to touch them he DARED them

There was no self defense element. Anthonoy is a murderer.

You are a racist posting lies

 

[JoeB131]

Yeah. Right. I am sick of all the fake Paternalism. When thev News REPORTS "Gangs of YOUTHS" looting stores and swarming they always neglect to mention they are always Black Thugs.

Because it's not always just blacks and it's not relevant.

Now, if we want to talk about "Looting", remember this gem?

 

[JoeB131]

They did have that authroity.

Jarmela was the thug provoking a fight.

He did not ask them not to touch them he DARED them

There was no self defense element. Anthonoy is a murderer.

And how does that not apply to Rittenouse, Zimmerman, and Reeves, who also are murderers who provoked fights?

 

[Soupnazi630]

And how does that not apply to Rittenouse, Zimmerman, and Reeves, who also are murderers who provoked fights?

They did not provoke anything nor commit murder

You have to out right lie and make up fictional details every time you make that claim.

 

[JoeB131]

They did not provoke anything nor commit murder

You have to out right lie and make up fictional details every time you make that claim.

Every last one of them could have made decisions to avoid those confrontations, as could Anthony.

But they were white.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Every last one of them could have made decisions to avoid those confrontations, as could Anthony.

But they were white.

Anthony Karmela instigated the confrontation and provoked it. Therein lies the difference.