Kari's Attorneys are Confident on Their Lawsuits!

[BackAgain]

That's why he put the question mark at the end of the sentence , you insufferable crybaby.

Damn; but you’re insipid. Go dry out your panties. Put on fresh ones. Maybe consider at least hitting the shower. You always smell like piss.

 

[rightwinger]

You have severe comprehension problems or you’re just dishonest.

First off, point to a list where I ever claimed what the court “would” do.

Secondly, the QUESTIONS are:

• “Did she lose by 17,000 votes?”
• 
  
• DID she “lose” at all?
• 
  
• Were the valid votes and only the valid votes counted?
• 
  
• We’re the votes properly counted?

Then, finally (for now) there is a short answer to your ignorant question. The “relief” sought by the plaintiff is a matter of law. The complaint cites it.

None of this means the court will entertain the suit. And even if it does, it doesn’t mean the plaintiff will win. And even if the plaintiff wins, it doesn’t mean the relief sought will be granted (either of the proposed remedies).

But the complaint itself seems fairly solid.

Yes, Kari Lake lost
She LOST by 17,000 votes
And the results have been certified by the state of Arizona

Nothing Lake is whining about changes that

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Damn; but you’re insipid. Go dry out your panties. Put on fresh ones. Maybe consider at least hitting the shower. You always smell like piss.

Yes, let the tantrum flow through you. Good stuff.

 

[BackAgain]

I agree. Which makes your apoplectic tantrums that much more hilarious.

But I haven’t offered any tantrums at all — as you knew when you posted that lie. As everyone can see. So your perpetual lies Farty make even less sense.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

But I haven’t offered any tantrums at all

 

[BackAgain]

Yes, Kari Lake lost
She LOST by 17,000 votes
And the results have been certified by the state of Arizona

Nothing Lake is whining about changes that

And the suit couldn’t be filed until the certification under AZ law; which demonstrates that even Arizona recognizes the possibility that the “certified“ results might need to be challenged.

Damn. You may be slow and plodding, but at least you remain unable to make a valid point.

And labeling her objections as “whining” or trying to label her as an “election denier” or a “crybaby” doesn’t support your idiocy in any way whatsoever.

 

[BackAgain]

Yes, let the tantrum flow through you. Good stuff.

Zzzzz.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

And the suit couldn’t be filed until the certification under AZ law; which demonstrates that even Arizona recognizes the possibility that the “certified“ results might need to be challenged.

Damn. You may be slow and plodding, but at least you remain unable to make a valid point.

And labeling her objections as “whining” or trying to label her as an “election denier” or a “crybaby” doesn’t support your idiocy in any way whatsoever.

A crybaby fraud hiring unscrupulous lawyers to fall on their faces in court is not an actual challenge.

 

[BackAgain]

A crybaby fraud hiring unscrupulous lawyers to fall on their faces in court is not an actual challenge.

You probably shouldn’t libel those lawyers.
I mean, you couldn’t establish that the lawyers involved in filing her complaint are now or have ever been “unscrupulous” if your worthless petty life depended on it.

 

[rightwinger]

And the suit couldn’t be filed until the certification under AZ law; which demonstrates that even Arizona recognizes the possibility that the “certified“ results might need to be challenged.

Damn. You may be slow and plodding, but at least you remain unable to make a valid point.

And labeling her objections as “whining” or trying to label her as an “election denier” or a “crybaby” doesn’t support your idiocy in any way whatsoever.

damn…you may be Gullible

There isn’t a conspiracy you won’t sign up to…as long as you win

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Gateway pundit

lol

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

You probably shouldn’t libel those lawyers.

I just did. I'll do it again, too. Good luck with your lawsuit. Maybe you and they can hire Powell like Trump bragged about doing.

 

[rightwinger]

I just did. I'll do it again, too. Good luck with your lawsuit. Maybe you and they can hire Powell like Trump bragged about doing.

Kari Lake needs the Kracken

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Kari's Attorneys are Confident on Their Lawsuits!

Then they’re dreadful lawyers.

They’re also dishonest lawyers, lying to their client; they should be disbarred.

 

[MagicMike]

Your opinion is baseless and of no consequence.

Then why do you continue to feel a need to reply?
Why not just PISS OFF?

 

[BackAgain]

damn…you may be Gullible

There isn’t a conspiracy you won’t sign up to…as long as you win

You’ve still got nothing Leftwhiner. You can’t dispute (intelligently or factually) a single sentence in the complaint. You certainly couldn’t refute a single faxrual assertion.

And for an empty vessel, such as you, to try to call anybody else “gullible” is ironic in the extreme. Tools like you actually buy the propaganda offered under the guise of “news” by the liberal apparatchik handmaiden media.

 

[BackAgain]

Then why do you continue to feel a need to reply?
Why not just PISS OFF?

To point out that you are again and again offering mere silly and uninformed opinion.

Besides, it clearly triggers you, you total pussy.

 

[BackAgain]

I just did. I'll do it again, too. Good luck with your lawsuit. Maybe you and they can hire Powell like Trump bragged about doing.

Have a blast. I’d laugh out loud if you did get sued.

 

[MagicMike]

To point out that you are again and again offering mere silly and uninformed opinion.

Besides, it clearly triggers you, you total pussy.

Dream on Skippy.

 

[BackAgain]

Dream on Skippy.

You’ve demonstrated it conclusively. No good purpose is served by your continuing ineffective denials.