Kari Lake is right, Trump should defy courts

[LeftofLeft]

Anti American bullshit.

You should self deport ASAP.

Russia and North Korea are looking for fascists like you.

Because Democrats and Liberals have never called for defying courts. Got it.

 

[LeftofLeft]

How about no? I'm not your ******* virtual assistant, you piece of shit.

Here’s fascism in the US…. The pieces of shit from ANTIFA preventing an old lady from crossing a public crosswalk.

 

[TemplarKormac]

These are probably Obama judges. It's more proof way too many judges are way too liberal. No wonder there are discussions about impeaching judges.

---Kari Lake Suggests Trump Should Defy Courts---

MSN

She is wrong.

Nobody, left nor right, should openly defy the courts. That sets a precedent for the other party to engage in it. Such behavior will render the courts meaningless.

You want tyranny? This is how you get tyranny! No. NO. BAD.

 

[Concerned American]

Well, you see--- here is the game:

• These judges all know they are way over the line and their plan is to push Trump, interfere so much in his ability to govern, to force him into saying FU to them all. They want him to do that so they can then run to the media yelling: "Trump's a dictator! He is out of control! He is a mad man!"
• They have been trying to set up that argument for a long time. They tried it with J6. Consider this J6 2.0"
• They hope to get power back in the midterms and use it to impeach Trump. It is all they have as they cannot possibly win on the issues.
• So Trump is hanging back hoping that either Congress or SCOTUS will do the right thing and cut these judge's dicks off.
• Trump's last resort is to go rogue, but he can do it and will if he must.
• Just remember: Trump is a counter-puncher and however this goes, Trump will be coming back hitting the democrats twice as hard as they hit him, and understand that no matter what, as president, Trump is positioned to hit harder than democrats can ever do to him, so expect Trump/Bondi to be leveling a few nukes later this year into next year. It is coming. Democrats think they have a scheme, but Trump has a scheme too-- a big one-- Trump did not spend all of '21-'24 out back picking flowers.

Democrats no longer have a majority in congress so these activist judges are running the obstruction that Piglosi, Schiff and their minions ran in the first admin.

 

[scruffy]

She is wrong.

Nobody, left nor right, should openly defy the courts. That sets a precedent for the other party to engage in it. Such behavior will render the courts meaningless.

You want tyranny? This is how you get tyranny! No. NO. BAD.

Depends on the court. And the judge.

We had one federal nincompoop the other day, demanding 21 days notice for deportations, when the law in the US Code specifically states 10 days.

Such "rulings" should not only be ignored, but the judge in question should be impeached for incompetence.

Judges do not make the law. They are explicitly forbidden from doing so. Any time a judge tries to make law, the ruling should be ignored. Challenged, if you're patient, and ignored if you're not.

Legislating from the bench is illegal. Judges aren't perfect, they can be called on their bullshit just like everyone else.

That's why we have three branches of government and not just one.

 

[TemplarKormac]

Such "rulings" should not only be ignored, but the judge in question should be impeached for incompetence.

You can, but then you create this "if they can do it, so can we" mentality; such a mentality can drive complacency, and can embolden others to ignore just rulings, not just bad ones.

 

[wamose]

You can, but then you create this "if they can do it, so can we" mentality; such a mentality can drive complacency, and can embolden others to ignore just rulings, not just bad ones.

It's bad, but I think Roberts, with his political leanings and his conflict of interests, is inviting defiance. Bias breeds tyranny.

 

[TheGreatSatan]

How about no? I'm not your ******* virtual assistant, you piece of shit.

I will.

When democrats attack Tesla owners and paint swastikas on their cars. That's fascism.

Democrats are the fascist they claim Americans to be.

Democrats = fascist

 

[Rigby5]

These are probably Obama judges. It's more proof way too many judges are way too liberal. No wonder there are discussions about impeaching judges.

---Kari Lake Suggests Trump Should Defy Courts---

MSN

Nonsense.
Judges have to be lawyers, which costs lots of money, so have to be capitalist, wealthy elite.
Judges tend to be the cream of the crop, so are the least corrupt.

It is Trump who is violating the law by not following judicial due process.
We don't want deportations to make mistakes and send innocents to El Salvador prisons, like we did with Kilmar.

 

[Superbadbrutha]

These are probably Obama judges. It's more proof way too many judges are way too liberal. No wonder there are discussions about impeaching judges.

---Kari Lake Suggests Trump Should Defy Courts---

MSN

All hail the New King in town.

 

[Rigby5]

That should be played every time you hear Dims acting outraged that Trump might ignore a judge.

Wrong.
That is over a president deciding not to cause a harmful ruling from a single judge to have effect until appealed.
That is the exact opposite of what Trump has done, to not even have any judicial due process at all, in order to illegally harm thousands of people.

 

[Rigby5]

I will.

When democrats attack Tesla owners and paint swastikas on their cars. That's fascism.

Democrats are the fascist they claim Americans to be.

Democrats = fascist

Wrong.
Fascism is profit motivated, there is no profits involved in political expressions against Musk.

 

[frigidweirdo]

These are probably Obama judges. It's more proof way too many judges are way too liberal. No wonder there are discussions about impeaching judges.

---Kari Lake Suggests Trump Should Defy Courts---

MSN

Well, aside from you being a parody account, a criminal in the White House trying to defy to courts is.... well.... to be expected.

 

[Rigby5]

Give me an example of fascism in America today

Easily done.
Health care in the early 1950s was inexpensive, but then insurance companies got an IRS regulation passed that allowed employer benefits to employees to be tax exempt.
That allowed the wealthy to write off health insurance.
Which then encouraged higher medical charges, so that people needed health insurance even more.
Which resulted in the poor not being covered, but having to pay rates that are twice as high, actually subsiding the health care of the wealthy.
That is pure fascism.

 

[Rigby5]

Here’s fascism in the US…. The pieces of shit from ANTIFA preventing an old lady from crossing a public crosswalk.

View attachment 1105296

Wrong.
There is no traffic.
The street is blocked.
So the elderly woman can cross anywhere, just like the protestors obvious are.
So there is no problem with her being able to cross the street.

 

[IM2]

"Kari Lake is right, Trump should defy courts"

 

[IM2]

That should be played every time you hear Dims acting outraged that Trump might ignore a judge.

False equivalence.

 

[LeftofLeft]

Wrong.
There is no traffic.
The street is blocked.
So the elderly woman can cross anywhere, just like the protestors obvious are.
So there is no problem with her being able to cross the street.

They are blocking her. Anyone getting out of the way or God forbid, escort/help her safely to the other side? No.

 

[Captain Caveman]

Anti American bullshit.

You should self deport ASAP.

Russia and North Korea are looking for fascists like you.

Explain post #4 Craptits -

Post in thread 'Kari Lake is right, Trump should defy courts'

Apr 27, 2025

These are probably Obama judges. It's more proof way too many judges are way too liberal. No wonder there are discussions about impeaching judges.

---Kari Lake Suggests Trump Should Defy Courts---

MSN

• mudwhistle

• 
• 

 

[toobfreak]

Well, aside from you being a parody account, a criminal in the White House trying to defy to courts is.... well.... to be expected.

A criminal you say? What does that make Joe Biden then when the highest court in the land ruled he didn't have the authority, twice, to just forgive millions of unpaid school loans, and both times, Joe ignored the court and vowed to forge ahead anyway?

Or the time Chuckie Schumer threatened SC Justices for making a ruling he did not agree with?

What kind of CRIMINAL does it take to use the power of the present to sign thousands of bills and pardons of all kinds of heinous criminals only to find that the signatures are all frauds, then on the last day in office to pardon himself, his wife, brother, son, family and friends of crimes not even charged going back a full decade coinciding with Hunter's beginnings as a "gas expert" working for Ukraine, the country Joe threatened if they did not stop investigating his son?