Kamala supports NO RESTRICTIONS on abortion

[ColonelAngus]

Harris dances around what abortion restrictions she would accept

Vice President Kamala Harris deflected questions about the specific abortion restrictions she would accept as president, instead redirecting the

www.washingtonexaminer.com

What kind of sick POS thinks it is fine to murder a baby on the table?

******* animals.

Soulless ghouls.

 

[TNHarley]

“I’m not gonna engage in hypotheticals because we could go on a variety of scenarios,” she said. “Let’s just start with a fundamental fact, a basic freedom has been taken from the women of America: the freedom to make decisions about their own body. And that cannot be negotiable, which is that we need to put back in the protections of Roe v Wade. And that is it.”
She in no way said she supports babies being killed on tables.

 

[ColonelAngus]

“I’m not gonna engage in hypotheticals because we could go on a variety of scenarios,” she said. “Let’s just start with a fundamental fact, a basic freedom has been taken from the women of America: the freedom to make decisions about their own body. And that cannot be negotiable, which is that we need to put back in the protections of Roe v Wade. And that is it.”
She in no way said she supports babies being killed on tables.

She is such a motherfucking liar.

What freedoms have been removed from the women of California, for example?

It is a state issue. “THE WOMEN OF AMERICA” haven’t lost shit.

Plus, WHAT IS A WOMAN?

 

[DGS49]

I have a serious question for anyone with the interest to respond. Note: You must have taken HS Civics at some point.

What the **** does the President have to do with "national abortion policy"? Given the Dobbs decision that makes it clear that the issue of abortion is now a matter for the States to deal with, what can any President do to implement ANY policy, whether restrictive or totally unrestricted?

In fact, absent a new Constitutional Amendment, there can be no "national abortion policy." Should Congress try to legislate one, it would immediately be challenged by at least a dozen States and neutered by the USSC.

 

[ColonelAngus]

I have a serious question for anyone with the interest to respond. Note: You must have taken HS Civics at some point.

What the **** does the President have to do with "national abortion policy"? Given the Dobbs decision that makes it clear that the issue of abortion is now a matter for the States to deal with, what can any President do to implement ANY policy, whether restrictive or totally unrestricted?

In fact, absent a new Constitutional Amendment, there can be no "national abortion policy." Should Congress try to legislate one, it would immediately be challenged by at least a dozen States and neutered by the USSC.

It is a non starter the Dems are running on to stoke fear into IGNORANT WOMEN.

Many states have abortions legal in month 9.

IF KILLING A BABY IS SO IMPORTANT TO YOU…MOVE TO A BABY MURDER STATE.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

It's a state issue.

One day or nine months it's an innocent child. If you don't want a child practice personal responsibility

 

[wamose]

The more disjointed Harris' opinions become, the more she falls back on the bogus problem of the evils of overturning of Roe v Wade. Hell, even Ginsburg agreed with overturning it. But, with no other real policy to run on, Harris is going to ride this abortion horse right into the ground. Back to MAGA

 

[ColonelAngus]

It's a state issue.

One day or nine months it's an innocent child. If you don't want a child practice personal responsibility

No, abortion is birth control. Why you harshing my mellow?

Definitely 5 minutes prior to birth it is perfectly fine to murder a baby.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

The more disjointed Harris' opinions become, the more she falls back on the bogus problem of the evils of overturning of Roe v Wade. Hell, even Ginsburg agreed with overturning it. But, with no other real policy to run on, Harris is going to ride this abortion horse right into the ground. Back to MAGA

It's not the issue the left thinks it is but damn sad if they think killing the most innocent of all is

 

[SassyIrishLass]

No, abortion is birth control. Why you harshing my mellow?

Definitely 5 minutes prior to birth it is perfectly fine to murder a baby.

Abortion is the termination of a human being. Period

 

[ColonelAngus]

Abortion is the termination of a human being. Period

Agreed.

As far as Kamala saying women have no rights over their bodies anymore…it is just patently untrue. Dems lie. It is what they do.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Agreed.

As far as Kamala saying women have no rights over their bodies anymore…it is just patently untrue. Dems lie. It is what they do.

It goes both ways, if a man doesn't want a child, personal responsibility. Put a hood on it. Takes two to tango

 

[ColonelAngus]

It goes both ways, if a man doesn't want a child, personal responsibility. Put a hood on it. Takes two to tango

Absolutely. And a woman’s responsibility to not bang a dude without a condom if they do not want a baby.

Plus, STDS.

 

[JoeB131]

Harris dances around what abortion restrictions she would accept

Vice President Kamala Harris deflected questions about the specific abortion restrictions she would accept as president, instead redirecting the

www.washingtonexaminer.com

What kind of sick POS thinks it is fine to murder a baby on the table?

******* animals.

Soulless ghouls.

Good for her.

Abortion is a very painful personal decision and the government needs to keep the **** out of it.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Good for her.

Abortion is a very painful personal decision and the government needs to keep the **** out of it.

Then why is Camel Toe blabbering about it?

Dumbass

 

[ColonelAngus]

If one can murder a baby on the table in many states, what freedom has been taken away from women in America.

ROE V WADE WAS MORE RESTRICTIVE….YOU STUPID FUCKBAGS.

 

[Votto]

I have a serious question for anyone with the interest to respond. Note: You must have taken HS Civics at some point.

What the **** does the President have to do with "national abortion policy"? Given the Dobbs decision that makes it clear that the issue of abortion is now a matter for the States to deal with, what can any President do to implement ANY policy, whether restrictive or totally unrestricted?

In fact, absent a new Constitutional Amendment, there can be no "national abortion policy." Should Congress try to legislate one, it would immediately be challenged by at least a dozen States and neutered by the USSC.

Because the democrats have nothing else to run on.

What else is there other than abortion?

 

[Votto]

If one can murder a baby on the table in many states, what freedom has been taken away from women in America.

ROE V WADE WAS MORE RESTRICTIVE….YOU STUPID FUCKBAGS.

That it was.

States across the country are adopting Constitutional amendments that basically take all restrictions away

At the same time, democrats convince people that they have lost their abortion rights so they should vote for Kamala to save them, even though abortion numbers have increased since the Dobbs decision

Simply incredible as they have their cake and eat it too.

 

[ColonelAngus]

That it was.

States across the country are adopting Constitutional amendments that basically take all restrictions away

At the same time, democrats convince people that they have lost their abortion rights so they should vote for Kamala to save them, even though abortion numbers have increased since the Dobbs decision

Simply incredible as they have their cake and eat it too.

What kills me is that bitches in CALI know they have less abortion restrictions now than when ROE. V WADE was in place.

Why are they lying whores who claim they have no rights?

 

[JoeB131]

Then why is Camel Toe blabbering about it?

Dumbass

Because, dumbass, the three knuckledraggers that Trump put on SCOTUS have made this an issue when it didn't need to be. We settled this problem 50 years ago.