Kamala Harris wants to fine companies that don't pay women the same as men

[K9Buck]

This is textbook fascism as the government doesn't own the means of production but the government manages the means of production. Private companies should be free to negotiate with private citizens in order to agree on a compensation plan. That is called free-market capitalism. The modern left is the fascist, totalitarian movement that they claim to oppose. What a joke.

https://nypost.com/2019/05/20/kamala-harris-wants-to-fine-companies-that-pay-men-more-than-women/

 

[aaronleland]

You get paid more the better you are at your job. When baby making becomes an occupation I fully expect women to get paid more for doing it.

 

[danielpalos]

women get compensated with more sex.

 

[Zorro!]

This is textbook fascism as the government doesn't own the means of production but the government manages the means of production. Private companies should be free to negotiate with private citizens in order to agree on a compensation plan. That is called free-market capitalism. The modern left is the fascist, totalitarian movement that they claim to oppose. What a joke.

https://nypost.com/2019/05/20/kamala-harris-wants-to-fine-companies-that-pay-men-more-than-women/

GLASS HOUSES: One Day After Announcing Wage Gap Plan, Report Shows Men Are Paid More Than Women in Kamala Harris’ Office.

 

[danielpalos]

we need better measures of equality.

 

[Sunsettommy]

This is textbook fascism as the government doesn't own the means of production but the government manages the means of production. Private companies should be free to negotiate with private citizens in order to agree on a compensation plan. That is called free-market capitalism. The modern left is the fascist, totalitarian movement that they claim to oppose. What a joke.

https://nypost.com/2019/05/20/kamala-harris-wants-to-fine-companies-that-pay-men-more-than-women/

I don't think Kammy has ever read/heard about this 1963 law:

The Equal Pay Act of 1963

Excerpt:

"(d) Prohibition of sex discrimination

(1) No employer having employees subject to any provisions of this section shall discriminate, within any establishment in which such employees are employed, between employees on the basis of sex by paying wages to employees in such establishment at a rate less than the rate at which he pays wages to employees of the opposite sex in such establishment for equal work on jobs the performance of which requires equal skill, effort, and responsibility, and which are performed under similar working conditions, except where such payment is made pursuant to (i) a seniority system; (ii) a merit system; (iii) a system which measures earnings by quantity or quality of production; or (iv) a differential based on any other factor other than sex: Provided, That an employer who is paying a wage rate differential in violation of this subsection shall not, in order to comply with the provisions of this subsection, reduce the wage rate of any employee."
========================================================================
It has been the law of the land since 1963, which is over 55 years ago.

Her ignorance is inexcusable.

 

[Leo123]

What do you expect from a woman who got her first real political appointment from having an affair with Willie Brown?

 

[Zorro!]

we need better measures of equality.

We don't need to measure anything other than equality before the law.

 

[PoliticalChic]

This is textbook fascism as the government doesn't own the means of production but the government manages the means of production. Private companies should be free to negotiate with private citizens in order to agree on a compensation plan. That is called free-market capitalism. The modern left is the fascist, totalitarian movement that they claim to oppose. What a joke.

https://nypost.com/2019/05/20/kamala-harris-wants-to-fine-companies-that-pay-men-more-than-women/

I don't think Kammy has ever read/heard about this 1963 law:

The Equal Pay Act of 1963

Excerpt:

"(d) Prohibition of sex discrimination

(1) No employer having employees subject to any provisions of this section shall discriminate, within any establishment in which such employees are employed, between employees on the basis of sex by paying wages to employees in such establishment at a rate less than the rate at which he pays wages to employees of the opposite sex in such establishment for equal work on jobs the performance of which requires equal skill, effort, and responsibility, and which are performed under similar working conditions, except where such payment is made pursuant to (i) a seniority system; (ii) a merit system; (iii) a system which measures earnings by quantity or quality of production; or (iv) a differential based on any other factor other than sex: Provided, That an employer who is paying a wage rate differential in violation of this subsection shall not, in order to comply with the provisions of this subsection, reduce the wage rate of any employee."
========================================================================
It has been the law of the land since 1963, which is over 55 years ago.

Her ignorance is inexcusable.

Is it possible that the Democrats are simply running out of new lies, and the ones that have been exposed....repeatedly......are being re-cycled?

 

[danielpalos]

we need better measures of equality.

We don't need to measure anything other than equality before the law.

thank you!

equal protection of the law in our at-will employment States for unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed.

 

[danielpalos]

This is textbook fascism as the government doesn't own the means of production but the government manages the means of production. Private companies should be free to negotiate with private citizens in order to agree on a compensation plan. That is called free-market capitalism. The modern left is the fascist, totalitarian movement that they claim to oppose. What a joke.

https://nypost.com/2019/05/20/kamala-harris-wants-to-fine-companies-that-pay-men-more-than-women/

I don't think Kammy has ever read/heard about this 1963 law:

The Equal Pay Act of 1963

Excerpt:

"(d) Prohibition of sex discrimination

(1) No employer having employees subject to any provisions of this section shall discriminate, within any establishment in which such employees are employed, between employees on the basis of sex by paying wages to employees in such establishment at a rate less than the rate at which he pays wages to employees of the opposite sex in such establishment for equal work on jobs the performance of which requires equal skill, effort, and responsibility, and which are performed under similar working conditions, except where such payment is made pursuant to (i) a seniority system; (ii) a merit system; (iii) a system which measures earnings by quantity or quality of production; or (iv) a differential based on any other factor other than sex: Provided, That an employer who is paying a wage rate differential in violation of this subsection shall not, in order to comply with the provisions of this subsection, reduce the wage rate of any employee."
========================================================================
It has been the law of the land since 1963, which is over 55 years ago.

Her ignorance is inexcusable.

Is it possible that the Democrats are simply running out of new lies, and the ones that have been exposed....repeatedly......are being re-cycled?

or, the right wing is simply, clueless and Causeless, like usual.

 

[Zorro!]

we need better measures of equality.

We don't need to measure anything other than equality before the law.

thank you!

equal protection of the law in our at-will employment States for unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed.

If you qualify for unemployment, I'm sure you are free to collect it. Public benefits can't fix everything, you know?

“CONGRATULATIONS ON A LIFE WELL-LIVED:” 13-Time Felon Accidentally Shoots Himself in the Testicles While Carrying Drugs in His Anus.