Kamala Harris Says She Has a Glock, but Many Glocks Are Barred in California by a Law She Supported

Last edited:
Kamala Harris says she owns a Glock despite supporting handgun bans in SF, prompting speculation it’s unregistered
Aren’t yall still speculating that she is an alien from Pluto? Why would anybody care what a bunch of kooks speculate about?
 
On what grounds is she going to confiscate lawfully held firearms and how exactly is she allegedly going to achieve this?

Our gun laws are enforced at the state level so are you claiming that she's going to personally push through a law to confiscate every known lawfully owned firearm in the country? Again, on what grounds?

There are plenty of groups who have and still are pushing an agenda to get gun "crime" categorized as a public health crisis. Is she doing that?

If not, what SPECIFICALLY is she doing that leads reasonable people to believe that she is planning a LAWFUL gun confiscation law and then event.

I don't agree with Red Flag laws because in my opinion, they by-pass the due process guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and tack it on after the fact in the form of a "hearing" but after the citizen has already been deprived of his "...life, freedom or property" in violation of the same

A Due Process Clause is found in both the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution, which prohibit the deprivation of "life, liberty, or property" by the federal and state governments, respectively, without due process of law.​

Kamala will do it by Executive Order, never mind the legalities.

That's the way the D's do it.

That's what Sleepy Joe did as far as his scheme to transfer student loans to the taxpayers. And even after the courts slapped him down, he continues to try again and again.
 
Kamala will do it by Executive Order, never mind the legalities.

That's the way the D's do it.

That's what Sleepy Joe did as far as his scheme to transfer student loans to the taxpayers. And even after the courts slapped him down, he continues to try again and again.
So she's going to use legal means to do something that is blatantly unconstitutional?

Well I guess after the SCOTUS's latest ruling giving POTUS virtually unlimited immunity in his or her official presidential actions, I guess that could be argued to be a real possibility.

Probably wasn't want Roberts had in mind when he led that charge, but whatever. I try my best not to worry about things until necessary after having prepared to the best of my abilities. That's the category this one falls into.
 
On what grounds is she going to confiscate lawfully held firearms and how exactly is she allegedly going to achieve this?

Our gun laws are enforced at the state level so are you claiming that she's going to personally push through a law to confiscate every known lawfully owned firearm in the country? Again, on what grounds?

There are plenty of groups who have and still are pushing an agenda to get gun "crime" categorized as a public health crisis. Is she doing that?

If not, what SPECIFICALLY is she doing that leads reasonable people to believe that she is planning a LAWFUL gun confiscation law and then event.

I don't agree with Red Flag laws because in my opinion, they by-pass the due process guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and tack it on after the fact in the form of a "hearing" but after the citizen has already been deprived of his "...life, freedom or property" in violation of the same

A Due Process Clause is found in both the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution, which prohibit the deprivation of "life, liberty, or property" by the federal and state governments, respectively, without due process of law.​


 
It's not the firearm that is restricted, it's the capacity of the magazine(s).

Last time I purchased a firearm in California they had not yet passed a law restricting magazine sizes to a maximum of ten rounds. And to the best of my knowledge, any firearms owned/purchased prior to the legislation going into effect were grandfathered in.
The 10 round capacity has been changed to 15 rounds by a District Court.

So you would be incorrect in stating that Vice President Harris is violating the law SIMPLY because she owns a Glock.
 
Then you won't own a gun in Cali for long... they'll find a way to take them from you.
Really?? Oh no… now I’m scared. I guess my only option is to move or vote Republican. Thank you for converting me. Well done!
 
Brainfart. A few steps down from GateWayFuckNuts. No, Glocks are NOT banned or barred in California. Shit for brains.
These are the approved Glocks. Gen 3 only,



ManufacturerModelGun TypeBarrel LengthCaliberExpired Date
Glock17 (Black) / Steel, PolymerPistol4.49"9mm01/01/25
Glock17 OD / Steel, PolymerPistol4.49"9mm01/01/25
Glock17C / Steel, PolymerPistol4.49"9mm01/01/25
Glock17RTF2 (Black) / Steel, PolymerPistol4.49"9mm01/01/25
Glock19 / Steel, PolymerPistol4.02"9mm01/01/25
Glock19 OD / Steel, PolymerPistol4.02"9mm01/01/25
Glock19C / Steel, PolymerPistol4.02"9mm01/01/25
Glock20 / Steel, PolymerPistol4.60"10mm01/01/25
Glock20 OD / Steel, PolymerPistol4.60"10mm01/01/25
Glock20C / Steel, PolymerPistol4.60"10mm01/01/25
Glock20SF (Black) / Steel, PolymerPistol4.60"10mm01/01/25
Glock21 / Steel, PolymerPistol4.60".45 ACP01/01/25
Glock21 OD / Steel, PolymerPistol4.60".45 ACP01/01/25
Glock21C / Steel, PolymerPistol4.60".45 ACP01/01/25
Glock21SF-STD / Steel, PolymerPistol4.61".45 ACP01/01/25
Glock22 / Steel, PolymerPistol4.49".40 S&W01/01/25
Glock22 - California Department of Corrections / Steel; PolymerPistol4.49".40 S&W01/01/25
Glock22 - FBI 100 Yr. Commemorative (Blk) / Steel, PolymerPistol4.49".40 S&W01/01/25
Glock22 C / Steel, PolymerPistol4.49".40 S&W01/01/25
Glock22 OD / Steel, PolymerPistol4.49".40 S&W01/01/25
 
The most left wing Senator ever....
is backed by Dick Cheney, owns a Glock, brags about how she would immediately cap off an intruder....
yet is for gun confiscation and defunding the police...
At some point, you realize this woman is really not sane....
She's not insane.
She's a pandering lightweight - and she's not very good at it.
 
I was under the impression that California had extreme requirements for citizens to legally carry firearms.

Classes, mental evaluations, applications, fees.

How was Kamala able to successfully navigate such a labyrinth, when most Californians can't?

Does she have connections?
 
I was under the impression that California had extreme requirements for citizens to legally carry firearms.

Classes, mental evaluations, applications, fees.

How was Kamala able to successfully navigate such a labyrinth, when most Californians can't?

Does she have connections?
Saying most Californians can’t navigate the gun owning process is a myth fed to you by whatever fear mongering media you listen to. I own a dozen guns and many people I know own guns. I don’t know one person who wanted a gun but couldn’t get one because of California’s laws
 
Back
Top Bottom