- Aug 4, 2009
- 282,099
- 145,813
- 2,615
Difference is that it wasn’t about Garland
Mitch refused to consider ANY appointment from Obama
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Kamala Harris is still living out of suitcases
- Thread starter Billy_Kinetta
- Start date
Difference is that it wasn’t about Garland
Mitch refused to consider ANY appointment from Obama
Sure...like I said, it's happened before....and more over was only following the doctrine clearly established by the Dems...actually, Joe and Chucky...but they merely highlighted something that had happened before...sometimes no action has been taken.Yes it has..,..geez...where do you come up with this nonsense? You need to stop listening to propaganda...Didn‘t happen until McConnellIt happens...not the first time...yep....he isn't the first person not to get confirmed to a position...it happens....he had no right to the positionwell because he was confirmed....you do know that right?Last I checked, Kavanaugh is on the Supreme Court.The way she and Progs treated Kavanaugh, when the time comes and the Progressive Socialist Party turns on its own more and more, you will see different. We are moving to an "inquisition" stage in this nation. Right now it is personal destruction and beat downs.Good. She doesn't belong there anyway.
81 million Americans say otherwise
Merrick Garland is not.
A privilege never given to Garland
Not that he wasn’t confirmed
He was never given a hearing or a vote.
Something that, despite whining from Conservatives, Kavanaugh was given
Specific candidates have been rejected. But McConnell said he would not consider ANY candidate that Obama offered
John Read
Edward Bardford
William Micou
Come to mind...and they were just Supreme Court Justice appointments that the Senate took no action on....I don't know off hand about other appointments.
Difference is that it wasn’t about Garland
Mitch refused to consider ANY appointment from Obama
This was nothing new
- Aug 4, 2009
- 282,099
- 145,813
- 2,615
Give us an example similar to GarlandSure...like I said, it's happened before....and more over was only following the doctrine clearly established by the Dems...actually, Joe and Chucky...but they merely highlighted something that had happened before...sometimes no action has been taken.Yes it has..,..geez...where do you come up with this nonsense? You need to stop listening to propaganda...Didn‘t happen until McConnellIt happens...not the first time...yep....he isn't the first person not to get confirmed to a position...it happens....he had no right to the positionwell because he was confirmed....you do know that right?Last I checked, Kavanaugh is on the Supreme Court.The way she and Progs treated Kavanaugh, when the time comes and the Progressive Socialist Party turns on its own more and more, you will see different. We are moving to an "inquisition" stage in this nation. Right now it is personal destruction and beat downs.Good. She doesn't belong there anyway.
81 million Americans say otherwise
Merrick Garland is not.
A privilege never given to Garland
Not that he wasn’t confirmed
He was never given a hearing or a vote.
Something that, despite whining from Conservatives, Kavanaugh was given
Specific candidates have been rejected. But McConnell said he would not consider ANY candidate that Obama offered
John Read
Edward Bardford
William Micou
Come to mind...and they were just Supreme Court Justice appointments that the Senate took no action on....I don't know off hand about other appointments.
Difference is that it wasn’t about Garland
Mitch refused to consider ANY appointment from Obama
This was nothing new
Billy_Kinetta
Paladin of the Lost Hour
- Mar 4, 2013
- 52,766
- 22,197
- 2,320
- Thread starter
- #44
Our President has a 54 percent approval rateOnly if their feelings have not changed since election day.81 million Americans say otherwiseGood. She doesn't belong there anyway.
God bless you always!!!
Holly
Among Democrats perhaps. They really pine for Kamala.
I listed the name already....you literally quoted my post.Give us an example similar to GarlandSure...like I said, it's happened before....and more over was only following the doctrine clearly established by the Dems...actually, Joe and Chucky...but they merely highlighted something that had happened before...sometimes no action has been taken.Yes it has..,..geez...where do you come up with this nonsense? You need to stop listening to propaganda...Didn‘t happen until McConnellIt happens...not the first time...yep....he isn't the first person not to get confirmed to a position...it happens....he had no right to the positionwell because he was confirmed....you do know that right?Last I checked, Kavanaugh is on the Supreme Court.The way she and Progs treated Kavanaugh, when the time comes and the Progressive Socialist Party turns on its own more and more, you will see different. We are moving to an "inquisition" stage in this nation. Right now it is personal destruction and beat downs.Good. She doesn't belong there anyway.
81 million Americans say otherwise
Merrick Garland is not.
A privilege never given to Garland
Not that he wasn’t confirmed
He was never given a hearing or a vote.
Something that, despite whining from Conservatives, Kavanaugh was given
Specific candidates have been rejected. But McConnell said he would not consider ANY candidate that Obama offered
John Read
Edward Bardford
William Micou
Come to mind...and they were just Supreme Court Justice appointments that the Senate took no action on....I don't know off hand about other appointments.
Difference is that it wasn’t about Garland
Mitch refused to consider ANY appointment from Obama
This was nothing new
- Aug 4, 2009
- 282,099
- 145,813
- 2,615
Not the sameI listed the name already....you literally quoted my post.Give us an example similar to GarlandSure...like I said, it's happened before....and more over was only following the doctrine clearly established by the Dems...actually, Joe and Chucky...but they merely highlighted something that had happened before...sometimes no action has been taken.Yes it has..,..geez...where do you come up with this nonsense? You need to stop listening to propaganda...Didn‘t happen until McConnellIt happens...not the first time...yep....he isn't the first person not to get confirmed to a position...it happens....he had no right to the positionwell because he was confirmed....you do know that right?Last I checked, Kavanaugh is on the Supreme Court.The way she and Progs treated Kavanaugh, when the time comes and the Progressive Socialist Party turns on its own more and more, you will see different. We are moving to an "inquisition" stage in this nation. Right now it is personal destruction and beat downs.Good. She doesn't belong there anyway.
81 million Americans say otherwise
Merrick Garland is not.
A privilege never given to Garland
Not that he wasn’t confirmed
He was never given a hearing or a vote.
Something that, despite whining from Conservatives, Kavanaugh was given
Specific candidates have been rejected. But McConnell said he would not consider ANY candidate that Obama offered
John Read
Edward Bardford
William Micou
Come to mind...and they were just Supreme Court Justice appointments that the Senate took no action on....I don't know off hand about other appointments.
Difference is that it wasn’t about Garland
Mitch refused to consider ANY appointment from Obama
This was nothing new
why not? I mean I agree the Biden rule wasn't around back then, but nonetheless....the US Senate has taken no action on Presidential nominees beforeNot the sameI listed the name already....you literally quoted my post.Give us an example similar to GarlandSure...like I said, it's happened before....and more over was only following the doctrine clearly established by the Dems...actually, Joe and Chucky...but they merely highlighted something that had happened before...sometimes no action has been taken.Yes it has..,..geez...where do you come up with this nonsense? You need to stop listening to propaganda...Didn‘t happen until McConnellIt happens...not the first time...yep....he isn't the first person not to get confirmed to a position...it happens....he had no right to the positionwell because he was confirmed....you do know that right?Last I checked, Kavanaugh is on the Supreme Court.The way she and Progs treated Kavanaugh, when the time comes and the Progressive Socialist Party turns on its own more and more, you will see different. We are moving to an "inquisition" stage in this nation. Right now it is personal destruction and beat downs.Good. She doesn't belong there anyway.
81 million Americans say otherwise
Merrick Garland is not.
A privilege never given to Garland
Not that he wasn’t confirmed
He was never given a hearing or a vote.
Something that, despite whining from Conservatives, Kavanaugh was given
Specific candidates have been rejected. But McConnell said he would not consider ANY candidate that Obama offered
John Read
Edward Bardford
William Micou
Come to mind...and they were just Supreme Court Justice appointments that the Senate took no action on....I don't know off hand about other appointments.
Difference is that it wasn’t about Garland
Mitch refused to consider ANY appointment from Obama
This was nothing new
Good. She doesn't belong there anyway.
81 million Americans say otherwise
That's your fantasy, not mine.
That it is. He's pretty damned good at lying to himself and does it all the time. He should get an Oscar. LOL
(CNN)It has been more than two months since Kamala Harris was sworn in as vice president of the United States, a historic moment for the country, as Harris is the first woman and the first woman of color to hold the second highest office in the land. Yet, Harris -- along with her husband, Georgetown Law professor Douglas Emhoff -- is still, ostensibly, living out of suitcases, unable to move into the private residence reserved for the vice president because it's still undergoing renovations.
Good. She doesn't belong there anyway.
After two months in office, Kamala Harris is still living out of suitcases -- and she's getting frustrated with it
That's kinda dumb. The VP has an official residence just as the POTUS does.
How dumb can you be to not be able find that residence. Some of the admin people should point her stupid ass in the right direction.
did they vote for her or biden?....81 million Americans say otherwise
Cecilie1200
Diamond Member
She’s “frustrated” with having to live out of suitcases? Who is the entitled diva who mandated renovations to the VP residence in the first place? Typical..... trying to have her cake and eat it too by getting the renovations but then getting sympathy for not being in the residence.
What the hell is she even talking about, "living out of suitcases"? She owns a condo in DC, last time I checked. She makes it sound like she's camped out at the Holiday Inn.
Cecilie1200
Diamond Member
Why is she living out of a suitcase instead of the house she already owned in DC?
Exactly! Also, when the repairs to the VP's house were announced back in January, it was also announced that Blair House, the Presidential guest house, was being made available to her.
I get that she's impatient to settle into the official residence permanently, but she can stop with this pretense that she's stuck in a motel or someone's guest bedroom.
- Aug 4, 2009
- 282,099
- 145,813
- 2,615
It’s been six monthsExactly! Also, when the repairs to the VP's house were announced back in January, it was also announced that Blair House, the Presidential guest house, was being made available to her.
I get that she's impatient to settle into the official residence permanently, but she can stop with this pretense that she's stuck in a motel or someone's guest bedroom.
Does anyone care anymore?
Living out of suitcases?
What, is she fucking a magician now?
What, is she fucking a magician now?
Cecilie1200
Diamond Member
Living out of suitcases?
What, is she fucking a magician now?
I treasure my ignorance on the entire subject.
Kamala cares. The VP residence is a temporary guest house until Joe has his .... event.It’s been six months
Does anyone care anymore?
Similar threads
- Replies
- 17
- Views
- 187
- Locked
- Replies
- 1
- Views
- 94
- Replies
- 14
- Views
- 152
- Replies
- 6
- Views
- 209
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 111
- Views
- 372
- Replies
- 44
- Views
- 894
- Replies
- 79
- Views
- 426
- Replies
- 180
- Views
- 490
- Replies
- 120
- Views
- 386
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8160
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 475
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-