Just stop with the Bloomberg is a racist nonsense

[Thinker101]

All you're doing is using the cancel culture logic and that shit is already poisonous enough without conservatives stooping to such a pathetic level. Essentially YOU ARE CONDONING the race baiting the left traffics in.
Stating the FACTS about crime in NY is not racist. If anything you should applaud his former honesty and mock his sudden cowardice. Calling him a racist makes you look stupid and no better than the wackadoodle left.

There are PLENTY of Avenues to challenge Bloomberg. RACISM IS NOT ONE OF THEM.


Beat the left HONESTLY and stop playing their dumbass games.

NO. It's not non-sense. He said and did those things, and he didn't stop until a Court forced him to.

Bloomberg defended Stop and Frisk right up until he just before his announced his candidacy and then he said he had "no idea" of the damage it did in the black community. That's because he refused to listen to the dozens of black leaders who went to his office and asked him to stop. He ignored the demonstrations, petitions, and court cases for 11 years.

So no, we're not going to give a pass to Bloomberg on his racism. Bloomberg is a REPUBLICAN attempting a hostile takeover of the Democratic Party.

Bad news, the fricken libs have already taken over the Democratic Party....and it wasn't hostile.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Democrat Primary 2020

 

[bluzman61]

All you're doing is using the cancel culture logic and that shit is already poisonous enough without conservatives stooping to such a pathetic level. Essentially YOU ARE CONDONING the race baiting the left traffics in.
Stating the FACTS about crime in NY is not racist. If anything you should applaud his former honesty and mock his sudden cowardice. Calling him a racist makes you look stupid and no better than the wackadoodle left.

There are PLENTY of Avenues to challenge Bloomberg. RACISM IS NOT ONE OF THEM.


Beat the left HONESTLY and stop playing their dumbass games.

Sorry, Gramps, from MANY of his comments, Bloomberg IS racist. There is NO doubt.

 

[PoliticalChic]

All you're doing is using the cancel culture logic and that shit is already poisonous enough without conservatives stooping to such a pathetic level. Essentially YOU ARE CONDONING the race baiting the left traffics in.
Stating the FACTS about crime in NY is not racist. If anything you should applaud his former honesty and mock his sudden cowardice. Calling him a racist makes you look stupid and no better than the wackadoodle left.

There are PLENTY of Avenues to challenge Bloomberg. RACISM IS NOT ONE OF THEM.


Beat the left HONESTLY and stop playing their dumbass games.

Sorry, Gramps, from MANY of his comments, Bloomberg IS racist. There is NO doubt.

bluz......I'm a NYer, and one of the three terms he won was after starting in 6th place....and lots of his votes were from black folks who just wanted to be safe.

The program was correct and effective, not the first time the courts have been wrong.

Bet you've heard this: "The Constitution is not a suicide pact."

 

[Bruce_T_Laney]

Beat the left HONESTLY...

And that's the problem, obviously.

Intellectual honesty is now entirely optional in our politics.

When both tribes have convinced themselves that they're "at war", the ends justify the means.
.

OMG MAC!

We get it all sides are bad and should be more like me... I mean you...

As for Bloomberg comments and them being racially offensive, well maybe if the data did not support his comments then the nutters could scream racism or better yet SNOB ELITIST!

Oh well...

 

[Bruce_T_Laney]

All you're doing is using the cancel culture logic and that shit is already poisonous enough without conservatives stooping to such a pathetic level. Essentially YOU ARE CONDONING the race baiting the left traffics in.
Stating the FACTS about crime in NY is not racist. If anything you should applaud his former honesty and mock his sudden cowardice. Calling him a racist makes you look stupid and no better than the wackadoodle left.

There are PLENTY of Avenues to challenge Bloomberg. RACISM IS NOT ONE OF THEM.


Beat the left HONESTLY and stop playing their dumbass games.

NO. It's not non-sense. He said and did those things, and he didn't stop until a Court forced him to.

Bloomberg defended Stop and Frisk right up until he just before his announced his candidacy and then he said he had "no idea" of the damage it did in the black community. That's because he refused to listen to the dozens of black leaders who went to his office and asked him to stop. He ignored the demonstrations, petitions, and court cases for 11 years.

So no, we're not going to give a pass to Bloomberg on his racism. Bloomberg is a REPUBLICAN attempting a hostile takeover of the Democratic Party.

If the DNC tells the super-delegates to vote for Bloomberg, you will all vote for him and like it.

She can't seeing she is Canadian...

 

[Bruce_T_Laney]

All you're doing is using the cancel culture logic and that shit is already poisonous enough without conservatives stooping to such a pathetic level. Essentially YOU ARE CONDONING the race baiting the left traffics in.
Stating the FACTS about crime in NY is not racist. If anything you should applaud his former honesty and mock his sudden cowardice. Calling him a racist makes you look stupid and no better than the wackadoodle left.

There are PLENTY of Avenues to challenge Bloomberg. RACISM IS NOT ONE OF THEM.


Beat the left HONESTLY and stop playing their dumbass games.

NO. It's not non-sense. He said and did those things, and he didn't stop until a Court forced him to.

Bloomberg defended Stop and Frisk right up until he just before his announced his candidacy and then he said he had "no idea" of the damage it did in the black community. That's because he refused to listen to the dozens of black leaders who went to his office and asked him to stop. He ignored the demonstrations, petitions, and court cases for 11 years.

So no, we're not going to give a pass to Bloomberg on his racism. Bloomberg is a REPUBLICAN attempting a hostile takeover of the Democratic Party.

And yet the Black Mayor of Houston to the former Black Mayor of Philadelphia do not care about it, so you are on the losing end again...

How does it feel to be wrong about so much?

 

[Crixus]

All you're doing is using the cancel culture logic and that shit is already poisonous enough without conservatives stooping to such a pathetic level. Essentially YOU ARE CONDONING the race baiting the left traffics in.
Stating the FACTS about crime in NY is not racist. If anything you should applaud his former honesty and mock his sudden cowardice. Calling him a racist makes you look stupid and no better than the wackadoodle left.

There are PLENTY of Avenues to challenge Bloomberg. RACISM IS NOT ONE OF THEM.


Beat the left HONESTLY and stop playing their dumbass games.

Na, he should be held to account for it just like Mittens was held to account for saying he would never get the votes of food stamp people.

 

[Crixus]

All you're doing is using the cancel culture logic and that shit is already poisonous enough without conservatives stooping to such a pathetic level. Essentially YOU ARE CONDONING the race baiting the left traffics in.
Stating the FACTS about crime in NY is not racist. If anything you should applaud his former honesty and mock his sudden cowardice. Calling him a racist makes you look stupid and no better than the wackadoodle left.

There are PLENTY of Avenues to challenge Bloomberg. RACISM IS NOT ONE OF THEM.


Beat the left HONESTLY and stop playing their dumbass games.

NO. It's not non-sense. He said and did those things, and he didn't stop until a Court forced him to.

Bloomberg defended Stop and Frisk right up until he just before his announced his candidacy and then he said he had "no idea" of the damage it did in the black community. That's because he refused to listen to the dozens of black leaders who went to his office and asked him to stop. He ignored the demonstrations, petitions, and court cases for 11 years.

So no, we're not going to give a pass to Bloomberg on his racism. Bloomberg is a REPUBLICAN attempting a hostile takeover of the Democratic Party.

And yet the Black Mayor of Houston to the former Black Mayor of Philadelphia do not care about it, so you are on the losing end again...

How does it feel to be wrong about so much?

The black Mayer in Houston would suck bloombergs dick for $10.00.

 

[blackhawk]

This is what politics has become I don’t think Bloomberg is racist nor do I feel sorry for him getting the treatment Republicans have gotten for years now.

 

[PoliticalChic]

No white man with an R by his name could get away with saying blacks should be thrown against the wall and frisked to remove their guns.

Yes he is racist, he said all the crime is minority males 15-25. What white republican could say that and have the media be silent about it?

There is nothing wrong with giving them some of their own medicine. Maybe one day it would teach them a lesson.

Hyperbole =/= racism.

He was making general statements based on crime statistics in NY.

You want to call out racists, there are a few on this board you can start with.

Bloomberg was bringing the hammer down on the thugs and killers, not a race.

I suppose that makes him a 'thugist.'

Based on the revealed criminality of the Democrat Party, how could they run a thugist for President????

 

[Indeependent]

Bloomberg is pro-Bloomberg...
Pure and simple.

 

[PoliticalChic]

"At a more emotive level, Mac Donald is being faulted for addressing honestly a difficult subject that most would prefer to avoid. The charge of pervasive police “racism” is, after all, driven in great part by the fact that police arrest, or stop and frisk, blacks at rates higher than they do whites or other ethnicities. But is racism the reason for this differential? In a Slate interview, Mac Donald notes that per capita rates of gun violence are 81 times higher in Brooklyn’s Brownsville, a predominantly black neighborhood, than in nearby Bay Ridge, which is predominantly white and Asian. Under such circumstances, should Bay Ridge be policed in exactly the same way as Brownsville? If you answer yes, you may establish your “non-racist” bona fides, but also that you couldn’t care less about the optimal allocation of scarce police resources in Brooklyn."
Heather Mac Donald's Inconvenient Facts | The American Conservative


Does that answer the question about Bloomberg?

 

[pknopp]

"At a more emotive level, Mac Donald is being faulted for addressing honestly a difficult subject that most would prefer to avoid. The charge of pervasive police “racism” is, after all, driven in great part by the fact that police arrest, or stop and frisk, blacks at rates higher than they do whites or other ethnicities. But is racism the reason for this differential? In a Slate interview, Mac Donald notes that per capita rates of gun violence are 81 times higher in Brooklyn’s Brownsville, a predominantly black neighborhood, than in nearby Bay Ridge, which is predominantly white and Asian. Under such circumstances, should Bay Ridge be policed in exactly the same way as Brownsville? If you answer yes, you may establish your “non-racist” bona fides, but also that you couldn’t care less about the optimal allocation of scarce police resources in Brooklyn."
Heather Mac Donald's Inconvenient Facts | The American Conservative


Does that answer the question about Bloomberg?

No, blacks could commit 5000 times more crimes and it doesn't justify unconstitutional searches.

 

[PoliticalChic]

"At a more emotive level, Mac Donald is being faulted for addressing honestly a difficult subject that most would prefer to avoid. The charge of pervasive police “racism” is, after all, driven in great part by the fact that police arrest, or stop and frisk, blacks at rates higher than they do whites or other ethnicities. But is racism the reason for this differential? In a Slate interview, Mac Donald notes that per capita rates of gun violence are 81 times higher in Brooklyn’s Brownsville, a predominantly black neighborhood, than in nearby Bay Ridge, which is predominantly white and Asian. Under such circumstances, should Bay Ridge be policed in exactly the same way as Brownsville? If you answer yes, you may establish your “non-racist” bona fides, but also that you couldn’t care less about the optimal allocation of scarce police resources in Brooklyn."
Heather Mac Donald's Inconvenient Facts | The American Conservative


Does that answer the question about Bloomberg?

No, blacks could commit 5000 times more crimes and it doesn't justify unconstitutional searches.

1. The Constitution is not a suicide pact.

2. Bloomberg won NYC elections with lots of black voters who didn't care to be victims.

3. You're a moron.

 

[pknopp]

"At a more emotive level, Mac Donald is being faulted for addressing honestly a difficult subject that most would prefer to avoid. The charge of pervasive police “racism” is, after all, driven in great part by the fact that police arrest, or stop and frisk, blacks at rates higher than they do whites or other ethnicities. But is racism the reason for this differential? In a Slate interview, Mac Donald notes that per capita rates of gun violence are 81 times higher in Brooklyn’s Brownsville, a predominantly black neighborhood, than in nearby Bay Ridge, which is predominantly white and Asian. Under such circumstances, should Bay Ridge be policed in exactly the same way as Brownsville? If you answer yes, you may establish your “non-racist” bona fides, but also that you couldn’t care less about the optimal allocation of scarce police resources in Brooklyn."
Heather Mac Donald's Inconvenient Facts | The American Conservative


Does that answer the question about Bloomberg?

No, blacks could commit 5000 times more crimes and it doesn't justify unconstitutional searches.

1. The Constitution is not a suicide pact.

2. Bloomberg won NYC elections with lots of black voters who didn't care to be victims.

3. You're a moron.

I'm a moron because I side with the Constitution. Gotcha.

It's sad how many are like you and want to tear down everything this country stands for.

 

[PoliticalChic]

"At a more emotive level, Mac Donald is being faulted for addressing honestly a difficult subject that most would prefer to avoid. The charge of pervasive police “racism” is, after all, driven in great part by the fact that police arrest, or stop and frisk, blacks at rates higher than they do whites or other ethnicities. But is racism the reason for this differential? In a Slate interview, Mac Donald notes that per capita rates of gun violence are 81 times higher in Brooklyn’s Brownsville, a predominantly black neighborhood, than in nearby Bay Ridge, which is predominantly white and Asian. Under such circumstances, should Bay Ridge be policed in exactly the same way as Brownsville? If you answer yes, you may establish your “non-racist” bona fides, but also that you couldn’t care less about the optimal allocation of scarce police resources in Brooklyn."
Heather Mac Donald's Inconvenient Facts | The American Conservative


Does that answer the question about Bloomberg?

No, blacks could commit 5000 times more crimes and it doesn't justify unconstitutional searches.

1. The Constitution is not a suicide pact.

2. Bloomberg won NYC elections with lots of black voters who didn't care to be victims.

3. You're a moron.

I'm a moron because I side with the Constitution. Gotcha.

It's sad how many are like you and want to tear down everything this country stands for.

No, ...for two reasons.

1. You are clueless about the court which made the decision.

and

2. Because you're a moron.

 

[pknopp]

"At a more emotive level, Mac Donald is being faulted for addressing honestly a difficult subject that most would prefer to avoid. The charge of pervasive police “racism” is, after all, driven in great part by the fact that police arrest, or stop and frisk, blacks at rates higher than they do whites or other ethnicities. But is racism the reason for this differential? In a Slate interview, Mac Donald notes that per capita rates of gun violence are 81 times higher in Brooklyn’s Brownsville, a predominantly black neighborhood, than in nearby Bay Ridge, which is predominantly white and Asian. Under such circumstances, should Bay Ridge be policed in exactly the same way as Brownsville? If you answer yes, you may establish your “non-racist” bona fides, but also that you couldn’t care less about the optimal allocation of scarce police resources in Brooklyn."
Heather Mac Donald's Inconvenient Facts | The American Conservative


Does that answer the question about Bloomberg?

No, blacks could commit 5000 times more crimes and it doesn't justify unconstitutional searches.

1. The Constitution is not a suicide pact.

2. Bloomberg won NYC elections with lots of black voters who didn't care to be victims.

3. You're a moron.

I'm a moron because I side with the Constitution. Gotcha.

It's sad how many are like you and want to tear down everything this country stands for.

No, ...for two reasons.

1. You are clueless about the court which made the decision.

and

2. Because you're a moron.

It wasn't appealed. There is a reason. Luckily the courts kept us from devolving into a third world country like you advocate for.

 

[LuckyDuck]

All you're doing is using the cancel culture logic and that shit is already poisonous enough without conservatives stooping to such a pathetic level. Essentially YOU ARE CONDONING the race baiting the left traffics in.
Stating the FACTS about crime in NY is not racist. If anything you should applaud his former honesty and mock his sudden cowardice. Calling him a racist makes you look stupid and no better than the wackadoodle left.

There are PLENTY of Avenues to challenge Bloomberg. RACISM IS NOT ONE OF THEM.


Beat the left HONESTLY and stop playing their dumbass games.

So, let's just reduce Bloomberg's focus only on blacks in New York City to reduce crime and address his current issue.
Despite that there are MORE THAN 90 MILLION LAW-ABIDING private citizens (Republican and Democrat) who own guns, and never commit crimes with them and are thus NO THREAT to you or others, douchebag Bloomberg's clear goal is to forcibly take them away from those same LAW-ABIDING private citizens.....why? They say, because criminals and the mentally ill commit crimes with them. Oh, of course, 60% of deaths by guns are actually "suicides" and you could take every gun away from every person that suffers from suicidal ideation, and it wouldn't change a thing, they'd just wrap a belt or rope around their neck, take pills, slit their wrists, sit in cars with the gas fumes running into the car, electrocute themselves, drown themselves, drink poisonous fluids, jump off tall structures, step in front of traffic...on and on and on the ways go.
So, because of the few idiots who do commit crimes, Bloomberg and his ilk on the left lie, saying....we support the Second Amendment, while at the same time, funding any candidate that wants to get rid of our right to firearms.
The actual reason, is for other reasons:
1. The United Nations has said that it wants all nations governments to take firearms away from their citizens.
2. The George Soros, Globalists, New World Order, wants the same thing.
3. The Marxist-Leninist left needs the civilian populace disarmed (as all Authoritarian governments have done) to implement their agendas, without armed resistance.
The entire purpose of the Second Amendment, was so that we could stand up against that last reason given.
If You ARE one of those, you are the enemy of the US Constitution and therefore the enemy of this nation you live in and a traitor!

 

[Mac1958]

Beat the left HONESTLY...

And that's the problem, obviously.

Intellectual honesty is now entirely optional in our politics.

When both tribes have convinced themselves that they're "at war", the ends justify the means.
.

OMG MAC!

We get it all sides are bad and should be more like me... I mean you...

As for Bloomberg comments and them being racially offensive, well maybe if the data did not support his comments then the nutters could scream racism or better yet SNOB ELITIST!

Oh well...

I'm from the "two wrongs don't make a right" school.
.