Just Some Feedback; If the Thread Title Mentions a News Outlet says ____, There Has to Be a Direct Link to That in the OP.

[candycorn]

Here is what I’m talking about...

B

Thread 'MSNBC Confirms MASSIVE Conspiracy Case Against Obama, Hillary, Clapper, Brennan and Others Moving Forward Fast In Florida!'

Nov 13, 2025

I keep telling you that justice is indeed coming and a MASSIVE criminal conspiracy case against Obama, Hillary and many others is coming….

And now even MSNBC just told you too!

Of course they are complaining about it, but read between the lines and realize they are only panicking because they’re finally realizing it’s real and they’re all going down!



Yeah, along with our colleague here at the White House, Laura Barron-Lopez, we have from sources that down in the Southern District of Florida, Jason Redding Quinones — he is the U.S. Attorney who was picked by Donald Trump to lead that...

• Billiejeens
• Replies: 104
• Forum: Politics

• 
• 
• 

If MSNBC confirmed something, surely there is a link to that confirmation on their website...right?

There is no direct link to the alleged MSNBC confiration. The OP shouldn’t be able to elevate their argment by claiming a reputable source shares the viewpoint without a direct link.

 

[Darkwind]

Here is what I’m talking about...

B

Thread 'MSNBC Confirms MASSIVE Conspiracy Case Against Obama, Hillary, Clapper, Brennan and Others Moving Forward Fast In Florida!'

Nov 13, 2025

I keep telling you that justice is indeed coming and a MASSIVE criminal conspiracy case against Obama, Hillary and many others is coming….

And now even MSNBC just told you too!

Of course they are complaining about it, but read between the lines and realize they are only panicking because they’re finally realizing it’s real and they’re all going down!



Yeah, along with our colleague here at the White House, Laura Barron-Lopez, we have from sources that down in the Southern District of Florida, Jason Redding Quinones — he is the U.S. Attorney who was picked by Donald Trump to lead that...

• Billiejeens
• Replies: 104
• Forum: Politics

• 
• 
• 

If MSNBC confirmed something, surely there is a link to that confirmation on their website...right?

There is no direct link to the alleged MSNBC confiration. The OP shouldn’t be able to elevate their argment by claiming a reputable source shares the viewpoint without a direct link.

"Sources close to the.... "

This is repeatedly used by those on the left here as proof and by the questioning media as a means of advancing a false narrative without providing direct proof.

 

[candycorn]

"Sources close to the.... "

This is repeatedly used by those on the left here as proof and by the questioning media as a means of advancing a false narrative without providing direct proof.

Left, Right, or Center...I think the rule should be that if your say _________ says________...you should have a link showing where _____________ said __________.

 

[Darkwind]

Left, Right, or Center...I think the rule should be that if your say _________ says________...you should have a link showing where _____________ said __________.

I think that the practice of 'anonymous sources' should be outlawed.

If you say it, own it.

 

[candycorn]

I think that the practice of 'anonymous sources' should be outlawed.

If you say it, own it.

Anonymous sources are fine... Saying MSNBC said something then not quoting MSNBC is BS. Its a news organization....If they said it, it would be recorded in video or on their website.

Clearly the only reason a thread starter would envoke the title of a well-known news organization is to add heft to their thread.

 

[Darkwind]

Anonymous sources are fine... Saying MSNBC said something then not quoting MSNBC is BS. Its a news organization....If they said it, it would be recorded in video or on their website.

Clearly the only reason a thread starter would envoke the title of a well-known news organization is to add heft to their thread.

Anonymous sources are NOT fine.

How to you prove the data if you cannot prove the source?

It is far worse than what you are prattling on about.

 

[candycorn]

Anonymous sources are NOT fine.

Sure they are. That is how Nixon was brought down.

How to you prove the data if you cannot prove the source?

You verify it or you don’t run with it. W&B did that.

It is far worse than what you are prattling on about.

Laughably false.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

Here is what I’m talking about...

B

Thread 'MSNBC Confirms MASSIVE Conspiracy Case Against Obama, Hillary, Clapper, Brennan and Others Moving Forward Fast In Florida!'

Nov 13, 2025

I keep telling you that justice is indeed coming and a MASSIVE criminal conspiracy case against Obama, Hillary and many others is coming….

And now even MSNBC just told you too!

Of course they are complaining about it, but read between the lines and realize they are only panicking because they’re finally realizing it’s real and they’re all going down!



Yeah, along with our colleague here at the White House, Laura Barron-Lopez, we have from sources that down in the Southern District of Florida, Jason Redding Quinones — he is the U.S. Attorney who was picked by Donald Trump to lead that...

• Billiejeens
• Replies: 104
• Forum: Politics

• 
• 
• 

If MSNBC confirmed something, surely there is a link to that confirmation on their website...right?

There is no direct link to the alleged MSNBC confiration. The OP shouldn’t be able to elevate their argment by claiming a reputable source shares the viewpoint without a direct link.

The article has an embedded video from MSNBC. I'm not sure what the issue is here.