Just four days after the political assassination of Charlie Kirk

[Lesh]

So, speaking of lost children, where are those 300,000 the Biden administration damned to sex slavery?

Lost on your imagination

 

[Lisa558]

He should be arrested for inciting violence.

 

[Lisa558]

Wow. You posted an example of right wing violence against people expressing free speech.

No. That was an example of a leftist inciting violence because people were expressing their grief over Kirk’s murder.

 

[Lesh]

No. That was an example of a leftist inciting violence because people were expressing their grief over Kirk’s murder.

Violence by who?

 

[Marener]

No. That was an example of a leftist inciting violence because people were expressing their grief over Kirk’s murder.

So you’re blaming the victim. Right wingers aren’t to blame for their violence. It’s the victim’s fault.

Your concept of “inciting violence” is dangerous.

 

[Lisa558]

So you’re blaming the victim. Right wingers aren’t to blame for their violence. It’s the victim’s fault.

Your concept of “inciting violence” is dangerous.

Oh, no….look who woke up.

Trampling on someone’s vigil of a murdered victim, yelling to F the poor soul murdered in cold blood, is indeed inciting violence.

 

[Marener]

Oh, no….look who woke up.

Trampling on someone’s vigil of a murdered victim, yelling to F the poor soul murdered in cold blood, is indeed inciting violence.

So you feel that they were justified in exercising physical violence against this individual? That’s okay. To beat the shit out of someone like that. Totally acceptable.

Is that right?

 

[Lesh]

Oh, no….look who woke up.

Trampling on someone’s vigil of a murdered victim, yelling to F the poor soul murdered in cold blood, is indeed inciting violence.

So expressing an opinion is now inciting violence?

Newsflash… if you become violent because you don’t like what someone says… YOU are the problem

 

[Lisa558]

So you feel that they were justified in exercising physical violence against this individual? That’s okay. To beat the shit out of someone like that. Totally acceptable.

Is that right?

Neither was it acceptable for a deranged, brainwashed leftist to trample on someone’s vigil, screaming profanities. That is NOT free speech.

 

[Lesh]

Neither was it acceptable for a deranged, brainwashed leftist to trample on someone’s vigil, screaming profanities. That is NOT free speech.

Actually it is. Free speech isn’t always pretty but it’s also not an excuse to engage in violence

You seem to think it is

 

[Marener]

Neither was it acceptable for a deranged, brainwashed leftist to trample on someone’s vigil, screaming profanities. That is NOT free speech.

Profanities are protected speech. He was in public, so first amendment applies.

The right used violence to suppress his speech, and you’re defending that violence.

 

[AntonToo]

He's right. The Left has become radical and violent.

He is not right, he is full of hateful, escalatory rhetoric like you and when some hopped-up rightwinger shoots up Democrats (yet again!) you and Miller are going to wash your hands of it like you have nothing to do with anything.

 

[Lisa558]

Profanities are protected speech. He was in public, so first amendment applies.

The right used violence to suppress his speech, and you’re defending that violence.

It wasn’t free speech, it was vandalism.

Funny, but you seem more upset that a vandal got a beating than a law-abiding man got a bullet.

 

[Marener]

It wasn’t free speech, it was vandalism.

Funny, but you seem more upset that a vandal got a beating than a law-abiding man got a bullet.

Saying “**** Charlie Kirk” is free speech. Sorry. That’s the way it goes.

Don’t like it, maybe you can move to a country that doesn’t have as broad of first amendment protections, the kinds of countries that were heavily criticized by right wing pundits and JD Vance.

 

[Lisa558]

Saying “**** Charlie Kirk” is free speech. Sorry. That’s the way it goes.

Don’t like it, maybe you can move to a country that doesn’t have as broad of first amendment protections, the kinds of countries that were heavily criticized by right wing pundits and JD Vance.

He trampled over the vigil. That’s vandalism.

Kirk was MURDERED for free speech.

Again, you’re more intent on defending a disgusting, vile leftist trampling on someone’s grave who got a beating for it than you are a good, decent, law-abiding man who got a bullet to the neck and a death sentence carried out in seconds.

 

[Marener]

He trampled over the vigil. That’s vandalism.

Kirk was MURDERED for free speech.

Again, you’re more intent on defending a disgusting, vile leftist trampling on someone’s grave who got a beating for it than you are a good, decent, law-abiding man who got a bullet to the neck and a death sentence carried out in seconds.

So you’re changing your tune.

Still doesn’t justify violence.

I’ll agree he’s a bad dude. That said, you don’t get to beat up bad dudes. You defend violence. Not me.

 

[CowboyTed]

View attachment 1162451

View attachment 1162452




Progressives will not stop inciting violence with their dangerous rhetoric at the homes of conservatives like Stephen Miller.
Groups like this should be investigated for instigating and supporting domestic terrorism.

Sorry this is mocking...

There are no threats of violence unlike what has come from Miller..

“Do it in Charlie’s name”: Miller threatens to “destroy” left-wing NGOs following Kirk assassination

The senior Trump adviser made his vow to JD Vance, while speaking on Kirk's podcast

www.yahoo.com

White House threatens broad crackdown on liberal groups

A senior official said that the Trump administration would dismantle an alleged 'vast domestic terror movement' that he linked to the killing of right-wing activist Charlie Kirk.

www.japantimes.co.jp

So nice try... Miller is ramping it up and people are making fun of him... The guy has said pretty vile and disgusting things in the past...

And yet people are showing restraint... Left isn't falling for the bait...

So thanks for another disgusting bait from the right...

 

[CowboyTed]

He should be arrested for inciting violence.

Don't agree with him but westboro baptist church...

I really don't like this and doesn't represent anyone but himself really..

 

[Lisa558]

So you’re changing your tune.

Still doesn’t justify violence.

I’ll agree he’s a bad dude. That said, you don’t get to beat up bad dudes. You defend violence. Not me.

Not changing my tune. It can be argued that vandalizing a memorial during a vigil is inciting violence.

So you now admit that the vandal was guilty of more than exercising his free speech? You’re changing your tune?

And again, it’s mild to what happened to a PEACEFUL man, not breaking any laws, but TRULY exercising his free speech.

 

[CowboyTed]

Oh, no….look who woke up.

Trampling on someone’s vigil of a murdered victim, yelling to F the poor soul murdered in cold blood, is indeed inciting violence.

Nope... Westboro baptist church incident has already ruled on that one....

Again, don't agree with his actions, it goes against what many Democrats and Left believe around respect and dignity...

But it is not illegal, it is free speech...

I defend Charlie Kirk's free speech and many found him offensive too...

Find it strange that commemorate Charlie Kirk's life who believed in free speech they want to mute free speech... That is just irony..