Deerfield is full of idiots that type. About 5 or more years ago, the rest of the country learned that you can't call it an Assault Rifle and it is constitutional. The definition for Assault Rifle takes in quite a few conventional semi auto rifles as well as the AR. The ones that have stuck and been supported in court have all been worded, "AR-15 and various clones". No description necessary. Straight to the point and specific. The Morons made the same mistakes others did that go their laws bounced and they had to rewrite them and defend them in the courts again but the second time, they were successful. I wonder if they have rubber bumpers on their streets.
Ban something because of cosmetics is moronic. The AR is not an "assault" weapon.
If it were due to cosmetics, the AR would be sexy and beautiful. It's not. Due to it's features, it looks like it does. Due to it's intent, it looks like it does. Due to it's engineering purpose it looks like it does. You want cosmetics, buy something with wood inlays or exotic woods. And funny, the Cops call it an Assault Rifle and almost every inner city cop car has one in the trunk. But I don't like the term Assault Rifle. That's too general. The AR was designed for war by Stoner.
It was not designed for a sporting gun unless you are being attacked by a whole gaggle of Rabid Gophers armed with AK-47s and a Flame Thrower. Or maybe you are being attacked by a bunch of unarmed school children, movie watchers or such. Then it might be mistaken for a Sporting Rifle.