Assault weapons ban in VA passes both houses and will be signed by the governor...stock up before 7.1.2026

[jackflash]

From Video:

Here we go Virginia, the waves of civilian disarmament continue to crash down upon you. Washington Gun Law President, William Kirk, discusses the passage of SB 749, Virginia's new assault weapon ban and magazine ban. This bill, when signed into law, will take effect on July 1 of this year. Today we discuss what this law does and does not do. We also get you up to speed on all the current challenges nationwide to similar laws, So, learn more today and arm yourself with education.

View attachment 1229386

Go auto...lose less gas!

The humiliated statist lefties have been so "tortured up" since Donald Trump landed the POTUS position that they are now grasping for anything that even resembles a victory for them. All that is needed to send the "Us Vs. Them" lefties into the ole padded cell of the psych ward, is for the S/C to rule the so called assault weapons(just run of the mill semi auto rifles) ban a violation of our 2nd amendment.

The "Us Vs. Them" conflict personality statist left, don't leave sanity without them!

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

The first thing that Totalitarian dictators do is disarm the citizens.
Then they suppress speech.
Then they start rounding up the dissenters.

Spanberger is a knuttjob

Gib deine Waffen ab oder gehe ins Lager

 

[Chuz Life]

 

[Quantrill]

Iran is willing to hold out through the bombings from Israel and the U.S. because they know their citizens have no guns. And that is what they fear, the overthrow of their government by the populace.

And they control the populace because the populace has no guns. Unless some country is able to arm the Iranian populace who want change, they don't stand a chance.

An armed citizenry keeps government in check against its citizenry.

Quantrill

 

[Chuz Life]

Iran is willing to hold out through the bombings from Israel and the U.S. because they know their citizens have no guns. And that is what they fear, the overthrow of their government by the populace.

And they control the populace because the populace has no guns. Unless some country is able to arm the Iranian populace who want change, they don't stand a chance.

An armed citizenry keeps government in check against its citizenry.

Quantrill

One has to wonder "what would the likes of John Jay, Patrick Henry, George Washington. . . have done about the "King" trying to pass a bill to control them in this manner?"

 

[Quantrill]

One has to wonder "what would the likes of John Jay, Patrick Henry, George Washington. . . have done about the "King" trying to pass a bill to control them in this manner?"

Indeed. But, we were defeated militarily by the likes of Abraham Lincoln and the lying North in 1865. The 'King' had the power to pass any bill it wanted. And it did.

But...we fought against it, and do so this day.

Quantrill

 

[Chuz Life]

Indeed. But, we were defeated militarily by the likes of Abraham Lincoln and the lying North in 1865. The 'King' had the power to pass any bill it wanted. And it did.

But...we fought against it, and do so this day.

Quantrill

The threshold is much higher now, for when the people will throw off an oppressive government, than it ever was in the early days of the nation.

The Boston Tea party was over a mere tax (pennies on the dollar.)

There is no such boundaries anymore.

 

[Quantrill]

The threshold is much higher now, for when the people will throw off an oppressive government, than it ever was in the early days of the nation.

The Boston Tea party was over a mere tax (pennies on the dollar.)

There is no such boundaries anymore.

The threshold was as high as it can be in 1861. Just because we paid the price, doesn't mean it's over.

Your statements make no sense to me. Please explain.

Quantrill

 

[Chuz Life]

The threshold was as high as it can be in 1861. Just because we paid the price, doesn't mean it's over.

Your statements make no sense to me. Please explain.

Quantrill

Sorry for any confusion.

The amount it took to cause our nation's founders to "take up arms" to defend themselves, their freedoms, liberty, etc. . . was a hell of a lot less than what it would take for the vast majority of Americans to do the same, today.

That's all.

 

[Quantrill]

Sorry for any confusion.

The amount it took to cause our nation's founders to "take up arms" to defend themselves, their freedoms, liberty, etc. . . was a hell of a lot less than what it would take for the vast majority of Americans today.

That's all.

The bottom line is, whether in 1776 or 1861, it would cost your life. I view the price the same. And so many patriots paid the price.

And that is the price today....still. It doesn't change. When Americans are wiling to pay.....is the question.

Quantrill

 

[Chuz Life]

The bottom line is, whether in 1776 or 1861, it would cost your life. I view the price the same. And so many patriots paid the price.

And that is the price today....still. it doesn't change. When Americans are wiling to pay.....is the question.

Quantrill

Wow.

Totally different mindset from my own.

The idea is not to be willing to die for your cause, here.

The idea is to make the other son of a ***** die for theirs.

 

[Lockback]

The threshold is much higher now, for when the people will throw off an oppressive government, than it ever was in the early days of the nation.

The Boston Tea party was over a mere tax (pennies on the dollar.)

There is no such boundaries anymore.

We accept a whole lot more abuse from government nowadays than they did back then.
I'm not sure that's a good thing.

I think this "assault weapon ban" - God, how I loathe that FUCKKING fake term - is fascism.
Plain and simple.
Phony asshole politicians saying, "We're allowed to have them. You're not. And, oh, we have bodyguards to protect us. You paeons must obey us."
There are no words to describe the outright contempt I have for these assholes.
Some jackass the other day in the Virginia legislature gave a speech saying " ... we don't need guns to battle people with guns."
It was the single most stupid remark I have ever seen a person make.
And yet that idiot has gotten his way. Asshole.

 

[Quantrill]

Wow.

Totally different mindset from my own.

The idea is not to be willing to die for your cause, here.

The idea is to make the other son of a ***** die for theirs.

Your statements make no sense. You can't make others die for theirs without being willing to die for yours. And you will die for yours if it means anything to you.

Quantrill

 

[Chuz Life]

Your statements make no sense. You can't make others die for theirs without being willing to die for yours. And you will die for yours if it means anything to you.

Quantrill

You can argue that out with the drill instructors, if you like.

I first learned of that mindset in the Marine Corps.

It wasn't a ***** parade. . . so the "be willing to die" scare tactic wasn't brought up.

It was a given that we were being trained to face an enemy that wanted us dead.

Duh.

 

[Quantrill]

You can argue that out with the drill instructors, if you like.

I first learned of that mindset in the Marine Corps.

It wasn't a ***** parade. . . so the "be willing to die" scare tactic wasn't brought up.

It was a given that we were being trained to face an enemy that wanted us dead.

Duh.

My point is: if your cause/loyalty isn't worth your life, it is of no value.

Quantrill

 

[Chuz Life]

My point is: if your cause/loyalty isn't worth your life, it is of no value.

Quantrill

Ok, that's not already a given to anyone who knows and understands the second amendment and the reason for it?

 

[Quantrill]

Ok, that's not already a given to anyone who knows and understands the second amendment and the reason for it?

You say it's a 'given'. That remainds to be seen.

Quantrill

 

[Chuz Life]

You say it's a 'given'. That remainds to be seen.

Quantrill

I guess so.

It's a given to me and that's good enough for me.