Judge Temporarily Blocks EO Banning Gender Affirming Care

[martybegan]

If the law was said to fund this in these amounts, Trump cannot touch them by himself.

Who knows?

All this is buried in hundreds of thousands of pages of laws, and tens of thousands of pages of appropriations law.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Who knows?

All this is buried in hundreds of thousands of pages of laws, and tens of thousands of pages of appropriations law.

Yeah, we know how government and the law works.

 

[Blaster]

Well I guess that it's my own fault for thinking that the war on woke was over. It turns out that it's only just begun. OhPleaseJustQuit, Thunk, JGalt, and toobfreak I feel like this is a trouble in paradise moment.

Judge blocks Trump order restricting access to gender-affirming care for now

President Trump's executive action sought to restrict access to gender-affirming care for people under the age of 19.

www.cbsnews.com

Just another activist judge.

 

[martybegan]

Yeah, we know how government and the law works.

And yet you want it to continue that way, with everything buried and no one accountable.

Someone is trying to take responsibility for it for once, and you all lose your minds.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

The law and the judges and the legislative will decide, Marty.

 

[martybegan]

The law and the judges and the legislative will decide, Marty.

Another non-answer from the bitch-king of non-answers.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Another non-answer from the bitch-king of non-answers.

Marty, Trump and the alt right don't make those decisions. Never.

 

[22lcidw]

The law and the judges and the legislative will decide, Marty.

The judges are unelected co-presidents. Installed just for this reason from Progs. As we get poorer, they will not be forgotten when it is time for karma. Impoverishment does this to people.

 

[Crepitus]

So you support Trump's EO on restricting puberty blockers, hormones, and surgery for children under 18?

I call you on one lie so you tell a bunch more?

Weird.

 

[martybegan]

I call you on one lie so you tell a bunch more?

Weird.

As usual you can't respond to the actual topic, or to any point.


It's the main failing of the left, they have to lie to themselves so it comes easy doing it to someone else.

 

[TemplarKormac]

All well and good for adults, says nothing about minors.

It also prohibits discrimination based on age.

 

[martybegan]

It also prohibits discrimination based on age.

That has never been applied to minors except in very specific cases.

If you did, you would have to let 5 year olds vote and get driver's licenses.

 

[Road Runner]

We don't have to ignore them, because these biased judges are clearly overstepping their bounds.

Sooner or later they will reach a critical mass and Trump should demand mandamus rulings from the appeals courts to squash this sort of thing.

FAFO.

The problem is the funding.

He needs Congress to strip the funding. HE cannot.

And before you get mad, I agree with the sentiment. But there still needs to be respect for the separation of powers.

I'm not mad.

 

[TemplarKormac]

That has never been applied to minors except in very specific cases.

If you did, you would have to let 5 year olds vote and get driver's licenses.

Section 1557 also prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, age, or disability under any program or activity that is administered by an Executive Agency, or any entity established under Title I of the ACA or its amendments.

The statute cites Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VI),

Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972  (Title IX),

the Age Discrimination Act of 1975 (Age Act),

and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 

to identify the grounds of discrimination prohibited by Section 1557

Federal Register :: Request Access

 

[Road Runner]

Got another lunatic here.

Loading…

www.npr.org

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

Got another lunatic here.

Loading…

www.npr.org

.

They're delusional. They can't do such a thing.


.