Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Well in the case of abortion it's not the mothers life being ended. Secondly as the child is equally the fathers why does he get no say, the woman carrying it is biology, so you can't use that as an excuse to murder a child.Who is trying to force you to have an abortion or marry a gay person?
The whole point is the CHOICE.
YOU have the CHOICE not to get an abortion or marry a gay person don't you?
Why not let others make their own choices?
That's why abortion laws belong in the states, each state decides how their laws will be designed. Then if a judge blocks what the legislature decides, the decision is appealed until a sane judge rules with what the state already decided.
Well in the case of abortion it's not the mothers life being ended. Secondly as the child is equally the fathers why does he get no say, the woman carrying it is biology, so you can't use that as an excuse to murder a child.
But tell you what how about we require all males upon reaching the age of puberty to submit a DNA sample so that the biological father of every child can be forced to pay child support?
What mob? The state decides how the matter will be determined, no judge has the ability to interfere with whatever law is set.I don't believe that the right to exercise dominion over your own body should be decided by the mob.
This technology is already available for anyone who has a dispute about paternity, why establish a governmental office and hire a huge staff to administer this, when its only a tiny minority that have to go on Maury Povich's or Lauren Lake's program to figure it out?
A liberal idea to spend billions for a bogus reason. I think the real reason for this is to establish a Liberal police state where everyone's actions can be traced through DNA.
The population of this country is the mob.What mob? The state decides how the matter will be determined, no judge has the ability to interfere with whatever law is set.
I don't believe that the right to exercise dominion over your own body should be decided by the mob.
No the reason I asked you is to see if you really want to hold men responsible for the children they father as much as you want to hold women responsible for getting pregnant.
If we can vote on the legality of abortion why not vote on that too?
Cough, Vaccine Mandates, Cough.
Abortion will again be legal in Wyoming — at least for now — after a judge on Wednesday temporarily blocked a ban that took effect a few days earlier.
Teton County District Court Judge Melissa Owens’ decision halts the ban amid a challenge in her court to a law that took effect Sunday. The Republican-controlled Legislature approved the law despite earlier rulings by Owens that had blocked a previous ban since shortly after it took effect last summer.
An amendment in the Wyoming Constitution says adults have a right to make their own health care decisions, so Republicans enacted a ban that states abortion is not health care. However, Owens said it's up to the courts, not lawmakers, to decide whether that's the case.
Judge halts Wyoming abortion ban days after it took effect
Abortion will again be legal in Wyoming — at least for now — after a judge on Wednesday temporarily blocked a ban that took effect a few days earlier. Campaign Action Teton County District Court Judge Melissa Owens’ decision halts the ban amid a...www.dailykos.com
Get ready for it. It's coming.
I agree that the baby daddies need to be ponying up for their children.
But I don't see where your idea is that practical or cost efficient to achieve that aim.
Waiting until their is a dispute before seeking DNA samples makes more sense, than just assuming that every man is guilty.
I suppose that a vote could be held on this, you should lobby liberal politicians to put it up to a vote where they are in control and we'll see how it works out.
No one was force to get a vaccine. Every single person has the right to refuse.So I guess vaccine mandates are illegal there as well?
Plus this would be more about forcing a procedure on a person, and less denying them one. Does that mean a doctor is required to amputate someone's hand if they believe they should be hand-less?
You were not forced to get a vaccine. Many millions of people did not get vaccinated or didn't you know that?
You were not forced to get a vaccine. Many millions of people did not get vaccinated or didn't you know that?
What's the difference between that and a court orders paternity test?
If we can vote on whether a woman much carry a pregnancy to term we can surely vote on this.
No one was force to get a vaccine. Every single person has the right to refuse.
They still were not forced to get a shot. Any of them could have opted for free weekly testing.Millions were denied employment or were fired, if they didn't get the vax. Being given the alternative of starving to death, they figured they would take a chance with the Biden vaccine.
Anyone could have opted for free weekly testingAnd by refusing suffer government or other entity mandated consequences to their freedoms or livelihoods.
That's being forced.
Not being forced means saying no and living your live the same way as before you said no.
Anyone could have opted for free weekly testing
you like to ignore that part
