Judge directs Trump officials to lift pause on certain immigration applications

EvilEyeFleegle

Dogpatch USA
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Nov 2, 2017
Messages
18,447
Reaction score
11,402
Points
1,280
Location
Twin Falls Idaho
Yet another Judge schools Trump...you'd think he'd learn....but no--


A federal judge in Massachusetts on Wednesday ordered the Trump administration to lift a pause it imposed on various immigration applications, saying it was not in the public interest for hundreds of thousands of immigrants to lose their legal status in the U.S.

The ruling by U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani is a reprieve for many immigrants from Afghanistan, Latin America, Ukraine and other parts of the world whose ability to remain and work in the U.S. lawfully had been threatened by several Trump administration actions.

Agreeing with pro-immigrant advocates who sued the Trump administration, Talwani found that the government's actions were arbitrary and capricious, in violation of federal administrative law.

"This court emphasizes, as it did in its prior order, that it is not in the public interest to manufacture a circumstance in which hundreds of thousands of individuals will, over the course of several months, become unlawfully present in the country, such that these individuals cannot legally work in their communities or provide for themselves and their families," Talwani wrote in her order.

The programs at the center of Talwani's order rely on a legal immigration authority known as parole, which allows the federal government to temporarily admit foreigners on humanitarian or public interest grounds. President Trump's appointees have sought to curtail the use of parole, arguing that the authority was broadly abused by the Biden administration.

That pause mainly affected 240,000 Ukrainians allowed into the U.S. under a sponsorship program known as Uniting for Ukraine set up after the Russian invasion of their homeland in February 2022, as well as 530,000 Cubans, Haitians, Nicaraguans and Venezuelans who benefited from another Biden-era parole policy. It prevented those who entered the U.S. under those policies from obtaining other forms of legal status, like asylum, Temporary Protected Status or permanent residency.

Talwani ordered the government to lift another pause, issued in January, that has barred immigration officials from considering parole extension requests from Afghans, Ukrainians and other immigrant populations granted entry into the U.S. through parole programs, mostly under the Biden administration.

Her ruling also blocked the Trump administration from taking any actions to stop processing parole applications under a longstanding program designed to give temporary legal relief to the immigrant relatives of U.S. service members or veterans. The administration has said this program has not been affected by its efforts to restrict the use of parole.
 
NotKing.webp
 
Yet another Judge schools Trump...

Indira Talwani, is that a man or a woman? Can't the Left even find someone with an english name?

Saying it was not in the public interest for hundreds of thousands of immigrants to lose their legal status in the U.S.? What, now she/he speaks on the authority of knowing what the public interest is? How? And how does an illegal immigrant have any legal status to lose in the first place?

No wonder this bum supports pro-immigration blindly, that is probably how he/she got into the country.

Saying it was not in the public interest is just this judge's OPINION.
 
Agreeing with pro-immigrant advocates who sued the Trump administration, Talwani found that the government's actions were arbitrary and capricious, in violation of federal administrative law.
Trump’s immigration agenda is also motivated by racism, bigotry, and hate.
 
Given that that statement was in response to the Court ruling that the forced removal of the Cherokee nation was illegal--ignoring it thus led to the 'Trail of Tears'---is that really something to be proud of?
But yeah..it's very Trump, to be sure.
Sure, Jackson was an 'Imperial' President--of a new nation with different moral and ethical standards.
That was 200 years ago..and there are literally have hundreds of millions of voters that are quite willing to force Trump into compliance.
History offers many opportunities for false equivalence---don't fall for it~
 
Given that that statement was in response to the Court ruling that the forced removal of the Cherokee nation was illegal--ignoring it thus led to the 'Trail of Tears'---is that really something to be proud of?
But yeah..it's very Trump, to be sure.
Sure, Jackson was an 'Imperial' President--of a new nation with different moral and ethical standards.
That was 200 years ago..and there are literally have hundreds of millions of voters that are quite willing to force Trump into compliance.
History offers many opportunities for false equivalence---don't fall for it~
Bold talk for a failed party
 
Bold talk for a failed party
LOL!
I've not been in a political party since 1972.
BTW..as far as I can tell from reading history..parties never really fail..and they never really succeed.
After all, a party is just a tool of the elites, right?

Too funny...As to Jackson, history has judged him as a brilliant man of his times and a prime mover in the cultural genocide of the native peoples--good stuff if yer white.

But it's 200 years later..and that Imperial shit will only fly so far.
 
Yet another Judge schools Trump...you'd think he'd learn....but no--


A federal judge in Massachusetts on Wednesday ordered the Trump administration to lift a pause it imposed on various immigration applications, saying it was not in the public interest for hundreds of thousands of immigrants to lose their legal status in the U.S.

The ruling by U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani is a reprieve for many immigrants from Afghanistan, Latin America, Ukraine and other parts of the world whose ability to remain and work in the U.S. lawfully had been threatened by several Trump administration actions.

Agreeing with pro-immigrant advocates who sued the Trump administration, Talwani found that the government's actions were arbitrary and capricious, in violation of federal administrative law.

"This court emphasizes, as it did in its prior order, that it is not in the public interest to manufacture a circumstance in which hundreds of thousands of individuals will, over the course of several months, become unlawfully present in the country, such that these individuals cannot legally work in their communities or provide for themselves and their families," Talwani wrote in her order.

The programs at the center of Talwani's order rely on a legal immigration authority known as parole, which allows the federal government to temporarily admit foreigners on humanitarian or public interest grounds. President Trump's appointees have sought to curtail the use of parole, arguing that the authority was broadly abused by the Biden administration.

That pause mainly affected 240,000 Ukrainians allowed into the U.S. under a sponsorship program known as Uniting for Ukraine set up after the Russian invasion of their homeland in February 2022, as well as 530,000 Cubans, Haitians, Nicaraguans and Venezuelans who benefited from another Biden-era parole policy. It prevented those who entered the U.S. under those policies from obtaining other forms of legal status, like asylum, Temporary Protected Status or permanent residency.

Talwani ordered the government to lift another pause, issued in January, that has barred immigration officials from considering parole extension requests from Afghans, Ukrainians and other immigrant populations granted entry into the U.S. through parole programs, mostly under the Biden administration.


Her ruling also blocked the Trump administration from taking any actions to stop processing parole applications under a longstanding program designed to give temporary legal relief to the immigrant relatives of U.S. service members or veterans. The administration has said this program has not been affected by its efforts to restrict the use of parole.

So much losing.
 
15th post
..and here you have it..SCOTUS is allowing the change in status to continue..thus deportations are on..for many, if not all of the people affected.
While the case will return to the 1st circuit--this ruling signals that the court believes that if one President can grant something..another can take it away.
Sadly, I agree with their reasoning, if not with the probable result~



The Supreme Court on Friday again cleared the way for the Trump administration to strip temporary legal protections from hundreds of thousands of immigrants for now, pushing the total number of people who could be newly exposed to deportation to nearly 1 million.

The justices lifted a lower-court order that kept humanitarian parole protections in place for more than 500,000 migrants from four countries: Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua and Venezuela. The court has also allowed the administration to revoke temporary legal status from about 350,000 Venezuelan migrants in another case.


His administration filed an emergency appeal to the Supreme Court after a federal judge in Boston blocked the administration’s push to end the program. The Justice Department argues that the protections for people fleeing turmoil in their home countries were always meant to be temporary, and the Department of Homeland Security has the power to revoke them without court interference.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom