Judge Cannon just dismissed Smith's classified documents case against Trump

[struth]

WTF?

Weiss was confirmed as US ATTORNEY.............DUMBASS.
And retained by.................BIDEN.

Yes, and that's the issue....Smith was never confirmed. Try and keep up

 

[Blisterfinger]

Not sure how lawlessness beats lawfare...but sure if you say so

Lawfare is lawlessness also. Low IQ poster

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

Well what about when Biden did the same thing and nothing happened?

IDK, ask Burr.

Or maybe trump didn't really have the kind of documentation they claimed he did. He was raided by the FBI and the case was poured over by groups of his most hated enemies, prosecuted by jack smith of department of justice that hated trump, all supported by an administration with government agencies and they couldn't find one document to nail him on?

They did numbnuts.
ALL of them.

The TRAITOR delayed the trial, them dismissed it.

If there was any proveable evidence they would have had canon disbarred.

She will be.

This is a case of you being a contrarian and not worried about the law as much as you are worried they didn't "get trump".

Teabaggers are the people who are ignoring the law.
From Ft.Pierce Florida......All the way to Washington DC and the supreme court.

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

Yes, and that's the issue....Smith was never confirmed. Try and keep up

Sure........... Q-NUT.

Take your own advice.

Since the expiration of the independent counsel provisions in the Ethics in Government Act in 1999, as was the case before 1978, neither Congress nor the courts have any official role in the appointment of a special counsel; however, Congress can use other powers to pressure an administration into appointing a special counsel.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

https://www.cnn.com/2024/07/15/politics/classified-documents-case-trump-dismissed-aileen-cannon

Good. Now we need the J6 case dismissed as well.

Because you know Trump is guilty as shit.

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

I didn't say it was the worst, but nonetheless, still a criminal act. He's just to senile to prosecute.

Yeah, the teabagger congress was/is too senile/stupid to prosecute.
BUT they will investigate, until the cows come home.

 

[struth]

Sure........... Q-NUT.

Take your own advice.

Since the expiration of the independent counsel provisions in the Ethics in Government Act in 1999, as was the case before 1978, neither Congress nor the courts have any official role in the appointment of a special counsel; however, Congress can use other powers to pressure an administration into appointing a special counsel.

I never claimed anyone was an independant counsel....so not sure what you mean

 

[struth]

Yeah, the teabagger congress was/is too senile to prosecute.

um, because Congress doesn't prosecute people....wow....do we need to review the three branches of Govt with you again?

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

I never claimed anyone was an independant counsel....so not sure what you mean

"Yes, and that's the issue....Smith was never confirmed. Try and keep up"

Office of Public Affairs | Appointment of a Special Counsel​

United States Department of Justice (.gov)
https://www.justice.gov › opa › appointment-special-co...
Nov 18, 2022 — Attorney General Merrick B. Garland announced today the appointment of former career Justice Department prosecutor and former chief ...


Attorney General Merrick B. Garland announced today the appointment of former career Justice Department prosecutor and former chief prosecutor for the special court in The Hague, Jack Smith, to serve as Special Counsel to oversee two ongoing criminal investigations.

 

[struth]

"Yes, and that's the issue....Smith was never confirmed. Try and keep up"

Office of Public Affairs | Appointment of a Special Counsel​

View attachment 977853
United States Department of Justice (.gov)
https://www.justice.gov › opa › appointment-special-co...
Nov 18, 2022 — Attorney General Merrick B. Garland announced today the appointment of former career Justice Department prosecutor and former chief ...


Attorney General Merrick B. Garland announced today the appointment of former career Justice Department prosecutor and former chief prosecutor for the special court in The Hague, Jack Smith, to serve as Special Counsel to oversee two ongoing criminal investigations.

what? when was he confirmed by the Senate? Garland, isn't the US Senate

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

um, because Congress doesn't prosecute people....wow....do we need to review the three branches of Govt with you again?

YES they do........NUMBNUTS.

Then, they refer their prosecution to the US Attorney general.
That's all the teabagger congress has been doing for the last FOUR years

 

[struth]

YES they do........NUMBNUTS.

Then, they refer their prosecution to the US Attorney general.
That's all the teabagger congress has been doing for the last FOUR years

um US Attorneys are part of the Executive branch, not the legislative branch. The US Attorney's Office, did investigate Xiden...hence the Hur report, that found he violated the law, but was too sentile to stand trial.

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

what? when was he confirmed by the Senate? Garland, isn't the US Senate

Holy FUCK...........Q-NUT.
Step away from the orange kool-aid.

Since the expiration of the independent counsel provisions in the Ethics in Government Act in 1999, as was the case before 1978, neither Congress nor the courts have any official role in the appointment of a special counsel; however, Congress can use other powers to pressure an administration into appointing a special counsel.

That was 12 minutes ago.

 

[struth]

Holy FUCK...........Q-NUT.
Step away from the orange kool-aid.

Since the expiration of the independent counsel provisions in the Ethics in Government Act in 1999, as was the case before 1978, neither Congress nor the courts have any official role in the appointment of a special counsel; however, Congress can use other powers to pressure an administration into appointing a special counsel.

That was 12 minutes ago.

yes, and once again, I am still waiting on your to show us when he was confirmed by the Senate, like Hur and Weiss was....https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/article-2/section-2/clause-2/overview-of-the-appointments-clause

The Appointments Clause requires that “Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the Supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States” be appointed by the President subject to the advice and consent of the Senate, although Congress may vest the appointment of “inferior” officers “in the President alone, in the Courts of Law, or in the Heads of Departments.” 1 The Supreme Court has interpreted these requirements as distinguishing between two types of officers: (1) “principal” officers who must be appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate to their position, and (2) “inferior” officers, whose appointment Congress may place with the President, judiciary, or department heads.

 

[Independent thinker]

https://www.cnn.com/2024/07/15/politics/classified-documents-case-trump-dismissed-aileen-cannon

Good. Now we need the J6 case dismissed as well.

We may have finally reached the point where democrats will start giving up. Everything they have done has been to stop Trump and now that Trump is stronger than ever it obviously hasn't worked.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

We may have finally reached the point where democrats will start giving up

Then you are doubly delusional.

The prosecutions have nothing to do with democrats. That's the point of the grand jury and court system.

Second, the DOJ doesn't just walk away from prosecutions whenever the wind turns in their faces. They absolutely will try to take the documents case to trial again.

 

[westwall]

Not sure how lawlessness beats lawfare...but sure if you say so

She is actually following the law. Unlike your corrupt judges.

DURRRRRR

 

[westwall]

WTF?

Weiss was confirmed as US ATTORNEY.............DUMBASS.
And retained by.................BIDEN.

Calm down Aldo raine, you're hyperventilating!

 

[Ava]

LOL the left isn’t having a good week.

Yes, their chickens are coming home to roost!!!!

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

yes, and once again, I am still waiting on your to show us when he was confirmed by the Senate, like Hur and Weiss was....https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/article-2/section-2/clause-2/overview-of-the-appointments-clause

Does your fellow Trump cult members make you take the short bus to your dear leader's pity rallies?

From your own link.

While the Constitution specifies that certain persons, such as Supreme Court Justices, qualify as “Officers of the United States,” the Appointments Clause does not specify all persons who fall under its purview. Thus, the Appointments Clause’s reach and scope has been disputed. In the 1976 case of Buckley v. Valeo, the Supreme Court explained that whether an individual wields “significant authority” informs the assessment of whether that person is an officer, but the Court has not significantly elaborated on this test since that decision.

Then.............They did.

Since the expiration of the independent counsel provisions in the Ethics in Government Act in 1999, as was the case before 1978, neither Congress nor the courts have any official role in the appointment of a special counsel; however, Congress can use other powers to pressure an administration into appointing a special counsel.

The Committee on Government Reform, to whom was referred the bill (H.R. 2904) to amend the Ethics in Government Act of 1978 to reauthorize funding for the Office of Government Ethics, having considered the same, report favorably thereon with amendments and recommend that the bill as amended do pass.

The Appointments Clause requires that “Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the Supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States” be appointed by the President subject to the advice and consent of the Senate, although Congress may vest the appointment of “inferior” officers “in the President alone, in the Courts of Law, or in the Heads of Departments.” 1 The Supreme Court has interpreted these requirements as distinguishing between two types of officers: (1) “principal” officers who must be appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate to their position, and (2) “inferior” officers, whose appointment Congress may place with the President, judiciary, or department heads.