Judge Cannon just dismissed Smith's classified documents case against Trump

[krichton]

1. Trump requested the NG on J3. There are many witnesses.

Gen. Kellogg: Trump did request Nat'l Guard troops on Jan. 6th; asks Congress to release his testimony

Retired U.S. Army Gen. Keith Kellogg said President Donald Trump requested National Guard deployments in Washington D.C. before Jan. 6, 2021.

americanmilitarynews.com

Kellogg, who was serving as Vice President Mike Pence’s National Security Advisor at the time of the Jan. 6, 2021 Capitol breach, tweeted last week, “To be clear on 6 Jan/NG. Pg 199 of my book, ‘On 3 Jan the President asked the Def Dept to deploy NG troops’ into DC for J6 contingencies. OK for J6 Cmte to publicly release my full sworn testimony.

2. Capitol Police Chief Sund also requested the NG before J6.

Security Officials Testify About Failures At Capitol On January 6

Former Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund described a scene that was “like nothing” he had seen in his 30 years of policing.

www.huffpost.com

Sund said he spoke to both Stenger and Irving about requesting the National Guard in the days before the riot, and that Irving said he was concerned about the “optics” of having them present.

3. Mayor Bowser said her police were adequate.

DC Mayor Bowser’s Letter Refusing National Guard on January 6

Washington DC Mayor Muriel Bowser sends a letter to the Acting United States Attorney General, Secretary of the Army, and...

fightwithkash.com

4. Nancy Pelosi video

MSN

Nancy Pelosi says ‘I take responsibility’ for not having National Guard at the Capitol on Jan. 6 in video shot by her own daughter​

The fact that Irving (her direct report) denied the early request because of Pelosi means she is actually to blame.
If the NG was deployed there would have been no riot, duh.

Trump's defense secretary denies there were orders to have 10K troops ready to deploy on January 6

Former acting Defense Secretary Chris Miller told the House select committee investigating the Capitol Hill insurrection that former President Donald Trump never gave him a formal order to have 10,000 troops ready to be deployed to the Capitol on January 6, 2021, according to new video of...

www.cnn.com

That's under testimony, not in some book in barnes and noble.

 

[kyzr]

That's under testimony, not in some book in barnes and noble.

There is no disagreement that at the J3 meeting Trump said "Fill the request"
That is not a direct order to provide 10,000 NG troops.
We need the House GOP to get the participants under oath and find out who is lying.
Nancy Pelosi takes responsibility in a video for denying NG troops
People in the NG loop:
At J3 meeting: SECDEF Miller, Milley, Kash, Kellogg, Trump, Meadows where Trump said "fill the request"
Mayor Bowser's letter denied the NG troops saying her police were adequate. Where were they during the riot?
Capitol Police Chief Sund also requested NG troops, Sgt. at Arms Irving denied his request based on Pelosi's policy

We need more testimony.
Mikey Johnson & Jim Jordan need to make it happen to find out why the NG was not there

 

[Delldude]

That's under testimony, not in some book in barnes and noble.

 

[Billo_Really]

ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooook

He was only responding the to violent rheotoric from the Demafacsit leadership in the Senate:



"you will pay the price!"

Only if the price is right?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Justice Thomas seems to be supporting Cannon

Well of course. It's more than support. He gave her the road map. She cited his opinion several times.

Kind of shows her incompetence.

 

[kyzr]

Well of course. It's more than support. He gave her the road map. She cited his opinion several times.

Kind of shows her incompetence.

Shows that the USSC agrees with her, duh.
Disagreeing with the USSC shows incompetence.

 

[WorldWatcher]

Shows that the USSC agrees with her, duh.
Disagreeing with the USSC shows incompetence.

#1 Justice Thomas inserted his comments into a concurring opinion having nothing to do with the Special Council BEFORE Judge Cannon issued her decision. Kind of hard for the SCOTUS to "agree with her" when her opinion hadn't been issued.

#2 Justice Thomas inserted his comments into a concurring opinion having nothing to do with the Special Council, Justice Thomas * * IS NOT * * the SCOTUS. He is a single member of 9. We (and you) have no clue about how they would rule if asked the question.

WW

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Shows that the USSC agrees with her, duh.

Excuse you. The opinion of one judge of 9 absolutely does not show that.

Why is every discussion with you nothing but a series of corrections of the wrong things you say?

Now remember... the incompetent judge was going to let what she deems an unconstitutional trial proceed, until one of her betters passed her a note.

Competence!

 

[Delldude]

Justice Thomas inserted his comments into a concurring opinion having nothing to do with the Special Council, Justice Thomas * * IS NOT * * the SCOTUS. He is a single member of 9. We (and you) have no clue about how they would rule if asked the question.

Also presides over the 11th.........

 

[WorldWatcher]

Also presides over the 11th.........

Yep, clear indication that Justice Thomas was attempting to interfer with Judge Cannon's case at the district level and was not a case before the SCOTUS.

He sent a message and the message was received.

WW

 

[Delldude]

Yep, clear indication that Justice Thomas was attempting to interfer with Judge Cannon's case at the district level and was not a case before the SCOTUS.

He sent a message and the message was received.

WW

Like it matters. There's already a brief before SCOTUS on this issue............and Cannon's ruling will go to the same place.

Not sure why you people ignore the facts.

 

[kyzr]

#1 Justice Thomas inserted his comments into a concurring opinion having nothing to do with the Special Council BEFORE Judge Cannon issued her decision. Kind of hard for the SCOTUS to "agree with her" when her opinion hadn't been issued.

#2 Justice Thomas inserted his comments into a concurring opinion having nothing to do with the Special Council, Justice Thomas * * IS NOT * * the SCOTUS. He is a single member of 9. We (and you) have no clue about how they would rule if asked the question.

WW

OK, rephrasing:
1. Cannon's opinion may have included or considered Justice Thomas' comments. Call it a "helpful hint".

How Clarence Thomas laid groundwork for Trump's classified documents case being dismissed

'This is an aggressive ruling,' one conservative scholar said of Judge Aileen Cannon's decision. 'I’m not sure she got it right on the merits.'

www.usatoday.com

How Clarence Thomas laid groundwork for Trump's classified documents case being dismissed​

2. Agreed that we don't know how many USSC justices agree with justice Thomas. However, that judge Cannon can refer to justice Thomas' opinion on the special counsel gives some weight to her ruling. As this case winds its way to the USSC we'll find out that number eventually.

 

[kyzr]

Excuse you. The opinion of one judge of 9 absolutely does not show that.
Why is every discussion with you nothing but a series of corrections of the wrong things you say?
Now remember... the incompetent judge was going to let what she deems an unconstitutional trial proceed, until one of her betters passed her a note.
Competence!

True, justice Thomas is one judge.
But its a safe bet that he would not be in the minority.
I'd give odds that when the entire USSC decides, it won't be 8-1 for Jack Smith.

 

[struth]

Only if the price is right?

I’ve noticed

 

[Billo_Really]

I’ve noticed

Hey, for enough money and dope, I'm your bitch!