Judge Boasberg Faces Removal

[Seymour Flops]

Judge Boasberg faces removal under new GOP proposal

Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts has already warned against using impeachment to unseat Boasberg.

www.newsweek.com

Why It Matters​

The resolution introduced by Arizona Representative Andy Biggs seeks to bypass the impeachment process, in which two thirds of the Senate would have to vote to fire Judge James Boasberg.


Whether this passes or not, it could serve as a wake up call to federal judges - if they are not too woke to wake up.

 

[pknopp]

Something that is never going to happen is not going to cause judges to care much.

 

[Seymour Flops]

Something that is never going to happen is not going to cause judges to care much.

If the vote itself happens, Biasberg will be even more tainted. What ambitious federal judge wants that?

 

[pknopp]

If the vote itself happens, Biasberg will be even more tainted. What ambitious federal judge wants that?

Tainted? LOL. Watch, a vote never happens because the Republican's would have a hard time getting 35 votes for it.

 

[wamose]

The bottom line is, the President needs to regain the power judges like Boasberg have illegally absconded with. Lawfare must end, now.

 

[Moonglow]

Judge Boasberg faces removal under new GOP proposal

Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts has already warned against using impeachment to unseat Boasberg.

www.newsweek.com

Why It Matters​

The resolution introduced by Arizona Representative Andy Biggs seeks to bypass the impeachment process, in which two thirds of the Senate would have to vote to fire Judge James Boasberg.


Whether this passes or not, it could serve as a wake up call to federal judges - if they are not too woke to wake up.

The Senate can't stop a federal judge or throw him out because he's icky.

 

[Moonglow]

The bottom line is, the President needs to regain the power judges like Boasberg have illegally absconded with. Lawfare must end, now.

Trump's power is limited in scope to the courts. That is what the balance of power with checks and balances in the Constitution.

 

[1srelluc]

I don't see it happening. Congress has other tools in the tool box to neuter wayward district court judges.

Jurisdiction stripping - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[Moonglow]

I don't see it happening. Congress has other tools in the tool box to neuter wayward district court judges.

Jurisdiction stripping - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Congress can limit only the appellate jurisdiction of the Court

and

The judicial power shall extend to all the cases enumerated in the constitution. As the mode is not limited, it may extend to all such cases, in any form, in which judicial power may be exercised. It may, therefore, extend to them in the shape of original or appellate jurisdiction, or both; for there is nothing in the nature of the cases which binds to the exercise of the one in preference to the other.

 

[Seymour Flops]

Tainted? LOL. Watch, a vote never happens because the Republican's would have a hard time getting 35 votes for it.

So what? A 35 to 65 vote would quickly identify 16 Democrat moles occupying Senate seats claiming to be of the Republican Party to be primary as soon as possible.

 

[Moonglow]

So what? A 35 to 65 vote would quickly identify 16 Democrat moles occupying Senate seats claiming to be of the Republican Party to be primary as soon as possible.

Which will not help Trump since historically, Congress changes the party power of the president in the mid-term elections.

 

[pknopp]

So what? A 35 to 65 vote would quickly identify 16 Democrat moles occupying Senate seats claiming to be of the Republican Party to be primary as soon as possible.

If you think that is a winning platform, go for it.

 

[JLW]

So, once Democrats take over the House, they can issue resolutions to remove federal court judges they disagree with.

okay

 

[Moonglow]

If you think that is a winning platform, go for it.

They enjoy their pyrrhic victories

 

[Seymour Flops]

If you think that is a winning platform, go for it.

The winning platform is reducing wasteful spending and deporting violent criminal aliens. It would not have been necessary to add get rid of obstructionist judges if they weren’t working so hard to obstruct that winning platform.

 

[Seymour Flops]

So, once Democrats take over the House, they can issue resolutions to remove federal court judges they disagree with.

okay

They won’t hesitate. Your leaders openly threatened SCOTUS over Dobbs.

Except the Dems need MAJOR change to ever win a majority again.

 

[pknopp]

The winning platform is reducing wasteful spending and deporting violent criminal aliens. It would not have been necessary to add get rid of obstructionist judges if they weren’t working so hard to obstruct that winning platform.

In this country even violent criminals have rights. I find it sad you wish the end that.

 

[rightwinger]

Got to fire anyone who will stand up to Trump

 

[Seymour Flops]

In this country even violent criminals have rights. I find it sad you wish the end that.

Peaceful citizens have more rights than violent illegals.

Violent illegals are subject to expedited removal, and no court has ever ruled that process unconstitutional. If the lawfare succeeds in stopping Trump from using the alien enemies act, he will just switch to expedited removal.

I found it sad when we had a president who prioritized admitting as many illegals and as possible over the safety of American citizens, and even the safety of other illegals that came with the violent ones. Now it’s just amusing to see the last remnants of the Democratic Party Try to use the courts to enforce violent illegals’ “rights” over rights of peaceful American citizens.

I’m sure George Soros, or one of his fronts, will endow a chair at a law school specifically for judge Biasberg so that he will have a soft landing when he leaves the federal bench. No doubt he will be the Democrats new Archibald Cox.

Serious question for you: in the unlikely event that somehow Trump is forced by Democrats to fly back a plane load of these violent men now in El Salvadoran Prison, how would that affect the Democrats’ chances in 2026 and 2028?

You think that the rapes and murders sure to follow soon would lead to a surge of support for your party?

 

[Synthaholic]

Which will not help Trump since historically, Congress changes the party power of the president in the mid-term elections.

MAGAts are not getting smarter, are they?