Juanita Broaddrick: Trump accusers "should bear investigation, scrutiny and vetting"


It should and it did, it is a proven fact that Bill Clinton is a rapist:


Juanita Broaddrick’s claim was supported by not one but fivewitnesses and a host of circumstantial (though no physical) evidence. Broaddrick’s colleague Norma Rogers, who was attending the conference in Little Rock with her, says she found Broaddrick in her hotel room crying and “in a state of shock” on the morning of the alleged assault, her pantyhose torn and her lip swollen. According to Rogers, Broaddrick told her that Bill Clinton had “forced himself on her.”

At the time, Broaddrick (then Juanita Hickey) was having an affair with David Broaddrick, who would become her second husband. David Broaddrick told Dateline NBC that he remembers Juanita’s arriving home with a swollen lip and telling him that she had been assaulted by Bill Clinton.

And three other friends — Susan Lewis, Louis Ma, and Norma Rogers’s sister Jean Darden — all maintain that Broaddrick told them about the rape, too. (Rogers and Darden stand by their stories but have pointed out that they have an apparent conflict of interest: As governor, Clinton commuted the life sentence of the man who murdered their father.)

Two small details lend particular credence to Broaddrick’s story.

First, the lip. In 1998, after previously denying any such rumors, actress Elizabeth Gracen admitted to having a one-night stand with Bill Clinton in 1982. She claimed that, during rough sexual intercourse, Clinton bit her lip.

Second, in an account of the assault given to the Wall Street Journal and published shortly before her NBC interview, Broaddrick made the peculiar claim that Clinton told her she need not worry about becoming pregnant. He was sterile, he said, from a childhood case of mumps. Gennifer Flowers, who in 1992 claimed to have had a twelve-year sexual relationship with Clinton in the 1970s and 1980s, and Dolly Kyle Browning, who claims a three-decade affair with Bill, both told The Weekly Standard that Clinton told them he had a fertility problem. And in his book Blood Sport, James Stewart reported that Bill and Hillary “contemplated a visit to a doctor at the University of California” in the late 1970s, because they were worried that they could not conceive.

All of this evidence — far more than was ever present in the Anita Hill case — was available in 1999. But Hillary Clinton kept silent. And she may have intimidated Broaddrick into silence.


Juanita Broaddrick: Hillary's Ghost

All of that is hearsay, and two of the "Witnesses" you mention had a grudge against Clinton because he commuted the sentence of the guy who killed their father.

The thing is, Broaddrick has told three different version of this story.

1) Clinton never touched her.
2) Clinton touched her, but Hillary didn't know about it.
3) Clinton touched her, and Hillary intimidated her.

As a rule, when you change your story multiple times, you aren't telling the truth.

You are a rape supporter and victim blamer the evidence that Bill Clinton raped her is undeniable and the fact that she tried everything she could to stay out of the spotlight and never sought a penny speaks volumes.
 
you just discredited at least 50 years of feminist/communist/left wing propaganda, not that anyone really ever believed it, but to force someone on the left to finally tell the truth about it is the kind of honesty we've needed from the left for a long long time, be proud of yourself, I'm proud of you.

Well, no, I really didn't. I think most feminists believe that these things should be done on a case by case basis, and you go by the evidence.

She has five witnesses and corroborating details, you refuse to acknowledge it because you are a rape supporting partisan hack.
 

It should and it did, it is a proven fact that Bill Clinton is a rapist:


Juanita Broaddrick’s claim was supported by not one but fivewitnesses and a host of circumstantial (though no physical) evidence. Broaddrick’s colleague Norma Rogers, who was attending the conference in Little Rock with her, says she found Broaddrick in her hotel room crying and “in a state of shock” on the morning of the alleged assault, her pantyhose torn and her lip swollen. According to Rogers, Broaddrick told her that Bill Clinton had “forced himself on her.”

At the time, Broaddrick (then Juanita Hickey) was having an affair with David Broaddrick, who would become her second husband. David Broaddrick told Dateline NBC that he remembers Juanita’s arriving home with a swollen lip and telling him that she had been assaulted by Bill Clinton.

And three other friends — Susan Lewis, Louis Ma, and Norma Rogers’s sister Jean Darden — all maintain that Broaddrick told them about the rape, too. (Rogers and Darden stand by their stories but have pointed out that they have an apparent conflict of interest: As governor, Clinton commuted the life sentence of the man who murdered their father.)

Two small details lend particular credence to Broaddrick’s story.

First, the lip. In 1998, after previously denying any such rumors, actress Elizabeth Gracen admitted to having a one-night stand with Bill Clinton in 1982. She claimed that, during rough sexual intercourse, Clinton bit her lip.

Second, in an account of the assault given to the Wall Street Journal and published shortly before her NBC interview, Broaddrick made the peculiar claim that Clinton told her she need not worry about becoming pregnant. He was sterile, he said, from a childhood case of mumps. Gennifer Flowers, who in 1992 claimed to have had a twelve-year sexual relationship with Clinton in the 1970s and 1980s, and Dolly Kyle Browning, who claims a three-decade affair with Bill, both told The Weekly Standard that Clinton told them he had a fertility problem. And in his book Blood Sport, James Stewart reported that Bill and Hillary “contemplated a visit to a doctor at the University of California” in the late 1970s, because they were worried that they could not conceive.

All of this evidence — far more than was ever present in the Anita Hill case — was available in 1999. But Hillary Clinton kept silent. And she may have intimidated Broaddrick into silence.


Juanita Broaddrick: Hillary's Ghost

All of that is hearsay, and two of the "Witnesses" you mention had a grudge against Clinton because he commuted the sentence of the guy who killed their father.

The thing is, Broaddrick has told three different version of this story.

1) Clinton never touched her.
2) Clinton touched her, but Hillary didn't know about it.
3) Clinton touched her, and Hillary intimidated her.

As a rule, when you change your story multiple times, you aren't telling the truth.

You are a rape supporter and victim blamer the evidence that Bill Clinton raped her is undeniable and the fact that she tried everything she could to stay out of the spotlight and never sought a penny speaks volumes.
Joe knows nothing about Juanita's case. MSLSD has yet to utter her name.
 
Well, no, I really didn't. I think most feminists believe that these things should be done on a case by case basis, and you go by the evidence.
don't be so modest, I have never heard anyone on the left claim a woman lied about rape until you came along [can you give some other examples of these claims based on casre by case basis? surely you are not just taking these claims of "case by case" at face value are you?], even the lacrosse players in NC didn't get that acknowledgement before or after their case, in fact the only reason they even had to go to court was because a woman would not lie about rape, and no one on the left is defending those players, at best/most just paying lip service and moving on right away.
 
All of that is hearsay,

No it's not it is 5 contemporary witnesses and 2 corroborating details.

and two of the "Witnesses" you mention had a grudge against Clinton because he commuted the sentence of the guy who killed their father.

And the other three.

The thing is, Broaddrick has told three different version of this story.

1) Clinton never touched her.
2) Clinton touched her, but Hillary didn't know about it.
3) Clinton touched her, and Hillary intimidated her.

As a rule, when you change your story multiple times, you aren't telling the truth.

She didn't want to come forward and when forced to under coercion she lied because she didn't want to be a target of Hillary's bimbo eruption squad you scum bag rape apologist, she did everything possible to stay out of the spotlight and only came forward when she was accused of being bribed to clear her name.
 
You are a rape supporter and victim blamer the evidence that Bill Clinton raped her is undeniable and the fact that she tried everything she could to stay out of the spotlight and never sought a penny speaks volumes.

actually, she's gotten a lot of money off her accusations.

But she lacks any real credibility.

don't be so modest, I have never heard anyone on the left claim a woman lied about rape until you came along [can you give some other examples of these claims based on casre by case basis? surely you are not just taking these claims of "case by case" at face value are you?], even the lacrosse players in NC didn't get that acknowledgement before or after their case, in fact the only reason they even had to go to court was because a woman would not lie about rape, and no one on the left is defending those players, at best/most just paying lip service and moving on right away.

I've said the LaCrosse players got a bad deal. Of course, they brought a lot of it on themselves by hiring strippers in the first place. The reason why it went to court was because of their largely boorish behavior. While they didn't rape the accuser, they did fling racial epitaths at her and were generally jerks.

But, um, yeah, Nifong should have done a better investigation,and shouldn't have doubled down when the evidence pointed in other directions. He was disbarred and should have been.

I've also said on this board, many times, that I think Anita Hill was a lying sack of crap. I've also talked about the Kathleen Webb/Gary Dotson case, but that's a local story here in Chicago, so you probably don't know that much about it.

I've also criticized the prosecutorial and judicial misconduct in the Roman Polanski case. (Guy pleads out, and then they renege on the deal, and wonder why he flees the country).

Now, you might have a legitimate point that because rape victims are sympathetic, we give undo credence to unsubstantiated charges.

That said, only 3% of rapists end up going to jail. So we also have a long way to go in other areas.
 
No it's not it is 5 contemporary witnesses and 2 corroborating details.

But it's STILL HEARSAY! Even if you take them at face value that they heard her say that, they didn't witness it. Their testimony would not be admissible in court.

She didn't want to come forward and when forced to under coercion she lied because she didn't want to be a target of Hillary's bimbo eruption squad you scum bag rape apologist, she did everything possible to stay out of the spotlight and only came forward when she was accused of being bribed to clear her name.

Or...

She had a consensual affair with Clinton. she saw how Gennifer Flowers and Sally Perdue and Elizabeth Ward Gracen were being dragged through the mud for admitting to such things. So she plead out false statements.

Then along comes Ken Starr with his FBI Jackboots, and they've already thrown Susan McDougal and Julie Hyatt Steele in jail for not saying what he wanted to hear, and was spending a lot of time and effort trying to get Monica Lewinsky to talk, dragging her whole family into court.

So she told Ken Starr whatever Ken Starr wanted to hear. If Ken Starr wanted her to day Clinton sank the Lustitania and kidnapped the Lindbergh baby, she'd have probably confessed to that.

So again, we are back to actual evidence. in that you have none.
 
I've said the LaCrosse players got a bad deal. Of course, they brought a lot of it on themselves by hiring strippers in the first place. The reason why it went to court was because of their largely boorish behavior. While they didn't rape the accuser, they did fling racial epitaths at her and were generally jerks.

But, um, yeah, Nifong should have done a better investigation,and shouldn't have doubled down when the evidence pointed in other directions. He was disbarred and should have been.

I've also said on this board, many times, that I think Anita Hill was a lying sack of crap. I've also talked about the Kathleen Webb/Gary Dotson case, but that's a local story here in Chicago, so you probably don't know that much about it.

I've also criticized the prosecutorial and judicial misconduct in the Roman Polanski case. (Guy pleads out, and then they renege on the deal, and wonder why he flees the country).

Now, you might have a legitimate point that because rape victims are sympathetic, we give undo credence to unsubstantiated charges.

That said, only 3% of rapists end up going to jail. So we also have a long way to go in other areas.
the first paragraph is such non-sense that I just about gave up on this post, but glad I didn't, it isn't bad nor too far off base with the way I see things, the left needs to reflect on these matters [including race and immigration] and see how they are perceived by those who do not take the same hard line stance they do, if they do that they will most certainly bring voters like myself back into the fold...
 
No it's not it is 5 contemporary witnesses and 2 corroborating details.

But it's STILL HEARSAY! Even if you take them at face value that they heard her say that, they didn't witness it. Their testimony would not be admissible in court.

Eyewitness testimony is not hearsay you ignorant fuck.

Or...

She had a consensual affair with Clinton. she saw how Gennifer Flowers and Sally Perdue and Elizabeth Ward Gracen were being dragged through the mud for admitting to such things. So she plead out false statements.

Then along comes Ken Starr with his FBI Jackboots, and they've already thrown Susan McDougal and Julie Hyatt Steele

Steele and McDougal are not the innocent victims you claim they were actively obstructing justice on behalf of Clinton bimbo eruption squad.

in jail for not saying what he wanted to hear, and was spending a lot of time and effort trying to get Monica Lewinsky to talk, dragging her whole family into court.

So she told Ken Starr whatever Ken Starr wanted to hear. If Ken Starr wanted her to day Clinton sank the Lustitania and kidnapped the Lindbergh baby, she'd have probably confessed to that.

So again, we are back to actual evidence. in that you have none.

Sorry pal but she was secretly taped not once but twice stating she was raped prior to Kenn Starr coming around so before you go around supporting rapists I suggest you get your facts straight first.


Road to disclosure: 1992-98Edit
Though Broaddrick was resistant to talking to the media, rumors about her story began circulating no later than Clinton’s presidential bid in 1992.[7] Broaddrick had confided in Phillip Yoakum, whom she knew from business circles and at the time considered a friend. When Clinton won the Democratic nomination, Yoakum, widely considered to have a Republican agenda,[7] contacted Sheffield Nelson, Clinton’s opponent in the 1990 gubernatorial race. Yoakum arranged a meeting between Nelson and Broaddrick, who resisted Yoakum's and Nelson’s push that she go public.[1] Yoakum secretly taped the conversation and wrote a letter summarizing the allegations, which began to circulate within Republican circles. The story reached the New York Times and the Los Angeles Times in October 1992, but the papers dropped the story after Broaddrick refused to talk to reporters and Yoakum refused to release the recording.[7]

In the fall of 1997, Paula Jones’s private investigators tried to talk to Broaddrick at her home, also secretly taping the conversation.[13] Broaddrick refused to discuss the incident, saying “it was just a horrible horrible thing,” and that she “wouldn’t relive it for anything.”[14]


Juanita Broaddrick - Wikipedia
 
Last edited:

It should and it did, it is a proven fact that Bill Clinton is a rapist:


Juanita Broaddrick’s claim was supported by not one but fivewitnesses and a host of circumstantial (though no physical) evidence. Broaddrick’s colleague Norma Rogers, who was attending the conference in Little Rock with her, says she found Broaddrick in her hotel room crying and “in a state of shock” on the morning of the alleged assault, her pantyhose torn and her lip swollen. According to Rogers, Broaddrick told her that Bill Clinton had “forced himself on her.”

At the time, Broaddrick (then Juanita Hickey) was having an affair with David Broaddrick, who would become her second husband. David Broaddrick told Dateline NBC that he remembers Juanita’s arriving home with a swollen lip and telling him that she had been assaulted by Bill Clinton.

And three other friends — Susan Lewis, Louis Ma, and Norma Rogers’s sister Jean Darden — all maintain that Broaddrick told them about the rape, too. (Rogers and Darden stand by their stories but have pointed out that they have an apparent conflict of interest: As governor, Clinton commuted the life sentence of the man who murdered their father.)

Two small details lend particular credence to Broaddrick’s story.

First, the lip. In 1998, after previously denying any such rumors, actress Elizabeth Gracen admitted to having a one-night stand with Bill Clinton in 1982. She claimed that, during rough sexual intercourse, Clinton bit her lip.

Second, in an account of the assault given to the Wall Street Journal and published shortly before her NBC interview, Broaddrick made the peculiar claim that Clinton told her she need not worry about becoming pregnant. He was sterile, he said, from a childhood case of mumps. Gennifer Flowers, who in 1992 claimed to have had a twelve-year sexual relationship with Clinton in the 1970s and 1980s, and Dolly Kyle Browning, who claims a three-decade affair with Bill, both told The Weekly Standard that Clinton told them he had a fertility problem. And in his book Blood Sport, James Stewart reported that Bill and Hillary “contemplated a visit to a doctor at the University of California” in the late 1970s, because they were worried that they could not conceive.

All of this evidence — far more than was ever present in the Anita Hill case — was available in 1999. But Hillary Clinton kept silent. And she may have intimidated Broaddrick into silence.


Juanita Broaddrick: Hillary's Ghost

All of that is hearsay, and two of the "Witnesses" you mention had a grudge against Clinton because he commuted the sentence of the guy who killed their father.

The thing is, Broaddrick has told three different version of this story.

1) Clinton never touched her.
2) Clinton touched her, but Hillary didn't know about it.
3) Clinton touched her, and Hillary intimidated her.

As a rule, when you change your story multiple times, you aren't telling the truth.

You are a rape supporter and victim blamer the evidence that Bill Clinton raped her is undeniable and the fact that she tried everything she could to stay out of the spotlight and never sought a penny speaks volumes.
Joe knows nothing about Juanita's case. MSLSD has yet to utter her name.


Actually, the MSNBC star Chris Hayes admitted what we've said for two decades about the rapist they elected.

"With all the scandals in the news, liberals are turning on President Clinton.

MSNBC’s Chris Hayes reckons that the “center left” is “overdue for a real reckoning” with Mr. Clinton.

The Times’ Michelle Goldberg says, “I believe Juanita,” a reference to Mrs. Broaddrick, who in the late 1990s alleged that in 1978, Mr. Clinton, then Arkansas’ attorney-general, raped her at a hotel. Mr. Clinton has long denied the charge.

Chelsea Handler tweets an apology to Mrs. Broaddrick. Ross Douthat, referring to the special prosecutor who turned Mr. Clinton over to Congress for impeachment for perjury and obstruction, asks, “What if Ken Starr was right?”
‘Juanita’s News’ - The New York Sun


But the slow-witted devotees can't keep up.....and are still pretending!

You can practically hear them muttering "....must defend Clinton...must defend party..."
 
the first paragraph is such non-sense that I just about gave up on this post,

Did you need someone to explain the big words to you, sweetie?

but glad I didn't, it isn't bad nor too far off base with the way I see things,

Right, it's pretty clear you didn't understand a fucking thing... but let's move on, shall we?

Eyewitness testimony is not hearsay you ignorant fuck.

No, Eyewitness testimony would be that they watched Clinton Rape her, not that she said later he raped her. I'm sorry this basic concept eludes you.

Steele and McDougal are not the innocent victims you claim they were actively obstructing justice on behalf of Clinton bimbo eruption squad.

Well, no.

Steele was charged with perjury for not confirming Kathleen Willey's account. She would not swear that Willey told her that at the time because that would be perjury.

McDougal refused to answer any questions. She excercised her fifth amendment rights. Starr threw her in jail anyway.

The conduct of Ken Starr was so beyond the pale it defies belief.

Sorry pal but she was secretly taped not once but twice stating she was raped prior to Kenn Starr coming around so before you go around supporting rapists I suggest you get your facts straight first.

The fact is, she swore out two affadavits to the Jones legal team that she had never had sex with Clinton.

NO prosecutor would go to court with a witness with a story that changed so much.

Juanita Broaderick was a liar. When she lied and what she lied about isn't that important.
 
Of course she was, but lefties don't know this because their media keeps them in the dark.
slick got away with rape and the victim is victimized a second time [at least]
Agree....though this just might be changing.

Old Slick Willie might finally get his just deserts.

Naw, it's unlikely, but you guys keep dreaming.

Juanita Brodderick was a liar 20 years ago and she's a liar now.
She has mental/emotional issues.
 

It should and it did, it is a proven fact that Bill Clinton is a rapist:


Juanita Broaddrick’s claim was supported by not one but fivewitnesses and a host of circumstantial (though no physical) evidence. Broaddrick’s colleague Norma Rogers, who was attending the conference in Little Rock with her, says she found Broaddrick in her hotel room crying and “in a state of shock” on the morning of the alleged assault, her pantyhose torn and her lip swollen. According to Rogers, Broaddrick told her that Bill Clinton had “forced himself on her.”

At the time, Broaddrick (then Juanita Hickey) was having an affair with David Broaddrick, who would become her second husband. David Broaddrick told Dateline NBC that he remembers Juanita’s arriving home with a swollen lip and telling him that she had been assaulted by Bill Clinton.

And three other friends — Susan Lewis, Louis Ma, and Norma Rogers’s sister Jean Darden — all maintain that Broaddrick told them about the rape, too. (Rogers and Darden stand by their stories but have pointed out that they have an apparent conflict of interest: As governor, Clinton commuted the life sentence of the man who murdered their father.)

Two small details lend particular credence to Broaddrick’s story.

First, the lip. In 1998, after previously denying any such rumors, actress Elizabeth Gracen admitted to having a one-night stand with Bill Clinton in 1982. She claimed that, during rough sexual intercourse, Clinton bit her lip.

Second, in an account of the assault given to the Wall Street Journal and published shortly before her NBC interview, Broaddrick made the peculiar claim that Clinton told her she need not worry about becoming pregnant. He was sterile, he said, from a childhood case of mumps. Gennifer Flowers, who in 1992 claimed to have had a twelve-year sexual relationship with Clinton in the 1970s and 1980s, and Dolly Kyle Browning, who claims a three-decade affair with Bill, both told The Weekly Standard that Clinton told them he had a fertility problem. And in his book Blood Sport, James Stewart reported that Bill and Hillary “contemplated a visit to a doctor at the University of California” in the late 1970s, because they were worried that they could not conceive.

All of this evidence — far more than was ever present in the Anita Hill case — was available in 1999. But Hillary Clinton kept silent. And she may have intimidated Broaddrick into silence.


Juanita Broaddrick: Hillary's Ghost

All of that is hearsay, and two of the "Witnesses" you mention had a grudge against Clinton because he commuted the sentence of the guy who killed their father.

The thing is, Broaddrick has told three different version of this story.

1) Clinton never touched her.
2) Clinton touched her, but Hillary didn't know about it.
3) Clinton touched her, and Hillary intimidated her.

As a rule, when you change your story multiple times, you aren't telling the truth.


"You guys...."


Meaning these guys?

The New York Times

MSNBC

The Atlantic

Slate

Vox


The problem is that the morons who were ordered to defend the rapist....Clinton....are not bright enough to keep up with the change in the propaganda.


And.....perhaps you failed to get the memo about not supporting pedophiles, too.....
 
Of course she was, but lefties don't know this because their media keeps them in the dark.
slick got away with rape and the victim is victimized a second time [at least]
Agree....though this just might be changing.

Old Slick Willie might finally get his just deserts.

Naw, it's unlikely, but you guys keep dreaming.

Juanita Brodderick was a liar 20 years ago and she's a liar now.
She has mental/emotional issues.



And, these Liberal outlets now admitting what we on the Right have said for decades about the rapist Clinton.....are you claiming that they have "mental/emotional issues" too?



The New York Times

MSNBC

The Atlantic

Slate


Vox
 
The problem is that the morons who were ordered to defend the rapist....Clinton....are not bright enough to keep up with the change in the propaganda.

Or that you still haven't presented any proof. I Guess it's easier to take Brodderick at her word when everyone has forgotten how many times they caught her lying in the past.

But she still lied.
 
And you leftist stooges can't figure out why you think your Goddess Clinton is so innocent, hasn't lied, hasn't sold you out lmfao. Hasn't raped ( Bill) gawd no wonder she said your all losers easy to manipulate..

upload_2017-11-25_11-31-1.png
 
The problem is that the morons who were ordered to defend the rapist....Clinton....are not bright enough to keep up with the change in the propaganda.

Or that you still haven't presented any proof. I Guess it's easier to take Brodderick at her word when everyone has forgotten how many times they caught her lying in the past.

But she still lied.



Let's see....on the one side is you, sleaze....on the other:

The New York Times

MSNBC

The Atlantic

Slate

Vox
 
And you leftist stooges can't figure out why you think your Goddess Clinton is so innocent, hasn't lied, hasn't sold you out lmfao. Hasn't raped ( Bill) gawd no wonder she said your all losers easy to manipulate..

View attachment 162623


I kinda liked this....

"In Mrs. Clinton’s America, spiritual inspiration exists to pursue redistributive materialism, all “progress” apart from a little doughty self-help is the result of state intervention, the state has a practically unlimited right and duty to correct meritocratic as well as inherited or exploitive socioeconomic imbalances, and the U.S. Democratic party must be a secular church militant where those who oppose abortions (about half the American public) are, along with many other large groups, unwelcome.

This isn’t really Christianity or democracy; it easily slips into rank acquisition of votes with the money of part of the electorate in a cynical and corrupt manner..."
Mrs. Clinton Convicts Herself In Stunning Display of Rage At What Happened in 2016 - The New York Sun
 

Forum List

Back
Top