Joy Behar Accuses Musk of Being ‘Pro-Apartheid,’ Begs Not to Be Sued

No, we didn't. That was your propagandists lying thier asses off to the little suckers like you who accept everthing you're told by your democrat clergy.
We learned that. You didn’t because it was kept from you.


She went to Syria 8 years ago and got put on the no fly list less than a year ago. What propaganda don't you parrot?? And when do leftists learn that meeting with your enemy is called diplomacy and fact finding?

And LOL, you're finally right. Tulsi was put on the TERROR watch list by Biden.
Her claims have yet to be substantiated. But it wasn’t a no fly list and the fact that she met with a terrorist supporter is absolutely true even though she has a hard time being honest about it.
In his interview in New York City, Nicole Wallace asked him, “It’s hard to imagine two FBI agents ending up in the State Room. How did that happen?” The audience erupted when Comey said dryly, “I sent them. Something we’ve, I probably wouldn’t have done or maybe gotten away with in a more organized investigation, a more organized administration. In the George W. Bush administration … or the Obama administration, two men that all of us, perhaps, have increased appreciation for over the last two years. In both of those administrations there was process.” He revealed, “So if the FBI wanted to send agents into the White House itself to interview a senior official, you would work through the White House counsel and there would be discussions and approvals and it would be there. I thought, ‘It’s early enough, let’s just send a couple of guys over.’”

Just send a couple of guys over. One line could not more aptly capture Comey and his own professed view of “ethical leadership.” The interview confirmed what some of us have written about Comey for more than two years. The media consistently reinforced his image as a rules driven and principled public servant, often referring to him as an almost naive Eagle Scout. The Washington Post even ran the headline, “Boy Scout James Comey is no match for Donald Trump.” Yet, the history of Comey shows both an overriding interest in his own actions as well as a willingness to violate rules to achieve that interest. But his comments, including a call to the public to defeat Trump in a “landslide” in the next election, have stripped away any remaining pretense. The fact is, there often was more pretense than principle in his final years as director.
This is far different than your accusation that he was set up. All Comey said was that he sent some guys to ask him questions. Flynn is the one that decided to lie.

You’re defaming Comey now.
The FBI investigation of former President Donald Trump’s alleged collusion with Russia in 2016 was “seriously flawed” and had no basis in evidence, special counsel John Durham said in a report released Monday.

Durham concluded his four-year review with a scathing indictment of official bias in the probe, which fueled Pulitzer Prize-winning coverage of Trump’s theorized conspiracy with the Kremlin to win the White House.

“It is the Office’s assessment that the FBI discounted or willfully ignored material information that did not support the narrative of a collusive relationship between Trump and Russia,” Durham wrote.

“Similarly, the FBI Inspection Division Report says that the investigators ‘repeatedly ignore[d] or explain[ed] away evidence contrary to the theory the Trump campaign… had conspired with Russia… It appeared that … there was a pattern of assuming nefarious intent,'” he added.
Durham said they were justified in opening a preliminary matter and not an investigation. A distinction narrow enough that it’s merely a matter of opinion.

Durham failed to identify any actual misconduct worthy of prosecution, although he did try to maliciously prosecute two people who were identified as enemies of Trump.
 
OK, I've wasted enough time replying to a cult member who has NO facts, no links to back up his opinions and is not the brightest bulb. Done here, to the scroll heap with you.
You know what’s different about all your little examples. These decisions came from bureaucrats who are not political.

Trump’s administration has none of that anymore. All decisions are political.

That’s what’s so intimidating to people.
 
If calling someone pro-apartheid isn’t protected, does that also mean that calling by someone pro-communism isn’t protected?
 

Joy Behar Accuses Musk of Being ‘Pro-Apartheid,’ Begs Not to Be Sued

27 Feb 2025 ~~ By Nicholas Fondacaro

The liberals are everything they accuse conservatives of being. During the Thursday edition of ABC’s The View, co-host Joy Behar went on an anti-immigrant tirade directed at billionaire Elon Musk. She viciously attacked him for being born in South Africa – something he had no choice in, accused him – without evidence – of being “pro-apartheid,” a “foreign agent” and “enemy of the United States,” and when she finally was told he was a naturalized citizen, she scoffed and wondered if he came in illegally.
And in an apparent attempt at heading off a possible defamation suit, she begged Musk not to sue her while weakly walking back only one of the baseless accusations.
Behar was coming unglued as she bloviated about how “Elon Musk kisses [President Donald Trump’s] butt and strokes his tiny ego or big ego, whatever it is.”
She apparently though people born elsewhere were beneath her and that only Americans born in the country should work for the government. She sneered as she decried how Musk “was not born in this country.”
And despite the fact that Musk was a child during and through the end of apartheid, Behar claimed it was something he embraced: “[He] was born under apartheid in South Africa, so has that mentality going on. He was pro-apartheid as I understand it!”
~Snip~
Behar apparently got a talking to during the commercial break, because when they came back she whined about “getting some flack because I said that Musk was pro-apartheid.” She refused to actually apologize but admitted that she had no evidence. And despite the facts, she suggested it was an unknown:
I was just going to say, now I'm getting some flack because I said that Musk was pro-apartheid. I don't really know for sure if he was. He grew up in that time when apartheid was full blown before the great Nelson Mandela fixed that. He was around at that time. But maybe he was, maybe he wasn't. He might have been a young guy too.
She then begged Musk not to sue her for defamation. “So don't be suing me, okay, Elon?” she said.


Commentary:
This has to be very hard on the Brooklyn born Shrew. Her racist mouth is going to get her rabbit's rump into hot water.
Behar is just another ignorant hack that verbally pukes what is handed to her. She is fortunate she doesn't have to think, breath or eat.
Behar puts out more lies and propaganda for the Communists. Take her down and the others will get the message due to her high visibility on the View. She is not a journalist and has no protections as such like making an apology on air. Bankrupt her like they tried to do to Trump and Giuliani.
At the least Elon Musk should sue her into the poor house.
Maybe Joy Behar can join Joy Reid in the unemployment line.
 
Please link to anything I posted about Biden that was not true. Please avail yourself to the defenses to libel and slander. Truth is paramount. Gotcha.
Easy.
Unauthorized storage and possession of classified documents in a garage next to the Vette, failure to secure the border, accepting bribes from Burisma. That's for starters.
 
Did Musk sue Behar? And if he does, it will be up to a court to decide if she libeled him, not you.

Musk got sued for the EXACTLY one example you could come up with after saying "Musk does it all the time." Guess what? He won.

You have one of the most serious cases of TDS on this board. Now its metastisized to MDS.

Be careful, those might be terminal.
Like many. many others, Trump's reelection has broken him. Perhaps permanently
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom