Marener
Diamond Member
- Jul 26, 2022
- 47,015
- 20,447
- 2,173
We learned that. You didn’t because it was kept from you.No, we didn't. That was your propagandists lying thier asses off to the little suckers like you who accept everthing you're told by your democrat clergy.

As IRS Targeted Tea Party Groups, It Went After Progressives Too
After three years of congressional hearings and three inspector-general audits, the scandal still ricochets around Capitol Hill.

Her claims have yet to be substantiated. But it wasn’t a no fly list and the fact that she met with a terrorist supporter is absolutely true even though she has a hard time being honest about it.She went to Syria 8 years ago and got put on the no fly list less than a year ago. What propaganda don't you parrot?? And when do leftists learn that meeting with your enemy is called diplomacy and fact finding?
And LOL, you're finally right. Tulsi was put on the TERROR watch list by Biden.
This is far different than your accusation that he was set up. All Comey said was that he sent some guys to ask him questions. Flynn is the one that decided to lie.In his interview in New York City, Nicole Wallace asked him, “It’s hard to imagine two FBI agents ending up in the State Room. How did that happen?” The audience erupted when Comey said dryly, “I sent them. Something we’ve, I probably wouldn’t have done or maybe gotten away with in a more organized investigation, a more organized administration. In the George W. Bush administration … or the Obama administration, two men that all of us, perhaps, have increased appreciation for over the last two years. In both of those administrations there was process.” He revealed, “So if the FBI wanted to send agents into the White House itself to interview a senior official, you would work through the White House counsel and there would be discussions and approvals and it would be there. I thought, ‘It’s early enough, let’s just send a couple of guys over.’”
Just send a couple of guys over. One line could not more aptly capture Comey and his own professed view of “ethical leadership.” The interview confirmed what some of us have written about Comey for more than two years. The media consistently reinforced his image as a rules driven and principled public servant, often referring to him as an almost naive Eagle Scout. The Washington Post even ran the headline, “Boy Scout James Comey is no match for Donald Trump.” Yet, the history of Comey shows both an overriding interest in his own actions as well as a willingness to violate rules to achieve that interest. But his comments, including a call to the public to defeat Trump in a “landslide” in the next election, have stripped away any remaining pretense. The fact is, there often was more pretense than principle in his final years as director.
You’re defaming Comey now.
Durham said they were justified in opening a preliminary matter and not an investigation. A distinction narrow enough that it’s merely a matter of opinion.The FBI investigation of former President Donald Trump’s alleged collusion with Russia in 2016 was “seriously flawed” and had no basis in evidence, special counsel John Durham said in a report released Monday.
Durham concluded his four-year review with a scathing indictment of official bias in the probe, which fueled Pulitzer Prize-winning coverage of Trump’s theorized conspiracy with the Kremlin to win the White House.
“It is the Office’s assessment that the FBI discounted or willfully ignored material information that did not support the narrative of a collusive relationship between Trump and Russia,” Durham wrote.
“Similarly, the FBI Inspection Division Report says that the investigators ‘repeatedly ignore[d] or explain[ed] away evidence contrary to the theory the Trump campaign… had conspired with Russia… It appeared that … there was a pattern of assuming nefarious intent,'” he added.
Durham failed to identify any actual misconduct worthy of prosecution, although he did try to maliciously prosecute two people who were identified as enemies of Trump.