The Light of Truth
- Sep 26, 2007
- Reaction score
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/...ce-assault-weapon-bans-reduce-mass-shootings/A study released by the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health declares there is no evidence “assault weapon” bans lead to a lower “incidence of fatal mass shootings.”
The push for an “assault weapons” ban is central to the Democrats’ gun control agenda nationally and is front and center for Democrats at the state level in places like Arizona and Virginia.
According to the Johns Hopkins study, researchers”did not find an independent association between assault weapon bans and the incidence of fatal mass shootings.”
I guess the VA Democrats have their "study" - eh?
Everyone - including those who support these bans - already knew this, of course, as 'assault weapons' bans do nothing to reduce access to 'assault weapons' - people still have access to existing weapons as well as new weapons that are modified to not fall under the ban.
And so, you must ask yourself:
Why do people who know bans on 'assault weapons' do not, will not, and can not affect the incidence of mass shootings, still support said bans?