Joe The World's Dumbest Politician Biden Says He’d Defy Subpoena to Testify in Trump’s Senate Trial

[LoneLaugher]

This whole blaming Republicans for what dems are doing is getting to be old hat.
Especially when we have Sideshow Biden admitting to quid pro quo on ******* video.

Are you aware of the facts surrounding that video clip? If so, why are you pushing lies? If not, why are you so ******* incurious?

What part of the video confuses you?

None of it. Why are you unable to grasp the concept and characterize it accurately? Are you a moron?

 

[LoneLaugher]

Why should he? If it is cool for Trump's people to say "no thanks" then it is cool for him to do so also.

Yep. We've all pretty much thrown law out the window and expect the other side to follow what they flaunt.

Unlike Trombies, I will demand that Biden testify if he is subpoenaed and Roberts approves the line of questioning as relevant to the proceedings.

The only one that has to approve of it is McConnell.

Incorrect. Roberts may very well take an active role. We don't know yet. There are very few "rules" for how this trial is supposed to be run. Try learning first and then typing.

Roberts who? Are you talking about Justice John Roberts? He would have nothing to do with it.

You really need to pay attention. It's embarrassing.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

This whole blaming Republicans for what dems are doing is getting to be old hat.
Especially when we have Sideshow Biden admitting to quid pro quo on ******* video.

Are you aware of the facts surrounding that video clip? If so, why are you pushing lies? If not, why are you so ******* incurious?

What part of the video confuses you?

None of it. Why are you unable to grasp the concept and characterize it accurately? Are you a moron?

You keep flapping your lips but nothing is coming out as far as clarifying your position.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

It would be cool if the nutbags demanding that Congress go to court to get Mulvaney and others to obey their subpoenaes would accept two facts.

1) These refusals to testify have no legal standing. They will almost certainly end up with the courts ordering that they obey the subpoenaes. In other words, the refusal is a clear attempt to obstruct justice.

2) The courts are under no obligation to hear these cases in a timely manner. They could take a very long time. That's the point.

1. Then why didn't the Democrats go to court? If there was no legal standing, they'd have gotten a ruling inside a week.

2. Correct. The courts are a separate AND EQUAL branch of government. They do not have to jump through any hoop congress sets for them.

Well. Nobody can ever accuse you of talking out of both sides of your vomit hole. Can they?

You’re one to point fingers, Lone Leftist. In your world everyone is a victim.

 

[jknowgood]

This whole blaming Republicans for what dems are doing is getting to be old hat.
Especially when we have Sideshow Biden admitting to quid pro quo on ******* video.

Are you aware of the facts surrounding that video clip? If so, why are you pushing lies? If not, why are you so ******* incurious?

What part of the video confuses you?

None of it. Why are you unable to grasp the concept and characterize it accurately? Are you a moron?

If Trump did the exact same thing, you would want him in jail.

 

[DOTR]

Joe Biden campaigning in New Mexico:,,,,,its great to be here in the beautiful state of East Carolina !!!

He learned from his mentors visits to all 57 states.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Yep. We've all pretty much thrown law out the window and expect the other side to follow what they flaunt.

Unlike Trombies, I will demand that Biden testify if he is subpoenaed and Roberts approves the line of questioning as relevant to the proceedings.

The only one that has to approve of it is McConnell.

Incorrect. Roberts may very well take an active role. We don't know yet. There are very few "rules" for how this trial is supposed to be run. Try learning first and then typing.

Roberts who? Are you talking about Justice John Roberts? He would have nothing to do with it.

You really need to pay attention. It's embarrassing.

All you said was Roberts. Roberts who? Perhaps you were talking with somebody I have on ignore, so I don't know what Roberts you speak of.

 

[LeeOnLido]

Biden.......I've campaigned in all 13 states!

 

[LoneLaugher]

This whole blaming Republicans for what dems are doing is getting to be old hat.
Especially when we have Sideshow Biden admitting to quid pro quo on ******* video.

Are you aware of the facts surrounding that video clip? If so, why are you pushing lies? If not, why are you so ******* incurious?

What part of the video confuses you?

None of it. Why are you unable to grasp the concept and characterize it accurately? Are you a moron?

You keep flapping your lips but nothing is coming out as far as clarifying your position.

My position is that, given the facts, Joe Biden asked for a proper quid pro quo in that video. His ask was for something...specifically a more
capable prosecutor to rid Ukraine of corruption, that benefited the US and the US's foreign policy goals. So...it was, in every way, A PERFECT VIDEO.

Asshole.

 

[LoneLaugher]

This whole blaming Republicans for what dems are doing is getting to be old hat.
Especially when we have Sideshow Biden admitting to quid pro quo on ******* video.

Are you aware of the facts surrounding that video clip? If so, why are you pushing lies? If not, why are you so ******* incurious?

What part of the video confuses you?

None of it. Why are you unable to grasp the concept and characterize it accurately? Are you a moron?

If Trump did the exact same thing, you would want him in jail.

No. You are intentionally misrepresenting what Biden did there....or you are a moron.

 

[LoneLaugher]

Unlike Trombies, I will demand that Biden testify if he is subpoenaed and Roberts approves the line of questioning as relevant to the proceedings.

The only one that has to approve of it is McConnell.

Incorrect. Roberts may very well take an active role. We don't know yet. There are very few "rules" for how this trial is supposed to be run. Try learning first and then typing.

Roberts who? Are you talking about Justice John Roberts? He would have nothing to do with it.

You really need to pay attention. It's embarrassing.

All you said was Roberts. Roberts who? Perhaps you were talking with somebody I have on ignore, so I don't know what Roberts you speak of.

Justice John Roberts....the dude who will preside over the Senate impeachment trial for President Donald J. Trump.

 

[jknowgood]

This whole blaming Republicans for what dems are doing is getting to be old hat.
Especially when we have Sideshow Biden admitting to quid pro quo on ******* video.

Are you aware of the facts surrounding that video clip? If so, why are you pushing lies? If not, why are you so ******* incurious?

What part of the video confuses you?

None of it. Why are you unable to grasp the concept and characterize it accurately? Are you a moron?

If Trump did the exact same thing, you would want him in jail.

No. You are intentionally misrepresenting what Biden did there....or you are a moron.

Nope, Biden wanted the investigating his son's company fired or they wouldn't get the money. Well son of a *****. They fired him.

 

[LoneLaugher]

Are you aware of the facts surrounding that video clip? If so, why are you pushing lies? If not, why are you so ******* incurious?

What part of the video confuses you?

None of it. Why are you unable to grasp the concept and characterize it accurately? Are you a moron?

If Trump did the exact same thing, you would want him in jail.

No. You are intentionally misrepresenting what Biden did there....or you are a moron.

Nope, Biden wanted the investigating his son's company fired or they wouldn't get the money. Well son of a *****. They fired him.

That is false.

Are you going to stick with that lie even though you know that it is a lie?

If so....what is the point of you even trying?

 

[jknowgood]

What part of the video confuses you?

None of it. Why are you unable to grasp the concept and characterize it accurately? Are you a moron?

If Trump did the exact same thing, you would want him in jail.

No. You are intentionally misrepresenting what Biden did there....or you are a moron.

Nope, Biden wanted the investigating his son's company fired or they wouldn't get the money. Well son of a *****. They fired him.

That is false.

Are you going to stick with that lie even though you know that it is a lie?

If so....what is the point of you even trying?

His own words in a video. Him and his son take air force 2 to China and Hunter comes back with millions. While earning $50,000 a month in Ukraine. Not bad for a vice presidents son. Oh, and Pelosi"s son did well in Ukraine. By supporting them, you are the problem.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

This whole blaming Republicans for what dems are doing is getting to be old hat.
Especially when we have Sideshow Biden admitting to quid pro quo on ******* video.

Are you aware of the facts surrounding that video clip? If so, why are you pushing lies? If not, why are you so ******* incurious?

What part of the video confuses you?

None of it. Why are you unable to grasp the concept and characterize it accurately? Are you a moron?

You keep flapping your lips but nothing is coming out as far as clarifying your position.

My position is that, given the facts, Joe Biden asked for a proper quid pro quo in that video. His ask was for something...specifically a more
capable prosecutor to rid Ukraine of corruption, that benefited the US and the US's foreign policy goals. So...it was, in every way, A PERFECT VIDEO.

Asshole.

You stupid ****!!!
Barisma is corrupt as hell!!!

 

[LoneLaugher]

Are you aware of the facts surrounding that video clip? If so, why are you pushing lies? If not, why are you so ******* incurious?

What part of the video confuses you?

None of it. Why are you unable to grasp the concept and characterize it accurately? Are you a moron?

You keep flapping your lips but nothing is coming out as far as clarifying your position.

My position is that, given the facts, Joe Biden asked for a proper quid pro quo in that video. His ask was for something...specifically a more
capable prosecutor to rid Ukraine of corruption, that benefited the US and the US's foreign policy goals. So...it was, in every way, A PERFECT VIDEO.

Asshole.

You stupid ****!!!
Barisma is corrupt as hell!!!

Yep. And Biden was seeking a tougher prosecutor to investigate said corruption.

If you guy would stop lying, you'd have nothing to say. It is really odd.

 

[jknowgood]

What part of the video confuses you?

None of it. Why are you unable to grasp the concept and characterize it accurately? Are you a moron?

You keep flapping your lips but nothing is coming out as far as clarifying your position.

My position is that, given the facts, Joe Biden asked for a proper quid pro quo in that video. His ask was for something...specifically a more
capable prosecutor to rid Ukraine of corruption, that benefited the US and the US's foreign policy goals. So...it was, in every way, A PERFECT VIDEO.

Asshole.

You stupid ****!!!
Barisma is corrupt as hell!!!

Yep. And Biden was seeking a tougher prosecutor to investigate said corruption.

If you guy would stop lying, you'd have nothing to say. It is really odd.

Lol, Biden was a part of the corruption. That's what the prosecuter was investigating. When Biden forced them to fire him.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

What part of the video confuses you?

None of it. Why are you unable to grasp the concept and characterize it accurately? Are you a moron?

You keep flapping your lips but nothing is coming out as far as clarifying your position.

My position is that, given the facts, Joe Biden asked for a proper quid pro quo in that video. His ask was for something...specifically a more
capable prosecutor to rid Ukraine of corruption, that benefited the US and the US's foreign policy goals. So...it was, in every way, A PERFECT VIDEO.

Asshole.

You stupid ****!!!
Barisma is corrupt as hell!!!

Yep. And Biden was seeking a tougher prosecutor to investigate said corruption.

If you guy would stop lying, you'd have nothing to say. It is really odd.

So Hunter working at a job he had zero experience in for 50k a month was on the up and up?
I got a bridge to sell ya.....

 

[LoneLaugher]

None of it. Why are you unable to grasp the concept and characterize it accurately? Are you a moron?

You keep flapping your lips but nothing is coming out as far as clarifying your position.

My position is that, given the facts, Joe Biden asked for a proper quid pro quo in that video. His ask was for something...specifically a more
capable prosecutor to rid Ukraine of corruption, that benefited the US and the US's foreign policy goals. So...it was, in every way, A PERFECT VIDEO.

Asshole.

You stupid ****!!!
Barisma is corrupt as hell!!!

Yep. And Biden was seeking a tougher prosecutor to investigate said corruption.

If you guy would stop lying, you'd have nothing to say. It is really odd.

Lol, Biden was a part of the corruption. That's what the prosecuter was investigating. When Biden forced them to fire him.

That is a false statement. You are now done. Liars suck.

 

[LoneLaugher]

None of it. Why are you unable to grasp the concept and characterize it accurately? Are you a moron?

You keep flapping your lips but nothing is coming out as far as clarifying your position.

My position is that, given the facts, Joe Biden asked for a proper quid pro quo in that video. His ask was for something...specifically a more
capable prosecutor to rid Ukraine of corruption, that benefited the US and the US's foreign policy goals. So...it was, in every way, A PERFECT VIDEO.

Asshole.

You stupid ****!!!
Barisma is corrupt as hell!!!

Yep. And Biden was seeking a tougher prosecutor to investigate said corruption.

If you guy would stop lying, you'd have nothing to say. It is really odd.

So Hunter working at a job he had zero experience in for 50k a month was on the up and up?
I got a bridge to sell ya.....

That has nothing to do with the video.
It was shady....as in nepotism shady and looks bad shady. He shouldn't have taken the gig. Joe
should have told him to refuse. But he didn't. Looks bad.

But there is no evidence of ant corruption between Joe Biden and Burisma. None. They were
investigated. Nothing. Stop lying.