Where did you get your info that he was?
The fat one?
Try this
"which Trump based his assertion – that Joe Biden had Shokin removed to stop him investigating wrongdoing in his son’s gas company – has already been widely debunked.
Put simply, the chronology doesn’t work – the investigation into
Burisma, where Hunter worked, was dormant by the time Shokin was pushed out. It would also represent a major historical anomaly. During Shokin’s 13 months in office, not one major figure was convicted. No oligarch. No politician. No ranking bureaucrat. It would appear unlikely he was in the middle of breaking the habit with the Bidens"
IT WAS DORMANT.
HAS BEEN WIDELY DEBUNKED
gawd google The Independent uk for gods sake.
You believe the 16000 lies teen peeking guy?
Ex-Ukraine prosecutor said he was told to back off probe of Biden-linked firm, files show
View attachment 297079
Oct 2, 2019 · Ukraine controversy brings focus to Hunter Biden's ... Shokin in which he claimed that his “investigations stopped out of ... him that the investigation has to be handled with white gloves,
You know only what the demonRAT/Socialists spoon feed you and the MSM regurgitates.....your IQ is getting lower with each of your bullshit posts!.. ROTFLMFAO!
Sakvarelidze has told the Kyiv Post that Shokin and his first deputy Yury Sevruk had been sabotaging efforts to prosecute Korniyets and Shapakin and cleanse the prosecutor’s office of corrupt and incompetent officials. Shokin and Sevruk deny the accusations.
Sakvarelidze and other opponents of Shokin say that Korniyets and Shapakin are protégés of Shokin and Sevruk.
Critics say Shokin could even be involved in the alleged corruption schemes of the “diamond prosecutors.” Sakvarelidze said on March 24 that a copy of Shokin’s passport and his land registration documents had been found in Korniyets’ house.
Demonstrators protest Shokin's firing of anti-corruption prosecutors - Mar. 25, 2016
------------------------------------------------
no amount of news articles matters to you, not even the truth.
Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today it has filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against the State Department seeking documents related to a reported “untouchables list” given in late 2016 by former U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Marie Yovanovitch to Ukraine Prosecutor General Yuriy Lutsenko.
Lutsenko recently
told The New York Times that Yovanovitch “pressed him not to prosecute anti-corruption activists.” Lutsenko previously reportedly
said the do-not-prosecute list included a founder of the Ukraine group
Anti-Corruption Action Centre (AntAC), which was funded by George Soros foundations and the U.S. federal government, and two members of the Ukrainian Parliament who vocally supported the Soros
group’s agenda:
The implied message to Ukraine’s prosecutors was clear: Don’t target AntAC in the middle of an American presidential election in which Soros was
backing Hillary Clinton to succeed another Soros favorite, Barack Obama, Ukrainian officials said.
Recently, Rudy Giuliani
stated that AntAC “was co-funded by the Obama administration and far-left billionaire financier George Soros,” and “was ironically under investigation for alleged corruption, namely a ‘misplaced’ $4.4 million in U.S. funds designated to ‘fight corruption inside the former Soviet republic,’ during the 2016 presidential election in America.”
Amb. Yovanovitch, who was recalled from her Ukraine post in May of this year by President Donald Trump, was a key witness for Democrats last month in their public impeachment hearings. Yovanovitch
denied providing any do-not-prosecute “list.”
Judicial Watch filed the lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia after the State Department failed to respond to a September 24, 2019, FOIA request (
Judicial Watch vs. U.S. Department of State) (No. 1:19-cv-03563) seeking:
- All records of communication between the Department of State and any representative of the Ukrainian government regarding any actual or proposed investigation or prosecution of the AntAC; the International Renaissance Foundation [Open Society Foundations’ office in Ukraine]; and/or Transparency International.
- All records concerning any meeting or telephonic conversation between former Ambassador Marie Yovanovitch and former Ukrainian Prosecutor General Yuriy Lutsenko.
- All records related to the list of individuals and entities provided to Lutsenko by Yovanovitch in late 2016.
“Reports suggest that the Ukrainian Embassy was a hotbed of anti-Trump, Deep State activism and tried to promote and protect leftist allies in Ukraine and the United States,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “As the coup attack on President Trump continues, this new federal lawsuit is designed to get to the real truth of the Deep State’s games in Ukraine.”
On October 9, 2019, Judicial Watch filed
a FOIA request for State Department records related to the possibly illegal collection of information by Yovanovitch on prominent conservative figures, journalists and persons with ties to President Donald Trump.
###
RELATED
TOM FITTON'S VIDEO WEEKLY UPDATE
Judicial Watch Sues FBI/DOJ for Emails Tied to So-Called Whistleblower
DECEMBER 27, 2019 | JUDICIAL WATCH
Judicial Watch Sues DOJ and CIA for Docs on Eric Ciaramella Happy New Year! Judicial Watch Sues DOJ and CIA for Documents on Eric Ciaramella As the impeachment/coup against Presid...
PRESS RELEASES
Judicial Watch Sues CIA and DOJ for Communications of CIA Analyst
DECEMBER 27, 2019 | JUDICIAL WATCH
(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today that it filed Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuits against both the DOJ and CIA for communications of CIA employee Eric Ciar...
IN THE NEWS
Judicial Watch Sues for Documents Related to Former Ukraine Ambassador Marie Yovanovitch’s Alleged Intervention with Ukraine Prosecutor - Judicial Watch