I HOPE THEY’RE PREPARED TO BE DISAPPOINTED:
33 Groups Urge Illegitimate Biden to Reject Big Tech Appointments to His Cabinet.
As you prepare for the presidential transition, we write to urge you to reject the influence of these corporations by committing to exclude Big Tech executives, lobbyists, lawyers and consultants from your administration. Amazon, Apple, Facebook, Google, and Microsoft once promised innovation and opportunity, and while they continue to provide many remarkable products, they now represent serious threats to privacy, democracy, innovation, and Americans’ economic well-being.
If they'll pay like China pays, Illegitimate Joe is their best friend!
Each of these companies have developed predatory business practices that harvest user data for profit. Over the last few years, we have seen how Facebook and Google irresponsibly wield immense influence over democratic elections, without oversight or accountability.
Well, yes — and now that they’ve used that influence to buy access to the White House, they’re going to get it, Big Time.
They're gonna this and they're gonna that. Biden was just elected, yes? Let's wait and see what They're gonna do.
One good thing is that they're not gonna deploy amateurs around the world to represent our nation in world affairs.
Another thing that they're not gonna do is to appoint "yes" men to the inner circle.
Another thing that they're gonna do is to encourage opposing viewpoints on subject matter and not fire people who disagree with the President.
Another thing that they're gonna do is to bring women and people of color into leadership positions of power.
In fact, they have already started this process in case you haven't noticed.
That's a lot of happy nonsense. What matters is talent and ability not gonads and melanin.
Will they back up Big Crony Corporatists who want to whipsaw the American Worker against the Lying Outlaw Slavers in China, or will they stand up for our American Workers?
Does it bother you that we all know the answer?
WHAT OUR WOKE CORPORATIONS DO IN BETWEEN LECTURING THE REST OF US ON DECENCY:
Report: Nike, Coke, other companies lobbying against bill that would ban goods made with slave labor of Uighurs in Xinjiang.
What bothers me is that you don't know the answer and are making silly assumptions that mean nothing.
Let's see what transpires. The fact is that the voters are sick of trump, and his shenanigans these past few weeks are only serving to solidify their feelings about him as he now is putting a strain on our democracy. Trump lost and he
needs to put his oversized ego aside and let our new administration move forward and govern.
Fake News. When the Left made certain that cheating could occur, they did so so they could cheat. That's the whole purpose for making sure cheating can occur.
We have every right to closely examine the election and you folks are only against it because you are concerned that your theft will be uncovered and safeguards put into place so that you cannot continue to cheat.
If you were confident that you won fairly you would be welcoming the examination. Examination does not undercut confidence, resisting it does. But, we all know that Biden stole it.
They revealed themselves as complete cheats, and only ended up with old Lame Duck Joe while they were badly beaten everywhere else. That's fine. He's a one termer. Our job now is to make sure that this is the very last presidency that is stolen.
The Epoch Times,
The Republican plaintiffs who are challenging legislation that allowed mail-in ballots from all comers in Pennsylvania, today filed a request to the Supreme Court to block the state from certifying the corrupt election.
The state Supreme Court had dismissed the case on Nov. 28, overturning a temporary block on election certification issued by a lower court.
Challenging that ruling, the emergency application for injunction, dated Dec. 1,
asks the Supreme Court to prohibit the Pennsylvania governor and secretary of state from “taking official action to tabulate, compute, canvass, certify, or otherwise finalize the results of the election.”
“To the extent that the above-prohibited actions have already taken place, petitioners seek an injunction to restore the status quo ante, compelling respondents to nullify any such actions already taken, until further order of this court,” says the petition.
The emergency application essentially asks the court to put a temporary hold on certifying the state election pending the filing of a full writ of certiorari - asking the court to review the lower court decisions.
The case was filed by Rep. Mike Kelly (R-Pa.) and others. They claim that
an act passed last year by the state legislature that allows voting by mail without excuse
violated the state constitution.
The state Supreme Court dismissed the case with prejudice, saying that the lawsuit had not been filed in a “timely manner,” since the act in question was
signed into law on Oct. 31, 2019.
That ruling, however, appears to leave open the broader merits of the case - that the law, Act 77, requires an amendment to the state constitution.
One of the plaintiffs, Republican congressional candidate Sean Parnell, told
KDKA on Nov. 30:
“While we believe that Act 77 is certainly a state issue, we also believe that there are very important federal questions nested within it. So what we’re doing is we’re looking to appeal to the Supreme Court on those federal questions.”
The petition, filed with Judge Samuel A. Alito, poses two questions for the Supreme Court to answer:
- Can a state violate its own constitutional restrictions without violating the U.S. constitutional clauses relating to elections and due process?
- And did the Pennsylvania Supreme Court violate the First and Fourteenth Amendments of the U.S. Constitution “by dismissing with prejudice the case below, on the basis of laches, thereby foreclosing any opportunity for petitioners to seek retrospective and prospective relief for ongoing constitutional violations?”
The state Supreme Court said on Nov. 28 that the petitioners waited until days before the county of boards of election were required to certify the election results, which
could “result in the disenfranchisement of millions of Pennsylvania voters” who voted by mail.
“It is beyond cavil that petitioners failed to act with due diligence in presenting the instant claim,” the court wrote.
Parnell told KDKA that it was a “Catch-22” situation.
“Had I filed it earlier, I would have probably not been able to bring the case into court because I wouldn’t have had legal standing,” he said.
“So they would have probably said, ‘Well, the harm that you’re alleging is speculative.'”
Parnell said that the case was not about whether mail-in ballots are good or bad per se, but about state constitutional procedure.
“Democrat or Republican, if the citizen learns that his law is unconstitutional, it’s our duty and responsibility as citizens to challenge that law.”
The lawsuit is filed against the state, the majority Republican general assembly, Gov. Tom Wolf, and Pennsylvania Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar.
