RealDave
Gold Member
- Sep 28, 2016
- 26,521
- 3,565
- 290
You still haven't said why Manafort gave their internal polling to the Russians. Why is that?You need to step out of your bubble.You forgot to tell me why Manafort sent their internal polling to the Russians.ANY DAY NOW NO REALLYRussia did interfere & to Trump's advantage.Y'all screeched for almost 4 years the Trump campaign colluded with Russia. You kept insisting the evidence would be provided "any day now! No, really!"
View attachment 422973
"Screw what over 80 million Americans affirm in a free and fair election!
You don't need any actual friggin' evidence for what some right-wing nut job tweets if it is about TV!"
NOW you insist if the evidence of election fraud isn't produced RIGHT NOW, it doesn't exist.
If it weren't for double standards, leftists would have no standards at all.
The Trump campaign sent their internal polling to the Russians. Why?
Manafort shared polling data on 2016 election with elusive Russian – Mueller
Manafort, 69, also accused of covering up other meetings and contacts with Russian consultant Konstantin Kilimnikwww.theguardian.com
The only thing the investigation proved was that the Hillary Campaign colluded with foreign intelligence services and the Obama Admin spied on American citizens.
Clinton hired a opposition research firm. They sent one of their people to Russia ti see what Trump was doing there. That is not colluding you stupiud shit.
Colluding is sending the Russians polling details so they know where to concentrate their efforts.
In fact, the entire Russian collusion conspiracy that held the nation hostage for more than two years was the brainchild of a foreign national who was working on behalf of a sanctioned Russian oligarch with close ties to the Kremlin. At the same time he was telling the media that Trump was the undisclosed agent of Russia, that foreign national was lobbying the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) to ease up on his Russian benefactor.
As it turns out, the DOJ official being lobbied was the spouse of one of that foreign national’s co-workers at the firm that hired the two of them to foment Russian hysteria on behalf of the Clinton campaign. And in a twist almost too absurd for even the most bizarre Franz Kafka novel, that firm was itself working on behalf of a Russian billionaire’s corporation that had been charged by U.S. federal prosecutors with illegally evading U.S. sanctions.
That foreign spook-turned-international political provocateur was none other than Christopher Steele, the author of the infamous and utterly debunked Steele dossier that ignited a domestic firestorm after it was briefed to president-elect Trump in January 2016 and subsequently published in full by BuzzFeed. His Russian benefactor at the time was Oleg Deripaska. His co-conspirator at DOJ was Bruce Ohr, whose wife Nellie Ohr received more than $40,000 for her work for Fusion GPS, the Clinton campaign-sponsored opposition research firm that just so happened to be working on behalf of Prevezon, a company owned by Russian billionaire Denis Katsyv, during the 2016 campaign.
The curious Clinton campaign collusion connections don’t end there. Somehow it gets worse. The Russian attorney for Prevezon, which later settled charges of laundering money and violating sanctions in exchange for $5.9 million in fines paid to the DOJ, was none other than Natalia Veselnitskaya, who arranged the Trump Tower meeting with Donald Trump Jr. and Jared Kushner, a meeting that was alleged to be proof-positive that the Trump campaign had illegally colluded with the Russians during the 2016 campaign.
Unlike the fabulist musings of Steele, who by his own admission colluded with Kremlin officials as he prepared and disseminated his anti-Trump dossier, the Clinton-Russian connections are not the delusions of a deranged conspiracy theorist. They are documented and verified facts which for some reason escaped the attention of the scores of journalists and investigators who purported to root out any and all instances of foreign collusion during the 2016 election.
If you want to know what a Democrat's guilty of, look to see what she accuses Republicans of.