So what? The Japanese are obsessed with little school girl's 'dirty' panties. You can buy them from ******* vending machines in parts of Japan.
^^I didn't post that, ya dumbfuck. Learn how to use the quote feature. <smh>Don't blame me.I can hardly imagine your thinking on the subject of debt. Ha ha. Young people are so naive.
Next you'll tell us we owe a debt to China. Go ahead. Tell us.
I voted for Carter in 1980, before the wrecking ball
of Reaganomics came to town. In January, 1981, the national debt was
under a trillion and going down, and Reagan tripled it in his first term.
I don't give a shit if we agree or not. Don't replace my quotes with quotes from others. Learn how to use the quote feature. It's really not that complicated.^^I didn't post that, ya dumbfuck. Learn how to use the quote feature. <smh>Don't blame me.I can hardly imagine your thinking on the subject of debt. Ha ha. Young people are so naive.
Next you'll tell us we owe a debt to China. Go ahead. Tell us.
I voted for Carter in 1980, before the wrecking ball
of Reaganomics came to town. In January, 1981, the national debt was
under a trillion and going down, and Reagan tripled it in his first term.
Agrees with me, but is too busy being a dick to notice.
There you go again.
Moron, you posted someone's opinion. Opinion is not news.You are the liar, and I already posted the link showing that Shokin was actively investigating Burisma and the Biden bad boys. No it's not opinion. It is fact, backed up by FBI documentation. It looks like you didn't even read the link, much less the informative sublinks.Liar,Shokin never investigated Burisma.
Timeline in Ukraine Probe Casts Doubt on Giuliani’s Biden Claim
There’s little question that the Bidens’ paths in Ukraine held the potential for conflict, and in a tweet last week, Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani said the U.S. should investigate the matter. But what has received less attention is that at the time Biden made his ultimatum, the probe into the company -- Burisma Holdings, owned by Mykola Zlochevsky -- had been long dormant, according to the former official, Vitaliy Kasko.
“There was no pressure from anyone from the U.S. to close cases against Zlochevsky,” Kasko said in an interview last week. “It was shelved by Ukrainian prosecutors in 2014 and through 2015.”
[...]
The case against Zlochevsky and his Burisma Holdings was assigned to Shokin, then a deputy prosecutor. But Shokin and others weren’t pursuing it, according to the internal reports from the Ukrainian prosecutor’s office reviewed by Bloomberg.
In a December 2014 letter, U.S. officials warned Ukrainian prosecutors of negative consequences for Ukraine over its failure to assist the U.K., which had seized Zlochevsky’s assets, according to the documents.
Those funds, $23.5 million, were unblocked in 2015 when a British court determined there wasn’t enough evidence to justify the continued freeze, in part because Ukrainian prosecutors had failed to provide the necessary information.
Shokin became prosecutor general in February 2015. Over the next year, the U.S. and the International Monetary Fund criticized officials for not doing enough to fight corruption in Ukraine.
Shokin took no action to pursue cases against Zlochevsky throughout 2015, said Kasko, who was Shokin’s deputy overseeing international cooperation and helping in asset-recovery investigations. Kasko said he had urged Shokin to pursue the investigations.
I must say you have me at a disadvantage, since I can only post on a cell phone, and can't copypate extracts from an article, as you've been doing. But I shouldn't need to. The link shows that Shokin was investigating Burisma and the Bidens, and that's why corrupt Joe went after Shokin.
I've already wasted to much time and energy on this dopey subject involving a guy who has as much chance of becoming POTUS as a housefly. The fact that you think he does is just more evidence of your youthful folly.
We'll come back to this thread after the election.
Solomon: These once-secret memos cast doubt on Joe Biden's Ukraine story
Real journalists investigated this and determined Shokin sat on the investigation for about 2 years and never pursued Burisma.
And if you weren't ancient, you'd know how to copy & paste on your phone like I do.
Moron. Anybody can dodge the truth just by calling it "opinion". I'd say "nice try" if would have been.Moron, you posted someone's opinion. Opinion is not news.You are the liar, and I already posted the link showing that Shokin was actively investigating Burisma and the Biden bad boys. No it's not opinion. It is fact, backed up by FBI documentation. It looks like you didn't even read the link, much less the informative sublinks.Liar,
Timeline in Ukraine Probe Casts Doubt on Giuliani’s Biden Claim
There’s little question that the Bidens’ paths in Ukraine held the potential for conflict, and in a tweet last week, Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani said the U.S. should investigate the matter. But what has received less attention is that at the time Biden made his ultimatum, the probe into the company -- Burisma Holdings, owned by Mykola Zlochevsky -- had been long dormant, according to the former official, Vitaliy Kasko.
“There was no pressure from anyone from the U.S. to close cases against Zlochevsky,” Kasko said in an interview last week. “It was shelved by Ukrainian prosecutors in 2014 and through 2015.”
[...]
The case against Zlochevsky and his Burisma Holdings was assigned to Shokin, then a deputy prosecutor. But Shokin and others weren’t pursuing it, according to the internal reports from the Ukrainian prosecutor’s office reviewed by Bloomberg.
In a December 2014 letter, U.S. officials warned Ukrainian prosecutors of negative consequences for Ukraine over its failure to assist the U.K., which had seized Zlochevsky’s assets, according to the documents.
Those funds, $23.5 million, were unblocked in 2015 when a British court determined there wasn’t enough evidence to justify the continued freeze, in part because Ukrainian prosecutors had failed to provide the necessary information.
Shokin became prosecutor general in February 2015. Over the next year, the U.S. and the International Monetary Fund criticized officials for not doing enough to fight corruption in Ukraine.
Shokin took no action to pursue cases against Zlochevsky throughout 2015, said Kasko, who was Shokin’s deputy overseeing international cooperation and helping in asset-recovery investigations. Kasko said he had urged Shokin to pursue the investigations.
I must say you have me at a disadvantage, since I can only post on a cell phone, and can't copypate extracts from an article, as you've been doing. But I shouldn't need to. The link shows that Shokin was investigating Burisma and the Bidens, and that's why corrupt Joe went after Shokin.
I've already wasted to much time and energy on this dopey subject involving a guy who has as much chance of becoming POTUS as a housefly. The fact that you think he does is just more evidence of your youthful folly.
We'll come back to this thread after the election.
Solomon: These once-secret memos cast doubt on Joe Biden's Ukraine story
Real journalists investigated this and determined Shokin sat on the investigation for about 2 years and never pursued Burisma.
And if you weren't ancient, you'd know how to copy & paste on your phone like I do.
Lies are not proof. Here we go with liberals goofily expecting everybody to accept their definition of "proof". Bunch of liberal propaganders.LOLOLOLYou got your proof, bullshit boy.You claiming he did sans proof is merely another fail on your part, gramps. Your words are hollow and meaningless.He did, and that's the only reason why Biden went after him. And you think Burisma brought Hunter Biden in for his Ukranian energy expertise, did you ? Any doctors in the house ?Liar,
Timeline in Ukraine Probe Casts Doubt on Giuliani’s Biden Claim
There’s little question that the Bidens’ paths in Ukraine held the potential for conflict, and in a tweet last week, Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani said the U.S. should investigate the matter. But what has received less attention is that at the time Biden made his ultimatum, the probe into the company -- Burisma Holdings, owned by Mykola Zlochevsky -- had been long dormant, according to the former official, Vitaliy Kasko.
“There was no pressure from anyone from the U.S. to close cases against Zlochevsky,” Kasko said in an interview last week. “It was shelved by Ukrainian prosecutors in 2014 and through 2015.”
[...]
The case against Zlochevsky and his Burisma Holdings was assigned to Shokin, then a deputy prosecutor. But Shokin and others weren’t pursuing it, according to the internal reports from the Ukrainian prosecutor’s office reviewed by Bloomberg.
In a December 2014 letter, U.S. officials warned Ukrainian prosecutors of negative consequences for Ukraine over its failure to assist the U.K., which had seized Zlochevsky’s assets, according to the documents.
Those funds, $23.5 million, were unblocked in 2015 when a British court determined there wasn’t enough evidence to justify the continued freeze, in part because Ukrainian prosecutors had failed to provide the necessary information.
Shokin became prosecutor general in February 2015. Over the next year, the U.S. and the International Monetary Fund criticized officials for not doing enough to fight corruption in Ukraine.
Shokin took no action to pursue cases against Zlochevsky throughout 2015, said Kasko, who was Shokin’s deputy overseeing international cooperation and helping in asset-recovery investigations. Kasko said he had urged Shokin to pursue the investigations.
Dumbfuck -- opinion is not proof.
Practicing healthy self-defense is not obsession.
Yup. Indeed. Scared to talk about debt and China in the same sentence.DODGE. Scared to mention China ?The debt under Impeached Trump is the same as the debt under Obama, gramps.
Are you saying we don't owe China something like $1 trillion now ?
You must be young. America will never owe China anything. China will always owe it's entire existence to America.
Poor, deranged, gramps. It's not real just because you want to b'lieve it is. Prove Solomon's opinion is factual in that Shokin was actively investigating Burisma while actual news shows he sat on that case for 2 years and causing Great Britain to have to shut down their own investigation into Zlochevsky because Shokin was protecting Burisma's owner....Moron, you posted someone's opinion. Opinion is not news.You are the liar, and I already posted the link showing that Shokin was actively investigating Burisma and the Biden bad boys. No it's not opinion. It is fact, backed up by FBI documentation. It looks like you didn't even read the link, much less the informative sublinks.Liar,
Timeline in Ukraine Probe Casts Doubt on Giuliani’s Biden Claim
There’s little question that the Bidens’ paths in Ukraine held the potential for conflict, and in a tweet last week, Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani said the U.S. should investigate the matter. But what has received less attention is that at the time Biden made his ultimatum, the probe into the company -- Burisma Holdings, owned by Mykola Zlochevsky -- had been long dormant, according to the former official, Vitaliy Kasko.
“There was no pressure from anyone from the U.S. to close cases against Zlochevsky,” Kasko said in an interview last week. “It was shelved by Ukrainian prosecutors in 2014 and through 2015.”
[...]
The case against Zlochevsky and his Burisma Holdings was assigned to Shokin, then a deputy prosecutor. But Shokin and others weren’t pursuing it, according to the internal reports from the Ukrainian prosecutor’s office reviewed by Bloomberg.
In a December 2014 letter, U.S. officials warned Ukrainian prosecutors of negative consequences for Ukraine over its failure to assist the U.K., which had seized Zlochevsky’s assets, according to the documents.
Those funds, $23.5 million, were unblocked in 2015 when a British court determined there wasn’t enough evidence to justify the continued freeze, in part because Ukrainian prosecutors had failed to provide the necessary information.
Shokin became prosecutor general in February 2015. Over the next year, the U.S. and the International Monetary Fund criticized officials for not doing enough to fight corruption in Ukraine.
Shokin took no action to pursue cases against Zlochevsky throughout 2015, said Kasko, who was Shokin’s deputy overseeing international cooperation and helping in asset-recovery investigations. Kasko said he had urged Shokin to pursue the investigations.
I must say you have me at a disadvantage, since I can only post on a cell phone, and can't copypate extracts from an article, as you've been doing. But I shouldn't need to. The link shows that Shokin was investigating Burisma and the Bidens, and that's why corrupt Joe went after Shokin.
I've already wasted to much time and energy on this dopey subject involving a guy who has as much chance of becoming POTUS as a housefly. The fact that you think he does is just more evidence of your youthful folly.
We'll come back to this thread after the election.
Solomon: These once-secret memos cast doubt on Joe Biden's Ukraine story
Real journalists investigated this and determined Shokin sat on the investigation for about 2 years and never pursued Burisma.
And if you weren't ancient, you'd know how to copy & paste on your phone like I do.Moron. Anybody can dodge the truth just by calling it "opinion". I'd say "nice try" if would have been.Moron, you posted someone's opinion. Opinion is not news.You are the liar, and I already posted the link showing that Shokin was actively investigating Burisma and the Biden bad boys. No it's not opinion. It is fact, backed up by FBI documentation. It looks like you didn't even read the link, much less the informative sublinks.Liar,
Timeline in Ukraine Probe Casts Doubt on Giuliani’s Biden Claim
There’s little question that the Bidens’ paths in Ukraine held the potential for conflict, and in a tweet last week, Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani said the U.S. should investigate the matter. But what has received less attention is that at the time Biden made his ultimatum, the probe into the company -- Burisma Holdings, owned by Mykola Zlochevsky -- had been long dormant, according to the former official, Vitaliy Kasko.
“There was no pressure from anyone from the U.S. to close cases against Zlochevsky,” Kasko said in an interview last week. “It was shelved by Ukrainian prosecutors in 2014 and through 2015.”
[...]
The case against Zlochevsky and his Burisma Holdings was assigned to Shokin, then a deputy prosecutor. But Shokin and others weren’t pursuing it, according to the internal reports from the Ukrainian prosecutor’s office reviewed by Bloomberg.
In a December 2014 letter, U.S. officials warned Ukrainian prosecutors of negative consequences for Ukraine over its failure to assist the U.K., which had seized Zlochevsky’s assets, according to the documents.
Those funds, $23.5 million, were unblocked in 2015 when a British court determined there wasn’t enough evidence to justify the continued freeze, in part because Ukrainian prosecutors had failed to provide the necessary information.
Shokin became prosecutor general in February 2015. Over the next year, the U.S. and the International Monetary Fund criticized officials for not doing enough to fight corruption in Ukraine.
Shokin took no action to pursue cases against Zlochevsky throughout 2015, said Kasko, who was Shokin’s deputy overseeing international cooperation and helping in asset-recovery investigations. Kasko said he had urged Shokin to pursue the investigations.
I must say you have me at a disadvantage, since I can only post on a cell phone, and can't copypate extracts from an article, as you've been doing. But I shouldn't need to. The link shows that Shokin was investigating Burisma and the Bidens, and that's why corrupt Joe went after Shokin.
I've already wasted to much time and energy on this dopey subject involving a guy who has as much chance of becoming POTUS as a housefly. The fact that you think he does is just more evidence of your youthful folly.
We'll come back to this thread after the election.
Solomon: These once-secret memos cast doubt on Joe Biden's Ukraine story
Real journalists investigated this and determined Shokin sat on the investigation for about 2 years and never pursued Burisma.
And if you weren't ancient, you'd know how to copy & paste on your phone like I do.
All you're doing is coming in here with the same bs as all the other laughable Biden supporters, trying to claim that Shokin wasn't investigating Burisma (he was), and trying to claim that Biden was trying to stop corruption (he wasn't).
Do realize how idiotic you look ? And are ? But then this is consistent with Democrat MO. No matter how stupid, just concoct an anti-Trump scenario, pump it up, and serve to the public.
Hey, the American people are fools, and they'll believe anything, right Fake Faun ? First the Kavanaugh charade of lying (probably paid-off sluts). The the Russian collusion farce(which Democrats themselves were guilty of).
It goes on and on. American aren't stupid, and even more now they will deliver another ass kick to Democrats, who again are picking an awful candidate to get beat by Trump. First, in 2016, a serial killer know-nothing, and now a senile buffoon who can't get through a sentence without muffing it.
Who is the greater laughingstock, Joe Biden, or the bozos like you who promote him ? Why don't you run Gomer Pyle for president ? At least he'd have good military credentials.
"Real journalists" HA HA HA. Like Chuck Todd on Meet the Trump-bashers ? No, Faun's idea of "real journalists" are ones working for a company 88% owned by a guy who just spent $500 Million to unseat Donald Trump. How's THAT for real journalists?
Is there a doctor in the house ? Joe Biden. Good grief!
LOLLies are not proof. Here we go with liberals goofily expecting everybody to accept their definition of "proof". Bunch of liberal propaganders.LOLOLOLYou got your proof, bullshit boy.You claiming he did sans proof is merely another fail on your part, gramps. Your words are hollow and meaningless.He did, and that's the only reason why Biden went after him. And you think Burisma brought Hunter Biden in for his Ukranian energy expertise, did you ? Any doctors in the house ?Liar,
Timeline in Ukraine Probe Casts Doubt on Giuliani’s Biden Claim
There’s little question that the Bidens’ paths in Ukraine held the potential for conflict, and in a tweet last week, Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani said the U.S. should investigate the matter. But what has received less attention is that at the time Biden made his ultimatum, the probe into the company -- Burisma Holdings, owned by Mykola Zlochevsky -- had been long dormant, according to the former official, Vitaliy Kasko.
“There was no pressure from anyone from the U.S. to close cases against Zlochevsky,” Kasko said in an interview last week. “It was shelved by Ukrainian prosecutors in 2014 and through 2015.”
[...]
The case against Zlochevsky and his Burisma Holdings was assigned to Shokin, then a deputy prosecutor. But Shokin and others weren’t pursuing it, according to the internal reports from the Ukrainian prosecutor’s office reviewed by Bloomberg.
In a December 2014 letter, U.S. officials warned Ukrainian prosecutors of negative consequences for Ukraine over its failure to assist the U.K., which had seized Zlochevsky’s assets, according to the documents.
Those funds, $23.5 million, were unblocked in 2015 when a British court determined there wasn’t enough evidence to justify the continued freeze, in part because Ukrainian prosecutors had failed to provide the necessary information.
Shokin became prosecutor general in February 2015. Over the next year, the U.S. and the International Monetary Fund criticized officials for not doing enough to fight corruption in Ukraine.
Shokin took no action to pursue cases against Zlochevsky throughout 2015, said Kasko, who was Shokin’s deputy overseeing international cooperation and helping in asset-recovery investigations. Kasko said he had urged Shokin to pursue the investigations.
Dumbfuck -- opinion is not proof.
Bloomberg ? "actual news" ? lolPoor, deranged, gramps. It's not real just because you want to b'lieve it is. Prove Solomon's opinion is factual in that Shokin was actively investigating Burisma while actual news shows he sat on that case for 2 years and causing Great Britain to have to shut down their own investigation into Zlochevsky because Shokin was protecting Burisma's owner....Moron, you posted someone's opinion. Opinion is not news.You are the liar, and I already posted the link showing that Shokin was actively investigating Burisma and the Biden bad boys. No it's not opinion. It is fact, backed up by FBI documentation. It looks like you didn't even read the link, much less the informative sublinks.Liar,
Timeline in Ukraine Probe Casts Doubt on Giuliani’s Biden Claim
There’s little question that the Bidens’ paths in Ukraine held the potential for conflict, and in a tweet last week, Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani said the U.S. should investigate the matter. But what has received less attention is that at the time Biden made his ultimatum, the probe into the company -- Burisma Holdings, owned by Mykola Zlochevsky -- had been long dormant, according to the former official, Vitaliy Kasko.
“There was no pressure from anyone from the U.S. to close cases against Zlochevsky,” Kasko said in an interview last week. “It was shelved by Ukrainian prosecutors in 2014 and through 2015.”
[...]
The case against Zlochevsky and his Burisma Holdings was assigned to Shokin, then a deputy prosecutor. But Shokin and others weren’t pursuing it, according to the internal reports from the Ukrainian prosecutor’s office reviewed by Bloomberg.
In a December 2014 letter, U.S. officials warned Ukrainian prosecutors of negative consequences for Ukraine over its failure to assist the U.K., which had seized Zlochevsky’s assets, according to the documents.
Those funds, $23.5 million, were unblocked in 2015 when a British court determined there wasn’t enough evidence to justify the continued freeze, in part because Ukrainian prosecutors had failed to provide the necessary information.
Shokin became prosecutor general in February 2015. Over the next year, the U.S. and the International Monetary Fund criticized officials for not doing enough to fight corruption in Ukraine.
Shokin took no action to pursue cases against Zlochevsky throughout 2015, said Kasko, who was Shokin’s deputy overseeing international cooperation and helping in asset-recovery investigations. Kasko said he had urged Shokin to pursue the investigations.
I must say you have me at a disadvantage, since I can only post on a cell phone, and can't copypate extracts from an article, as you've been doing. But I shouldn't need to. The link shows that Shokin was investigating Burisma and the Bidens, and that's why corrupt Joe went after Shokin.
I've already wasted to much time and energy on this dopey subject involving a guy who has as much chance of becoming POTUS as a housefly. The fact that you think he does is just more evidence of your youthful folly.
We'll come back to this thread after the election.
Solomon: These once-secret memos cast doubt on Joe Biden's Ukraine story
Real journalists investigated this and determined Shokin sat on the investigation for about 2 years and never pursued Burisma.
And if you weren't ancient, you'd know how to copy & paste on your phone like I do.Moron. Anybody can dodge the truth just by calling it "opinion". I'd say "nice try" if would have been.Moron, you posted someone's opinion. Opinion is not news.You are the liar, and I already posted the link showing that Shokin was actively investigating Burisma and the Biden bad boys. No it's not opinion. It is fact, backed up by FBI documentation. It looks like you didn't even read the link, much less the informative sublinks.Liar,
Timeline in Ukraine Probe Casts Doubt on Giuliani’s Biden Claim
There’s little question that the Bidens’ paths in Ukraine held the potential for conflict, and in a tweet last week, Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani said the U.S. should investigate the matter. But what has received less attention is that at the time Biden made his ultimatum, the probe into the company -- Burisma Holdings, owned by Mykola Zlochevsky -- had been long dormant, according to the former official, Vitaliy Kasko.
“There was no pressure from anyone from the U.S. to close cases against Zlochevsky,” Kasko said in an interview last week. “It was shelved by Ukrainian prosecutors in 2014 and through 2015.”
[...]
The case against Zlochevsky and his Burisma Holdings was assigned to Shokin, then a deputy prosecutor. But Shokin and others weren’t pursuing it, according to the internal reports from the Ukrainian prosecutor’s office reviewed by Bloomberg.
In a December 2014 letter, U.S. officials warned Ukrainian prosecutors of negative consequences for Ukraine over its failure to assist the U.K., which had seized Zlochevsky’s assets, according to the documents.
Those funds, $23.5 million, were unblocked in 2015 when a British court determined there wasn’t enough evidence to justify the continued freeze, in part because Ukrainian prosecutors had failed to provide the necessary information.
Shokin became prosecutor general in February 2015. Over the next year, the U.S. and the International Monetary Fund criticized officials for not doing enough to fight corruption in Ukraine.
Shokin took no action to pursue cases against Zlochevsky throughout 2015, said Kasko, who was Shokin’s deputy overseeing international cooperation and helping in asset-recovery investigations. Kasko said he had urged Shokin to pursue the investigations.
I must say you have me at a disadvantage, since I can only post on a cell phone, and can't copypate extracts from an article, as you've been doing. But I shouldn't need to. The link shows that Shokin was investigating Burisma and the Bidens, and that's why corrupt Joe went after Shokin.
I've already wasted to much time and energy on this dopey subject involving a guy who has as much chance of becoming POTUS as a housefly. The fact that you think he does is just more evidence of your youthful folly.
We'll come back to this thread after the election.
Solomon: These once-secret memos cast doubt on Joe Biden's Ukraine story
Real journalists investigated this and determined Shokin sat on the investigation for about 2 years and never pursued Burisma.
And if you weren't ancient, you'd know how to copy & paste on your phone like I do.
All you're doing is coming in here with the same bs as all the other laughable Biden supporters, trying to claim that Shokin wasn't investigating Burisma (he was), and trying to claim that Biden was trying to stop corruption (he wasn't).
Do realize how idiotic you look ? And are ? But then this is consistent with Democrat MO. No matter how stupid, just concoct an anti-Trump scenario, pump it up, and serve to the public.
Hey, the American people are fools, and they'll believe anything, right Fake Faun ? First the Kavanaugh charade of lying (probably paid-off sluts). The the Russian collusion farce(which Democrats themselves were guilty of).
It goes on and on. American aren't stupid, and even more now they will deliver another ass kick to Democrats, who again are picking an awful candidate to get beat by Trump. First, in 2016, a serial killer know-nothing, and now a senile buffoon who can't get through a sentence without muffing it.
Who is the greater laughingstock, Joe Biden, or the bozos like you who promote him ? Why don't you run Gomer Pyle for president ? At least he'd have good military credentials.
"Real journalists" HA HA HA. Like Chuck Todd on Meet the Trump-bashers ? No, Faun's idea of "real journalists" are ones working for a company 88% owned by a guy who just spent $500 Million to unseat Donald Trump. How's THAT for real journalists?
Is there a doctor in the house ? Joe Biden. Good grief!
Yup, actual news written by actual journalists -- not disgraced opinion writers.Bloomberg ? "actual news" ? lolPoor, deranged, gramps. It's not real just because you want to b'lieve it is. Prove Solomon's opinion is factual in that Shokin was actively investigating Burisma while actual news shows he sat on that case for 2 years and causing Great Britain to have to shut down their own investigation into Zlochevsky because Shokin was protecting Burisma's owner....Moron, you posted someone's opinion. Opinion is not news.You are the liar, and I already posted the link showing that Shokin was actively investigating Burisma and the Biden bad boys. No it's not opinion. It is fact, backed up by FBI documentation. It looks like you didn't even read the link, much less the informative sublinks.Liar,
Timeline in Ukraine Probe Casts Doubt on Giuliani’s Biden Claim
There’s little question that the Bidens’ paths in Ukraine held the potential for conflict, and in a tweet last week, Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani said the U.S. should investigate the matter. But what has received less attention is that at the time Biden made his ultimatum, the probe into the company -- Burisma Holdings, owned by Mykola Zlochevsky -- had been long dormant, according to the former official, Vitaliy Kasko.
“There was no pressure from anyone from the U.S. to close cases against Zlochevsky,” Kasko said in an interview last week. “It was shelved by Ukrainian prosecutors in 2014 and through 2015.”
[...]
The case against Zlochevsky and his Burisma Holdings was assigned to Shokin, then a deputy prosecutor. But Shokin and others weren’t pursuing it, according to the internal reports from the Ukrainian prosecutor’s office reviewed by Bloomberg.
In a December 2014 letter, U.S. officials warned Ukrainian prosecutors of negative consequences for Ukraine over its failure to assist the U.K., which had seized Zlochevsky’s assets, according to the documents.
Those funds, $23.5 million, were unblocked in 2015 when a British court determined there wasn’t enough evidence to justify the continued freeze, in part because Ukrainian prosecutors had failed to provide the necessary information.
Shokin became prosecutor general in February 2015. Over the next year, the U.S. and the International Monetary Fund criticized officials for not doing enough to fight corruption in Ukraine.
Shokin took no action to pursue cases against Zlochevsky throughout 2015, said Kasko, who was Shokin’s deputy overseeing international cooperation and helping in asset-recovery investigations. Kasko said he had urged Shokin to pursue the investigations.
I must say you have me at a disadvantage, since I can only post on a cell phone, and can't copypate extracts from an article, as you've been doing. But I shouldn't need to. The link shows that Shokin was investigating Burisma and the Bidens, and that's why corrupt Joe went after Shokin.
I've already wasted to much time and energy on this dopey subject involving a guy who has as much chance of becoming POTUS as a housefly. The fact that you think he does is just more evidence of your youthful folly.
We'll come back to this thread after the election.
Solomon: These once-secret memos cast doubt on Joe Biden's Ukraine story
Real journalists investigated this and determined Shokin sat on the investigation for about 2 years and never pursued Burisma.
And if you weren't ancient, you'd know how to copy & paste on your phone like I do.Moron. Anybody can dodge the truth just by calling it "opinion". I'd say "nice try" if would have been.Moron, you posted someone's opinion. Opinion is not news.You are the liar, and I already posted the link showing that Shokin was actively investigating Burisma and the Biden bad boys. No it's not opinion. It is fact, backed up by FBI documentation. It looks like you didn't even read the link, much less the informative sublinks.Liar,
Timeline in Ukraine Probe Casts Doubt on Giuliani’s Biden Claim
There’s little question that the Bidens’ paths in Ukraine held the potential for conflict, and in a tweet last week, Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani said the U.S. should investigate the matter. But what has received less attention is that at the time Biden made his ultimatum, the probe into the company -- Burisma Holdings, owned by Mykola Zlochevsky -- had been long dormant, according to the former official, Vitaliy Kasko.
“There was no pressure from anyone from the U.S. to close cases against Zlochevsky,” Kasko said in an interview last week. “It was shelved by Ukrainian prosecutors in 2014 and through 2015.”
[...]
The case against Zlochevsky and his Burisma Holdings was assigned to Shokin, then a deputy prosecutor. But Shokin and others weren’t pursuing it, according to the internal reports from the Ukrainian prosecutor’s office reviewed by Bloomberg.
In a December 2014 letter, U.S. officials warned Ukrainian prosecutors of negative consequences for Ukraine over its failure to assist the U.K., which had seized Zlochevsky’s assets, according to the documents.
Those funds, $23.5 million, were unblocked in 2015 when a British court determined there wasn’t enough evidence to justify the continued freeze, in part because Ukrainian prosecutors had failed to provide the necessary information.
Shokin became prosecutor general in February 2015. Over the next year, the U.S. and the International Monetary Fund criticized officials for not doing enough to fight corruption in Ukraine.
Shokin took no action to pursue cases against Zlochevsky throughout 2015, said Kasko, who was Shokin’s deputy overseeing international cooperation and helping in asset-recovery investigations. Kasko said he had urged Shokin to pursue the investigations.
I must say you have me at a disadvantage, since I can only post on a cell phone, and can't copypate extracts from an article, as you've been doing. But I shouldn't need to. The link shows that Shokin was investigating Burisma and the Bidens, and that's why corrupt Joe went after Shokin.
I've already wasted to much time and energy on this dopey subject involving a guy who has as much chance of becoming POTUS as a housefly. The fact that you think he does is just more evidence of your youthful folly.
We'll come back to this thread after the election.
Solomon: These once-secret memos cast doubt on Joe Biden's Ukraine story
Real journalists investigated this and determined Shokin sat on the investigation for about 2 years and never pursued Burisma.
And if you weren't ancient, you'd know how to copy & paste on your phone like I do.
All you're doing is coming in here with the same bs as all the other laughable Biden supporters, trying to claim that Shokin wasn't investigating Burisma (he was), and trying to claim that Biden was trying to stop corruption (he wasn't).
Do realize how idiotic you look ? And are ? But then this is consistent with Democrat MO. No matter how stupid, just concoct an anti-Trump scenario, pump it up, and serve to the public.
Hey, the American people are fools, and they'll believe anything, right Fake Faun ? First the Kavanaugh charade of lying (probably paid-off sluts). The the Russian collusion farce(which Democrats themselves were guilty of).
It goes on and on. American aren't stupid, and even more now they will deliver another ass kick to Democrats, who again are picking an awful candidate to get beat by Trump. First, in 2016, a serial killer know-nothing, and now a senile buffoon who can't get through a sentence without muffing it.
Who is the greater laughingstock, Joe Biden, or the bozos like you who promote him ? Why don't you run Gomer Pyle for president ? At least he'd have good military credentials.
"Real journalists" HA HA HA. Like Chuck Todd on Meet the Trump-bashers ? No, Faun's idea of "real journalists" are ones working for a company 88% owned by a guy who just spent $500 Million to unseat Donald Trump. How's THAT for real journalists?
Is there a doctor in the house ? Joe Biden. Good grief!
you're posting from what I said you're posting from. Bloomberg.LOLLies are not proof. Here we go with liberals goofily expecting everybody to accept their definition of "proof". Bunch of liberal propaganders.
I'm posting from news sources while you're posting the opinion of an opinion writer who's been distanced by his former employer for writing bullshit and embarrassing them.
I'm with you on that.
