protectionist
Diamond Member
- Oct 20, 2013
- 61,827
- 21,944
- 2,250
Me too. But then there was Obama's jihadist in Fort Hood (November 2009)
Joe Biden gets into testy exchange with man over gun rights
- Thread starter Mac-7
- Start date
protectionist
Diamond Member
- Oct 20, 2013
- 61,827
- 21,944
- 2,250
FALSE! Bush's nation was the USA. Obama's nation was the Uhmma.
Faun
Diamond Member
- Nov 14, 2011
- 126,711
- 121,327
- 3,635
Liar,
Shokin never investigated Burisma.Timeline in Ukraine Probe Casts Doubt on Giuliani’s Biden Claim
There’s little question that the Bidens’ paths in Ukraine held the potential for conflict, and in a tweet last week, Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani said the U.S. should investigate the matter. But what has received less attention is that at the time Biden made his ultimatum, the probe into the company -- Burisma Holdings, owned by Mykola Zlochevsky -- had been long dormant, according to the former official, Vitaliy Kasko.
“There was no pressure from anyone from the U.S. to close cases against Zlochevsky,” Kasko said in an interview last week. “It was shelved by Ukrainian prosecutors in 2014 and through 2015.”
[...]
The case against Zlochevsky and his Burisma Holdings was assigned to Shokin, then a deputy prosecutor. But Shokin and others weren’t pursuing it, according to the internal reports from the Ukrainian prosecutor’s office reviewed by Bloomberg.
In a December 2014 letter, U.S. officials warned Ukrainian prosecutors of negative consequences for Ukraine over its failure to assist the U.K., which had seized Zlochevsky’s assets, according to the documents.
Those funds, $23.5 million, were unblocked in 2015 when a British court determined there wasn’t enough evidence to justify the continued freeze, in part because Ukrainian prosecutors had failed to provide the necessary information.
Shokin became prosecutor general in February 2015. Over the next year, the U.S. and the International Monetary Fund criticized officials for not doing enough to fight corruption in Ukraine.
Shokin took no action to pursue cases against Zlochevsky throughout 2015, said Kasko, who was Shokin’s deputy overseeing international cooperation and helping in asset-recovery investigations. Kasko said he had urged Shokin to pursue the investigations.
There’s little question that the Bidens’ paths in Ukraine held the potential for conflict, and in a tweet last week, Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani said the U.S. should investigate the matter. But what has received less attention is that at the time Biden made his ultimatum, the probe into the company -- Burisma Holdings, owned by Mykola Zlochevsky -- had been long dormant, according to the former official, Vitaliy Kasko.
“There was no pressure from anyone from the U.S. to close cases against Zlochevsky,” Kasko said in an interview last week. “It was shelved by Ukrainian prosecutors in 2014 and through 2015.”
[...]
The case against Zlochevsky and his Burisma Holdings was assigned to Shokin, then a deputy prosecutor. But Shokin and others weren’t pursuing it, according to the internal reports from the Ukrainian prosecutor’s office reviewed by Bloomberg.
In a December 2014 letter, U.S. officials warned Ukrainian prosecutors of negative consequences for Ukraine over its failure to assist the U.K., which had seized Zlochevsky’s assets, according to the documents.
Those funds, $23.5 million, were unblocked in 2015 when a British court determined there wasn’t enough evidence to justify the continued freeze, in part because Ukrainian prosecutors had failed to provide the necessary information.
Shokin became prosecutor general in February 2015. Over the next year, the U.S. and the International Monetary Fund criticized officials for not doing enough to fight corruption in Ukraine.
Shokin took no action to pursue cases against Zlochevsky throughout 2015, said Kasko, who was Shokin’s deputy overseeing international cooperation and helping in asset-recovery investigations. Kasko said he had urged Shokin to pursue the investigations.
Faun
Diamond Member
- Nov 14, 2011
- 126,711
- 121,327
- 3,635
basquebromance
Diamond Member
- Nov 26, 2015
- 109,396
- 27,172
- 2,220
- Banned
- #245
how could anyone not suffering from a diet of lead paint chips and head trauma possibly believe that one gimcrack piece of paper (the constitution) would constrain the Biden-Beto administration from infringing on our gun rights?
the other mike
Diamond Member
Bush and Obama combined basically bankrupted this country in 16 years.
From 2001 to 2017 the national debt went from $5 Trillion with a budget surplus in 2000
to $20 trillion in 2016.
Trump has begun to lower the trade deficit but the debt is still spiraling up out of control.
https://www.usdebtclock.org/
Faun
Diamond Member
- Nov 14, 2011
- 126,711
- 121,327
- 3,635
And Impeached Trump, in a good economy, has already added $3½ trillion in little over 3 years and is on pace to add almost as much as Obama who started off in the worst economy since the Great Depression.
protectionist
Diamond Member
- Oct 20, 2013
- 61,827
- 21,944
- 2,250
He did, and that's the only reason why Biden went after him. And you think Burisma brought Hunter Biden in for his Ukranian energy expertise, did you ? Any doctors in the house ?Liar,
Timeline in Ukraine Probe Casts Doubt on Giuliani’s Biden Claim
There’s little question that the Bidens’ paths in Ukraine held the potential for conflict, and in a tweet last week, Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani said the U.S. should investigate the matter. But what has received less attention is that at the time Biden made his ultimatum, the probe into the company -- Burisma Holdings, owned by Mykola Zlochevsky -- had been long dormant, according to the former official, Vitaliy Kasko.
“There was no pressure from anyone from the U.S. to close cases against Zlochevsky,” Kasko said in an interview last week. “It was shelved by Ukrainian prosecutors in 2014 and through 2015.”
[...]
The case against Zlochevsky and his Burisma Holdings was assigned to Shokin, then a deputy prosecutor. But Shokin and others weren’t pursuing it, according to the internal reports from the Ukrainian prosecutor’s office reviewed by Bloomberg.
In a December 2014 letter, U.S. officials warned Ukrainian prosecutors of negative consequences for Ukraine over its failure to assist the U.K., which had seized Zlochevsky’s assets, according to the documents.
Those funds, $23.5 million, were unblocked in 2015 when a British court determined there wasn’t enough evidence to justify the continued freeze, in part because Ukrainian prosecutors had failed to provide the necessary information.
Shokin became prosecutor general in February 2015. Over the next year, the U.S. and the International Monetary Fund criticized officials for not doing enough to fight corruption in Ukraine.
Shokin took no action to pursue cases against Zlochevsky throughout 2015, said Kasko, who was Shokin’s deputy overseeing international cooperation and helping in asset-recovery investigations. Kasko said he had urged Shokin to pursue the investigations.
Faun
Diamond Member
- Nov 14, 2011
- 126,711
- 121,327
- 3,635
You claiming he did sans proof is merely another fail on your part, gramps. Your words are hollow and meaningless.He did, and that's the only reason why Biden went after him. And you think Burisma brought Hunter Biden in for his Ukranian energy expertise, did you ? Any doctors in the house ?Liar,
Timeline in Ukraine Probe Casts Doubt on Giuliani’s Biden Claim
There’s little question that the Bidens’ paths in Ukraine held the potential for conflict, and in a tweet last week, Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani said the U.S. should investigate the matter. But what has received less attention is that at the time Biden made his ultimatum, the probe into the company -- Burisma Holdings, owned by Mykola Zlochevsky -- had been long dormant, according to the former official, Vitaliy Kasko.
“There was no pressure from anyone from the U.S. to close cases against Zlochevsky,” Kasko said in an interview last week. “It was shelved by Ukrainian prosecutors in 2014 and through 2015.”
[...]
The case against Zlochevsky and his Burisma Holdings was assigned to Shokin, then a deputy prosecutor. But Shokin and others weren’t pursuing it, according to the internal reports from the Ukrainian prosecutor’s office reviewed by Bloomberg.
In a December 2014 letter, U.S. officials warned Ukrainian prosecutors of negative consequences for Ukraine over its failure to assist the U.K., which had seized Zlochevsky’s assets, according to the documents.
Those funds, $23.5 million, were unblocked in 2015 when a British court determined there wasn’t enough evidence to justify the continued freeze, in part because Ukrainian prosecutors had failed to provide the necessary information.
Shokin became prosecutor general in February 2015. Over the next year, the U.S. and the International Monetary Fund criticized officials for not doing enough to fight corruption in Ukraine.
Shokin took no action to pursue cases against Zlochevsky throughout 2015, said Kasko, who was Shokin’s deputy overseeing international cooperation and helping in asset-recovery investigations. Kasko said he had urged Shokin to pursue the investigations.
protectionist
Diamond Member
- Oct 20, 2013
- 61,827
- 21,944
- 2,250
I can hardly imagine your thinking on the subject of debt. Ha ha. Young people are so naive.
Next you'll tell us we owe a debt to China. Go ahead. Tell us.
Faun
Diamond Member
- Nov 14, 2011
- 126,711
- 121,327
- 3,635
The debt under Impeached Trump is the same as the debt under Obama, gramps.
the other mike
Diamond Member
Don't blame me.I can hardly imagine your thinking on the subject of debt. Ha ha. Young people are so naive.
Next you'll tell us we owe a debt to China. Go ahead. Tell us.
I voted for Carter in 1980, before the wrecking ball
of Reaganomics came to town. In January, 1981, the national debt was
under a trillion and going down, and Reagan tripled it in his first term.
protectionist
Diamond Member
- Oct 20, 2013
- 61,827
- 21,944
- 2,250
You are the liar, and I already posted the link showing that Shokin was actively investigating Burisma and the Biden bad boys. No it's not opinion. It is fact, backed up by FBI documentation. It looks like you didn't even read the link, much less the informative sublinks.Liar,
Timeline in Ukraine Probe Casts Doubt on Giuliani’s Biden Claim
There’s little question that the Bidens’ paths in Ukraine held the potential for conflict, and in a tweet last week, Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani said the U.S. should investigate the matter. But what has received less attention is that at the time Biden made his ultimatum, the probe into the company -- Burisma Holdings, owned by Mykola Zlochevsky -- had been long dormant, according to the former official, Vitaliy Kasko.
“There was no pressure from anyone from the U.S. to close cases against Zlochevsky,” Kasko said in an interview last week. “It was shelved by Ukrainian prosecutors in 2014 and through 2015.”
[...]
The case against Zlochevsky and his Burisma Holdings was assigned to Shokin, then a deputy prosecutor. But Shokin and others weren’t pursuing it, according to the internal reports from the Ukrainian prosecutor’s office reviewed by Bloomberg.
In a December 2014 letter, U.S. officials warned Ukrainian prosecutors of negative consequences for Ukraine over its failure to assist the U.K., which had seized Zlochevsky’s assets, according to the documents.
Those funds, $23.5 million, were unblocked in 2015 when a British court determined there wasn’t enough evidence to justify the continued freeze, in part because Ukrainian prosecutors had failed to provide the necessary information.
Shokin became prosecutor general in February 2015. Over the next year, the U.S. and the International Monetary Fund criticized officials for not doing enough to fight corruption in Ukraine.
Shokin took no action to pursue cases against Zlochevsky throughout 2015, said Kasko, who was Shokin’s deputy overseeing international cooperation and helping in asset-recovery investigations. Kasko said he had urged Shokin to pursue the investigations.
I must say you have me at a disadvantage, since I can only post on a cell phone, and can't copypate extracts from an article, as you've been doing. But I shouldn't need to. The link shows that Shokin was investigating Burisma and the Bidens, and that's why corrupt Joe went after Shokin.
I've already wasted to much time and energy on this dopey subject involving a guy who has as much chance of becoming POTUS as a housefly. The fact that you think he does is just more evidence of your youthful folly.
We'll come back to this thread after the election.
Solomon: These once-secret memos cast doubt on Joe Biden's Ukraine story
Last edited:
protectionist
Diamond Member
- Oct 20, 2013
- 61,827
- 21,944
- 2,250
DODGE. Scared to mention China ?The debt under Impeached Trump is the same as the debt under Obama, gramps.
protectionist
Diamond Member
- Oct 20, 2013
- 61,827
- 21,944
- 2,250
You got your proof, bullshit boy.You claiming he did sans proof is merely another fail on your part, gramps. Your words are hollow and meaningless.He did, and that's the only reason why Biden went after him. And you think Burisma brought Hunter Biden in for his Ukranian energy expertise, did you ? Any doctors in the house ?Liar,
Timeline in Ukraine Probe Casts Doubt on Giuliani’s Biden Claim
There’s little question that the Bidens’ paths in Ukraine held the potential for conflict, and in a tweet last week, Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani said the U.S. should investigate the matter. But what has received less attention is that at the time Biden made his ultimatum, the probe into the company -- Burisma Holdings, owned by Mykola Zlochevsky -- had been long dormant, according to the former official, Vitaliy Kasko.
“There was no pressure from anyone from the U.S. to close cases against Zlochevsky,” Kasko said in an interview last week. “It was shelved by Ukrainian prosecutors in 2014 and through 2015.”
[...]
The case against Zlochevsky and his Burisma Holdings was assigned to Shokin, then a deputy prosecutor. But Shokin and others weren’t pursuing it, according to the internal reports from the Ukrainian prosecutor’s office reviewed by Bloomberg.
In a December 2014 letter, U.S. officials warned Ukrainian prosecutors of negative consequences for Ukraine over its failure to assist the U.K., which had seized Zlochevsky’s assets, according to the documents.
Those funds, $23.5 million, were unblocked in 2015 when a British court determined there wasn’t enough evidence to justify the continued freeze, in part because Ukrainian prosecutors had failed to provide the necessary information.
Shokin became prosecutor general in February 2015. Over the next year, the U.S. and the International Monetary Fund criticized officials for not doing enough to fight corruption in Ukraine.
Shokin took no action to pursue cases against Zlochevsky throughout 2015, said Kasko, who was Shokin’s deputy overseeing international cooperation and helping in asset-recovery investigations. Kasko said he had urged Shokin to pursue the investigations.
basquebromance
Diamond Member
- Nov 26, 2015
- 109,396
- 27,172
- 2,220
- Banned
- #256
Biden's attack on guns is a personal attack on american citizens
let me do some esoteric subtle technical analysis for Biden and his supporters to understand: AMERICANS ******* LOVE GUNS!
let me do some esoteric subtle technical analysis for Biden and his supporters to understand: AMERICANS ******* LOVE GUNS!
Faun
Diamond Member
- Nov 14, 2011
- 126,711
- 121,327
- 3,635
I didn't post that, ya dumbfuck. Learn how to use the quote feature. <smh>Don't blame me.I can hardly imagine your thinking on the subject of debt. Ha ha. Young people are so naive.
Next you'll tell us we owe a debt to China. Go ahead. Tell us.
I voted for Carter in 1980, before the wrecking ball
of Reaganomics came to town. In January, 1981, the national debt was
under a trillion and going down, and Reagan tripled it in his first term.
Faun
Diamond Member
- Nov 14, 2011
- 126,711
- 121,327
- 3,635
Moron, you posted someone's opinion. Opinion is not news.You are the liar, and I already posted the link showing that Shokin was actively investigating Burisma and the Biden bad boys. No it's not opinion. It is fact, backed up by FBI documentation. It looks like you didn't even read the link, much less the informative sublinks.Liar,
Timeline in Ukraine Probe Casts Doubt on Giuliani’s Biden Claim
There’s little question that the Bidens’ paths in Ukraine held the potential for conflict, and in a tweet last week, Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani said the U.S. should investigate the matter. But what has received less attention is that at the time Biden made his ultimatum, the probe into the company -- Burisma Holdings, owned by Mykola Zlochevsky -- had been long dormant, according to the former official, Vitaliy Kasko.
“There was no pressure from anyone from the U.S. to close cases against Zlochevsky,” Kasko said in an interview last week. “It was shelved by Ukrainian prosecutors in 2014 and through 2015.”
[...]
The case against Zlochevsky and his Burisma Holdings was assigned to Shokin, then a deputy prosecutor. But Shokin and others weren’t pursuing it, according to the internal reports from the Ukrainian prosecutor’s office reviewed by Bloomberg.
In a December 2014 letter, U.S. officials warned Ukrainian prosecutors of negative consequences for Ukraine over its failure to assist the U.K., which had seized Zlochevsky’s assets, according to the documents.
Those funds, $23.5 million, were unblocked in 2015 when a British court determined there wasn’t enough evidence to justify the continued freeze, in part because Ukrainian prosecutors had failed to provide the necessary information.
Shokin became prosecutor general in February 2015. Over the next year, the U.S. and the International Monetary Fund criticized officials for not doing enough to fight corruption in Ukraine.
Shokin took no action to pursue cases against Zlochevsky throughout 2015, said Kasko, who was Shokin’s deputy overseeing international cooperation and helping in asset-recovery investigations. Kasko said he had urged Shokin to pursue the investigations.
I must say you have me at a disadvantage, since I can only post on a cell phone, and can't copypate extracts from an article, as you've been doing. But I shouldn't need to. The link shows that Shokin was investigating Burisma and the Bidens, and that's why corrupt Joe went after Shokin.
I've already wasted to much time and energy on this dopey subject involving a guy who has as much chance of becoming POTUS as a housefly. The fact that you think he does is just more evidence of your youthful folly.
We'll come back to this thread after the election.
Solomon: These once-secret memos cast doubt on Joe Biden's Ukraine story
Real journalists investigated this and determined Shokin sat on the investigation for about 2 years and never pursued Burisma.
And if you weren't ancient, you'd know how to copy & paste on your phone like I do.
Faun
Diamond Member
- Nov 14, 2011
- 126,711
- 121,327
- 3,635
There's nothing to dodge gramps. Our debt is held by the same entities now as when it accumulated under Obama.DODGE. Scared to mention China ?The debt under Impeached Trump is the same as the debt under Obama, gramps.
Faun
Diamond Member
- Nov 14, 2011
- 126,711
- 121,327
- 3,635
LOLOLOLYou got your proof, bullshit boy.You claiming he did sans proof is merely another fail on your part, gramps. Your words are hollow and meaningless.He did, and that's the only reason why Biden went after him. And you think Burisma brought Hunter Biden in for his Ukranian energy expertise, did you ? Any doctors in the house ?Liar,
Timeline in Ukraine Probe Casts Doubt on Giuliani’s Biden Claim
There’s little question that the Bidens’ paths in Ukraine held the potential for conflict, and in a tweet last week, Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani said the U.S. should investigate the matter. But what has received less attention is that at the time Biden made his ultimatum, the probe into the company -- Burisma Holdings, owned by Mykola Zlochevsky -- had been long dormant, according to the former official, Vitaliy Kasko.
“There was no pressure from anyone from the U.S. to close cases against Zlochevsky,” Kasko said in an interview last week. “It was shelved by Ukrainian prosecutors in 2014 and through 2015.”
[...]
The case against Zlochevsky and his Burisma Holdings was assigned to Shokin, then a deputy prosecutor. But Shokin and others weren’t pursuing it, according to the internal reports from the Ukrainian prosecutor’s office reviewed by Bloomberg.
In a December 2014 letter, U.S. officials warned Ukrainian prosecutors of negative consequences for Ukraine over its failure to assist the U.K., which had seized Zlochevsky’s assets, according to the documents.
Those funds, $23.5 million, were unblocked in 2015 when a British court determined there wasn’t enough evidence to justify the continued freeze, in part because Ukrainian prosecutors had failed to provide the necessary information.
Shokin became prosecutor general in February 2015. Over the next year, the U.S. and the International Monetary Fund criticized officials for not doing enough to fight corruption in Ukraine.
Shokin took no action to pursue cases against Zlochevsky throughout 2015, said Kasko, who was Shokin’s deputy overseeing international cooperation and helping in asset-recovery investigations. Kasko said he had urged Shokin to pursue the investigations.
Dumbfuck -- opinion is not proof.
Similar threads
New Topics
-
Is it true that the Iranian Embasay in Denmark raises the old Persian Flag?- Started by BackAgain
- Replies: 1
-
-
-
-
