I guess they don't want jurors selected ahead of time, who might want to do their own research, while waiting for the trial to start.
Jodi Arias Penalty
- Thread starter testarosa
- Start date
I guess they don't want jurors selected ahead of time, who might want to do their own research, while waiting for the trial to start.
That made me laugh. Maybe it was her bro.
There was a feed? I thought there wasn't going to be a feed. Oh well, got work done.
- Thread starter
- #4,947
I don't know. Also, there were other people waiting for court in the courtroom, this wasn't like a full Jodi day, this was one hearing in the middle of a docket of hearings.
- Moderator
- #4,950
Yep, but it was only for comments from the media (ABC15 link).
Live Video | ABC15.com | Phoenix, Arizona | KNXV-TV | Local and Breaking News, Weather, Radar, Traffic, Life, Sports
Jodi Arias sentencing: No ruling from judge on postponement of penalty phase
"PHOENIX - A judge on Thursday announced she will not rule on a motion to postpone the Jodi Arias sentencing phase to January 2014.
Judge Sherry Stephens set another court date to July 18.
Arias arrived in the courtroom wearing jailhouse stripes and went into the judge's chambers shortly after 8:30 a.m. with attorneys and the aunt of victim Travis Alexander.
Judge Stephens heard motions from both sides in the judge's chambers and was expected to issue a ruling.
Prosecutor Juan Martinez asked Judge Stephens earlier this month to reject the defense team's request to delay until next year, saying none of the reasons offered in their motion warrants a postponement.
Arias' attorneys asked for a postponement to allow their client time to gather witnesses to testify on her behalf.
They also have said they have scheduling conflicts with the current July 18 date set for retrial.
Arias was convicted of first-degree murder May 8 in the June 2008 death of her former boyfriend, Alexander.
About two weeks later, the same panel failed to reach a unanimous decision on whether to her punishment."
Notice what I highlighted in RED. The hearing for the motion is re-set for July 18, same day the 2nd round of the penalty phase was to begin. So if they have schedule conflicts with that date for the retrial, why are they ok with a ruling on the motion that day? HMMMMMMM
Tink
Active Member
- May 19, 2013
- 948
- 60
- 28
Yep, but it was only for comments from the media (ABC15 link).
Live Video | ABC15.com | Phoenix, Arizona | KNXV-TV | Local and Breaking News, Weather, Radar, Traffic, Life, Sports
Jodi Arias sentencing: No ruling from judge on postponement of penalty phase
"PHOENIX - A judge on Thursday announced she will not rule on a motion to postpone the Jodi Arias sentencing phase to January 2014.
Judge Sherry Stephens set another court date to July 18.
Arias arrived in the courtroom wearing jailhouse stripes and went into the judge's chambers shortly after 8:30 a.m. with attorneys and the aunt of victim Travis Alexander.
Judge Stephens heard motions from both sides in the judge's chambers and was expected to issue a ruling.
Prosecutor Juan Martinez asked Judge Stephens earlier this month to reject the defense team's request to delay until next year, saying none of the reasons offered in their motion warrants a postponement.
Arias' attorneys asked for a postponement to allow their client time to gather witnesses to testify on her behalf.
They also have said they have scheduling conflicts with the current July 18 date set for retrial.
Arias was convicted of first-degree murder May 8 in the June 2008 death of her former boyfriend, Alexander.
About two weeks later, the same panel failed to reach a unanimous decision on whether to her punishment."
Notice what I highlighted in RED. The hearing for the motion is re-set for July 18, same day the 2nd round of the penalty phase was to begin. So if they have schedule conflicts with that date for the retrial, why are they ok with a ruling on the motion that day? HMMMMMMM
I'm guessing there will be another motion or delay but why not just say something today? Maybe Wilmott will just handle the motion while Nurmi is out of town. She can handle the motion alone its not the same as picking a new jury where they both need to be there.
- Thread starter
- #4,954
Don't know, they just checked it. Probably for illegal paraphernalia like crayons and pens. lol
- Thread starter
- #4,955
Yep, but it was only for comments from the media (ABC15 link).
Live Video | ABC15.com | Phoenix, Arizona | KNXV-TV | Local and Breaking News, Weather, Radar, Traffic, Life, Sports
Jodi Arias sentencing: No ruling from judge on postponement of penalty phase
"PHOENIX - A judge on Thursday announced she will not rule on a motion to postpone the Jodi Arias sentencing phase to January 2014.
Judge Sherry Stephens set another court date to July 18.
Arias arrived in the courtroom wearing jailhouse stripes and went into the judge's chambers shortly after 8:30 a.m. with attorneys and the aunt of victim Travis Alexander.
Judge Stephens heard motions from both sides in the judge's chambers and was expected to issue a ruling.
Prosecutor Juan Martinez asked Judge Stephens earlier this month to reject the defense team's request to delay until next year, saying none of the reasons offered in their motion warrants a postponement.
Arias' attorneys asked for a postponement to allow their client time to gather witnesses to testify on her behalf.
They also have said they have scheduling conflicts with the current July 18 date set for retrial.
Arias was convicted of first-degree murder May 8 in the June 2008 death of her former boyfriend, Alexander.
About two weeks later, the same panel failed to reach a unanimous decision on whether to her punishment."
Notice what I highlighted in RED. The hearing for the motion is re-set for July 18, same day the 2nd round of the penalty phase was to begin. So if they have schedule conflicts with that date for the retrial, why are they ok with a ruling on the motion that day? HMMMMMMM
I noted your red earlier and went back and red the original motion which included THAT DATE. mmm-hmmm.
Tink - the point on that, is if JW is going to handle it, why file the motion they had to postpone due to that, then schedule the date for that date cited in the motion. yep. whatevah.
I figured it was something like, get your witnesses and we'll see what your progress is in a month before she rules. Dang, if you can't get some witnesses in 30-60 days, how you going to get some by January? Waiting for the niece/nephew to grow old enough to testify on her behalf?
- Thread starter
- #4,956
#abc15 will soon be posting court proceedings and excerpt from jury interviews post court on ABC15 Arizona | KNXV-TV Phoenix | News, Weather, Sports, Things To Do
I've heard enough from jurors, at this point.
Yep, but it was only for comments from the media (ABC15 link).
Live Video | ABC15.com | Phoenix, Arizona | KNXV-TV | Local and Breaking News, Weather, Radar, Traffic, Life, Sports
Jodi Arias sentencing: No ruling from judge on postponement of penalty phase
"PHOENIX - A judge on Thursday announced she will not rule on a motion to postpone the Jodi Arias sentencing phase to January 2014.
Judge Sherry Stephens set another court date to July 18.
Arias arrived in the courtroom wearing jailhouse stripes and went into the judge's chambers shortly after 8:30 a.m. with attorneys and the aunt of victim Travis Alexander.
Judge Stephens heard motions from both sides in the judge's chambers and was expected to issue a ruling.
Prosecutor Juan Martinez asked Judge Stephens earlier this month to reject the defense team's request to delay until next year, saying none of the reasons offered in their motion warrants a postponement.
Arias' attorneys asked for a postponement to allow their client time to gather witnesses to testify on her behalf.
They also have said they have scheduling conflicts with the current July 18 date set for retrial.
Arias was convicted of first-degree murder May 8 in the June 2008 death of her former boyfriend, Alexander.
About two weeks later, the same panel failed to reach a unanimous decision on whether to her punishment."
Notice what I highlighted in RED. The hearing for the motion is re-set for July 18, same day the 2nd round of the penalty phase was to begin. So if they have schedule conflicts with that date for the retrial, why are they ok with a ruling on the motion that day? HMMMMMMM
I noted your red earlier and went back and red the original motion which included THAT DATE. mmm-hmmm.
Tink - the point on that, is if JW is going to handle it, why file the motion they had to postpone due to that, then schedule the date for that date cited in the motion. yep. whatevah.
I figured it was something like, get your witnesses and we'll see what your progress is in a month before she rules. Dang, if you can't get some witnesses in 30-60 days, how you going to get some by January? Waiting for the niece/nephew to grow old enough to testify on her behalf?
Maybe they are trying to get, ahem, "expert" witnesses to commit to a time?
Similar threads
New Topics
-
-
-
Trump kicks Tucker Carlson out of MAGA [Tuckiyya Qatarlson]- Started by Pastelli
- Replies: 3
-
Who was actually being psychologically tested?- Started by DennisPTate
- Replies: 6
-
