bripat9643
Diamond Member
- Apr 1, 2011
- 170,170
- 47,370
- 2,180
We all lost. The omnipotent state won.You lost. Get over it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We all lost. The omnipotent state won.You lost. Get over it.
I know....and I just explained itAgain, I was quoting you.
We all lost. The omnipotent state won.
Sure you did. You're just too stupid to know it.Nope, you lost. I didn't.
Sure you did. You're just too stupid to know it.
John Durham did.yes because the GoP DAs don’t abuse their offices
OR TO AID OR CONCEAL THE COMMISSION THEREOFPenal Law § 175.10 reads: "A person is guilty of falsifying business records in the first degree when he commits the crime of falsifying business records in the second degree, and when his intent to defraud includes an intent to commit another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof." T
um John Durham isn't a DA you idiot....geez...you are so wrong all the timeJohn Durham did.
I didn’t say he was a DA.um John Durham isn't a DA you idiot....geez...you are so wrong all the time
I didn't....I am still waiting on you to tell me that crimeOR TO AID OR CONCEAL THE COMMISSION THEREOF
how’d you miss that? You quoted it
Let's go over the post....I saidI didn’t say he was a DA.
But he did abuse his power. That’s for sure.
You said .....John Durham did.yes because the GoP DAs don’t abuse their offices
You answered your own questionI didn't....I am still waiting on you to tell me that crime
Read that again jackassPenal Law § 175.10 reads: "A person is guilty of falsifying business records in the first degree when he commits the crime of falsifying business records in the second degree, and when his intent to defraud includes an intent to commit another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof." T
hahaha yeah ooook....I'll take that as a white flag....You answered your own question
I didn't....I am still waiting on you to tell me that crime
So you’re okay with prosecutors abusing power as long as they aren’t a DA.Let's go over the post....I said
You said .....John Durham did.
How did he abuse his power? Wait nevermind...not only did you not know he wasn't a DA, your defense is that you can't comprehend words....so I don't think I even want to go down this rabbit hole with someone that empty
I saw no evidence he did, he was assigned to review something and did.So you’re okay with prosecutors abusing power as long as they aren’t a DA.
Really tells us a lot about your lack of character.
Bragg doesn't have the authoritiy to prosecute Fed Law.Bragg hasn't said yet. Possibly:
- Title 52, United States Code, Section 30101
- N.Y. Elec. Law § 17-152
- N.Y. Elec. Law § 14-126
Bragg has already warned Jordan not to interfere in his prosecution
Congress does not have oversight on state prosecutions
Will Jordan be next?
again, I ask what crime?Read that again jackass
Especially the last 8 words