Jim Jordan Warns Bragg

[bripat9643]

Prosecuting violations of state law, which is his job.

I really shouldn’t have to explain this to you. It’s not that complicated. But alas, your brain is so very smooth.

No, he's prosecuting federal campaing law and the IRS code, fuckstick.

 

[Lisa558]

Falsifying business records in the first degree is a felony.

Did you read the indictment? It’s like the first sentence.

For that claim to hold, there needs to be an underlying crime. What’s the underlying crime?

 

[Marener]

We understand that he is going after a $130,000 payment as part of an NDA to a slutty, while Hillary walks after paying a law firm to create a Russia conspiracy hoax to destroy her opponent.

Don’t blame me. Trump’s DoJ didn’t prosecute Clinton. Blame your obese cult leader.

 

[Marener]

For that claim to hold, there needs to be an underlying crime. What’s the underlying crime?

Campaign finance fraud.

 

[Lisa558]

No, he's prosecuting federal campaing law and the IRS code, fuckstick.

Yup. Anything else is a misdemeanor. Which has expired. So he’s prosecuting a federal crime over which he has no jurisdiction.

And Biden smirks.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Prosecuting violations of state law, which is his job.

His job is to prosecute criminals which he has a terrible record of. Much of his cases in violent crime he drops to a misdemeanor and his felony conviction rate is deplorable. But for politics? He has all the time in the world.

 

[Lisa558]

Don’t blame me. Trump’s DoJ didn’t prosecute Clinton. Blame your obese cult leader.

Trump’s DOJ was staffed with Democratic operatives, and was busy creating the Russia Hoax against him.

When Trump gets back in, Gd-willing, he needs to fire the entire lot of them.

 

[BackAgain]

No one is violating equal protection rights.

Bragg is.

There is no evidence of partisanship.

Of course there is.

Republicans are the ones who are acting in a partisan manner.

No. That would be the Democraps.

 

[Marener]

His job is to prosecute criminals which he has a terrible record of. Much of his cases in violent crime he drops to a misdemeanor and his felony conviction rate is deplorable. But for politics? He has all the time in the world.

Oh okay. You think politicians are above the law.

 

[Marener]

Trump’s DOJ was staffed with Democratic operatives, and was busy creating the Russia Hoax against him.

When Trump gets back in, Gd-willing, he needs to fire the entire lot of them.

Trump’s DoJ was staffed with US attorneys that he hand picked not to mention his hand picked AG.

Your excuses are as pathetic as they are false.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

It’s definitely their intent to interfere. No prosecutor would answer questions about ongoing investigations which could jeopardize the prosecution of crimes.

It’s common sense.

However Congress reserves the right to ask questions about the money they appropriated. So don't say it's interfering with an investigation when it's not.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

None of this has happened. Your saying it does not make it true.

Bragg's Trump indictment is a campaign promise kept

Alvin Bragg, the local district attorney in Manhattan who has led the effort to indict former President Donald Trump, is an elected official. He ran for his current office in

www.oleantimesherald.com

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

No wonder you’re confused. You were too lazy to read the statement of fact.

If you had, you’d have seen that the second crime is very clearly laid out and you wouldn’t be repeating lies about Bragg.

Sounds good. Give me the page number or indictment number where it states the second crime.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

If the best you got is a jurisdictional claim, Trump would have this case dismissed by now

You got to come up with a better story

You can't get a case dismissed in a grand jury hearing. It has to go to trial to do that.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Oh okay. You think politicians are above the law.

No, I think that addressing violent crime and the increase of it in places like NYC is paramount to petty shit like misdemeanors in a presidential campaign.

 

[Clipper]

Not really. Sometimes the only way to stop the government from harassing you is a plea bargain. That's what happened to Trump with the phony discrimination lawsuit against his company. After years of Florida going after Rush Limbaugh, it's what he had to do to stop them from constantly harassing him about using Oxycontin.

Even Sarah Palin quit her position as Governor because the Communists kept placing lawsuit after lawsuit on her until she couldn't afford to defend herself any longer.

When the Communists want you out of the picture or to stop you in your goals, they have unlimited taxpayer resources to get their way. It's why they hate Trump so much. He also has nearly unlimited resources to fight back against them. They're not used to a person with his arrogance and determination.

Are you nuts? Limbaugh was busted for Dr shopping & recieving 2000 painkillers over a 3 yr period. He received a slap on the wrist even though he frequently ranted & raved that drug users should be jailed.

Another one of Trump's "best people".

 

[scruffy]

This is about the state crime of falsifying financial records to cover up a felony.

That whole law will get tossed on appeal. It's far too vague, AND, it places the burden on the prosecution to prove intent, which is impossible.

 

[scruffy]

He’s not.

Which only proves the kangaroo nature of these non-charges.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Are you nuts? Limbaugh was busted for Dr shopping & recieving 2000 painkillers over a 3 yr period. He received a slap on the wrist even though he frequently ranted & raved that drug users should be jailed.

Another one of Trump's "best people".

He wasn't busted for anything. That's the reason for the plea deal.

 

[scruffy]

What evidence do you need? We both know that Cohen was prosecuted for illegal campaign contributions and pled guilty.

At least I hope we both know that. Either way it’s true.

So that proves that the law was broken. A conviction is proof of a violation of law.

But you have to prove that Trump was thinking about elections instead of taxes, which is completely impossible.

This case is so weak they should just dismiss it and move on.