Oh please, so are you now scouring the internet to find a statement by a rabbi. Want to do the same for a muslim cleric or a Christian one? Who the hell cares what one person says, no matter what faith he claims to represent, especially when it is clear he is being crapped on by the rest of this people. Like I said, go have a bagel.If you say they didn't exist until they got off the boat in the US, then it must be so.
Ah, now it has to lie now, having failed to rebut anything, just make up screeds as filler.
So tell us,Link o dodo, how should we refer to Yosef here; is he a Mexican, or a Rotarian, or maybe a Cambodian cab driver?
JERUSALEM (JTA) — Israeli Sephardic leader Rabbi Ovadia Yosef in his weekly Saturday night sermon said that non-Jews exist to serve Jews.
“Goyim were born only to serve us. Without that, they have no place in the world; only to serve the People of Israel,” he said during a public discussion of what kind of work non-Jews are allowed to perform on Shabbat.
Sephardi leader Yosef: Non-Jews exist to serve Jews - Jewish Telegraphic Agency
And, are these other Jews 'all the same' as well, as you obviously think? They are clearly antisemitic, right? you say they are, after all:
The American Jewish Committee condemned the rabbi’s remarks in a statement issued Monday.
"Rabbi Yosef’s remarks — suggesting outrageously that Jewish scripture asserts non-Jews exist to serve Jews — are abhorrent and an offense to human dignity and human equality,” said AJC Executive Director David Harris. "Judaism first taught the world that all individuals are created in the divine image, which helped form the basis of our moral code. A rabbi should be the first, not the last, to reflect that bedrock teaching of our tradition."
Maybe Yosef should be referred to as a Cherokee accountant?
That explains his feelings. Thanks for the info. Again Picaro seems to think it is somehow very very important.Oh please, so are you now scouring the internet to find a statement by a rabbi. Want to do the same for a muslim cleric or a Christian one? Who the hell cares what one person says, no matter what faith he claims to represent, especially when it is clear he is being crapped on by the rest of this people. Like I said, go have a bagel.If you say they didn't exist until they got off the boat in the US, then it must be so.
Ah, now it has to lie now, having failed to rebut anything, just make up screeds as filler.
So tell us,Link o dodo, how should we refer to Yosef here; is he a Mexican, or a Rotarian, or maybe a Cambodian cab driver?
JERUSALEM (JTA) — Israeli Sephardic leader Rabbi Ovadia Yosef in his weekly Saturday night sermon said that non-Jews exist to serve Jews.
“Goyim were born only to serve us. Without that, they have no place in the world; only to serve the People of Israel,” he said during a public discussion of what kind of work non-Jews are allowed to perform on Shabbat.
Sephardi leader Yosef: Non-Jews exist to serve Jews - Jewish Telegraphic Agency
And, are these other Jews 'all the same' as well, as you obviously think? They are clearly antisemitic, right? you say they are, after all:
The American Jewish Committee condemned the rabbi’s remarks in a statement issued Monday.
"Rabbi Yosef’s remarks — suggesting outrageously that Jewish scripture asserts non-Jews exist to serve Jews — are abhorrent and an offense to human dignity and human equality,” said AJC Executive Director David Harris. "Judaism first taught the world that all individuals are created in the divine image, which helped form the basis of our moral code. A rabbi should be the first, not the last, to reflect that bedrock teaching of our tradition."
Maybe Yosef should be referred to as a Cherokee accountant?
Rabbi Ovadia (Ovadia is the hebew equivalent of ABDULLAH) was born in Iraq----witnessed the
murder of family and friends in Iraq in the early 1940s by Pics fave Nazi-
muslims and was in his NINETIES when when he made his controversial
remarks which Pic presents in mistranslation. He (Ovadia not pic) died shortly
thereafter.
As far as I know Constantin wrote nothing. Constantin needed a reliable written source for the Christian religion. The bible is a canonized summary of books (that's why it's called the book of books). This yet existing books were accepted as authentic writings. The First Council of Nicea, which was initiated from emperor Constantin, who needed a common source for the monotheistic religion within the roman empire - made practically only a table of contents, the biblical canon. And Constantin was by the way also not a Christian. Empress Fausta, his wife, the daughter of emperor Maximian, was a Christian. Under Constantin the bible was "only" canonized. Tsi makes notginrg true or wrign ewhtaö was not canonized. What they did is to give textes the attribute "trustworthy information".
As far as I know the Jews were citizens of Rome since the early third century. They bought the citizenship from a previous Roman emperor.
Hmm ... it's by the way somehow funny that the problems Constatine had once are comparable with the problems of the USA and their hypernationalistic pseudo-religion "USA". In the USA made so many people the bible to a god and do not like any longer to see everywhere all around them the word of god (and their own sins against gods creation too) so as a result they broke the Christian religion into a powder of empty phrases instead to fear (= to respect) the power of god any longer. Gods first revelation is his creation, the nature all around and in us. It needs all of this damned "fucking" universe for our existence - and what do "we" do if we have to do only a little to support god and his creation? Very little? Nothing? Less than nothing? ...
all true------it is likely that Constantine was not even literate (anyone?) HOWEVER---it is also true that regarding the NEW TESTAMENT---
Constantine had absolute power of VETO. To suggest that he had only a little or nothing to do with the final product is IDIOTIC
Good grief. Augustinus and Marc Aurel for example were excellent philosophers. You should not think a Roman emperor was an idiot. The "pax romana", the roman empire, needed this "product" - but he was not able to make it on his own. And only because you call other people idiots makes nothing real, what's in your thoughts. Under Constantine no one wrote the textes of the bible.
As far as I know Constantin wrote nothing. Constantin needed a reliable written source for the Christian religion. The bible is a canonized summary of books (that's why it's called the book of books). This yet existing books were accepted as authentic writings. The First Council of Nicea, which was initiated from emperor Constantin, who needed a common source for the monotheistic religion within the roman empire - made practically only a table of contents, the biblical canon. And Constantin was by the way also not a Christian. Empress Fausta, his wife, the daughter of emperor Maximian, was a Christian. Under Constantin the bible was "only" canonized. Tsi makes notginrg true or wrign ewhtaö was not canonized. What they did is to give textes the attribute "trustworthy information".
As far as I know the Jews were citizens of Rome since the early third century. They bought the citizenship from a previous Roman emperor.
Hmm ... it's by the way somehow funny that the problems Constatine had once are comparable with the problems of the USA and their hypernationalistic pseudo-religion "USA". In the USA made so many people the bible to a god and do not like any longer to see everywhere all around them the word of god (and their own sins against gods creation too) so as a result they broke the Christian religion into a powder of empty phrases instead to fear (= to respect) the power of god any longer. Gods first revelation is his creation, the nature all around and in us. It needs all of this damned "fucking" universe for our existence - and what do "we" do if we have to do only a little to support god and his creation? Very little? Nothing? Less than nothing? ...
all true------it is likely that Constantine was not even literate (anyone?) HOWEVER---it is also true that regarding the NEW TESTAMENT---
Constantine had absolute power of VETO. To suggest that he had only a little or nothing to do with the final product is IDIOTIC
Good grief. Augustinus and Marc Aurel for example were excellent philosophers. You should not think a Roman emperor was an idiot. The "pax romana", the roman empire, needed this "product" - but he was not able to make it on his own. And only because you call other people idiots makes nothing real, what's in your thoughts. Under Constantine no one wrote the textes of the bible.
Constantine was not an "idiot"----neither was Adolf Hitler who adopted
Perhaps. But they were that way before so perhaps not.
We are witness to a global history of peace amongst all different ideologies.
But the maps have changed. Quite a lot actually. So some would argue there has not been global peace among ideologies. While others will argue it is the calm before the storm.
Have you ever heard of sarcasm? If is goes over your head, I pity you.
Sarcasm...the world has been one tulmultous mess since free will man was created.
Yes, I have. One time.
Finally something we can agree upon.
I don’t disrespect your beliefs, I disrespect those who have misquoted and mistranslated Tanach with the sole purpose of creating a new religion; they came way before you were born.
That explains his feelings. Thanks for the info. Again Picaro seems to think it is somehow very very important.Oh please, so are you now scouring the internet to find a statement by a rabbi. Want to do the same for a muslim cleric or a Christian one? Who the hell cares what one person says, no matter what faith he claims to represent, especially when it is clear he is being crapped on by the rest of this people. Like I said, go have a bagel.If you say they didn't exist until they got off the boat in the US, then it must be so.
Ah, now it has to lie now, having failed to rebut anything, just make up screeds as filler.
So tell us,Link o dodo, how should we refer to Yosef here; is he a Mexican, or a Rotarian, or maybe a Cambodian cab driver?
JERUSALEM (JTA) — Israeli Sephardic leader Rabbi Ovadia Yosef in his weekly Saturday night sermon said that non-Jews exist to serve Jews.
“Goyim were born only to serve us. Without that, they have no place in the world; only to serve the People of Israel,” he said during a public discussion of what kind of work non-Jews are allowed to perform on Shabbat.
Sephardi leader Yosef: Non-Jews exist to serve Jews - Jewish Telegraphic Agency
And, are these other Jews 'all the same' as well, as you obviously think? They are clearly antisemitic, right? you say they are, after all:
The American Jewish Committee condemned the rabbi’s remarks in a statement issued Monday.
"Rabbi Yosef’s remarks — suggesting outrageously that Jewish scripture asserts non-Jews exist to serve Jews — are abhorrent and an offense to human dignity and human equality,” said AJC Executive Director David Harris. "Judaism first taught the world that all individuals are created in the divine image, which helped form the basis of our moral code. A rabbi should be the first, not the last, to reflect that bedrock teaching of our tradition."
Maybe Yosef should be referred to as a Cherokee accountant?
Rabbi Ovadia (Ovadia is the hebew equivalent of ABDULLAH) was born in Iraq----witnessed the
murder of family and friends in Iraq in the early 1940s by Pics fave Nazi-
muslims and was in his NINETIES when when he made his controversial
remarks which Pic presents in mistranslation. He (Ovadia not pic) died shortly
thereafter.
