for the record---neither Jesus nor Christians are mentioned in the Talmud.
Some catechism whores have so claimed-----but it is not true. Jews do not
have a version of hell. Hell is a greek and roman construct. Sobie dear----
can you cite the BOOK OF THE TALMUD ----in which that claim that jesus is
boiling in excrement------you need not quote the putative lines----just the
name of the book. (this one always makes me laugh)
You know you Jews are being dishonest, when you say there's no Jewish version of Hell.
Plain & simply J00 do.
Tzoah Rotachat - Wikipedia
Tzoah Rotachat
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
tsoah rothachath — "boiling excrement") in the
Talmud and
Zohar is a location in
Gehenna (
Gehinnom) where the souls of
Jews who committed certain sins are sent for punishment. This form of punishment is cited as being of extreme nature, if not the most extreme, in the sense that those individuals sentenced there are not given relief even on
Shabbat, and are not released after the standard twelve-month period.
wrong again------GEHINNOM is not hell------it is a garbage dump outside the precincts of
Jerusalem----there is no DEVIL OR HADES presiding, it is not a place underground--
---and the entire issue is metaphor
It sure sounds very close to Hell to me.
Gehenna - Wikipedia
Cool...
Rather than study Scripture, go to Wikipedia.
Hell is
you that has no connection to God.
Here is a Holocaust survivor, and a Historian who's an Israeli Jew.
He exposed the Talmud, and basically "Crickets" from other Jews.
Israel and Anti-Gentile Traditions | My Jewish Learning
Are Jewish Lives Worth More?
In
Jewish History, Jewish Religion Shahak brings numerous texts and legal rulings to demonstrate Jewish antipathy to non-Jews. He mentions a passage from the that says that Jesus will be punished in hell by being immersed in boiling excrement. He relates that Jewish tradition teaches pious Jews to burn copies of the New Testament and curse the mothers of the dead when passing non-Jewish cemeteries. Shahak highlights the famous passage from Leviticus commanding Jews to "love thy neighbor as thyself" and mentions that, according to rabbinic interpretation, "thy neighbor" refers only to Jews.
Shahak further suggests that the Jewish tradition values Jewish life more than Gentile life. He cites Maimonides’ assertion that whereas one who murders a Jew is subject to the death penalty, one who murders a non-Jew is not (
Mishneh Torah, Laws of Murder 2:11). According to another leading commentator, indirectly causing the death of a non-Jew is no sin at all (Rabbi Yoel Sirkis,
Bayit Hadash, commentary on
Bet Yosef,
Yoreh Deah 158).
Shahak reiterates the well-known Jewish teaching that the duty to save a life supersedes all other obligations and notes that the rabbis interpreted this to apply to Jews only. According to the Talmud, "Gentiles are neither to be lifted [out of a well] nor hauled down [into it]" (
Tractate Avodah Zarah, 26b). Maimonides writes: "As for Gentiles with whom we are not at war…their death must not be caused, but it is forbidden to save them if they are at the point of death; if, for example, one of them is seen falling into the sea, he should not be rescued, for it is written: ‘neither shalt thou stand against the blood of thy fellow’–but [a Gentile] is not thy fellow" (
Mishneh Torah, Laws of Murder 4:11).
ADVERTISING
Indeed, Maimonides is the focus of much of Shahak’s analysis. Shahak believes that the 12th-century philosopher and talmudist was a Gentile-hater and racist. He quotes Maimonides’ statement that, "their [the Turks and the blacks] nature is like the nature of mute animals, and according to my opinion they are not on the level of human beings" (
Guide For the Perplexed, Book III, Chapter 51).
Practical Ramifications
Shahak recognizes that many of these traditions are not followed in practice, but he believes that, in general, they have been covered up, instead of confronted. In support of this claim, he refers to another a violent passage from Maimonides that is not translated in the bilingual addition of the
Guide published in Jerusalem in 1962. He sees this as a deliberate deception on the part of the editors to soften classical Jewish militancy. His own English translation of the passage, which discusses the command to kill Jewish infidels reads: "It is a duty to exterminate them with one’s own hands. Such as Jesus of Nazareth and his pupils, and Tzadoq and Baitos [the founders of the Sadducees] and their pupils, may the name of the wicked rot."
According to Shahak, Jewish "traditions of contempt" infiltrated Zionism and have affected Israeli policy towards its Arab citizens and the Palestinians. He cites three main areas where he believes this has occurred: residency rights, employment rights, and equality before the law.
As an example, he mentions that 92% of Israel’s land is legally restricted to Jews. While in other countries it would be labeled anti-Semitic if a policy excluded Jews from living on or owning land, in the Israeli context Jews tolerate it. He adds that based on the distinction in classical Judaism between reverence for Jewish cemeteries and not for non-Jewish ones, the state of Israel has destroyed hundreds of Muslim cemeteries, including one in order to build the Hilton Hotel in Tel Aviv.