Jerome Corsi negotiating plea with Mueller

[basquebromance]

 

[Uncensored2008]

I don't know who Corsi is.

An expert on political violence and terrorism. Corsi helped found and launch the Iran Freedom Foundation, a non-profit educational and charitable organization established to educate the public about the Islamic Republic of Iran and to promote freedom in the region. The IFF is made up of American and Iranian scholars, professionals, philanthropists and human rights advocates who have joined together to support the rights of the Iranian people.

It's why the deep staters hate him so much. Particularly the war hawks in the military industrial complex who want to keep that area of the world on fire.

Then the party must destroy him. Soros is invested in making Iran the major power in the middle east.

 

[Faun]

No, it’s not like pleading guilty since he didn’t plead guilty in their court. He had the opportunity to challenge it and given he had stopped practicing law nearly 2 decades earlier and had never taken a case to the U.S. Supreme Court, he opted to to resign from the Supreme Court bar instead.

No matter how desperate you are to try and spin it, Clinton wasn’t disbarred, as you (and trump), idiotically claimed.

You merely lack the intelligence to know any better and you lack the character needed to simply admit you’re wrong. Like I said earlier, I can live with that.

No, it’s not like pleading guilty since he didn’t plead guilty in their court.

What's the difference between 5 years in jail from a conviction and 5 years in jail from a plea?

The difference is Clinton was neither convicted by the Supreme Court nor did he work out a plea agreement with that court. You really suck at this analogy thing.

And still, he was not disbarred. A reality you should come to terms with.

One punishment for his perjury was he couldn't practice in front of the Supreme Court.

Can he practice in front of the Supreme Court or not?

It’s not really a punishment since he had given up his legal practice. Regardless, even if he hadn’t and even if he bothered to get his license to practice law in Arkansas reinstated, he still wasn’t disbarred. Not from the Arkansas bar; and not from the Supreme Court bar. He can’t practice in on front of of Supreme Court because he resigned from the Supreme Court bar.

A rational person in your shoes right now would simply admit they fucked up and move on. But alas, you’re a conservative.

You mean like Christina Ford?

You mean Christine Ford? Not exactly. Ford never sued, never went to court, and never had a case to dismiss.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Clinton didn't plead guilty to anything. He did pay Paula Jones to not appeal the fact that her case was thrown out of court. That's it.

Slick Willy said he 'never had sex with that woman'.
- He did.

Slick Willy said he never dropped his pants in front of Jones and told her to 'Suck It'.
- He then lied his ass off in court in front of the Jury and the Judge, resulting in his being found GUILTY of Contempt of Court for unethically lying / attempting to deceive, a violation of his oath of office by attempting to strip a US citizen of her right to a fair trial, one of the rights he swore to protect as President.

Of course Slick Willy did not 'admit' to anything. That would have violated one of the Clinton/Democrat Party tenants - 'Lie, Deny, & Justify'!

Mr. Innocent DID pay Jones a butt-load of money, after being severely damaged in the 1st court case - having been caught lying, found guilty of Contempt of Court, and stripped of his license to practice law for a time in Arkansas, making him LOOK as guilty of doing to Jones as what he really did. At this point he had had enough and just wanted her to go away. Hillary claimed Jones was the result of 'dragging a dollar through a trailer park' ... but it cost Slick Willy a helluva lot more than a $1 to make her go away!

The case was thrown out because Slick Willy contaminated the entire case by lying his ass off in court in front of the Jury and Judge. Not only did a sitting President get dragged into court in front of a Jury for dropping his pants and telling an unwilling woman to 'Suck It', not only did a sitting President get found GUILTY of Contempt of Court for unethical behavior, not only did a sitting President have his license to practice law stripped from him, this sitting President also got IMPEACHED for his perjury / deceit, unethical behavior, violation of his oath of office, and attempt to strip a US citizen of their right to a fair trial.

'That's it.'

....Yet none of this has anything to do with Corsi telling criminal Co-Conspirator / Illegitimate Special Counsel Mueller to take his PERJURY TRAP and go F* Himself!

The case was thrown out because Mrs. Jones had no evidence to support her claims.

That and $850 grand.

You're such a lying cocksucker, a typical Communist.

The case was not "thrown out" you lying fuck, Clinton settled out of court for nearly a million, because he would clearly lose.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/clinton/stories/jones111498.htm

 

[Uncensored2008]

Did they say he couldn't practice in front of the Supreme Court? DERP!

LOL

Read your own link, ya dumbfuck. It says he wasn’t disbarred.

He wasn't convicted.....he plead guilty....DERP!

Clinton didn't plead guilty to anything.

He did pay Paula Jones to not appeal the fact that her case was thrown out of court.

That's it.

Stop lying.

What reason did Bill have to pay Jones?
Had Jones appealed the case Bill would have gone to prison. He knew it and so does the rest of the world.

To end her retrying her lawsuit after it was dismissed due to lack of merit.

And for what does your deformed brain think Bill Clinton would have gone to prison?

If it was "dismissed" then there was no lawsuit.

But we all know you are lying, as always.

{
Jones filed her suit in May 1994, accusing Clinton of luring her to a suite at the Excelsior Hotel during a May 8, 1991, conference when he was governor of Arkansas and she was a state clerk. During that brief encounter, she said he touched her, tried to kiss her and dropped his pants and asked for oral sex. Clinton has denied that steadfastly, maintaining he does not even remember meeting her.

U.S. District Judge Susan Webber Wright dismissed the case last spring, ruling that even if Jones's allegations were true, such "boorish and offensive" behavior would not be severe enough to constitute sexual harassment under the law.

Jones then asked the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to overturn the decision and, after Starr's report came out, argued that Clinton's alleged misconduct during the case justified a reversal. Two members of the three-judge panel appeared sympathetic during oral arguments last month and on Tuesday the court asked for the full transcript of Clinton's Jan. 17 deposition in the case, which some lawyers close to the Jones camp interpreted as a sign that they were concerned about possible perjury by the president.}

Wright protected her close personal friend Clinton, but could not survive appeal. Her absurdly unethical act did little more than stall the action

 

[Uncensored2008]

Slick Willy said he 'never had sex with that woman'.
- He did.

Slick Willy said he never dropped his pants in front of Jones and told her to 'Suck It'.
- He then lied his ass off in court in front of the Jury and the Judge, resulting in his being found GUILTY of Contempt of Court for unethically lying / attempting to deceive, a violation of his oath of office by attempting to strip a US citizen of her right to a fair trial, one of the rights he swore to protect as President.

Of course Slick Willy did not 'admit' to anything. That would have violated one of the Clinton/Democrat Party tenants - 'Lie, Deny, & Justify'!

Mr. Innocent DID pay Jones a butt-load of money, after being severely damaged in the 1st court case - having been caught lying, found guilty of Contempt of Court, and stripped of his license to practice law for a time in Arkansas, making him LOOK as guilty of doing to Jones as what he really did. At this point he had had enough and just wanted her to go away. Hillary claimed Jones was the result of 'dragging a dollar through a trailer park' ... but it cost Slick Willy a helluva lot more than a $1 to make her go away!

The case was thrown out because Slick Willy contaminated the entire case by lying his ass off in court in front of the Jury and Judge. Not only did a sitting President get dragged into court in front of a Jury for dropping his pants and telling an unwilling woman to 'Suck It', not only did a sitting President get found GUILTY of Contempt of Court for unethical behavior, not only did a sitting President have his license to practice law stripped from him, this sitting President also got IMPEACHED for his perjury / deceit, unethical behavior, violation of his oath of office, and attempt to strip a US citizen of their right to a fair trial.

'That's it.'

....Yet none of this has anything to do with Corsi telling criminal Co-Conspirator / Illegitimate Special Counsel Mueller to take his PERJURY TRAP and go F* Himself!

The case was thrown out because Mrs. Jones had no evidence to support her claims.

That's not right either:

Paula Jones - Wikipedia

On April 2, 1998, before the case could reach trial,[16] Judge Wright granted President Clinton's motion for dismissal, ruling that Jones could not show that she had suffered any damages​

Fucking moron, it’s dead on accurate and what you posted doesn’t actually counter what I said.

Hmmm, yes it does, moron. "No evidence" is something different than "no damages." Don't imagine that no one noticed you tripping over your own dick.

Fucking moron, lack of merit means she could not prove any damages.

And yet, Clinton settled.

Wright was little more than part of the Clinton defense, but the appeals court had agreed to take the case. Not only was Bill Clinton exposed, but Wright faced repercussions for her highly unethical ruling on behalf of her close personal friend and former law professor...

 

[Lesh]

NBC News has published excerpts of some of these emails. There is an email trail showing that Corsi knew ahead of the dump what was in the hacked cache.

"Word is friend in embassy plans 2 more dumps," Corsi wrote on Aug. 2, 2016, referring to WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, according to the draft court papers. "One shortly after I'm back. 2nd in Oct. Impact planned to be very damaging."

Schecter asked Corsi about this in her interview with him:

SCHECTER: When he said "time to let more than Podesta be exposed in bed with enemy, if they're not ready to drop HRC." What does that mean?

CORSI: Well, I was saying to Stone that I thought these were going to be so damaging to Hillary, as they had been to Debbie Wasserman Schultz, that the Democrats might want to say Hillary's sick and old and get rid of her because I believe these Podesta e-mails would destroy Hillary. Why did I think they were coming out in October? Because I said to myself, if I had these e-mails, I'd use them as the October surprise and if I had them why would they come out drip by drip? It''s because Assange is very strategic, he understands the news cycle.

Corsi is going to jail

Stone is going to jail

Trump is in deep shit

 

[Faun]

The case was thrown out because Mrs. Jones had no evidence to support her claims.

That's not right either:

Paula Jones - Wikipedia

On April 2, 1998, before the case could reach trial,[16] Judge Wright granted President Clinton's motion for dismissal, ruling that Jones could not show that she had suffered any damages​

Fucking moron, it’s dead on accurate and what you posted doesn’t actually counter what I said.

Hmmm, yes it does, moron. "No evidence" is something different than "no damages." Don't imagine that no one noticed you tripping over your own dick.

Fucking moron, lack of merit means she could not prove any damages.

You said it was dismissed because she had no evidence that the events she claim ever happened. That's clearly wrong.

Don't imagine no one noticed how you're trying to weasel your way out of being clearly and emphatically wrong.

Fucking moron, that’s still lack of merit. Proving damages requires evidence.

 

[Faun]

Clinton didn't plead guilty to anything. He did pay Paula Jones to not appeal the fact that her case was thrown out of court. That's it.

Slick Willy said he 'never had sex with that woman'.
- He did.

Slick Willy said he never dropped his pants in front of Jones and told her to 'Suck It'.
- He then lied his ass off in court in front of the Jury and the Judge, resulting in his being found GUILTY of Contempt of Court for unethically lying / attempting to deceive, a violation of his oath of office by attempting to strip a US citizen of her right to a fair trial, one of the rights he swore to protect as President.

Of course Slick Willy did not 'admit' to anything. That would have violated one of the Clinton/Democrat Party tenants - 'Lie, Deny, & Justify'!

Mr. Innocent DID pay Jones a butt-load of money, after being severely damaged in the 1st court case - having been caught lying, found guilty of Contempt of Court, and stripped of his license to practice law for a time in Arkansas, making him LOOK as guilty of doing to Jones as what he really did. At this point he had had enough and just wanted her to go away. Hillary claimed Jones was the result of 'dragging a dollar through a trailer park' ... but it cost Slick Willy a helluva lot more than a $1 to make her go away!

The case was thrown out because Slick Willy contaminated the entire case by lying his ass off in court in front of the Jury and Judge. Not only did a sitting President get dragged into court in front of a Jury for dropping his pants and telling an unwilling woman to 'Suck It', not only did a sitting President get found GUILTY of Contempt of Court for unethical behavior, not only did a sitting President have his license to practice law stripped from him, this sitting President also got IMPEACHED for his perjury / deceit, unethical behavior, violation of his oath of office, and attempt to strip a US citizen of their right to a fair trial.

'That's it.'

....Yet none of this has anything to do with Corsi telling criminal Co-Conspirator / Illegitimate Special Counsel Mueller to take his PERJURY TRAP and go F* Himself!

The case was thrown out because Mrs. Jones had no evidence to support her claims.

That and $850 grand.

You're such a lying cocksucker, a typical Communist.

The case was not "thrown out" you lying fuck, Clinton settled out of court for nearly a million, because he would clearly lose.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/clinton/stories/jones111498.htm

The case was dismissed, ya raving lunatic.

For the foregoing reasons, the court finds that the president's and Ferguson's motions for summary judgment should both be and hereby are granted. There being no remaining issues, the Court will enter judgment dismissing this case.

It is so ordered this 1st day of April 1998.

Susan Webber Wright, United States District Judge​

... the $850,000 settlement was agreed upon between the two parties for Jones to drop her appeal of having her lawsuit thrown out of court due to lack of merit.

 

[Faun]

LOL

Read your own link, ya dumbfuck. It says he wasn’t disbarred.

He wasn't convicted.....he plead guilty....DERP!

Clinton didn't plead guilty to anything.

He did pay Paula Jones to not appeal the fact that her case was thrown out of court.

That's it.

Stop lying.

What reason did Bill have to pay Jones?
Had Jones appealed the case Bill would have gone to prison. He knew it and so does the rest of the world.

To end her retrying her lawsuit after it was dismissed due to lack of merit.

And for what does your deformed brain think Bill Clinton would have gone to prison?

If it was "dismissed" then there was no lawsuit.

But we all know you are lying, as always.

{
Jones filed her suit in May 1994, accusing Clinton of luring her to a suite at the Excelsior Hotel during a May 8, 1991, conference when he was governor of Arkansas and she was a state clerk. During that brief encounter, she said he touched her, tried to kiss her and dropped his pants and asked for oral sex. Clinton has denied that steadfastly, maintaining he does not even remember meeting her.

U.S. District Judge Susan Webber Wright dismissed the case last spring, ruling that even if Jones's allegations were true, such "boorish and offensive" behavior would not be severe enough to constitute sexual harassment under the law.

Jones then asked the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to overturn the decision and, after Starr's report came out, argued that Clinton's alleged misconduct during the case justified a reversal. Two members of the three-judge panel appeared sympathetic during oral arguments last month and on Tuesday the court asked for the full transcript of Clinton's Jan. 17 deposition in the case, which some lawyers close to the Jones camp interpreted as a sign that they were concerned about possible perjury by the president.}

Wright protected her close personal friend Clinton, but could not survive appeal. Her absurdly unethical act did little more than stall the action

”If it was "dismissed" then there was no lawsuit.”

Dayum, it’s like you’re not connected to reality at all. She filed a lawsuit .... it was thrown out due to lack of merit. She filed an appeal and then dropped it when Clinton paid her to go away.

 

[Faun]

The case was thrown out because Mrs. Jones had no evidence to support her claims.

That's not right either:

Paula Jones - Wikipedia

On April 2, 1998, before the case could reach trial,[16] Judge Wright granted President Clinton's motion for dismissal, ruling that Jones could not show that she had suffered any damages​

Fucking moron, it’s dead on accurate and what you posted doesn’t actually counter what I said.

Hmmm, yes it does, moron. "No evidence" is something different than "no damages." Don't imagine that no one noticed you tripping over your own dick.

Fucking moron, lack of merit means she could not prove any damages.

And yet, Clinton settled.

Wright was little more than part of the Clinton defense, but the appeals court had agreed to take the case. Not only was Bill Clinton exposed, but Wright faced repercussions for her highly unethical ruling on behalf of her close personal friend and former law professor...

Clinton settled to get her to go away after he defeated her in court.

”Wright was little more than part of the Clinton defense”​

You’re too fucking insane. I don’t know why I bother.

Retard, what you idiotically call “part of the Clinton defense” and “close personal friend” was in fact, the very judge who held Clinton in contempt of court.

Don’t you ever get tired of exposing your senility?

”but the appeals court had agreed to take the case.”​

Crazy person... you can’t even get the simple facts right. The appeals court never agreed to take the case.

 

[bripat9643]

No, it’s not like pleading guilty since he didn’t plead guilty in their court.

What's the difference between 5 years in jail from a conviction and 5 years in jail from a plea?

The difference is Clinton was neither convicted by the Supreme Court nor did he work out a plea agreement with that court. You really suck at this analogy thing.

And still, he was not disbarred. A reality you should come to terms with.

One punishment for his perjury was he couldn't practice in front of the Supreme Court.

Can he practice in front of the Supreme Court or not?

It’s not really a punishment since he had given up his legal practice. Regardless, even if he hadn’t and even if he bothered to get his license to practice law in Arkansas reinstated, he still wasn’t disbarred. Not from the Arkansas bar; and not from the Supreme Court bar. He can’t practice in on front of of Supreme Court because he resigned from the Supreme Court bar.

A rational person in your shoes right now would simply admit they fucked up and move on. But alas, you’re a conservative.

You mean like Christina Ford?

You mean Christine Ford? Not exactly. Ford never sued, never went to court, and never had a case to dismiss.

She didn't exactly admit she fucked up and moved on, did she?

 

[dannyboys]

NBC News has published excerpts of some of these emails. There is an email trail showing that Corsi knew ahead of the dump what was in the hacked cache.

"Word is friend in embassy plans 2 more dumps," Corsi wrote on Aug. 2, 2016, referring to WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, according to the draft court papers. "One shortly after I'm back. 2nd in Oct. Impact planned to be very damaging."

Schecter asked Corsi about this in her interview with him:

SCHECTER: When he said "time to let more than Podesta be exposed in bed with enemy, if they're not ready to drop HRC." What does that mean?

CORSI: Well, I was saying to Stone that I thought these were going to be so damaging to Hillary, as they had been to Debbie Wasserman Schultz, that the Democrats might want to say Hillary's sick and old and get rid of her because I believe these Podesta e-mails would destroy Hillary. Why did I think they were coming out in October? Because I said to myself, if I had these e-mails, I'd use them as the October surprise and if I had them why would they come out drip by drip? It''s because Assange is very strategic, he understands the news cycle.

Corsi is going to jail

Stone is going to jail

Trump is in deep shit

Corsi just told Mullier to stick his bullshit 'probe' up Mueller's ass!
IF Corsi ends up serving 12 days in prison it makes Mueller's 'probe' look laughable.
Everyone is getting 14 days in the slammer!
What a pathetic joke!

 

[Faun]

NBC News has published excerpts of some of these emails. There is an email trail showing that Corsi knew ahead of the dump what was in the hacked cache.

"Word is friend in embassy plans 2 more dumps," Corsi wrote on Aug. 2, 2016, referring to WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, according to the draft court papers. "One shortly after I'm back. 2nd in Oct. Impact planned to be very damaging."

Schecter asked Corsi about this in her interview with him:

SCHECTER: When he said "time to let more than Podesta be exposed in bed with enemy, if they're not ready to drop HRC." What does that mean?

CORSI: Well, I was saying to Stone that I thought these were going to be so damaging to Hillary, as they had been to Debbie Wasserman Schultz, that the Democrats might want to say Hillary's sick and old and get rid of her because I believe these Podesta e-mails would destroy Hillary. Why did I think they were coming out in October? Because I said to myself, if I had these e-mails, I'd use them as the October surprise and if I had them why would they come out drip by drip? It''s because Assange is very strategic, he understands the news cycle.

Corsi is going to jail

Stone is going to jail

Trump is in deep shit

Corsi just told Mullier to stick his bullshit 'probe' up Mueller's ass!
IF Corsi ends up serving 12 days in prison it makes Mueller's 'probe' look laughable.
Everyone is getting 14 days in the slammer!
What a pathetic joke!

Why would Corsi even spend one minute in jail? There’s no evidence that anyone from Mueller’s office has even suggested corsi is facing perjury charges. Corsi he is a proven liar. It’s entirely possible he’s making this whole thing up for attention.