JD Vance calls Jamine Crockett a street girl. She screams RACISM!!!

The President does not have immunity from acts not connected with the official duties of the office.
Yet the OLC opinion from years ago prevents a prez from being prosecuted while in office.
 
There are circumstances that demand enhanced interrogation techniques.
So, as I said, you believe torture is justified under certain circumstances. US law makes no such distinctions.

AI Overview

In U.S. law, torture is absolutely prohibited under all circumstances, with no exceptions for "ticking bomb" scenarios or emergencies, as it violates international treaties and federal laws like the
Detainee Treatment Act (DTA) and War Crimes Act, making it a crime under domestic and international law, though debates continue on extreme hypothetical situations.
 
Two days ago, you lefties were spamming the RECESSION talking point.

To be clear, you were spamming it, as a BAD THING, and TRUMP'S FAULT.

A recession is TWO quarters of a NEGATIVE growth number, thus ANY positve number, if you were serious people, would be shocking to you and cause to reevaluate your entire position.

In the context of TWO days ago, ANY positive number would be a huge win for America and MAGA.

It is possible that recent events might have weakened data collection and maybe that number is somewhat exaggerated.

Can you admit that ANY positive number, means that your spamming of RECESSION, was wrong?
Made up bullshit from the Shitler! BLS.
 
There are circumstances that demand enhanced interrogation techniques.

Do you have other instances of its use?
AI Overview

The War Crimes Act of 1996 (18 U.S.C. § 2441) is a U.S. federal law making it a crime to commit "grave breaches" of the Geneva Conventions, allowing prosecution of anyone, U.S. or foreign, inside or outside the U.S., for acts like willful killing, torture, or inhuman treatment against protected persons, fulfilling international obligations by criminalizing severe violations of the laws of war. It provides penalties including fines, life imprisonment, or death if a victim dies.

Rice was part of a small group of Bushies who voted to authorize the CIA's use of waterboarding.
 
So, as I said, you believe torture is justified under certain circumstances. US law makes no such distinctions.

AI Overview

In U.S. law, torture is absolutely prohibited under all circumstances, with no exceptions for "ticking bomb" scenarios or emergencies, as it violates international treaties and federal laws like the
Detainee Treatment Act (DTA) and War Crimes Act, making it a crime under domestic and international law, though debates continue on extreme hypothetical situations.
The DTA sets the Army's standards of interrogation as the standard for all agencies in the Department of Defense. It prohibits all other agencies of the U.S. government, such as the CIA, from subjecting any person in their custody to "cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment". However, the Act does not provide detailed guidelines that spell out the meaning of that phrase.
 
That's simply a cop out for a case that wasn't going anywhere.
The evidence in the indictment says otherwise. It was air tight. So air tight Don and his attorney's tried to resort to lawfare to get the charges dropped.
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: IM2
The DTA sets the Army's standards of interrogation as the standard for all agencies in the Department of Defense. It prohibits all other agencies of the U.S. government, such as the CIA, from subjecting any person in their custody to "cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment". However, the Act does not provide detailed guidelines that spell out the meaning of that phrase.
The law, both US and international, leaves no ambiguity about the legality of torture under any circumstance. Torture Rice voted to approve along with other is the admin.
 
  • Fact
Reactions: IM2
15th post
Trump is tanking the economy. No one tells people to stop buying at a time when businesses are trying to make their nut for the year. What a maroon!

Buddy. The more your shit talk is removed from reality, the more you make yourself irrelevant.

Also, when you do this, you are admitting to everyone, EVERYONE, that you know you have lost the contest of ideas.

ALL you have left now, is to spam shit talk, stonewall and hope you can trick people into thinking that you are not their enemy. When you clearly are.
 
Yeah, Vance is the VP, I’d say his opinion carries weight.

also, she is a lawmaker? Really? She is?

These are comments by her staff:
The VP doesn't really carry all that much weight. Now I am really tired of these racist attacks on black people. Here we see a bunch of white racist losers condemning a woman because her black family was able to work hard and give their child a better life. They did everything you faggots say blacks should do. Crockett has not had a bunch of children by different men; she is not a crack whore on welfare. She definitely has behaved detter than that white Republican ho Lauren Bobert, who was doing public handjobs in movie theatres. She has gotten educated, built a business, and has done everything you mfs tell us that blacks should do to be sucessful and you sorry motherfuckers want to make up something you can use to discredit her. IDGAF about the cherry-picked comments your sorry racist --- posted.

It's funny how you sorry bitches can use all kinds of unnamed sources, but when unnamed sources say shit about Trump's punk ass, suddenly unnamed sources are not good. This is why you MAGATS get foul language. You live by a double standard whereby you believe you get to do and say WTF you want, but you get to determine what everyone else must say, think, and believe. **** that.

The fact remains that Crockett is one of the most popular politicians in this country, and the more she is attacked by you losers, the more support she will get.

And then you wonder why you get called a racist.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom