berg80
Diamond Member
- Oct 28, 2017
- 33,804
- 27,531
- 2,820
How so? I've acknowledged she isn't a convicted war criminal.You just made a claim about being a war criminal which was untrue.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How so? I've acknowledged she isn't a convicted war criminal.You just made a claim about being a war criminal which was untrue.
She is not a war criminal.How so?
You know the difference between someone who committed a crime and one who was not convicted of it, correct?Post 208.......you called her a war criminal. But when called on it you then said "not a convicted war criminal"
That's why your first claim is called bullshit
If a recitation of facts sounds like anger to you it should tell you something.
I know your specious claims do not mean she committed war crimes. That much is absolutely correct.You know the difference between someone who committed a crime and one who was not convicted of it, correct?
No one throws insults like Trump. He’s done it since Day One. Never misses a chance to act hurt and make everything about himself.Oh please, the democrats give as good as they get.
Didn't you mean to say..."In my opinion, your specious claims do not mean she committed war crimes. That much is absolutely correct."I know your specious claims do not mean she committed war crimes. That much is absolutely correct.
Has he hurt your sensitive feelings?No one throws insults like Trump. He’s done it since Day One. Never misses a chance to act hurt and make everything about himself.
No I mean exactly what I said. She wasn't brought up on or tried for war crimes.Didn't you mean to say..."In my opinion, your specious claims do not mean she committed war crimes. That much is absolutely correct."
Why would I be? His opinion has no value.Are you not upset that Vance made the comment about Crockett?
It valuable enough to you that you have invested considerable time already this morning trying to counter it.Why would I be? His opinion has no value.
We've already agreed about that. trump wasn't tried for the theft of classified docs either. It doesn't mean he didn't steal them.No I mean exactly what I said. She wasn't brought up on or tried for war crimes.
Maybe......a trial would sorted that. But it didnt even make it that far.We've already agreed about that. trump wasn't tried for the theft of classified docs either. It doesn't mean he didn't steal them.
Here we see white and stupid. J.D. Vance and you MAGATS don't call white women street girls. You guys are the racists.Is Jasmine saying there are no white street girls? That's real racist from Crockett.
No one throws insults like Trump. He’s done it since Day One. Never misses a chance to act hurt and make everything about himself.
And do you have an excuse as to why what Vance said isn't racist?Are you not upset that Vance made the comment about Crockett?
Why would I be? His opinion has no value.
Actually, I've spent little time on it. Much more so trying to point out to you that whether Condi is a war criminal or not is a matter of opinion. With the stipulation being she is not a convicted war criminal.It valuable enough to you that you have invested considerable time already this morning trying to counter it.
Have we hurt his? He seems to think so!Has he hurt your sensitive feelings?
Her opinion has more value than Vance's. She is an actual lawmaker. Vance is not.True, but then neither does hers