Are poor people not supposed to have a phone? Really?
Some phone plans are cheap. Pay as you go plans mean low monthly rates and generally a phone with no bells and whistles. More than most of us grew up having.
Obamaphones are free. If a person is poor, they probably have an Obamaphone. Google applying for an Obamaphone. Not difficult.
If you have an expensive iPhone, you also have the extra fee of $25 to $30. That is necessary with any of the phones that can go online. So, yea, if you are subsidized by tax payers, it's not cool to have things that many tax payers have trouble affording.
Why would someone spend what money they have on things that they don't need while ignoring the important things they do need? Many people went without little extras just to ensure they could afford the basic necessities.
How many tax payers have to choose between necessities and wants? I realize the left has no sympathy for those who lost their insurance after Obamacare passed because they could no longer afford it. Many lost their doctors and plans and had to pay a lot more for less. Again, no sympathy from the left. It's because many of those tax payers don't vote Democrat so you guys don't give a shit.
It's not that people have no right to have a phone. There is a limit on what you can expect other people to hand you for free. You also have the right to get a job and pay for your own shit.
It's the left that took away some people's rights to have health insurance by taking the plans they chose and making it so they couldn't afford the new ones.