Jan Brewer expected to veto AZ gay hate bill

[Asclepias]

Which is worse, a spineless coward or a money grubbing whore?

Take your pick but she just lost the support of most of those across the country that deeply respected her.

She can rot in hell for all I care now.

Dont be mad bro.

Why do you think I am angry?

I know in the end, we Christians win, and you liars burn.

I am totally OK with occasional set-backs, but Brewer just burned all her support and her new allies wont do a ******* thing to help her as we walk away.

Her stupidity is just amazing while yours is altogether boringly predictable.

I think you are angry because you claim to be a Christian but you want someone to rot in hell. How do you reconcile those 2 diametrically opposed statements? You most definitely are angry and not at all ok with setbacks. Your stupidity in not seeing this for the lie it is happens to be equally as predictable.

 

[OnePercenter]

Money talks.

She vetoed the bill.


`

hhhnnnnmmmmm I could have sworn you hypocrites wanted money out of politics..

WTH are you dithering about?

FACT: Brewer vetoed because of money. NOT because of a belief in Constitutional rights.

FACT: That's the rw way.

Brewer vetoed it because it was the right thing to do. Hate, has nothing to do with religious freedom.

 

[Gracie]

Jim is a ...gasp...christian? What he just sent to me in a pm from my neg to him would make his pastor blush.

 

[Gracie]

Those for businesses to discriminate against gays...got a question for ya.

Biz is slow. REAL slow. Customers come in to gawk or do the Tourist Stomp (which means they wander in all the shops but are just looky loos), and rent is due. So are utilities. You need tape for the register, need to order bags and receipt books, pay employee(s). In short...times are tough. You pray for a miracle..that better days are head.

So God answers your prayer cuz a gay couple just walked in and want to buy that item that is priced at $3995.00. They also will take item B that is priced at 459.00 because it goes so well with the 3993 buck item. They are so thrilled with their purchases, they tell each other they will tell Bob and Jim, Mike and Donny, Mary and Susan.

Now..whatchagonnado? Tell them they are gay and therefore you don't want their money OR their friends to come in? Really? God just answered your prayer. You now have some high spending customers with friends with more money. Yet..they are gay. So...nope. You will shut your doors down first.

RIGHT?

No, you stupid shit, you don't deny them the purchase of their toys.

This bill isn't about that kind of thing. How would one tell that someone buying regular merchandise is a queer? That is not the point, dumbfuck.

If the customer asks you to provide a service you think immoral, like catering a gay bath house, the vetoed bill would have allowed you to legally say, sorry, don't provide service to gay bath-houses.

You libtards are so ******* stupid it is just mythical proportions, really.

roflmao, Gracie negged me for this post, lol, like I give a shit what that moron thinks.

lololololol

Yep. I sure did. Cuz you ...as a...cough cough..."christian"...lost it and resorted to name calling. Who wins now? Certainly not you.

 

[OnePercenter]

Ok, so for religious purposed, they don't want to do business with the gay community. Um. How do they know if someone is gay? .

roflmao

For example, suppose someone goes to a Church based banner printing business and asked them to make a big banner for a gay orgy that said 'Free Butt ***** over here!'

by this law, the business could not say no, that would be discrimination, derp.

Open the door and step out of the closet!!!!!​

 

[hazlnut]

Her reasoning is hilarious.

$$ over e'rrthang, America the Corporatocracy

I think Jan Brewer is just using that as an excuse. Appealing to their fiscal conservative free market sense. She knew the law was bigoted intolerant shit and she was saving AZ the embarrassment.

I think most GOPs in power just pretend to be anti-gay (except Santorum and few others) -- to get to that level you have to be bright enough to know that sexual orientation is not a choice and most likely have Gays working in their offices, so they just placate their base with the b.s. "Christian" stuff.

 

[bodecea]

So you're "comfortable" with having a double standard, and you think that is "right" ?

My standard is the same across the board. I dont condone baseless bigotry - and hiding behind manmade religious texts doesnt justify bigotry.

Discriminating against queers, in certain instances, is perfectly correct, and actually should be mandatory by law. This may have nothing to do with religion. This is for protection, and has no more to do with bigotry, than discriminating against criminals or people with infectious diseases. Some discrimination is proper. Some isn't.

So...how do you explain lesbians having few infectious diseases than straight people in general?

 

[bodecea]

Her reasoning is hilarious.

$$ over e'rrthang, America the Corporatocracy

I think Jan Brewer is just using that as an excuse. Appealing to their fiscal conservative free market sense. She knew the law was bigoted intolerant shit and she was saving AZ the embarrassment.

I think most GOPs in power just pretend to be anti-gay (except Santorum and few others) -- to get to that level you have to be bright enough to know that sexual orientation is not a choice and most likely have Gays working in their offices, so they just placate their base with the b.s. "Christian" stuff.

They were BEGGING her to veto the bill they voted for..."Save us from ourselves, Jan!"

 

[bodecea]

Ok, so for religious purposed, they don't want to do business with the gay community. Um. How do they know if someone is gay? .

roflmao

For example, suppose someone goes to a Church based banner printing business and asked them to make a big banner for a gay orgy that said 'Free Butt ***** over here!'

by this law, the business could not say no, that would be discrimination, derp.

But...Jim would be ok with a straight person going to a church based banner printing business (whatever the heck THAT is) and asked them to make a big banner for a straight orgy.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Those for businesses to discriminate against gays...got a question for ya.

Biz is slow. REAL slow. Customers come in to gawk or do the Tourist Stomp (which means they wander in all the shops but are just looky loos), and rent is due. So are utilities. You need tape for the register, need to order bags and receipt books, pay employee(s). In short...times are tough. You pray for a miracle..that better days are head.

So God answers your prayer cuz a gay couple just walked in and want to buy that item that is priced at $3995.00. They also will take item B that is priced at 459.00 because it goes so well with the 3993 buck item. They are so thrilled with their purchases, they tell each other they will tell Bob and Jim, Mike and Donny, Mary and Susan.

Now..whatchagonnado? Tell them they are gay and therefore you don't want their money OR their friends to come in? Really? God just answered your prayer. You now have some high spending customers with friends with more money. Yet..they are gay. So...nope. You will shut your doors down first.

RIGHT?

No, you stupid shit, you don't deny them the purchase of their toys.

This bill isn't about that kind of thing. How would one tell that someone buying regular merchandise is a queer? That is not the point, dumbfuck.

If the customer asks you to provide a service you think immoral, like catering a gay bath house, the vetoed bill would have allowed you to legally say, sorry, don't provide service to gay bath-houses.

You libtards are so ******* stupid it is just mythical proportions, really.

What’s sad and telling is this is actually the hateful America most conservatives wish to live in.

 

[bodecea]

No, you stupid shit, you don't deny them the purchase of their toys.

This bill isn't about that kind of thing. How would one tell that someone buying regular merchandise is a queer? That is not the point, dumbfuck.

If the customer asks you to provide a service you think immoral, like catering a gay bath house, the vetoed bill would have allowed you to legally say, sorry, don't provide service to gay bath-houses.

You libtards are so ******* stupid it is just mythical proportions, really.

roflmao, Gracie negged me for this post, lol, like I give a shit what that moron thinks.

lololololol

Yep. I sure did. Cuz you ...as a...cough cough..."christian"...lost it and resorted to name calling. Who wins now? Certainly not you.

That's our JimBowie.

 

[protectionist]

My standard is the same across the board. I dont condone baseless bigotry - and hiding behind manmade religious texts doesnt justify bigotry.

Discriminating against queers, in certain instances, is perfectly correct, and actually should be mandatory by law. This may have nothing to do with religion. This is for protection, and has no more to do with bigotry, than discriminating against criminals or people with infectious diseases. Some discrimination is proper. Some isn't.

I bet thats what the NA's thought about when Europeans brought all those diseases over to the Americas.

So maybe they would have agreed with the Arizona law, huh ?

BTW. The so-called "Native Americans" might not be so "native" after all. ever hear of Kennewick Man ?

 

[Asclepias]

Discriminating against queers, in certain instances, is perfectly correct, and actually should be mandatory by law. This may have nothing to do with religion. This is for protection, and has no more to do with bigotry, than discriminating against criminals or people with infectious diseases. Some discrimination is proper. Some isn't.

I bet thats what the NA's thought about when Europeans brought all those diseases over to the Americas.

Europeans (Caucasions) WERE the native Americans. HAdn't you heqd about Kennewick Man ? And the many others like him, that American Indians have fought to keep hidden and out of anthropological study ? And which American Indian ass-kissers (afraid of being labeled a racist) have kept it all concealed ? Weren't you supposed to be the big history expert ?

Now back to the TOPIC.

 

[protectionist]

Those for businesses to discriminate against gays...got a question for ya.

Biz is slow. REAL slow. Customers come in to gawk or do the Tourist Stomp (which means they wander in all the shops but are just looky loos), and rent is due. So are utilities. You need tape for the register, need to order bags and receipt books, pay employee(s). In short...times are tough. You pray for a miracle..that better days are head.

So God answers your prayer cuz a gay couple just walked in and want to buy that item that is priced at $3995.00. They also will take item B that is priced at 459.00 because it goes so well with the 3993 buck item. They are so thrilled with their purchases, they tell each other they will tell Bob and Jim, Mike and Donny, Mary and Susan.

Now..whatchagonnado? Tell them they are gay and therefore you don't want their money OR their friends to come in? Really? God just answered your prayer. You now have some high spending customers with friends with more money. Yet..they are gay. So...nope. You will shut your doors down first.

RIGHT?

No, you stupid shit, you don't deny them the purchase of their toys.

This bill isn't about that kind of thing. How would one tell that someone buying regular merchandise is a queer? That is not the point, dumbfuck.

If the customer asks you to provide a service you think immoral, like catering a gay bath house, the vetoed bill would have allowed you to legally say, sorry, don't provide service to gay bath-houses.

You libtards are so ******* stupid it is just mythical proportions, really.

What’s sad and telling is this is actually the hateful America most conservatives wish to live in.

What’s sad and telling is this is actually the looney (or deceitful) America most liberals wish to live in, in which they misrepresent opposition to sexual perversion as "hate".

 

[protectionist]

I bet thats what the NA's thought about when Europeans brought all those diseases over to the Americas.

Europeans (Caucasions) WERE the native Americans. HAdn't you heqd about Kennewick Man ? And the many others like him, that American Indians have fought to keep hidden and out of anthropological study ? And which American Indian ass-kissers (afraid of being labeled a racist) have kept it all concealed ? Weren't you supposed to be the big history expert ?

Now back to the TOPIC.

 

[Gracie]

I am constantly amazed at the "twisting in the wind" types here. And the downright stupidity.

 

[jillian]

[

No, you stupid shit, you don't deny them the purchase of their toys.

This bill isn't about that kind of thing. How would one tell that someone buying regular merchandise is a queer? That is not the point, dumbfuck.

If the customer asks you to provide a service you think immoral, like catering a gay bath house, the vetoed bill would have allowed you to legally say, sorry, don't provide service to gay bath-houses.

You libtards are so ******* stupid it is just mythical proportions, really.

having read your posts, you calling anyone else stupid is kind of …. well, silly at best. you also seem intentionally dishonest about what the bill would have done.

you can do what you want in your own home. you cannot deny services to someone because they are black, or a jew, or gay… or anything else that might offend some braindead bigot.

while you have the right to be as stupid as you want in your personal associations, you don't have the right to deny someone access to a business service that would be allowed to anyone else for an illegally discriminatory reason.

now get over it.

stop whining.

movie on.

you don't get to jim crow gays.

see how that works?

 

[freedombecki]

Ok, so for religious purposed, they don't want to do business with the gay community. Um. How do they know if someone is gay? .

roflmao

For example, suppose someone goes to a Church based banner printing business and asked them to make a big banner for a gay orgy that said 'Free Butt ***** over here!'

by this law, the business could not say no, that would be discrimination, derp.

Well, she's not a derp, really, Jim, but the dead giveaway is decorating a cake with two grooms at showtime.

 

[mudwhistle]

I think she made a wise decision.

Why give the left anymore ammo.

 

[JimBowie1958]

Jim is a ...gasp...christian? What he just sent to me in a pm from my neg to him would make his pastor blush.

Lol, clearly you know very little about Catholic priests, you stupid retard.