Jan Brewer expected to veto AZ gay hate bill

[whitehall]

Why can't sodomites respect the religious beliefs of Christians and patronize establishments that cater to hairy men in dresses?

 

[Political Junky]

Anyone who ever engaged in oral sex is a sodomite.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Brewer will veto the bill because she "doesn't want to take any actions that could jeopardize the economic momentum" in Arizona, a source told NBC News.

Rare pragmatism from the right.

It would also be expensive and time-consuming for the state to litigate only to lose.

 

[Political Junky]

Mitt Romney has urged Brewer to veto the bill.

 

[Luddly Neddite]

Her reasoning is hilarious.

$$ over e'rrthang, America the Corporatocracy

true.

but at least this time the money was on the right side...

and she realized that the AZ boycott probably wouldn't get finished that quickly.... at least not before them losing the superbowl.

I think it's just .....




divine.

She also thinks she's gonna get some sort of dispensation so she can run again.

AZ used to be a really nice place to live.

 

[Katzndogz]

Let Christians find an alternative way out. There are plenty of them.

 

[Luddly Neddite]

Anyone who ever engaged in oral sex is a sodomite.

That's no one on the right though.

Repubs and tee potties don't DO that icky stuff.

 

[Asclepias]

Nothing is keeping the homophobes and bigots from posting nasty signs saying they hate gay people in their place of business. If they are committed to their religious convictions why don't they do that? What are they afraid of?

 

[Asclepias]

Anyone who ever engaged in oral sex is a sodomite.

Wait......what?

 

[Interpol]

One could just as easily say that you are backwards assed bigot thinking against Christians, and their protection under the 1st amendment. Or bigoted against those who wish to live in a culturally homogeneous (heterosexual) environment.

Should Christians also have the right to keep out Jews, on religious grounds?

Absolutely. They should have the right to keep someone out because they have an ugly face. It's no ones business but the owner of the private business who he choses to and not to serve or exchange with. It's really that simple.

LOLberals like Jillian would have a cow if a story popped up in which the KKK went to an african american's bakery for a celebritory cake that read "We Hate N***ers". and she would certainly not want to force that black man to make that cake. but when the shoe is on the other foot....oh, nevermind. LOLberals are hypocrites. it's the default position.

A story would NEVER pop up where the KKK went to a black bakery and ordered that because they already don't like black people, moron.

 

[Asclepias]

Should Christians also have the right to keep out Jews, on religious grounds?

Absolutely. They should have the right to keep someone out because they have an ugly face. It's no ones business but the owner of the private business who he choses to and not to serve or exchange with. It's really that simple.

LOLberals like Jillian would have a cow if a story popped up in which the KKK went to an african american's bakery for a celebritory cake that read "We Hate N***ers". and she would certainly not want to force that black man to make that cake. but when the shoe is on the other foot....oh, nevermind. LOLberals are hypocrites. it's the default position.

A story would NEVER pop up where the KKK went to a black bakery and ordered that because they already don't like black people, moron.

Not only that but they would never under any circumstances identify themselves as the KKK unless it was a little old Black lady alone and there were 2 of them.

 

[OnePercenter]

Her reasoning is hilarious.

$$ over e'rrthang, America the Corporatocracy

$$$$$ talks, and bullshit racism walks. WOW! What a country!

 

[Asclepias]

OK. This is starting to make sense now. I mean after all this is AZ we are talking about. No wonder this sounded suspicious.

Business leaders worried bill could prompt NFL to relocate Super Bowl - CBSSports.com

The NFL also issued a statement on the matter.

"Our policies emphasize tolerance and inclusiveness and prohibit discrimination based on age, gender, race, religion, sexual orientation or any other improper standard," NFL spokesman Greg Aiello said. "We are following the issue in Arizona and will continue to do so should the bill be signed into law, but will decline further comment at this time."

 

[jillian]

However they can close down entirely and lay off all their employees.

except only a moron would do that.


you can be excused for thinking it's a possibility….. rightwing extremists are pretty divorced from reality.

i figure you'd have made the same "arguments" to preserve jim crow.

but please…defend bigots….

then wonder why the right can't win national elections.

 

[NoNukes]

Absolutely. They should have the right to keep someone out because they have an ugly face. It's no ones business but the owner of the private business who he choses to and not to serve or exchange with. It's really that simple.

LOLberals like Jillian would have a cow if a story popped up in which the KKK went to an african american's bakery for a celebritory cake that read "We Hate N***ers". and she would certainly not want to force that black man to make that cake. but when the shoe is on the other foot....oh, nevermind. LOLberals are hypocrites. it's the default position.

A story would NEVER pop up where the KKK went to a black bakery and ordered that because they already don't like black people, moron.

Not only that but they would never under any circumstances identify themselves as the KKK unless it was a little old Black lady alone and there were 2 of them.

Would they eat an anti Black cake made by Blacks?

 

[JakeStarkey]

You do not have the right to someone elses services or products. The fact that you think you do lets me know you hate freedom and private property.

You do not understand the your private property rights do not trump freedom and public accomodation if you engage in business in the public forum.

Oh, I understand that Statists believe they have a right to dictate to others what they do with their own property, yes. That doesn't mean it's the ethically or morally sound position. And again, I already know you hate anything that isn't pure, unadulterated Social Statism. You love it. We know it. So lets just keep it to what it is, and not about your retarded injections, Fake.

Who cares what an ethically as well as constitutionally challenged individual such as you thinks. We the People and SCOTUS decides matter such as this. Don't like it? Get a majority to change the law.

 

[TemplarKormac]

I guess that kinda makes up for the 3 Americans she killed.

Kinda..

Here's the funny part. No conservative is screaming bloody murder for an investigation.

LOL. Leave it to you to bring something totally irrelevant into a discussion. But heres the funny part. Nothing will make up for the 4 Americans Obama killed. Here's the funny part, no liberal is screaming bloody murder for an investigation.

 

[Stephanie]

aww, Jilly the (lawyer) life has been so hard, crying us a river

But it's fine she goes around calling people moron and bigots

 

[Asclepias]

Suns and Mercury release statement against controversial bill - CBSSports.com

The Phoenix Suns and Phoenix Mercury issue the following statement regarding Arizona Senate Bill 1062: “Sports has the unique power to unite, to bring together a community without regard to individual differences. The Phoenix Suns & Phoenix Mercury are proud members of this community, and we embrace fans, families and businesses of every stripe. We are steadfastly committed to the principles of inclusivity and acceptance, and cannot support anything that is not in line with that philosophy.”

 

[TakeAStepBack]

You do not understand the your private property rights do not trump freedom and public accomodation if you engage in business in the public forum.

Oh, I understand that Statists believe they have a right to dictate to others what they do with their own property, yes. That doesn't mean it's the ethically or morally sound position. And again, I already know you hate anything that isn't pure, unadulterated Social Statism. You love it. We know it. So lets just keep it to what it is, and not about your retarded injections, Fake.

Who cares what an ethically as well as constitutionally challenged individual such as you thinks. We the People and SCOTUS decides matter such as this. Don't like it? Get a majority to change the law.

There goes Fake speaking on behalf of others again. You know, there is help for you if you seek it.