Jan 6 Rioter Pardoned By Trump Has Now Been Charged With Threating House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries

1. The Biden Adminstration decided to go after EVERYONE and in doing so, they failed to give the accused a speedy trial. That is a violation of their civil rights.


2. The grandmother was charged only becasue she leaned to the RIGHT politically. IF the 1/6 riot had been a left leaning riot, the Biden Administration would have never made such a big deal over it. You know this. You are playing retarded. She is thus a POLITICAL PRISONER.

3. I accepted your links. I pointed out that they did not support your claims. Becuase they did not. Indeed, your link said, "almost 140". Thus PROVING my point about EXAGGERATION.
Everyone is entitled to an opinion, but yours is particularly stupid.

She punched a cop. Pretty sure normal people think that when you punch a cop, you’ll get charged. Doesn’t matter what your political leanings are, people who punch cops get charged.

My links showed a cop lost an eye and one was stapled with a flagpole.

Others broke ribs, suffered concussions and plenty of PTSD to go around.
 
Everyone is entitled to an opinion, but yours is particularly stupid.

She punched a cop. Pretty sure normal people think that when you punch a cop, you’ll get charged. Doesn’t matter what your political leanings are, people who punch cops get charged.

YOu are doing the logical fallacy of argument by assertion. You are ignoring the fact that I have addressed this point and offered a counterpoint repeatedly.

This is you losing the debate.

YOu are supporting the arresting of elderly women as POLITICAL PRISONERS.

That is where this debate has gone. That is where it has bogged down as you stonewall.

That is your current position, simply supporting the taking and holding of POLITICAL PRISONERS IN AMERICA.



My links showed a cop lost an eye and one was stapled with a flagpole.

Your link showed a union man saying that a cop WOULD lose an eye, and was... hit with a flagpole, no discussion of it penetrating his skin or causing a deep wound.

I cited your links several times to point out that your claims were EXAGGERATIONS.


And to remind you, the reason we are discussing this at all, is because you lefties are citing the "140" number to justify POLITICAL PRISONERS.



Others broke ribs, suffered concussions and plenty of PTSD to go around.

There was ONE claim of broken ribs. And broken ribs is a lot more believable considering the violence seems to consist mostly of shoving and crowds surging.

PTSD? Give me a break. IF any of those cops weren't prepared for that small and short riot, they were dumb to take the job.
 
YOu are doing the logical fallacy of argument by assertion. You are ignoring the fact that I have addressed this point and offered a counterpoint repeatedly.

This is you losing the debate.

YOu are supporting the arresting of elderly women as POLITICAL PRISONERS.

That is where this debate has gone. That is where it has bogged down as you stonewall.

That is your current position, simply supporting the taking and holding of POLITICAL PRISONERS IN AMERICA.
You’re making a counterfactual, which is never provable or disposable.

My assertion is that people who punch cops get charged. Is that really a difficult thing to accept?
Your link showed a union man saying that a cop WOULD lose an eye, and was... hit with a flagpole, no discussion of it penetrating his skin or causing a deep wound.

I cited your links several times to point out that your claims were EXAGGERATIONS.

And to remind you, the reason we are discussing this at all, is because you lefties are citing the "140" number to justify POLITICAL PRISONERS.





There was ONE claim of broken ribs. And broken ribs is a lot more believable considering the violence seems to consist mostly of shoving and crowds surging.

PTSD? Give me a break. IF any of those cops weren't prepared for that small and short riot, they were dumb to take the job.
You’re just trying to downplay the attack. You do this because you’re a hack.
 
So you believe that due process for a misdemeanor crime of trespassing in a public building is summary execution. A misdemeanor is not a capital crime. Try again. As you no doubt are aware, George Floyd proved that FELONIES are not capital crimes in all cases. But you think his due process was more important than an unarmed veteran's.
One doesn’t need to wait for “due process” to defend oneself.
 
You’re making a counterfactual, which is never provable or disposable.

Nope. I cited your links to show that your claim was exaggerated. The list that was created to justify the massive crackdown, is an exaggeration.




My assertion is that people who punch cops get charged. Is that really a difficult thing to accept?

Considering that fact that the Thousands of rioters from the lefty riots of the same period, were not investigated, chased or charged with the same level of intensity or politically motivated zeal,

yes, it is hard to accept because recent history shows that what you are claiming is simply not true.


You’re just trying to downplay the attack. You do this because you’re a hack.


No, you are exaggerating the 1/6 riot to justify violating the rights of republcians.

It was a riot. The actual violent rioters should have been arrested. There should have been several resonable and fair trials. All the evidence should have been presented and shared and considered.


Instead we got a witch hunt. A POLITICAL witch hunt. And thus, POLITICAL PRISONERS.
 
Jeffries praised state and federal authorities for apprehending the suspect.

A man pardoned by President Donald Trump for storming the Capitol on Jan. 6 was arrested last week for allegedly threatening to kill House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries.


Christopher Moynihan, who was among a small group of Jan. 6 rioters convicted for breaching the Senate floor and rifling through senators’ desks, was arrested by New York State Police after a “thorough investigation,” which authorities say began with an anonymous tip to the FBI.

Court records reflect that the FBI’s tipster told the bureau that on Oct. 17, Moynihan “made statements regarding the assassination of Congressman Hakeem Jeffries” and that he planned to carry out the attack “in a few days,” while the Democratic House leader was in New York. The person told the FBI that Moynihan described the motivation for the plot as “the future” and voiced concern that the man given clemency by Trump had been abusing drugs and expressing increasing “homicidal ideations.”

Another so-called, "Peace Loving" Jan 6. Sedionist arrest, good. He should have stayed behind bars.
Arrested by the Trump Administration...
You forgot to include that detail.
 
WASHINGTON — A Jan. 6 defendant who was among the hundreds President Donald Trump pardoned in January was arrested for making a "credible death threat" against House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., the congressman said in a statement.

Christopher Moynihan, a 34-year-old from Clinton, New York, was charged with a felony count of making a terroristic threat, according to the New York State Police.

Once a MAGA terrorist......ALWAYS a MAGA terrorist.

Exhibit A on why Trump should not have pardoned these mentally disturbed traitors.


That's what happens when you pardon criminals. Should have been kept in prison. Will trump pardon him again ? If he does , trump needs to go to prison.
 
That's what happens when you pardon criminals. Should have been kept in prison. Will trump pardon him again ? If he does , trump needs to go to prison.
Trump isn't going to pardon him again. He pardoned the J6'ers because of the gross injustice in the many civil rights violations in the mishandling of their cases.

And hell, name one politician at this rate who shouldn't be in prison. They're all a bunch of crooks.
 
Back
Top Bottom