- Moderator
- #301
Read post #300.Did I attack you? I want to learn about why you attacked me.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Read post #300.Did I attack you? I want to learn about why you attacked me.
Why?I’m attacking your post.
Because the claims you make are hyperbole. Perhaps I should say I’m disagreeing with your post.Why?
You will not get agreement by anybody doing that to posters.Because the claims you make are hyperbole. Perhaps I should say I’m disagreeing with your post.
What would your reaction be had I treated you that way? I do not care that others do not agree with me. It is claims made as were you angry that make me ask what did I do to you?Because the claims you make are hyperbole. Perhaps I should say I’m disagreeing with your post.
What, disagreeing with what you posted?You will not get agreement by anybody doing that to posters.
I think you might be taking it too personally. Hyperbole is exaggeration, and that is what I felt your claims were. Is there a better way to say it?What would your reaction be had I treated you that way? I do not care that others do not agree with me. It is claims made as were you angry that make me ask what did I do to you?
Agree.When will you stop?
Doing what? Focus on what he has in his hand. Focus on her location. Focus on officers who were with her but walked away. Does this smell like they knew he would kill her?Doesn’t answer the question but it is what I expected.
It made me sick to know how they attack cops who had to hold down a criminal who fought them for many minutes yet appreciate this cop who killed an unarmed innocent woman.Agree.
I just watched the murder of an unarmed Republican woman. What kind of a creepshow was this thread supposed to be?
Some of those men who had guns definitely do not appear to be Republican protesters. The shoe just doesn't fit.
It was personally directed to me. As it still is. What hyperbole?I think you might be taking it too personally. Hyperbole is exaggeration, and that is what I felt your claims were. Is there a better way to say it?
"Democrat riots", eh?murdered like 30 people at their democrat riots,
No kidding? A "democrat"?Floyd was a fine example of law-abiding democrats just like BLM/Antifa.
January 6th? Who called it an attack?Who called it an attack?
Partner, your postings sure indicate a poster who does zero due diligence.Grab them, jail them, publish almost no articles and jail them for 22 years
Today?I just watched the murder of an unarmed Republican woman
Same questions as just posed to poster Beautress.appreciate this cop who killed an unarmed innocent woman.
You don't know my limits? However I use google a lot and after that I remark on my findings. That is due diligence. There was no seditious conspiracy. You might have proved it were there any.Partner, your postings sure indicate a poster who does zero due diligence.
Like above.
Why?
You do know that homework really does have utilitarian value?
Notably, and due diligence would have enlightened you, that the bloke who got 22yrs, Enrique Tarrio, had a 3-month long trial, lotsa witnesses, including insiders, able defense attorneys who did competent voir dire, and in front of a jury of his peers. They unanimously found him guilty of Seditious Conspiracy.
Why, I ask........why didn't you know that?
She was a victim, not a criminal. That is the tiny female boosted into a tall window did no crime. She was murdered by a cop hiding on the other side of the wall.Same questions as just posed to poster Beautress.
First, let's start with your reference to an "innocent" woman.
Who is that?
What do you know about this woman's 'innocense'.
How do you know?
Thanx.
------------------------------------------------You might have proved it were there any.
Obviously you gave no proof to back up your claims. It makes you seem a loudmouth know it all and I wish it were not true. Trust me.------------------------------------------------
Me?
Wasn't up to me to prove anything about Enrique Tarrio.
The DOJ did.
And a jury of Tarrio's peers believed the DOJ did. Unanimously.
Can you provide differently?
And also, Bob, yes, I believe you are doing a disservice to your avatar by not doing due diligence on a variety of topics you opine on. It shows.
And it makes your avatar look bad.
Trust me.
You are referencing the DOA Babbitt.She was a victim, not a criminal
Would you believe a police Lt. who commanded that day at the Capitol Building?You are referencing the DOA Babbitt.
It is well-plowed ground, Bob.
3yrs of it.
She attacked the police on the other side of the barricade, serving as the point of the spear, the point-man, in front of a violent mob that could have, would have, surged through once she opened the doors blocking them.
Ashli Babbit is dead because of Ashli Babbitt.
May her family find peace.
And relief from RWNJ-MAGA's who are constantly dragging her bloody corpse across the internet in their attempts to distract from the attempted theft of a Presidency by Don Trump and his enablers and co-conspirators.
I hope I am clear.
From the court records on Tarrio.Me?
Wasn't up to me to prove anything about Enrique Tarrio.
The DOJ did.
And a jury of Tarrio's peers believed the DOJ did. Unanimously.
Can you provide differently?