James Woods Posted 13 Lines That the Democrat Party Cannot Answer

Is there any lie you won’t repeat?

 
Martin Luther King Jr. was not killed by a Democrat. He was assassinated on April 4, 1968, by James Earl Ray, an escaped convict and avowed segregationist. [1, 2, 3, 4]
Ray did not align with the Democratic party. Instead, he was a staunch supporter of the segregationist Alabama Governor George Wallace and his 1968 presidential campaign, which ran under the anti-establishment American Independent Party ticket. [1]

If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck...

Being a staunch segregationist, his core values were still aligned with the Democrats, many of whom felt the national Democratic Party had betrayed them by championing the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Voting Rights Act of 1965.

So for all practical purposes, he was a a more radicalized version of a Democrat.
 
Martin Luther King Jr. was not killed by a Democrat. He was assassinated on April 4, 1968, by James Earl Ray, an escaped convict and avowed segregationist. [1, 2, 3, 4]
Ray did not align with the Democratic party. Instead, he was a staunch supporter of the segregationist Alabama Governor George Wallace and his 1968 presidential campaign, which ran under the anti-establishment American Independent Party ticket. [1]
You could never post a fact
 
I came across this in my email inbox.
Woods makes a disturbing observation here, one the conservatives/Republicans aren't even close in matching.
The Democrats are the party of the USA's political Left, and the following is not good for their resume'.
...
James Woods Posted 13 Lines That the Democrat Party Cannot Answer

May 25, 2026


shutterstock_2611988487-Editor-3.jpg
Joseph Kelly image via Shutterstock

One image stopped America cold at 3 AM Sunday – Lincoln, JFK, MLK, Reagan, and Trump side by side under four words: "All shot by a Democrat."
James Woods made it go viral.
And now Democrats have to explain thirteen lines they have spent sixty years hoping nobody would write in one place.

The Ledger Democrats Cannot Explain Away​

Thirteen lines. No spin. Just the record.

Democrats assassinated Abraham Lincoln.

They assassinated JFK.

They assassinated Martin Luther King Jr.

They assassinated Malcolm X.

They attempted to assassinate Theodore Roosevelt.

They attempted to assassinate Ronald Reagan.

They attempted to assassinate Donald Trump – twice.

They killed the CEO of United Healthcare.

They killed two Israeli embassy staffers.

They doxed and attempted to kill federal ICE agents and police while burning down cities – ongoing as of June 2025.

They killed a Minnesota state representative and her husband, and injured a senator and his wife.

Woods closed with the only conclusion the evidence supports: "Democrats have worked tirelessly for decades to prove that the left is nothing more than a full blown domestic terrorist organization, and it's time that we start believing them."

168,400 views before sunrise.
...
View attachment 1261452


Also I might add, the Democrats started a civil war over their "right" to own slaves. A civil war that killed 750,000 Americans.
 
Imagine the level of ideological capture to not be able to connect the dots with THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT CHANGING THEIR DEFINITION OF “VACCINE” from “IMMUNITY” to “PROTECTION”.

Then allowing Pharma to use EMERGENCY USE AUTHORIZATION ACT TO PROTECT THEM FROM BEING SUED FOR VAX DAMAGE.

Millions of people ARE VAX DAMAGED FROM THE COVID SHOT….and cannot sue Pharma for their lies.

THE INVENTOR AND PATENT HOLDER FOR THE mRNA TECH CLAIMS THIS IS NOT THE PROPER APPLICATION OF THIS TECHNOLOGY…..SO HE SO HE IS CENSORED AND VILIFIED.

You commies are just so effing brainwashed. For what?
 
Also I might add, the Democrats started a civil war over their "right" to own slaves. A civil war that killed 750,000 Americans.
Those (D) of the day were also called Conservatives and members of the Confederacy.
 
If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck...

Being a staunch segregationist, his core values were still aligned with the Democrats, many of whom felt the national Democratic Party had betrayed them by championing the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Voting Rights Act of 1965.

So for all practical purposes, he was a a more radicalized version of a Democrat.
 
Imagine the level of ideological capture to not be able to connect the dots with THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT CHANGING THEIR DEFINITION OF “VACCINE” from “IMMUNITY” to “PROTECTION”.

Then allowing Pharma to use EMERGENCY USE AUTHORIZATION ACT TO PROTECT THEM FROM BEING SUED FOR VAX DAMAGE.

Millions of people ARE VAX DAMAGED FROM THE COVID SHOT….and cannot sue Pharma for their lies.

THE INVENTOR AND PATENT HOLDER FOR THE mRNA TECH CLAIMS THIS IS NOT THE PROPER APPLICATION OF THIS TECHNOLOGY…..SO HE SO HE IS CENSORED AND VILIFIED.

You commies are just so effing brainwashed. For what?
Claims that the inventor of mRNA technology asserts its use is "not proper" typically refer to Dr. Robert Malone. However, within the broader scientific community, the consensus and historical credit for foundational mRNA vaccine development differ significantly. [1, 2, 3]
  • Dr. Robert Malone's Claims: Early in his career, Dr. Malone contributed to early, foundational gene transfection research in the late 1980s. During the COVID-19 pandemic, he became a vocal critic of the rollout, questioning the safety profile, the dosage, and the overall public health strategy of the mRNA vaccines.
  • The Scientific Consensus: The scientific community and leading global institutions credit Dr. Katalin Karikó and Dr. Drew Weissman with the foundational discoveries that enabled the successful development of mRNA vaccines. They were awarded the 2023 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for their discoveries regarding nucleoside base modifications that prevented severe inflammatory responses, making the technology safe and effective for humans. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7]
The Patent Landscape
The intellectual property (IP) underpinning modern mRNA vaccines is heavily contested and shared among multiple biotechnology companies, rather than a single individual. The foundational patents for modified mRNA and lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) are primarily held by institutions and companies like the University of Pennsylvania (licensed to BioNTech/Pfizer), Moderna, and Acuitas Therapeutics. Major legal battles exist, such as Moderna's patent infringement lawsuits against Pfizer and BioNTech over mRNA and delivery structures, rather than over whether the technology itself is appropriate. [1, 2, 3, 4]
Clinical Efficacy & Use
Despite criticisms raised by some figures regarding application, global health authorities, including the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, endorse the technology, citing extensive data proving that mRNA vaccines saved millions of lives and successfully provided immunity during the pandemic. [1, 2, 3]
1779804683167.webp
1779804683179.webp
12 sites
  • The patent dispute over the breakthrough mRNA technology
    On 26 August 2022, Moderna filed a patent infringement lawsuit against Pfizer and BioNTech in the United States District Court for...
    National Institutes of Health (.gov)
  • mRNA Patent Wars Update: The Plot Thickens with Key ...
    Mar 23, 2025 — Recap. Over the past three years, mRNA and LNP patent litigation activity has grown and persisted. Lipid pioneer Arbutus has pursu...
    IPWatchdog.com
  • Moderna sues Pfizer/BioNTech over COVID patent
    Aug 26, 2022 — sorry moderna is suing Pfizer. and its German partner bayontech for patent infringement in the development of the first covid-19 v...
    1779804683193.webp

    1:51
    YouTube·Reuters
 
The blob was shot by a registered republican. Most of the others are arguable.

What isn't arguable is....
Shot Gabby Giffords
Democrats are fed lies that they believe are the unquestionable truth because democrats tend to be extremely gullible. What evidence exists that Giffords was shot by a 'typical white supremacist moron?' None whatsoever.

AI Overview




The shooter's motivations were driven primarily by severe mental illness and personal grievances rather than a coherent political ideology. While the assailant, Jared Lee Loughner, held anti-government views, authorities and forensic psychologists determined he was a delusional schizophrenic whose actions were not tied to any specific political group or movement. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
 
15th post
Claims that the inventor of mRNA technology asserts its use is "not proper" typically refer to Dr. Robert Malone. However, within the broader scientific community, the consensus and historical credit for foundational mRNA vaccine development differ significantly. [1, 2, 3]
  • Dr. Robert Malone's Claims: Early in his career, Dr. Malone contributed to early, foundational gene transfection research in the late 1980s. During the COVID-19 pandemic, he became a vocal critic of the rollout, questioning the safety profile, the dosage, and the overall public health strategy of the mRNA vaccines.
  • The Scientific Consensus: The scientific community and leading global institutions credit Dr. Katalin Karikó and Dr. Drew Weissman with the foundational discoveries that enabled the successful development of mRNA vaccines. They were awarded the 2023 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for their discoveries regarding nucleoside base modifications that prevented severe inflammatory responses, making the technology safe and effective for humans. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7]
The Patent Landscape
The intellectual property (IP) underpinning modern mRNA vaccines is heavily contested and shared among multiple biotechnology companies, rather than a single individual. The foundational patents for modified mRNA and lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) are primarily held by institutions and companies like the University of Pennsylvania (licensed to BioNTech/Pfizer), Moderna, and Acuitas Therapeutics. Major legal battles exist, such as Moderna's patent infringement lawsuits against Pfizer and BioNTech over mRNA and delivery structures, rather than over whether the technology itself is appropriate. [1, 2, 3, 4]
Clinical Efficacy & Use
Despite criticisms raised by some figures regarding application, global health authorities, including the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, endorse the technology, citing extensive data proving that mRNA vaccines saved millions of lives and successfully provided immunity during the pandemic. [1, 2, 3]
View attachment 1261567View attachment 126156512 sites
  • The patent dispute over the breakthrough mRNA technology
    On 26 August 2022, Moderna filed a patent infringement lawsuit against Pfizer and BioNTech in the United States District Court for...
    National Institutes of Health (.gov)
  • mRNA Patent Wars Update: The Plot Thickens with Key ...
    Mar 23, 2025 — Recap. Over the past three years, mRNA and LNP patent litigation activity has grown and persisted. Lipid pioneer Arbutus has pursu...
    IPWatchdog.com
  • Moderna sues Pfizer/BioNTech over COVID patent
    Aug 26, 2022 — sorry moderna is suing Pfizer. and its German partner bayontech for patent infringement in the development of the first covid-19 v...
    View attachment 1261566
    1:51
    YouTube·Reuters

So your copy and paste proves that people who got the VACCINE DID NOT GET COVID?

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
 
The commies claim on a certain day, the parties agree to FLIP IDEOLOGIES!

😂

THE DIXIECRATS became NOT RACIST, AND THE PARTY OF LINCOLN BECAME RACIST.

Just effing clowns.
The Dixiecrats became Republicans, and the Northern Democrats are still Democrats. The Republicans are still in the middle and less represented by the GOP because Trump has suppressed the party for his own.
 
Back
Top Bottom