James Talarico said it’s “existential” to reduce meat consumption to fight climate change

[citygator]

"What a fragile human you are."

Your lack of self awareness is profound

That followed a salient point. Your posts are all insults. You might as well just quit the board if you dont want to debate. Or at least take a break.

 

[Rawley]

That followed a salient point. Your posts are all insults. You might as well just quit the board if you dont want to debate. Or at least take a break.

You consider name calling "debate" And when I return in kind, you get all prissy. Oh well

Enough. Have a blessed day

 

[Rawley]

Meat is healthy.
And of course, you miss the point. Or you just ignored it and chose to gaslight.

One can only conclude he's a moron.

Candidate in Iowa runs on a campaign that corn is an existential threat and is killing the environment, we have to reduce our corn farms.

Citimoron: TRUMP

 

[citygator]

You consider name calling "debate" And when I return in kind, you get all prissy. Oh well

Enough. Have a blessed day

Try not to piss in your pants if a politician says its healthy for your body the environment to eat less meat.

 

[Paddlefoot]

Talarico is the only one that the insect and worm lobby can hire to get the fool minions to consume that stuff. And with that as the only food source for poor and middle class the population will soon start to decline, That will cause less crime and murder rate as less people to do things to,'

 

[Woodznutz]

The extent to which red meat consumption affects climate change is questionable, there is no possible way to prove or disprove that hypothesis one way or the other. What about milk and other dairy products? All I've seen so far is estimates based on self-supporting individuals. Yeah, that's conclusive evidence. <sarcasm>

All sources of climate change should be examined, and adjusted if necessary. Regarding beef, switch to raising them on grass on improved pastures instead of CAFO feedlots.

 

[Paddlefoot]

All sources of climate change should be examined, and adjusted if necessary. Regarding beef, switch to raising them on grass on improved pastures instead of CAFO feedlots.

Maybe crunch the numbers on if a mini cow is more profiable per pound than a full size one. they would have to be easier to transport and process.

[COLOR=rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.75)]Advantages Over Standard-Sized Cattle[/COLOR]​

[COLOR=rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.5)]Mini cattle offer several advantages over standard-sized cattle, particularly for small-acreage farmers. Some of the key benefits include:

• Space efficiency: Mini cattle require less land to graze, making them ideal for small farms.
• Lower feed costs: Due to their smaller size, mini cattle consume less feed, reducing the overall cost of maintenance.
• Easier handling: Mini cattle are generally more docile and easier to handle than standard-sized cattle.

Height at Shoulder	Under 42 inches	Over 50 inches
Weight	500-1,200 pounds	1,000-2,000 pounds
Feed Costs	Lower	Higher

[th]

Characteristics​

[/th][th]

Mini Cattle​

[/th][th]

Standard Cattle​

[/th]​

[/COLOR]

 

[westwall]

Its ok. We are running out of water.

Send the illegals back and you'll be fine

 

[westwall]

All sources of climate change should be examined, and adjusted if necessary. Regarding beef, switch to raising them on grass on improved pastures instead of CAFO feedlots.

How about you provide empirical evidence that anything man does can affect the climate.

 

[Woodznutz]

How about you provide empirical evidence that anything man does can affect the climate.

How about you providing evidence that it doesn't?

 

[Woodznutz]

Maybe crunch the numbers on if a mini cow is more profiable per pound than a full size one. they would have to be easier to transport and process.

[COLOR=rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.75)]Advantages Over Standard-Sized Cattle[/COLOR]​

[COLOR=rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.5)]Mini cattle offer several advantages over standard-sized cattle, particularly for small-acreage farmers. Some of the key benefits include:

• Space efficiency: Mini cattle require less land to graze, making them ideal for small farms.
• Lower feed costs: Due to their smaller size, mini cattle consume less feed, reducing the overall cost of maintenance.
• Easier handling: Mini cattle are generally more docile and easier to handle than standard-sized cattle.

Height at Shoulder	Under 42 inches	Over 50 inches
Weight	500-1,200 pounds	1,000-2,000 pounds
Feed Costs	Lower	Higher

[th]
Characteristics

[/th][th]
Mini Cattle

[/th][th]
Standard Cattle

[/th]​

[/COLOR]

I dunno. We need those full-size leather hides.

 

[toobfreak]

This will play out well in Texas. I'm beginning to think that Crockett may have actually been the more electable Democrat.

And yet I keep hearing this guy is polling well ahead of Paxton and Cornyn.

We keep getting ridiculous candidates who can't possibly win in any sane world, like Mamdani and Spanburger, and then they win anyway.

 

[westwall]

How about you providing evidence that it doesn't?

That's not how science works. YOU have made the extraordinary claim that mankind affects the climate. It's up to YOU to prove it.

I can PROVE that nothing happening today, is different from anything that has happened in the past.

That's a scientific principle called UNIFORMITARIANISM. YOU are claiming that things are different....somehow.

So YOU prove it.

 

[The Irish Ram]

When they tell us that chicken farts are killing us too, or that children are little germ factories, will we put a bullseye on them next?
Cows causing global warming is ridiculous. There are about 50 active volcanoes at any given time, and we are supposed to believe cows are the problem? One good volcano makes a cow fart seem like a breath of fresh air.

And cow farts are much less toxic than the chemicals Gates is poisoning our air with now.
This is the maniacal Gates plan to become the pedophile King of the world.
Feed that asshole some beans and then put him down with the first fart. That would make the world safer...

 

[Woodznutz]

That's not how science works. YOU have made the extraordinary claim that mankind affects the climate. It's up to YOU to prove it.

I can PROVE that nothing happening today, is different from anything that has happened in the past.

That's a scientific principle called UNIFORMITARIANISM. YOU are claiming that things are different....somehow.

So YOU prove it.

I think climate scientists have pretty much established that man has influenced the climate. No need to reinvent the wheel here.

 

[westwall]

I think climate scientists have pretty much established that man has influenced the climate. No need to reinvent the wheel here.

No, they haven't. They have created computer models that make that claim. But, to date, there is ZERO empirical evidence to support their claims.

None.

What you just did is called an APPEAL TO AUTHORITY, which is a logic fail.

I am adhering to the scientific method. A thought process developed over centuries to take us away from the myths and religious dogma of the past.

Climatologists, the bad ones that you seem to pay attention to, are trying desperately as hell to take us back to those old "sacrifice the virgin to the volcano gods" days.

 

[toobfreak]

When they tell us that chicken farts are killing us too, or that children are little germ factories, will we put a bullseye on them next?
Cows causing global warming is ridiculous.

Volcanoes (The Deccan Traps) an event that hit Siberia right around the time of the Chicxulub Impactor is accredited as having more impact on the death of the dinosaurs than the impactor itself. But if chickens and cows were the problem, why then has the Earth been COOLING these past 55 million years since the age of mammals (chickens, cows, etc.) really began, back in the Eocene Epoch? Other than for an overt ice age, these are actually some of the coolest times the Earth has ever seen.

 

[toobfreak]

I am adhering to the scientific method. A thought process developed over centuries to take us away from the myths and religious dogma of the past.

To clarify: SCIENCE is the process of reason invented by man in an effort to prove that the universe around us was actually understandable as the result of logical, natural and predicable processes one could measure, graph and repeat, and not just the results of magic, myth, Gods and mysticism.

Climatologists, the bad ones that you seem to pay attention to, are trying desperately as hell to take us back to those old "sacrifice the virgin to the volcano gods" days.

Thar be money in Climate Change. Money, profit, and job security.

 

[westwall]

Volcanoes (The Deccan Traps) an event that hit Siberia right around the time of the Chicxulub Impactor is accredited as having more impact on the death of the dinosaurs than the impactor itself. But if chickens and cows were the problem, why then has the Earth been COOLING these past 55 million years since the age of mammals (chickens, cows, etc.) really began, back in the Eocene Epoch? Other than for an overt ice age, these are actually some of the coolest times the Earth has ever seen.

Correct. The mammals we know evolved during the PETM, 55 million years ago the Earth was 12 degrees warmer than it is now.

Life thrived.

 

[westwall]

To clarify: SCIENCE is the process of reason invented by man in an effort to prove that the universe around us was actually understandable as the result of logical, natural and predicable processes one could measure, graph and repeat, and not just the results of magic, myth, Gods and mysticism.


Thar be money in Climate Change. Money, profit, and job security.

The scientific method is how science does that.