James O’Keefe’s OMG catches grooming teacher

[SassyIrishLass]

"You don't have to eat the whole tub of lard to know it's gone bad."
HL Mencken

You failed also

 

[late]

because you can’t argue about the footage.

Best joke of the day!

 

[late]

You failed also

It's good to have a fantasy life, not so hot if it gets in the way of reality.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

It's good to have a fantasy life, not so hot if it gets in the way of reality.

Still can't point out what's fake can you? Save your infantile nonsense you're exposed

 

[jotathought]

Known faker is a fact.

Indeed, the first hit piece he did, the one that made him a star to the Fox Noise crowd, was staged.

“Known faker” is a conclusion, not evidence.

The real question is simple: are the conversations genuine or not?

Did the people actually say those words?
Were the clips fabricated? Were they deceptively edited in a way that changes the meaning?

If the conversations are genuine, then your objection isn’t to the content—it’s to who posted it.

If Kamala Harris posted the exact same footage, would it suddenly become true? If Donald Trump posted the exact same footage, would it suddenly become false?

Evidence doesn’t change based on who publishes it. The authenticity of a conversation is either real or it isn’t.

So which is it? Are the conversations fake, or do you just dislike the messenger?

 

[jotathought]

Best joke of the day!

You’d think after 50 comments about O’Keefe, somebody would eventually get around to discussing the video.

Maybe that’s tomorrow’s assignment. At some point the joke starts writing itself.

 

[late]

You’d think after 50 comments about O’Keefe, somebody would eventually get around to discussing the video.

Maybe that’s tomorrow’s assignment. At some point the joke starts writing itself.

At some point you lose interest in juvenile character assassination.

 

[jotathought]

At some point you lose interest in juvenile character assassination.

“Best joke of the day.”

The best joke is a thread full of grown people, like you, claiming the video is fake while carefully avoiding any discussion of what’s actually in it.

It’s easy to lose interest when you have to be objective and provide facts instead of subjective distractions. Go out and play junior.

 

[late]

It’s easy to lose interest when you have to be objective and provide facts instead of subjective distractions. Go out and play junior.

New best joke of the day...

You are defending a professional propagandist as if he wasn't all about propaganda.

That's dumbass.

 

[jotathought]

New best joke of the day...

You are defending a professional propagandist as if he wasn't all about propaganda.

That's dumbass.

Calling someone a propagandist isn’t an argument. It’s what people reach for when they’d rather attack the source than wrestle with the substance.

You’ve spent more energy proving you dislike O’Keefe than proving the footage is false.

That’s not only dumbass, it’s intellectually lazy. Lazy ass

 

[late]

Calling someone a propagandist isn’t an argument.

That is partly correct.

"The legal maxim you are likely thinking of is "Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus" (Latin for "False in one thing, false in all things")

This historical legal principle dictates that if a witness is proven to be untruthful about a single detail ("once impeached"), the judge or jury has the legal justification to entirely disregard all of the witness's other testimony as unreliable."
Google AI

Wake me up if you accidentally stumble over reality.

 

[jotathought]

That is partly correct.

"The legal maxim you are likely thinking of is "Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus" (Latin for "False in one thing, false in all things")

This historical legal principle dictates that if a witness is proven to be untruthful about a single detail ("once impeached"), the judge or jury has the legal justification to entirely disregard all of the witness's other testimony as unreliable."
Google AI

Wake me up if you accidentally stumble over reality.

You’re overstating the doctrine. “Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus” allows a factfinder to question credibility; it doesn’t require them to reject everything a person has ever said.

If it did, we’d have to throw out reporting from CNN, Fox, MSNBC, the New York Times, the Washington Post, politicians from both parties, and just about every public institution that’s ever gotten a story wrong.

Curiouslly, you don’t seem eager to apply that standard consistently.

 

[late]

You’re overstating the doctrine. “Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus” allows a factfinder to question credibility; it doesn’t require them to reject everything a person has ever said.

If it did, we’d have to throw out reporting from CNN, Fox, MSNBC, the New York Times, the Washington Post, politicians from both parties, and just about every public institution that’s ever gotten a story wrong.

Curiously, you don’t seem eager to apply that standard consistently.

Modern tradition doesn't require someone to reject everything.

But this guy a professional asshole.

And until the Pope blesses what this sociopath is saying, I am rejecting everything he says or does.

This is not new, he has been a total asshole many times.

 

[TimFitz]

What in the vid is fake? So far none of you have even tried to go there

It isn't worth the effort.

O'Keefe is a faker and a fraud.

Best not to waste time on him, no matter how much you think we ought to.

 

[jotathought]

Modern tradition doesn't require someone to reject everything.

But this guy a professional asshole.

And until the Pope blesses what this sociopath is saying, I am rejecting everything he says or does.

This is not new, he has been a total asshole many times.

So we’ve finally arrived at the real argument:

Not “the footage is fake.”
Not “the quotes are fabricated.”
Not “the context changes the meaning.”

Just, “I hate O’Keefe.”

Could’ve saved everyone a lot of time and started with that.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

It isn't worth the effort.

O'Keefe is a faker and a fraud.

Best not to waste time on him, no matter how much you think we ought to.

Another massive fail. You people look ridiculous

 

[theHawk]

Just the fact that you're now really pushing the notion that this video is genuine and that teachers go around bragging about "grooming children" shows that even you don't believe it's genuine. Why would anyone admit that on camera and post it to media? Why would you publically admit you're a child molester? You'd have to be pretty stupid to do that.

I googled your claim of the success of PV sting operations and this is what I got.

• Democratic Operatives (2016): Democratic consultant Scott Foval was fired, and political operative Bob Creamer stepped back from their roles after undercover videos purported to show them discussing strategies for inciting violence at Donald Trump rallies. [1, 2]
• City Hall Aide (2022): New York City Mayor Eric Adams fired City Hall aide Christopher Baugh after Project Veritas secretly recorded him making disparaging remarks about the mayor. [1]
• Washington Nationals Official (2026): The Washington Nationals fired a team official after an undercover video surfaced that appeared to show him discussing internal club operations and a player's religion.

Three people, one of whom dissed the mayor of New York, and the football guy for violating his confidentiality agreement. The guy who got fired for talking about inciting violence at a Trump Rally was small potatoes and deserved it, but these are hardly big investigative scores.
Then I googled the times PV got caught lying:

• The Washington Post Infiltration (2017): Project Veritas attempted to trick The Washington Post into publishing a false story about a political candidate to discredit the publication. The scam backfired; the Post caught the operative lying and won a Pulitzer Prize for exposing the operation.
• Voter Fraud Admissions (2020/2024): The group released highly publicized allegations regarding voter fraud at a Pennsylvania post office. Project Veritas later admitted in court and settling agreements that it had zero evidence to support these claims.
• Deceptive Editing: The group has a history of selectively editing hidden-camera footage. For example, a deceptively edited video portraying NPR executives led to the resignation of NPR's CEO in 2013.

And then I googled their legal cases:

• The Diary Case: Federal authorities investigated how Project Veritas acquired the diary. In August 2022, two Florida residents pleaded guilty to stealing the diary and other personal items and selling them to the organization.
• Founder Fallout: Amid the ongoing federal probe and internal allegations of financial malfeasance, the organization's board ousted founder James O'Keefe in early 2023.
• Operational Shutdown: Following a wave of staff layoffs, lawsuits, and executive departures, Project Veritas suspended all operations in September 2023.

Last but not least Media Bias/Fact Check said:

• Overall, we rate Project Veritas Right Biased and Questionable based on the promotion of misleading videos, unsubstantiated theories, and several failed fact checks.

Project Veritas - Bias and Credibility

QUESTIONABLE SOURCE A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no

mediabiasfactcheck.com

You still haven’t shown how this is a “fake” video. You just don’t want to believe it because you think people never confess to the bad shit they do in private conversations?

You just hate him because he exposes how the left are so corrupt and so degenerate. As if it’s so hard to belief some leftwing lunatic out there would still be secretly pushing LGBTQ crap onto kids when they aren’t supposed to.

Do you think school teachers should be able to teach kids about LGBTQ matters, yes or no? Be honest. Let’s hear it.

 

[DonGlock26]

James O'Keefe posts another fake video on X

Prove the video is fake, or you are fake news.

 

[DonGlock26]

Another massive fail. You people look ridiculous

Indeed.

 

[late]

Just, “I hate O’Keefe.”

He makes a living doing propaganda.

You guys love it, anyone that likes democracy doesn't.