Jack Smith could be indicted for fraud

[The Duke]

But the law does. And evideence is king.

Which is why your ilk despise the courts. Its where your grifts go to die.

And where Trump is going to have to face the evidence. At least 4. Arizona is taking a long, hard look at the forged documents Trump and his ilk pushed in their State in 2020.

We'll see what happens. I guarantee it ain't gonna go the way you expect.

 

[Skylar]

Who's going to indict Jack Smith? The corrupt Biden DOJ? I have serious doubts of that happening.

For what exactly?

There's zero evidence that Jack Smith sought any charges against Trump for the riot. Making Alan's imaginary and completely hypothetical 'omission' irrelevant. As there are no riot charges.

 

[AZrailwhale]

You enjoy your zeal.

I'll stick with the evidence. And the evidence against Trump is detailed and damning.

So you were on the Grand Jury? They are the only people who have seen any evidence and the only evidence they have seen is what supports the DAs charges. Grand Juries are never allowed to see exculpatory evidence. That’s why there is the old saying that a DA can indict a ham sandwich.

 

[The Duke]

For what exactly?

There's zero evidence that Jack Smith sought any charges against Trump for the riot. Making Alan's imaginary and completely hypothetical 'omission' irrelevant. As there are no riot charges.

For corrupting the IRS in 2010 would be a start, jackass.

 

[Skylar]

We'll see what happens. I guarantee it ain't gonna go the way you expect.

Your guarantees have never amounted to much, Duke.

As you generally have no idea what you're talking about. Even here, you ignore the evidence of very serious crimes by Trump and try and pretend that none of it exists.

Willfull ignorance is not the best basis of a 'guarantee'.

 

[The Duke]

Your guarantees have never amounted to much, Duke.

As you generally have no idea what you're talking about. Even here, you ignore the evidence of very serious crimes by Trump and try and pretend that none of it exists.

Willfull ignorance is not the best basis of a 'guarantee'.

What do you see that happened here, Douchelord? I am far from ignorant. Also far from being a balless putz like you.

Testimony: In 2010, Justice Department Sought Lois Lerner’s Help to Prosecute Tax Exempt Groups Engaging in Politics - United States House Committee on Oversight and Accountability

United States House Committee on Oversight and Accountability

oversight.house.gov

My hopes of you reading that objectively are zero. That's for other people to see what a shithead Jack Smith is.

 

[Skylar]

For corrupting the IRS in 2010 would be a start, jackass.

Laughing....13 YEARS ago? Where no one was charged, nor did the Inspector General recommend any charges for ANYONE?

Good luck with that imaginary horseshit.

I'll stick with actual indictments, actual evidence, actual testimony, actual recordings justifying actual charges.

 

[Skylar]

What do you see that happened here, Douchelord? I am far from ignorant. Also far from being a balless putz like you.

Testimony: In 2010, Justice Department Sought Lois Lerner’s Help to Prosecute Tax Exempt Groups Engaging in Politics - United States House Committee on Oversight and Accountability

United States House Committee on Oversight and Accountability

oversight.house.gov

Can you please stop wasting both our time and just link to whatever right wing blog you're apeing. We both know you don't research shit. You're posting links you've been given, apeing arguments you don't understand by people you don't know.

You're irrelevant in your own opinions. You're just a middle man for whomever is doing your thinking for you. And I'm stuck trying to interpret your awkward paraphrases of someone else's argument.

Please fast forward to the part where you and just link to them.

 

[0311]

MSN

www.msn.com

For omitting that Trump said "Peacefully and Patriotically make your voices heard" on Jan 6. If the Grand Jury didn't hear all pertinent facts that is a violation of law : exculpatory evidence

No, there was no peacfully and patriotically making your voice heard. Jan. 6 was violence the state. An Insurrection to overthrow the duly and democratically elected government of the United States.

Fuck Off.

 

[Quasar44]

MSN

www.msn.com

For omitting that Trump said "Peacefully and Patriotically make your voices heard" on Jan 6. If the Grand Jury didn't hear all pertinent facts that is a violation of law : exculpatory evidence

Weak azz GOP does zero

Entire party has zero future

Zero leadership
Zero balls

 

[Lastamender]

But the law does. And evideence is king.

Which is why your ilk despise the courts. Its where your grifts go to die.

And where Trump is going to have to face the evidence. At least 4. Arizona is taking a long, hard look at the forged documents Trump and his ilk pushed in their State in 2020.

Evidence is king if they allow the evidence to be presented.

 

[Lastamender]

No, there was no peacfully and patriotically making your voice heard. Jan. 6 was violence the state. An Insurrection to overthrow the duly and democratically elected government of the United States.

Fuck Off.

 

[Skylar]

Evidence is king if they allow the evidence to be presented.

Trump had his own trial scheduled where he could call witnesses, present his evidence...BUT would have his own claims subject to cross examination, his own witnesses held to the standards of law.

And what did Trump do the day before he had a chance to present all the evidence he wanted to?

Trump Legal Team Folds | Georgia Secretary of State

President Trump and Chairman David Shafer’s legal team folded Thursday and voluntarily dismissed their election contests.

sos.ga.gov

Trump voluntarily dismissed his own case rather than face the standards of evidence in an actual court of law.

Try again, Grifty.

 

[Winco]

Your crowd is being led by the nose to believe he'll be DQ'd because of some murky accusation of "incitement" or "sedition".

Not even remotely true ^^^^.

trump can run if:

he is indicted........currently running and currently indicted (4)
he is on trial
he has been convicted
he is convicted and subject to home detention (he won't be put in jail)

 

[Crepitus]

MSN

www.msn.com

For omitting that Trump said "Peacefully and Patriotically make your voices heard" on Jan 6. If the Grand Jury didn't hear all pertinent facts that is a violation of law : exculpatory evidence

You guys already tried this one.

Fell flat the first time too.

Jack Smith could be indicted for Fraud for Omitting Trump’s "Peaceful" Statement

The indictment charges Trump with four counts, including “conspiracy to defraud the United States.” But in a portion recounting Trump’s speech at the “Stop the Steal” rally, Smith repeats the errors made by House Democrats in Trump’s second impeachment trial: he focuses on Trump’s use of the...

www.usmessageboard.com

 

[Lastamender]

Trump had his own trial scheduled where he could call witnesses, present his evidence...BUT would have his own claims subject to cross examination, his own witnesses held to the standards of law.

And what did Trump do the day before he had a chance to present all the evidence he wanted to?

Trump Legal Team Folds | Georgia Secretary of State

President Trump and Chairman David Shafer’s legal team folded Thursday and voluntarily dismissed their election contests.

sos.ga.gov

Trump voluntarily dismissed his own case rather than face the standards of evidence in an actual court of law.

Try again, Grifty.

From your link.
“Spreading disinformation about elections is dangerous and wrong,” said Secretary Raffensperger. “It was wrong when Stacey Abrams and her allies made false claims about Georgia’s election processes following the 2018 election and run-up to the 2020 election, and it’s wrong when the President and his allies are doing it now.”

Lock her fat ass up.

 

[Skylar]

From your link.
“Spreading disinformation about elections is dangerous and wrong,” said Secretary Raffensperger. “It was wrong when Stacey Abrams and her allies made false claims about Georgia’s election processes following the 2018 election and run-up to the 2020 election, and it’s wrong when the President and his allies are doing it now.”

Lock her fat ass up.

Laughing....so much for your whining that Trump never had a chance to present his evidence.

You already knew you were lying, Grifty. As conmen and liars do.

And Stacey Abrams forged fraudulent election documents? Threatened election workers? Tried to obstruct an official proceeding?

Prove it.

 

[Lastamender]

Laughing....so much for your whining that Trump never had a chance to present his evidence.

You already knew you were lying, Grifty. As conmen and liars do.

And Stacey Abrams forged fraudulent election documents? Threatened election workers? Tried to obstruct an official proceeding?

Prove it.

Prove those were evidentiary hearings. And those cases were about the SOS. breaking the law which the GA.legislature did nothing about. And yes Abrams had a lot do with fake votes in 2020.

Try the whole story.

 

[skye]

Hope springs eternal.

 

[Skylar]

Prove those were evidentiary hearings. I'll wait. And yes Abrams had a lot do with fake votes in 2020.

They weren't 'evidenntiary hearings', Last. It was a trial where Trump could call his witneses and submit his evidence.

And Trump folded like a cheap suit a day before it was supposed to start, Grifty.

You know this. But as grifters do, you keep looking for an ignorant audience, hoping to shill your lies to people that don't know any better. So you pretend that Trump never had a chance to present his 'evidence' when you know damn well that he did.

But being a victim sells, doesn't it Grifty?