Jack Smith and Tanya Chutkan Chug On In Their Quest For Election Interference

toobfreak

Tungsten/Glass Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2017
Messages
87,776
Reaction score
89,326
Points
3,615
Location
On The Way Home To Earth
Though the bulk of the documents released are redacted, with many pages fully unviewable, the documents provide a window into Trump’s conduct still unknown to the public in their continual attempt to stop Trump's reelection.

The prosecutors argue that it was somehow Trump’s effort to thwart the transfer of power despite not even being there and the riot being a wholly random and unorganized rather than a protest by the public objecting to how the 2020 was held and rammed through, questions unanswered. Trump’s attorneys are due to respond in the days following November’s presidential election.

The judge rationalizes the release by suggesting that to NOT release it would itself be a form of election interference, meanwhile, tries to get the case they cannot win in court held in the public forum!

 
The supreme court needs to shut this down today... its ridiculous and unconstitutional as hell...
Democrat Election interference is happening all over the damn place... Garland suing a state for cleaning their voter rolls... its not his to mess with...
 
Though the bulk of the documents released are redacted, with many pages fully unviewable, the documents provide a window into Trump’s conduct still unknown to the public in their continual attempt to stop Trump's reelection.

The prosecutors argue that it was somehow Trump’s effort to thwart the transfer of power despite not even being there and the riot being a wholly random and unorganized rather than a protest by the public objecting to how the 2020 was held and rammed through, questions unanswered. Trump’s attorneys are due to respond in the days following November’s presidential election.

The judge rationalizes the release by suggesting that to NOT release it would itself be a form of election interference, meanwhile, tries to get the case they cannot win in court held in the public forum!

Good!
It's a shame that all of Trump's delays in this case have pushed the release of this evidence right up till two weeks before the election.....but I guess he should have thought of that last year before he started delaying with endless appeals and challenges.
And now here we are.
 
Good!
It's a shame that all of Trump's delays in this case have pushed the release of this evidence right up till two weeks before the election.....but I guess he should have thought of that last year before he started delaying with endless appeals and challenges.
And now here we are.
Made up accusing crimes by people who commit crimes.
 
The judge rationalizes the release by suggesting that to NOT release it would itself be a form of election interference, meanwhile, tries to get the case they cannot win in court held in the public forum!

She's right. Trumps lawyers have made it very clear in their motions they want to delay the proceedings until after the election. Their purpose is to keep the information under seal so that the people can't see it before the election.

They (Trump and his lawyers) clearly want to interfere with the election.

I persons day job has no bearing on the proceedings of the court and Trump's day job is being a candidate and she's having no part of it.

Good for her.

WW
.
.
.
.
 
Good!
It's a shame that all of Trump's delays in this case have pushed the release of this evidence right up till two weeks before the election.....but I guess he should have thought of that last year before he started delaying with endless appeals and challenges.
And now here we are.
No one cares and no one is paying it any attention...
 
1729277966071.webp
 
The supreme court needs to shut this down today... its ridiculous and unconstitutional as hell...
Democrat Election interference is happening all over the damn place... Garland suing a state for cleaning their voter rolls... its not his to mess with...
Don't you think voters who might not have tuned into the Jan 6th Committee hearings a year and a half ago deserve to get a look at all the evidence they missed before they go cast their votes?
And by the way, it is illegal to purge voter rolls within 90 days of the election. You would think legitimate election officials would be familiar with this federal law wouldn't you?
But you see, these people aren't actually legitimate election officials. They are MAGAt cultroach plants inbedded in state election boards since the big lie of 2020. They were installed into these positions to help Trump steal this election. Purging legitimate Democrat voters from the rolls is just one prong of this fascist attack on our free and fair election.
Fortunately there is a vast army of lawyers (including The Justice Department) out there watching for these anti-American activities to pop up around the country and stomping them out so Trump can't get away with the big steal part 2.
 
In fact, it will gain Trump votes.
Probably not. The only votes to be "gained" at this point are the votes that he already has.
His die hard MAGAt cultroaches.
He hasn't expanded his voter base. "Undecideds" are moving to Harris. Even MAGAt women will defect in secret in large numbers to vote for Harris although they will never admit it to pollsters or their husbands.
They are TIRED of this guy; all the noise and rudeness and incompetence and never ending scandal. This will help them go that way.
It's time to turn the page.
 
Probably not. The only votes to be "gained" at this point are the votes that he already has.
His die hard MAGAt cultroaches.
He hasn't expanded his voter base. "Undecideds" are moving to Harris. Even MAGAt women will defect in secret in large numbers to vote for Harris although they will never admit it to pollsters or their husbands.
They are TIRED of this guy; all the noise and rudeness and incompetence and never ending scandal. This will help them go that way.
It's time to turn the page.


You poor thing.
 
Dems trying to cheat and rig the election, no surprise there. Trump has forced these Dem filth out into the open.
 
Dems trying to cheat and rig the election, no surprise there. Trump has forced these Dem filth out into the open.

Trying to interfere with the election by keeping court records out of the public view is the real attempt to cheat and rig the election by hiding information on the actions of a candidate who tried to overturn an election are the actions of the real filth (Trump and his lawyers).

WW
 
Trying to interfere with the election by keeping court records out of the public view is the real attempt to cheat and rig the election by hiding information on the actions of a candidate who tried to overturn an election are the actions of the real filth (Trump and his lawyers).

WW
Cheating libs please, YOU PEOPLE pulled off the cheat of the century squashing the Biden laptop story in 2020. You have zero credibility cheaters.
 
Though the bulk of the documents released are redacted, with many pages fully unviewable, the documents provide a window into Trump’s conduct still unknown to the public in their continual attempt to stop Trump's reelection.

The prosecutors argue that it was somehow Trump’s effort to thwart the transfer of power despite not even being there and the riot being a wholly random and unorganized rather than a protest by the public objecting to how the 2020 was held and rammed through, questions unanswered. Trump’s attorneys are due to respond in the days following November’s presidential election.

The judge rationalizes the release by suggesting that to NOT release it would itself be a form of election interference, meanwhile, tries to get the case they cannot win in court held in the public forum!

Trump broke the law. The courts don't give a damn about a campaign.
 
Good!
It's a shame that all of Trump's delays in this case have pushed the release of this evidence right up till two weeks before the election.....but I guess he should have thought of that last year before he started delaying with endless appeals and challenges.
And now here we are.
It's not evidence until it is introduced in court and given an exhibit number. Reason is that opposing counsel has the right to object to anything that will be introduced against a defendant.

Anything from the J6 hearings is inadmissible hearsay- if the prosecution wants to introduce testimony from a witness, he has to call that witness in court. Reason is to preserve the right to confront witnesses against you, and cross-examine them.
 
It's not evidence until it is introduced in court and given an exhibit number. Reason is that opposing counsel has the right to object to anything that will be introduced against a defendant.

Anything from the J6 hearings is inadmissible hearsay- if the prosecution wants to introduce testimony from a witness, he has to call that witness in court. Reason is to preserve the right to confront witnesses against you, and cross-examine them.
Wrong again.
It is good to see though that that honorary law degree from Trump University hasn't been completely wasted on you though.

Justice Department Special counsel Jack Smith's evidence dossier in former President Donald Trump's election-fraud case has been made public.

The dossier includes interviews conducted by the House select committee on the January 6, 2021 attack on the U.S. Capitol, as well as transcripts of Trump's speech from that day. The majority of the dossier is still sealed or redacted.

Trump is accused of conspiracy to defraud the United States; conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding; obstruction and attempting to obstruct an official proceeding; and conspiracy against rights in connection with an alleged pressure campaign on state officials to reverse the 2020 election results.


 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom