Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Parts of it were confirmed as Comey testified to Congress. Maybe your PEABRAIN can tell us how you can spy on a campaign through a former campaign official. Page left the Trump campaign in September and the warrants were obtained in October. For your information, September comes before October.
No one knows what Mueller has. He is just completing the investigation he was tasked with.
What did Mueller START with? You can't empower a Special Counsel to investigate crimes unless you have proof that a crime took place! So what was the proof that Trump's campaign committed criminal acts? Because Hillary Clinton said they did? Think long and hard about that, BB because Clinton is the person who actually DID the behavior that she accused Trump of! She DID collude with foreign agents to affect the election!
There is no doubt that Trump asked Comey to lay off of Flynn who was under investigation. Trump admitted he fired Comey because of the Russia investigation. The question was whether a fair and impartial investigation could be conducted by the DOJ. The answer was a clear no. Maybe Trump and his supporters need to take Trey Gowdy's advice. Act like you are innocent if you are innocent.
There is no doubt that Russia interfered in our election. They hacked the DNC servers and gave the e-mails to WikiLeaks. On at least 1 occasion, the trump campaign met with a Russian national expecting to receive dirt on Clinton. She DID NOT collude with any foreign agents.
How can you possibly sit here and claim that Clinton didn't collude with any foreign agents when it's been proven beyond any doubt that's EXACTLY what she DID do! The Clinton campaign paid huge sums of money to Fusion GPS and through them to Richard Steele to fabricate lies about Donald Trump and then put them out to a compliant main stream media through Russian nationals to hide who generated them in the first place! What she did is the epitome of collusion!
you either need to get out more or go on a strict no conspiracy diet ...
epitome this ......
Think about the size of the claim here: the Clinton campaign, which was convinced it was going to beat Trump in a landslide, funded an espionage-laden high-wire act with a firm whose clients included some unsavory Russians themselves, in which a highly experienced British spook got suckered by the Democrats into weaponizing some Russian disinformation. (Steele could outplay the Russians, but he couldn’t outplay Robby Mook?)
There are other variations on this theme, but central to all of them was the idea that without Fusion there would be nothing, and that we would know this if only we could know what Simpson said to the Senate investigators. But since the Senate intelligence committee wouldn’t release the transcript, we couldn’t know just how much Simpson had spilled his guts.
So now we know, and none of it supports the rickety Jenga pile of Republican conspiracy theories.
Now you're claiming that it's unlikely that the Clinton campaign would use dirty tricks because they were convinced they would beat Trump in a landslide? I take it you also think they wouldn't use dirty tricks against Bernie Sanders even though there was practically no feasible way for him to win the nomination?
Steele didn't get "suckered" into providing disinformation! It's quite clear that he got paid...and paid handsomely...to provide disinformation and that money came from the Clinton campaign! Rickety Jenga pile of conspiracy theories? What Clinton and the DNC did in that election isn't a "theory"...it's proven fact! The rickety Jenga pile of conspiracy theories is what you on the left have employed against Trump from the moment he was nominated by the GOP! Compared to the house of cards you've built...the case against Clinton rests on concrete footings!
/—-/ And the First Russian company has appeared to tell Muller to produce the evidence. He wasn’t expecting that. And process crimes are 100% BS.What did Mueller START with? You can't empower a Special Counsel to investigate crimes unless you have proof that a crime took place! So what was the proof that Trump's campaign committed criminal acts? Because Hillary Clinton said they did? Think long and hard about that, BB because Clinton is the person who actually DID the behavior that she accused Trump of! She DID collude with foreign agents to affect the election!
There is no doubt that Trump asked Comey to lay off of Flynn who was under investigation. Trump admitted he fired Comey because of the Russia investigation. The question was whether a fair and impartial investigation could be conducted by the DOJ. The answer was a clear no. Maybe Trump and his supporters need to take Trey Gowdy's advice. Act like you are innocent if you are innocent.
There is no doubt that Russia interfered in our election. They hacked the DNC servers and gave the e-mails to WikiLeaks. On at least 1 occasion, the trump campaign met with a Russian national expecting to receive dirt on Clinton. She DID NOT collude with any foreign agents.
How can you possibly sit here and claim that Clinton didn't collude with any foreign agents when it's been proven beyond any doubt that's EXACTLY what she DID do! The Clinton campaign paid huge sums of money to Fusion GPS and through them to Richard Steele to fabricate lies about Donald Trump and then put them out to a compliant main stream media through Russian nationals to hide who generated them in the first place! What she did is the epitome of collusion!
you either need to get out more or go on a strict no conspiracy diet ...
epitome this ......
Think about the size of the claim here: the Clinton campaign, which was convinced it was going to beat Trump in a landslide, funded an espionage-laden high-wire act with a firm whose clients included some unsavory Russians themselves, in which a highly experienced British spook got suckered by the Democrats into weaponizing some Russian disinformation. (Steele could outplay the Russians, but he couldn’t outplay Robby Mook?)
There are other variations on this theme, but central to all of them was the idea that without Fusion there would be nothing, and that we would know this if only we could know what Simpson said to the Senate investigators. But since the Senate intelligence committee wouldn’t release the transcript, we couldn’t know just how much Simpson had spilled his guts.
So now we know, and none of it supports the rickety Jenga pile of Republican conspiracy theories.
Now you're claiming that it's unlikely that the Clinton campaign would use dirty tricks because they were convinced they would beat Trump in a landslide? I take it you also think they wouldn't use dirty tricks against Bernie Sanders even though there was practically no feasible way for him to win the nomination?
Steele didn't get "suckered" into providing disinformation! It's quite clear that he got paid...and paid handsomely...to provide disinformation and that money came from the Clinton campaign! Rickety Jenga pile of conspiracy theories? What Clinton and the DNC did in that election isn't a "theory"...it's proven fact! The rickety Jenga pile of conspiracy theories is what you on the left have employed against Trump from the moment he was nominated by the GOP! Compared to the house of cards you've built...the case against Clinton rests on concrete footings!
the case against Clinton rests on concrete footings ?
concerete heads is more like it ...
that house of cards has issued more than 100 criminal counts against 19 people and three companies. Of the 19 people, five — including three Trump associates — have pleaded guilty. Thirteen are Russians accused of meddling in the 2016 presidential election.
nothing personal, but you're an idiot, you idiot.
He got paid $168,000. Not bad but I wouldn't refer to that as "handsomely." Especially not when you consider Fusion GPS, who Hillary hired to do opposition research, got about about a million dollars.Parts of it were confirmed as Comey testified to Congress. Maybe your PEABRAIN can tell us how you can spy on a campaign through a former campaign official. Page left the Trump campaign in September and the warrants were obtained in October. For your information, September comes before October.
No one knows what Mueller has. He is just completing the investigation he was tasked with.
What did Mueller START with? You can't empower a Special Counsel to investigate crimes unless you have proof that a crime took place! So what was the proof that Trump's campaign committed criminal acts? Because Hillary Clinton said they did? Think long and hard about that, BB because Clinton is the person who actually DID the behavior that she accused Trump of! She DID collude with foreign agents to affect the election!
There is no doubt that Trump asked Comey to lay off of Flynn who was under investigation. Trump admitted he fired Comey because of the Russia investigation. The question was whether a fair and impartial investigation could be conducted by the DOJ. The answer was a clear no. Maybe Trump and his supporters need to take Trey Gowdy's advice. Act like you are innocent if you are innocent.
There is no doubt that Russia interfered in our election. They hacked the DNC servers and gave the e-mails to WikiLeaks. On at least 1 occasion, the trump campaign met with a Russian national expecting to receive dirt on Clinton. She DID NOT collude with any foreign agents.
How can you possibly sit here and claim that Clinton didn't collude with any foreign agents when it's been proven beyond any doubt that's EXACTLY what she DID do! The Clinton campaign paid huge sums of money to Fusion GPS and through them to Richard Steele to fabricate lies about Donald Trump and then put them out to a compliant main stream media through Russian nationals to hide who generated them in the first place! What she did is the epitome of collusion!
you either need to get out more or go on a strict no conspiracy diet ...
epitome this ......
Think about the size of the claim here: the Clinton campaign, which was convinced it was going to beat Trump in a landslide, funded an espionage-laden high-wire act with a firm whose clients included some unsavory Russians themselves, in which a highly experienced British spook got suckered by the Democrats into weaponizing some Russian disinformation. (Steele could outplay the Russians, but he couldn’t outplay Robby Mook?)
There are other variations on this theme, but central to all of them was the idea that without Fusion there would be nothing, and that we would know this if only we could know what Simpson said to the Senate investigators. But since the Senate intelligence committee wouldn’t release the transcript, we couldn’t know just how much Simpson had spilled his guts.
So now we know, and none of it supports the rickety Jenga pile of Republican conspiracy theories.
Now you're claiming that it's unlikely that the Clinton campaign would use dirty tricks because they were convinced they would beat Trump in a landslide? I take it you also think they wouldn't use dirty tricks against Bernie Sanders even though there was practically no feasible way for him to win the nomination?
Steele didn't get "suckered" into providing disinformation! It's quite clear that he got paid...and paid handsomely...to provide disinformation and that money came from the Clinton campaign! Rickety Jenga pile of conspiracy theories? What Clinton and the DNC did in that election isn't a "theory"...it's proven fact! The rickety Jenga pile of conspiracy theories is what you on the left have employed against Trump from the moment he was nominated by the GOP! Compared to the house of cards you've built...the case against Clinton rests on concrete footings!
Again, for the hard of learning....Now you’re reduced to lying. That didn’t take long. Steele never said ”the information contained in the dossiers was never presented by him as fact.”You said, "if it's someone like Comey.."Speculation? Is it speculation that the Clinton campaign paid to have Trump smeared by foreign agents? Is it speculation that the Obama Justice Department then turned around and utilized what they KNEW was a phony dossier paid for by Clinton to obtain FISA court warrants to spy on the Trump campaign? Is is speculation that Comey lied to Congress? That Brennan lied to Congress?
This is an investigation that will begin over CORRUPTION at the highest levels of the Democratic Party and the Obama White House!
That shows you don't know who it is, if it's even anyone. That's called, speculation. So you think investigations will begin over speculation?
As far as the rest of your diatribe....
- There's no evidence Hillary knew the research she paid for was sourced to a foreign national.
- The dossier is not fake, and in fact, none of it has been proven false; some of it has been confirmed to be accurate; and most of it has been neither confirmed nor dismissed.
- No one in the trump campaign was spied on.
- There's no proof that Comey lied to Congress.
I note that you're not even trying to claim that the Clinton campaign didn't pay for the phony Trump dossiers, Faun...but have resorted to the rather pathetic stance that it's OK if Hillary didn't know about it?
It's dossiers plural and in fact it HAS been proven false and that's been done by the person who would know best...it's author! Steele got sued for libel in a British court and in his testimony stated that the information contained in the dossiers was never presented by him as fact...but was rather something that might have happened! Steele is basically admitting that he made the whole thing up.
Let's forget the very real possibility that the FBI planted someone in the Trump campaign (I'll withhold comment on that until it's proven) just having the FISA warrants to wire tap the phones of people who were in communication with the Trump campaign regularly let the Obama White House spy on the Trump campaign!
No proof that Comey lied to Congress? His statements and his Deputy Director Andrew McCabe's statements contradict themselves. Either Comey lied to Congress when he said he never leaked information or authorized leaks to the media or his Deputy Director lied when he stated that he had authorization from the Director of the FBI to leak information to the media. Comey's claim that "he" didn't leak information is rather laughable when in fact he gave information to his good friend at Columbia Law School and had HIM leak it to the media!
He said some of the last things entered had not yet been vetted as the research came to an end. In no way does that discredit the entire dossier. And again, not a stitch has been proven false.
As far as the claims of the FBI planting an informant in Trump’s campaign, it appears to be the opposite of that. It appears someone from Trump’s campaign went to the FBI to report inappropriate behavior with Russians.
And as far as wiretapping, no one in Trump’s campaign was wiretapped. Anyone who was wiretapped was no longer connected to trump’s campaign.
"In another indication that Mr. Steele was no longer wholeheartedly vouching for his own findings, he said he told journalists that they may not quote his research. He “understood that the information provided might be used for the purpose of further research, but would not be published or attributed,” he said through his attorney.
Mr. Steele also acknowledged that his final December memo, the only one that dealt with Mr. Gubarev, contained information he never vetted.
“The contents of the December memorandum did not represent (and did not purport to represent) verified facts, but were raw intelligence which had identified a range of allegations that warranted investigation given their potential national security implications,” he wrote."
Christopher Steele hedges on Russia dossier claims against Donald Trump
Steele never said his entire dossier was not presented as fact. He was speaking only about his most recent additions. He was vetting information he was getting. Towards the end of his gathering, he had not yet vetted his most recent findings, which is what he was referring to in his libel suit.
Steele is a trusted source who has helped in other ventures. Some of his dossier was confirmed by our own intelligence. It was that confirmed portion of the dossier which the FBI used to obtain the FISA warrant on Page, who had earlier, split from the Trump campaign and who was under investigation long before even becoming loosely connected to the campaign.
Sadly, all you do is lie because the truth sinks your posts.
He got paid $168,000. Not bad but I wouldn't refer to that as "handsomely." Especially not when you consider Fusion GPS, who Hillary hired to do opposition research, got about about a million dollars.What did Mueller START with? You can't empower a Special Counsel to investigate crimes unless you have proof that a crime took place! So what was the proof that Trump's campaign committed criminal acts? Because Hillary Clinton said they did? Think long and hard about that, BB because Clinton is the person who actually DID the behavior that she accused Trump of! She DID collude with foreign agents to affect the election!
There is no doubt that Trump asked Comey to lay off of Flynn who was under investigation. Trump admitted he fired Comey because of the Russia investigation. The question was whether a fair and impartial investigation could be conducted by the DOJ. The answer was a clear no. Maybe Trump and his supporters need to take Trey Gowdy's advice. Act like you are innocent if you are innocent.
There is no doubt that Russia interfered in our election. They hacked the DNC servers and gave the e-mails to WikiLeaks. On at least 1 occasion, the trump campaign met with a Russian national expecting to receive dirt on Clinton. She DID NOT collude with any foreign agents.
How can you possibly sit here and claim that Clinton didn't collude with any foreign agents when it's been proven beyond any doubt that's EXACTLY what she DID do! The Clinton campaign paid huge sums of money to Fusion GPS and through them to Richard Steele to fabricate lies about Donald Trump and then put them out to a compliant main stream media through Russian nationals to hide who generated them in the first place! What she did is the epitome of collusion!
you either need to get out more or go on a strict no conspiracy diet ...
epitome this ......
Think about the size of the claim here: the Clinton campaign, which was convinced it was going to beat Trump in a landslide, funded an espionage-laden high-wire act with a firm whose clients included some unsavory Russians themselves, in which a highly experienced British spook got suckered by the Democrats into weaponizing some Russian disinformation. (Steele could outplay the Russians, but he couldn’t outplay Robby Mook?)
There are other variations on this theme, but central to all of them was the idea that without Fusion there would be nothing, and that we would know this if only we could know what Simpson said to the Senate investigators. But since the Senate intelligence committee wouldn’t release the transcript, we couldn’t know just how much Simpson had spilled his guts.
So now we know, and none of it supports the rickety Jenga pile of Republican conspiracy theories.
Now you're claiming that it's unlikely that the Clinton campaign would use dirty tricks because they were convinced they would beat Trump in a landslide? I take it you also think they wouldn't use dirty tricks against Bernie Sanders even though there was practically no feasible way for him to win the nomination?
Steele didn't get "suckered" into providing disinformation! It's quite clear that he got paid...and paid handsomely...to provide disinformation and that money came from the Clinton campaign! Rickety Jenga pile of conspiracy theories? What Clinton and the DNC did in that election isn't a "theory"...it's proven fact! The rickety Jenga pile of conspiracy theories is what you on the left have employed against Trump from the moment he was nominated by the GOP! Compared to the house of cards you've built...the case against Clinton rests on concrete footings!
He got paid $168,000. Not bad but I wouldn't refer to that as "handsomely." Especially not when you consider Fusion GPS, who Hillary hired to do opposition research, got about about a million dollars.What did Mueller START with? You can't empower a Special Counsel to investigate crimes unless you have proof that a crime took place! So what was the proof that Trump's campaign committed criminal acts? Because Hillary Clinton said they did? Think long and hard about that, BB because Clinton is the person who actually DID the behavior that she accused Trump of! She DID collude with foreign agents to affect the election!
There is no doubt that Trump asked Comey to lay off of Flynn who was under investigation. Trump admitted he fired Comey because of the Russia investigation. The question was whether a fair and impartial investigation could be conducted by the DOJ. The answer was a clear no. Maybe Trump and his supporters need to take Trey Gowdy's advice. Act like you are innocent if you are innocent.
There is no doubt that Russia interfered in our election. They hacked the DNC servers and gave the e-mails to WikiLeaks. On at least 1 occasion, the trump campaign met with a Russian national expecting to receive dirt on Clinton. She DID NOT collude with any foreign agents.
How can you possibly sit here and claim that Clinton didn't collude with any foreign agents when it's been proven beyond any doubt that's EXACTLY what she DID do! The Clinton campaign paid huge sums of money to Fusion GPS and through them to Richard Steele to fabricate lies about Donald Trump and then put them out to a compliant main stream media through Russian nationals to hide who generated them in the first place! What she did is the epitome of collusion!
you either need to get out more or go on a strict no conspiracy diet ...
epitome this ......
Think about the size of the claim here: the Clinton campaign, which was convinced it was going to beat Trump in a landslide, funded an espionage-laden high-wire act with a firm whose clients included some unsavory Russians themselves, in which a highly experienced British spook got suckered by the Democrats into weaponizing some Russian disinformation. (Steele could outplay the Russians, but he couldn’t outplay Robby Mook?)
There are other variations on this theme, but central to all of them was the idea that without Fusion there would be nothing, and that we would know this if only we could know what Simpson said to the Senate investigators. But since the Senate intelligence committee wouldn’t release the transcript, we couldn’t know just how much Simpson had spilled his guts.
So now we know, and none of it supports the rickety Jenga pile of Republican conspiracy theories.
Now you're claiming that it's unlikely that the Clinton campaign would use dirty tricks because they were convinced they would beat Trump in a landslide? I take it you also think they wouldn't use dirty tricks against Bernie Sanders even though there was practically no feasible way for him to win the nomination?
Steele didn't get "suckered" into providing disinformation! It's quite clear that he got paid...and paid handsomely...to provide disinformation and that money came from the Clinton campaign! Rickety Jenga pile of conspiracy theories? What Clinton and the DNC did in that election isn't a "theory"...it's proven fact! The rickety Jenga pile of conspiracy theories is what you on the left have employed against Trump from the moment he was nominated by the GOP! Compared to the house of cards you've built...the case against Clinton rests on concrete footings!
He got paid $168,000. Not bad but I wouldn't refer to that as "handsomely." Especially not when you consider Fusion GPS, who Hillary hired to do opposition research, got about about a million dollars.There is no doubt that Trump asked Comey to lay off of Flynn who was under investigation. Trump admitted he fired Comey because of the Russia investigation. The question was whether a fair and impartial investigation could be conducted by the DOJ. The answer was a clear no. Maybe Trump and his supporters need to take Trey Gowdy's advice. Act like you are innocent if you are innocent.
There is no doubt that Russia interfered in our election. They hacked the DNC servers and gave the e-mails to WikiLeaks. On at least 1 occasion, the trump campaign met with a Russian national expecting to receive dirt on Clinton. She DID NOT collude with any foreign agents.
How can you possibly sit here and claim that Clinton didn't collude with any foreign agents when it's been proven beyond any doubt that's EXACTLY what she DID do! The Clinton campaign paid huge sums of money to Fusion GPS and through them to Richard Steele to fabricate lies about Donald Trump and then put them out to a compliant main stream media through Russian nationals to hide who generated them in the first place! What she did is the epitome of collusion!
you either need to get out more or go on a strict no conspiracy diet ...
epitome this ......
Think about the size of the claim here: the Clinton campaign, which was convinced it was going to beat Trump in a landslide, funded an espionage-laden high-wire act with a firm whose clients included some unsavory Russians themselves, in which a highly experienced British spook got suckered by the Democrats into weaponizing some Russian disinformation. (Steele could outplay the Russians, but he couldn’t outplay Robby Mook?)
There are other variations on this theme, but central to all of them was the idea that without Fusion there would be nothing, and that we would know this if only we could know what Simpson said to the Senate investigators. But since the Senate intelligence committee wouldn’t release the transcript, we couldn’t know just how much Simpson had spilled his guts.
So now we know, and none of it supports the rickety Jenga pile of Republican conspiracy theories.
Now you're claiming that it's unlikely that the Clinton campaign would use dirty tricks because they were convinced they would beat Trump in a landslide? I take it you also think they wouldn't use dirty tricks against Bernie Sanders even though there was practically no feasible way for him to win the nomination?
Steele didn't get "suckered" into providing disinformation! It's quite clear that he got paid...and paid handsomely...to provide disinformation and that money came from the Clinton campaign! Rickety Jenga pile of conspiracy theories? What Clinton and the DNC did in that election isn't a "theory"...it's proven fact! The rickety Jenga pile of conspiracy theories is what you on the left have employed against Trump from the moment he was nominated by the GOP! Compared to the house of cards you've built...the case against Clinton rests on concrete footings!
so how much $$$ do you think Trump paid Russia for opposition resesach - he paid stormy 130k for opposition research ...
How true is the Trump-Russia dossier? One year later, what we know about its claimsAgain, for the hard of learning....Now you’re reduced to lying. That didn’t take long. Steele never said ”the information contained in the dossiers was never presented by him as fact.”You said, "if it's someone like Comey.."
That shows you don't know who it is, if it's even anyone. That's called, speculation. So you think investigations will begin over speculation?
As far as the rest of your diatribe....
- There's no evidence Hillary knew the research she paid for was sourced to a foreign national.
- The dossier is not fake, and in fact, none of it has been proven false; some of it has been confirmed to be accurate; and most of it has been neither confirmed nor dismissed.
- No one in the trump campaign was spied on.
- There's no proof that Comey lied to Congress.
I note that you're not even trying to claim that the Clinton campaign didn't pay for the phony Trump dossiers, Faun...but have resorted to the rather pathetic stance that it's OK if Hillary didn't know about it?
It's dossiers plural and in fact it HAS been proven false and that's been done by the person who would know best...it's author! Steele got sued for libel in a British court and in his testimony stated that the information contained in the dossiers was never presented by him as fact...but was rather something that might have happened! Steele is basically admitting that he made the whole thing up.
Let's forget the very real possibility that the FBI planted someone in the Trump campaign (I'll withhold comment on that until it's proven) just having the FISA warrants to wire tap the phones of people who were in communication with the Trump campaign regularly let the Obama White House spy on the Trump campaign!
No proof that Comey lied to Congress? His statements and his Deputy Director Andrew McCabe's statements contradict themselves. Either Comey lied to Congress when he said he never leaked information or authorized leaks to the media or his Deputy Director lied when he stated that he had authorization from the Director of the FBI to leak information to the media. Comey's claim that "he" didn't leak information is rather laughable when in fact he gave information to his good friend at Columbia Law School and had HIM leak it to the media!
He said some of the last things entered had not yet been vetted as the research came to an end. In no way does that discredit the entire dossier. And again, not a stitch has been proven false.
As far as the claims of the FBI planting an informant in Trump’s campaign, it appears to be the opposite of that. It appears someone from Trump’s campaign went to the FBI to report inappropriate behavior with Russians.
And as far as wiretapping, no one in Trump’s campaign was wiretapped. Anyone who was wiretapped was no longer connected to trump’s campaign.
"In another indication that Mr. Steele was no longer wholeheartedly vouching for his own findings, he said he told journalists that they may not quote his research. He “understood that the information provided might be used for the purpose of further research, but would not be published or attributed,” he said through his attorney.
Mr. Steele also acknowledged that his final December memo, the only one that dealt with Mr. Gubarev, contained information he never vetted.
“The contents of the December memorandum did not represent (and did not purport to represent) verified facts, but were raw intelligence which had identified a range of allegations that warranted investigation given their potential national security implications,” he wrote."
Christopher Steele hedges on Russia dossier claims against Donald Trump
Steele never said his entire dossier was not presented as fact. He was speaking only about his most recent additions. He was vetting information he was getting. Towards the end of his gathering, he had not yet vetted his most recent findings, which is what he was referring to in his libel suit.
Steele is a trusted source who has helped in other ventures. Some of his dossier was confirmed by our own intelligence. It was that confirmed portion of the dossier which the FBI used to obtain the FISA warrant on Page, who had earlier, split from the Trump campaign and who was under investigation long before even becoming loosely connected to the campaign.
Sadly, all you do is lie because the truth sinks your posts.
What part of the Steele dossiers have ever been "confirmed" by our own intelligence services, Faun?
What did Mueller START with? You can't empower a Special Counsel to investigate crimes unless you have proof that a crime took place! So what was the proof that Trump's campaign committed criminal acts? Because Hillary Clinton said they did? Think long and hard about that, BB because Clinton is the person who actually DID the behavior that she accused Trump of! She DID collude with foreign agents to affect the election!
There is no doubt that Trump asked Comey to lay off of Flynn who was under investigation. Trump admitted he fired Comey because of the Russia investigation. The question was whether a fair and impartial investigation could be conducted by the DOJ. The answer was a clear no. Maybe Trump and his supporters need to take Trey Gowdy's advice. Act like you are innocent if you are innocent.
There is no doubt that Russia interfered in our election. They hacked the DNC servers and gave the e-mails to WikiLeaks. On at least 1 occasion, the trump campaign met with a Russian national expecting to receive dirt on Clinton. She DID NOT collude with any foreign agents.
How can you possibly sit here and claim that Clinton didn't collude with any foreign agents when it's been proven beyond any doubt that's EXACTLY what she DID do! The Clinton campaign paid huge sums of money to Fusion GPS and through them to Richard Steele to fabricate lies about Donald Trump and then put them out to a compliant main stream media through Russian nationals to hide who generated them in the first place! What she did is the epitome of collusion!
you either need to get out more or go on a strict no conspiracy diet ...
epitome this ......
Think about the size of the claim here: the Clinton campaign, which was convinced it was going to beat Trump in a landslide, funded an espionage-laden high-wire act with a firm whose clients included some unsavory Russians themselves, in which a highly experienced British spook got suckered by the Democrats into weaponizing some Russian disinformation. (Steele could outplay the Russians, but he couldn’t outplay Robby Mook?)
There are other variations on this theme, but central to all of them was the idea that without Fusion there would be nothing, and that we would know this if only we could know what Simpson said to the Senate investigators. But since the Senate intelligence committee wouldn’t release the transcript, we couldn’t know just how much Simpson had spilled his guts.
So now we know, and none of it supports the rickety Jenga pile of Republican conspiracy theories.
Now you're claiming that it's unlikely that the Clinton campaign would use dirty tricks because they were convinced they would beat Trump in a landslide? I take it you also think they wouldn't use dirty tricks against Bernie Sanders even though there was practically no feasible way for him to win the nomination?
Steele didn't get "suckered" into providing disinformation! It's quite clear that he got paid...and paid handsomely...to provide disinformation and that money came from the Clinton campaign! Rickety Jenga pile of conspiracy theories? What Clinton and the DNC did in that election isn't a "theory"...it's proven fact! The rickety Jenga pile of conspiracy theories is what you on the left have employed against Trump from the moment he was nominated by the GOP! Compared to the house of cards you've built...the case against Clinton rests on concrete footings!
the case against Clinton rests on concrete footings ?
concerete heads is more like it ...
that house of cards has issued more than 100 criminal counts against 19 people and three companies. Of the 19 people, five — including three Trump associates — have pleaded guilty. Thirteen are Russians accused of meddling in the 2016 presidential election.
nothing personal, but you're an idiot, you idiot.
How true is the Trump-Russia dossier? One year later, what we know about its claimsAgain, for the hard of learning....Now you’re reduced to lying. That didn’t take long. Steele never said ”the information contained in the dossiers was never presented by him as fact.”I note that you're not even trying to claim that the Clinton campaign didn't pay for the phony Trump dossiers, Faun...but have resorted to the rather pathetic stance that it's OK if Hillary didn't know about it?
It's dossiers plural and in fact it HAS been proven false and that's been done by the person who would know best...it's author! Steele got sued for libel in a British court and in his testimony stated that the information contained in the dossiers was never presented by him as fact...but was rather something that might have happened! Steele is basically admitting that he made the whole thing up.
Let's forget the very real possibility that the FBI planted someone in the Trump campaign (I'll withhold comment on that until it's proven) just having the FISA warrants to wire tap the phones of people who were in communication with the Trump campaign regularly let the Obama White House spy on the Trump campaign!
No proof that Comey lied to Congress? His statements and his Deputy Director Andrew McCabe's statements contradict themselves. Either Comey lied to Congress when he said he never leaked information or authorized leaks to the media or his Deputy Director lied when he stated that he had authorization from the Director of the FBI to leak information to the media. Comey's claim that "he" didn't leak information is rather laughable when in fact he gave information to his good friend at Columbia Law School and had HIM leak it to the media!
He said some of the last things entered had not yet been vetted as the research came to an end. In no way does that discredit the entire dossier. And again, not a stitch has been proven false.
As far as the claims of the FBI planting an informant in Trump’s campaign, it appears to be the opposite of that. It appears someone from Trump’s campaign went to the FBI to report inappropriate behavior with Russians.
And as far as wiretapping, no one in Trump’s campaign was wiretapped. Anyone who was wiretapped was no longer connected to trump’s campaign.
"In another indication that Mr. Steele was no longer wholeheartedly vouching for his own findings, he said he told journalists that they may not quote his research. He “understood that the information provided might be used for the purpose of further research, but would not be published or attributed,” he said through his attorney.
Mr. Steele also acknowledged that his final December memo, the only one that dealt with Mr. Gubarev, contained information he never vetted.
“The contents of the December memorandum did not represent (and did not purport to represent) verified facts, but were raw intelligence which had identified a range of allegations that warranted investigation given their potential national security implications,” he wrote."
Christopher Steele hedges on Russia dossier claims against Donald Trump
Steele never said his entire dossier was not presented as fact. He was speaking only about his most recent additions. He was vetting information he was getting. Towards the end of his gathering, he had not yet vetted his most recent findings, which is what he was referring to in his libel suit.
Steele is a trusted source who has helped in other ventures. Some of his dossier was confirmed by our own intelligence. It was that confirmed portion of the dossier which the FBI used to obtain the FISA warrant on Page, who had earlier, split from the Trump campaign and who was under investigation long before even becoming loosely connected to the campaign.
Sadly, all you do is lie because the truth sinks your posts.
What part of the Steele dossiers have ever been "confirmed" by our own intelligence services, Faun?
Verified: Former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page met with representatives of Russian state-owned oil giant Rosneft.
Verified: The Kremlin targeted educated youth and swing state voters during its cyber attacks in the 2016 campaign.
Verified: Trump maintains ties to rich businessmen from Azerbaijan.
The part I can't grasp is why you're incapable of telling the truth? What a pity you can't stop lying, huh?He got paid $168,000. Not bad but I wouldn't refer to that as "handsomely." Especially not when you consider Fusion GPS, who Hillary hired to do opposition research, got about about a million dollars.There is no doubt that Trump asked Comey to lay off of Flynn who was under investigation. Trump admitted he fired Comey because of the Russia investigation. The question was whether a fair and impartial investigation could be conducted by the DOJ. The answer was a clear no. Maybe Trump and his supporters need to take Trey Gowdy's advice. Act like you are innocent if you are innocent.
There is no doubt that Russia interfered in our election. They hacked the DNC servers and gave the e-mails to WikiLeaks. On at least 1 occasion, the trump campaign met with a Russian national expecting to receive dirt on Clinton. She DID NOT collude with any foreign agents.
How can you possibly sit here and claim that Clinton didn't collude with any foreign agents when it's been proven beyond any doubt that's EXACTLY what she DID do! The Clinton campaign paid huge sums of money to Fusion GPS and through them to Richard Steele to fabricate lies about Donald Trump and then put them out to a compliant main stream media through Russian nationals to hide who generated them in the first place! What she did is the epitome of collusion!
you either need to get out more or go on a strict no conspiracy diet ...
epitome this ......
Think about the size of the claim here: the Clinton campaign, which was convinced it was going to beat Trump in a landslide, funded an espionage-laden high-wire act with a firm whose clients included some unsavory Russians themselves, in which a highly experienced British spook got suckered by the Democrats into weaponizing some Russian disinformation. (Steele could outplay the Russians, but he couldn’t outplay Robby Mook?)
There are other variations on this theme, but central to all of them was the idea that without Fusion there would be nothing, and that we would know this if only we could know what Simpson said to the Senate investigators. But since the Senate intelligence committee wouldn’t release the transcript, we couldn’t know just how much Simpson had spilled his guts.
So now we know, and none of it supports the rickety Jenga pile of Republican conspiracy theories.
Now you're claiming that it's unlikely that the Clinton campaign would use dirty tricks because they were convinced they would beat Trump in a landslide? I take it you also think they wouldn't use dirty tricks against Bernie Sanders even though there was practically no feasible way for him to win the nomination?
Steele didn't get "suckered" into providing disinformation! It's quite clear that he got paid...and paid handsomely...to provide disinformation and that money came from the Clinton campaign! Rickety Jenga pile of conspiracy theories? What Clinton and the DNC did in that election isn't a "theory"...it's proven fact! The rickety Jenga pile of conspiracy theories is what you on the left have employed against Trump from the moment he was nominated by the GOP! Compared to the house of cards you've built...the case against Clinton rests on concrete footings!
$168,000 to sit down at a computer and fabricate a bunch of lies about someone? It's not like Steele actually did any research into anything he put out in his dossiers, Faun! He just made it all up! What part of that can't you grasp?
Hell, you're lying for free.And claiming someone is a "trusted source" when it's quite clear they just got paid to lie about someone is rather amusing...
I accept your surrender.How true is the Trump-Russia dossier? One year later, what we know about its claimsAgain, for the hard of learning....Now you’re reduced to lying. That didn’t take long. Steele never said ”the information contained in the dossiers was never presented by him as fact.”
He said some of the last things entered had not yet been vetted as the research came to an end. In no way does that discredit the entire dossier. And again, not a stitch has been proven false.
As far as the claims of the FBI planting an informant in Trump’s campaign, it appears to be the opposite of that. It appears someone from Trump’s campaign went to the FBI to report inappropriate behavior with Russians.
And as far as wiretapping, no one in Trump’s campaign was wiretapped. Anyone who was wiretapped was no longer connected to trump’s campaign.
"In another indication that Mr. Steele was no longer wholeheartedly vouching for his own findings, he said he told journalists that they may not quote his research. He “understood that the information provided might be used for the purpose of further research, but would not be published or attributed,” he said through his attorney.
Mr. Steele also acknowledged that his final December memo, the only one that dealt with Mr. Gubarev, contained information he never vetted.
“The contents of the December memorandum did not represent (and did not purport to represent) verified facts, but were raw intelligence which had identified a range of allegations that warranted investigation given their potential national security implications,” he wrote."
Christopher Steele hedges on Russia dossier claims against Donald Trump
Steele never said his entire dossier was not presented as fact. He was speaking only about his most recent additions. He was vetting information he was getting. Towards the end of his gathering, he had not yet vetted his most recent findings, which is what he was referring to in his libel suit.
Steele is a trusted source who has helped in other ventures. Some of his dossier was confirmed by our own intelligence. It was that confirmed portion of the dossier which the FBI used to obtain the FISA warrant on Page, who had earlier, split from the Trump campaign and who was under investigation long before even becoming loosely connected to the campaign.
Sadly, all you do is lie because the truth sinks your posts.
What part of the Steele dossiers have ever been "confirmed" by our own intelligence services, Faun?
Verified: Former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page met with representatives of Russian state-owned oil giant Rosneft.
Verified: The Kremlin targeted educated youth and swing state voters during its cyber attacks in the 2016 campaign.
Verified: Trump maintains ties to rich businessmen from Azerbaijan.
LOL...in what way do ANY of those things add up to the "collusion" that Steele alleged took place between the Trump campaign and Russia? What you've done is exactly what Steele did...you've taken various things that have zero to do with collusion and tried to say that they add up to collusion because they have something to do with Russia and Trump!
The part I can't grasp is why you're incapable of telling the truth? What a pity you can't stop lying, huh?He got paid $168,000. Not bad but I wouldn't refer to that as "handsomely." Especially not when you consider Fusion GPS, who Hillary hired to do opposition research, got about about a million dollars.How can you possibly sit here and claim that Clinton didn't collude with any foreign agents when it's been proven beyond any doubt that's EXACTLY what she DID do! The Clinton campaign paid huge sums of money to Fusion GPS and through them to Richard Steele to fabricate lies about Donald Trump and then put them out to a compliant main stream media through Russian nationals to hide who generated them in the first place! What she did is the epitome of collusion!
you either need to get out more or go on a strict no conspiracy diet ...
epitome this ......
Think about the size of the claim here: the Clinton campaign, which was convinced it was going to beat Trump in a landslide, funded an espionage-laden high-wire act with a firm whose clients included some unsavory Russians themselves, in which a highly experienced British spook got suckered by the Democrats into weaponizing some Russian disinformation. (Steele could outplay the Russians, but he couldn’t outplay Robby Mook?)
There are other variations on this theme, but central to all of them was the idea that without Fusion there would be nothing, and that we would know this if only we could know what Simpson said to the Senate investigators. But since the Senate intelligence committee wouldn’t release the transcript, we couldn’t know just how much Simpson had spilled his guts.
So now we know, and none of it supports the rickety Jenga pile of Republican conspiracy theories.
Now you're claiming that it's unlikely that the Clinton campaign would use dirty tricks because they were convinced they would beat Trump in a landslide? I take it you also think they wouldn't use dirty tricks against Bernie Sanders even though there was practically no feasible way for him to win the nomination?
Steele didn't get "suckered" into providing disinformation! It's quite clear that he got paid...and paid handsomely...to provide disinformation and that money came from the Clinton campaign! Rickety Jenga pile of conspiracy theories? What Clinton and the DNC did in that election isn't a "theory"...it's proven fact! The rickety Jenga pile of conspiracy theories is what you on the left have employed against Trump from the moment he was nominated by the GOP! Compared to the house of cards you've built...the case against Clinton rests on concrete footings!
$168,000 to sit down at a computer and fabricate a bunch of lies about someone? It's not like Steele actually did any research into anything he put out in his dossiers, Faun! He just made it all up! What part of that can't you grasp?
Again, he's a trusted source who's helped in the past. Not something he could accomplish if his M.O. was to invent his own material; which he didn't do here, as you falsely claim. He levied former contacts he had established as a spy when he worked undercover in Russia. And again, some of the dossier has been confirmed by our own intelligence; also not something that would have been possible had he simply fabricated the entire dossier.
Hell, you're lying for free.And claiming someone is a "trusted source" when it's quite clear they just got paid to lie about someone is rather amusing...
/----/ A Process Crime is an offense charged by a prosecutor alleging criminal conduct related to an investigation of a crime, but not to the crime itself.There is no doubt that Trump asked Comey to lay off of Flynn who was under investigation. Trump admitted he fired Comey because of the Russia investigation. The question was whether a fair and impartial investigation could be conducted by the DOJ. The answer was a clear no. Maybe Trump and his supporters need to take Trey Gowdy's advice. Act like you are innocent if you are innocent.
There is no doubt that Russia interfered in our election. They hacked the DNC servers and gave the e-mails to WikiLeaks. On at least 1 occasion, the trump campaign met with a Russian national expecting to receive dirt on Clinton. She DID NOT collude with any foreign agents.
How can you possibly sit here and claim that Clinton didn't collude with any foreign agents when it's been proven beyond any doubt that's EXACTLY what she DID do! The Clinton campaign paid huge sums of money to Fusion GPS and through them to Richard Steele to fabricate lies about Donald Trump and then put them out to a compliant main stream media through Russian nationals to hide who generated them in the first place! What she did is the epitome of collusion!
you either need to get out more or go on a strict no conspiracy diet ...
epitome this ......
Think about the size of the claim here: the Clinton campaign, which was convinced it was going to beat Trump in a landslide, funded an espionage-laden high-wire act with a firm whose clients included some unsavory Russians themselves, in which a highly experienced British spook got suckered by the Democrats into weaponizing some Russian disinformation. (Steele could outplay the Russians, but he couldn’t outplay Robby Mook?)
There are other variations on this theme, but central to all of them was the idea that without Fusion there would be nothing, and that we would know this if only we could know what Simpson said to the Senate investigators. But since the Senate intelligence committee wouldn’t release the transcript, we couldn’t know just how much Simpson had spilled his guts.
So now we know, and none of it supports the rickety Jenga pile of Republican conspiracy theories.
Now you're claiming that it's unlikely that the Clinton campaign would use dirty tricks because they were convinced they would beat Trump in a landslide? I take it you also think they wouldn't use dirty tricks against Bernie Sanders even though there was practically no feasible way for him to win the nomination?
Steele didn't get "suckered" into providing disinformation! It's quite clear that he got paid...and paid handsomely...to provide disinformation and that money came from the Clinton campaign! Rickety Jenga pile of conspiracy theories? What Clinton and the DNC did in that election isn't a "theory"...it's proven fact! The rickety Jenga pile of conspiracy theories is what you on the left have employed against Trump from the moment he was nominated by the GOP! Compared to the house of cards you've built...the case against Clinton rests on concrete footings!
the case against Clinton rests on concrete footings ?
concerete heads is more like it ...
that house of cards has issued more than 100 criminal counts against 19 people and three companies. Of the 19 people, five — including three Trump associates — have pleaded guilty. Thirteen are Russians accused of meddling in the 2016 presidential election.
nothing personal, but you're an idiot, you idiot.
How many of those "criminal counts" are against Trump associates for "collusion"? That would be a big ZERO!
Mueller is corrupt to the core. It's now imperative that he shut the investigation down due to violating The Presidential Transition Act.
Attorney Gregg Jarrett: 'Mueller and His Entire Team Must be Removed'
Dershowitz: 'Rod Rosenstein Should Recuse Himself' - Breitbart
The Presidential Transition Act states that all records of transition operations are private and confidential.
Yet Mueller seems to have ignored the law. Without a warrant or subpoena, his team of lawyers brazenly demanded these private records from the General Services Administration (GSA) which held custody of the materials. The GSA does this as a service to all incoming presidents out of courtesy, but it neither owns the documents nor is authorized to release them to anyone under any circumstances because they are deemed entirely private.
Jarrett says the most damning charge against Mueller is that he obtained, reviewed and used material that is privileged.
"Courts have clearly stated what prosecutors are supposed to do under these circumstances: “An attorney who receives privileged documents has an ethical duty to cease review of the documents, notify the privilege holder, and return the documents.” (U.S. v. Taylor 764 Fed Sup 2nd, 230, 235)
There is no doubt that Trump asked Comey to lay off of Flynn who was under investigation. Trump admitted he fired Comey because of the Russia investigation. The question was whether a fair and impartial investigation could be conducted by the DOJ. The answer was a clear no. Maybe Trump and his supporters need to take Trey Gowdy's advice. Act like you are innocent if you are innocent.
There is no doubt that Russia interfered in our election. They hacked the DNC servers and gave the e-mails to WikiLeaks. On at least 1 occasion, the trump campaign met with a Russian national expecting to receive dirt on Clinton. She DID NOT collude with any foreign agents.
How can you possibly sit here and claim that Clinton didn't collude with any foreign agents when it's been proven beyond any doubt that's EXACTLY what she DID do! The Clinton campaign paid huge sums of money to Fusion GPS and through them to Richard Steele to fabricate lies about Donald Trump and then put them out to a compliant main stream media through Russian nationals to hide who generated them in the first place! What she did is the epitome of collusion!
you either need to get out more or go on a strict no conspiracy diet ...
epitome this ......
Think about the size of the claim here: the Clinton campaign, which was convinced it was going to beat Trump in a landslide, funded an espionage-laden high-wire act with a firm whose clients included some unsavory Russians themselves, in which a highly experienced British spook got suckered by the Democrats into weaponizing some Russian disinformation. (Steele could outplay the Russians, but he couldn’t outplay Robby Mook?)
There are other variations on this theme, but central to all of them was the idea that without Fusion there would be nothing, and that we would know this if only we could know what Simpson said to the Senate investigators. But since the Senate intelligence committee wouldn’t release the transcript, we couldn’t know just how much Simpson had spilled his guts.
So now we know, and none of it supports the rickety Jenga pile of Republican conspiracy theories.
Now you're claiming that it's unlikely that the Clinton campaign would use dirty tricks because they were convinced they would beat Trump in a landslide? I take it you also think they wouldn't use dirty tricks against Bernie Sanders even though there was practically no feasible way for him to win the nomination?
Steele didn't get "suckered" into providing disinformation! It's quite clear that he got paid...and paid handsomely...to provide disinformation and that money came from the Clinton campaign! Rickety Jenga pile of conspiracy theories? What Clinton and the DNC did in that election isn't a "theory"...it's proven fact! The rickety Jenga pile of conspiracy theories is what you on the left have employed against Trump from the moment he was nominated by the GOP! Compared to the house of cards you've built...the case against Clinton rests on concrete footings!
the case against Clinton rests on concrete footings ?
concerete heads is more like it ...
that house of cards has issued more than 100 criminal counts against 19 people and three companies. Of the 19 people, five — including three Trump associates — have pleaded guilty. Thirteen are Russians accused of meddling in the 2016 presidential election.
nothing personal, but you're an idiot, you idiot.
How many of those "criminal counts" are against Trump associates for "collusion"? That would be a big ZERO!
