How many people who voted for Obama the first time around will vote for him the second? And, why?
Who cares. Why should it matter to you?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How many people who voted for Obama the first time around will vote for him the second? And, why?
Cuyo, thank you for removing all doubt over whether you were an Obama bot or not.
When President Bush, served can you recall a time when he blamed anything on a predecessor? I think that what your research will show you is that he evaluated a problem, identified the cause, and then started reworking on a resolution.
Was he successful all of the time. The answer is no. No one is successful all of the time. Was he a perfect President. The answer to that question is no as well. There were many things that President Bush did that I didn't agree with. Yet I never once thought that President Bush didn't have the best interests of the United States foremost in his mind.
I doubt Obama, all of the time. I feel that Obama, has the best interests of Obama, and the democratic party foremost on his mind. His actions support that assumption. What has disillusioned the American people with Obama, is the fact that he spends more time playing the blame game instead of the resolution game. That is not the trait of a good leader. Obama, earned the title of the worst President in United States history for a reason.
Cuyo, thank you for removing all doubt over whether you were an Obama bot or not.
When President Bush, served can you recall a time when he blamed anything on a predecessor? .
How many people who voted for Obama the first time around will vote for him the second? And, why?
Who cares. Why should it matter to you?
It depends on who the repubs put up.
Palin? Definitely not.
Gingrich? No.
Romney? Maybe
Ron Paul? Yes.
It depends on who the repubs put up.
Palin? Definitely not.
Gingrich? No.
Romney? Maybe
Ron Paul? Yes.
I'm sorry what are you saying here?
You would vote for Obama if Ron Paul ran but would not vote for Obama if Palin ran? Or the other way around?
And why would you vote or not vote for palin or Ron Paul over Obama?
How many people who voted for Obama the first time around will vote for him the second? And, why?
Who cares. Why should it matter to you?
I voted for Obama because it was him or McCain but Obama was not my first choice. Kucinich was. I can say that Obama has turned out to be just about what I expected but he's still a big improvement over Bush who was owned and driven by the rich who want to eliminate the middle class.
I will vote for Obama again because regardless of who they put up the Republican Party is attached by financial umbilicus to the corporatocracy which is determined to resurrect the Gilded Age. I know the Democrats have a lot of warts but those of you who work for a living and who plan to retire with some comfort and dignity you will be working against your own interests if you vote Republican.
I should mention that I was a registered Republican going back to Barry Goldwater and I was Conservative when the party was truly Conservative, which it no longer is. Today's neo-Conservatives are really fascists in bloom.
I voted for Bush in 2000 but when I realized what a mistake that was I re-registered as a Democrat (in '04) only because there is no Independent Party in New Jersey and one must belong to a party to vote in primaries and there is no Independent Party in New Jersey (as yet). Although I do embrace some Liberal ideals I am by no means a Liberal, nor am I a loyal Democrat. I am simply aware of which is the lesser of two evils.
I think Obama, so far, as resembled Bush's presidency. With the exception of a few things, we have a president who is spending a crap load of money, has authorized military action (without congressional approval), and obviously doesn't know what the hell is going on the world. Bush ran as a conservative but was hardly conservative financially. Obama is doing the same things as Bush, but still blaming Bush for the things that are going on. I sure hope someone can come up with a candidate to oust Obama. As far as the "elite" you do realize that Obama is elitist right? He's a multi-millionaire.
How many people who voted for Obama the first time around will vote for him the second? And, why?
Who cares. Why should it matter to you?
I'm sensing buyer's remorse.
How many people who voted for Obama the first time around will vote for him the second? And, why?
It depends on who the repubs put up.
Palin? Definitely not.
Gingrich? No.
Romney? Maybe
Ron Paul? Yes.
I'm sorry what are you saying here?
You would vote for Obama if Ron Paul ran but would not vote for Obama if Palin ran? Or the other way around?
And why would you vote or not vote for palin or Ron Paul over Obama?
Palin is a dipshit / phony.
Paul has backbone and a brain.
A small bit of research will confirm that I'm actually quite disappointed in Obama. But you specifically pointed to deficit and debt, and that is not his baby. Period. (Cuyo)
Cuyo, if I've unfairly maligned you please accept my apology. That was not my intention.
I just want to make this point clear. Assigning blame doesn't matter. What does matter is Identifying the problem (The USA is not fiscally responsible.) Evaluating the Problem (what is the cause of this problem.) The end game is resolution. (determining what remedial action is appropriate, and putting in place a plan to implement this action.) This is what good leaders do. They don't waste time playing the blame game.
Obama, plays the blame game to take focus off of his own incompetence, and lack of experience. Obama, is not a good leader.
I've said this before. I will say it again. It is understood that a bipartisan effort threw our fiscal house is into chaos. It should also be understood that it will take a concerted bipartisan effort to resolve this situation.
In Washington today. There is one group who identified this problem. They are trying to resolve it. On the other hand we have a group that is insisting on continuing with the same bad policies that is responsible for getting this country into this fiscal morass. That is another identified problem that must be resolved in 2012.
How many people who voted for Obama the first time around will vote for him the second? And, why?
Who cares. Why should it matter to you?
Fuck EWE!
Cuyo, thank you for removing all doubt over whether you were an Obama bot or not.
When President Bush, served can you recall a time when he blamed anything on a predecessor?
Well, Cuyo answered you well on that peice of foolishness.
I think that what your research will show you is that he evaluated a problem, identified the cause, and then started reworking on a resolution.
LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! And fucked up every time.
Was he successful all of the time. The answer is no. No one is successful all of the time. Was he a perfect President. The answer to that question is no as well. There were many things that President Bush did that I didn't agree with. Yet I never once thought that President Bush didn't have the best interests of the United States foremost in his mind.
If you define the best interests of the United States as the best interest of the top one per cent and the transnational corperations.
I doubt Obama, all of the time. I feel that Obama, has the best interests of Obama, and the democratic party foremost on his mind. His actions support that assumption. What has disillusioned the American people with Obama, is the fact that he spends more time playing the blame game instead of the resolution game. That is not the trait of a good leader. Obama, earned the title of the worst President in United States history for a reason.
Who cares. Why should it matter to you?
Fuck EWE!
You're from Montana, right?
Cuyo, thank you for removing all doubt over whether you were an Obama bot or not.
When President Bush, served can you recall a time when he blamed anything on a predecessor?
Well, Cuyo answered you well on that peice of foolishness.
I think that what your research will show you is that he evaluated a problem, identified the cause, and then started reworking on a resolution.
LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! And fucked up every time.
Was he successful all of the time. The answer is no. No one is successful all of the time. Was he a perfect President. The answer to that question is no as well. There were many things that President Bush did that I didn't agree with. Yet I never once thought that President Bush didn't have the best interests of the United States foremost in his mind.
If you define the best interests of the United States as the best interest of the top one per cent and the transnational corperations.
I doubt Obama, all of the time. I feel that Obama, has the best interests of Obama, and the democratic party foremost on his mind. His actions support that assumption. What has disillusioned the American people with Obama, is the fact that he spends more time playing the blame game instead of the resolution game. That is not the trait of a good leader. Obama, earned the title of the worst President in United States history for a reason.
My goodness. in a bit of a rush for a historical judgement, there, old boy.
It will be very hard to beat Bush for that title.
We will see what President Obama does for the rest of this term, and in his next term. For people like you and the rest of the Teabaggers will make his second term a certainty as we observe the trainwrecks in the states where the Teabaggers are destroying all they touch.
Cuyo, thank you for removing all doubt over whether you were an Obama bot or not.
When President Bush, served can you recall a time when he blamed anything on a predecessor?
Well, Cuyo answered you well on that peice of foolishness.
I think that what your research will show you is that he evaluated a problem, identified the cause, and then started reworking on a resolution.
LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! And fucked up every time.
Was he successful all of the time. The answer is no. No one is successful all of the time. Was he a perfect President. The answer to that question is no as well. There were many things that President Bush did that I didn't agree with. Yet I never once thought that President Bush didn't have the best interests of the United States foremost in his mind.
If you define the best interests of the United States as the best interest of the top one per cent and the transnational corperations.
I doubt Obama, all of the time. I feel that Obama, has the best interests of Obama, and the democratic party foremost on his mind. His actions support that assumption. What has disillusioned the American people with Obama, is the fact that he spends more time playing the blame game instead of the resolution game. That is not the trait of a good leader. Obama, earned the title of the worst President in United States history for a reason.
My goodness. in a bit of a rush for a historical judgement, there, old boy.
It will be very hard to beat Bush for that title.
We will see what President Obama does for the rest of this term, and in his next term. For people like you and the rest of the Teabaggers will make his second term a certainty as we observe the trainwrecks in the states where the Teabaggers are destroying all they touch.