If my world were little, I'd believe your post.
but....
44% of 2200 doesn't represent over 200 million people, if the participants don't represent an equal cross section of the country.
it only represents 44% of those 2200 people.
If my world were little, I'd believe your post.
but....
44% of 2200 doesn't represent over 200 million people, if the participants don't represent an equal cross section of the country.
it only represents 44% of those 2200 people.
Omg girl..maybe your grandkids
could help you out with reading comprehension!
I replied to the crap cowboyted posted
He's creaming over a pew research poll.
2,002 people were polled
If anyone bothered to read the fine print,
they would have learned, don't know answers, weren't included
and that the numbers add to more than 100%
because of multiple responses
I listed these facts and added....
44% of 2,000 people, represent over 200 million people
Do you enjoy living in your own little world?
Which, he must...because that's the only place,
where 44% of 2,002 respondents, can make him cream....
His own little world
There are over 200 million people,
2,002 people do not speak for the majority
Don't worry about my math skills,
my math skills are fine....
Worry about your comprehension skills...
they suck!
44% of 2,000 people, represent over 200 million people
only if that 44% is a fair cross section of the country.
Seems to be something wrong with your comprehension, not mine.
only if that 44% is a fair cross section of the country.
Seems to be something wrong with your comprehension, not mine.
Omg....wtf are you talking about?
44%, of 2,002 people, isn't a fair representation of people...
44%, of 2,002 people, is less than 20 people per state
And your talking about, as long as it's a fair cross section
There is definitely something wrong with your
comprehension, math and critical thinking skills....not mine
Sorry, I'm not fluent in idiocy
Sorry, I'm not fluent in idiocy
your posts prove otherwise.
you're not getting the point.
if 1500 of those polled are democrats, 500 republicans, and 2 independents....
is it a fair poll?
Sorry, I'm not fluent in idiocy
your posts prove otherwise.
ROFLMAO...is that so
Since it's acceptable for you to be an idiot,
it's acceptable for me to point it out
you're not getting the point.
No darling, I reject your illogical argument
You don't have, nor make, a reasonable point,
when it's supported by an illogical argument
44% of 2200 doesn't represent over 200 million people, if the participants don't represent an equal cross section of the country.
it only represents 44% of those 2200 people.
Post #83 ^
if 1500 of those polled are democrats, 500 republicans, and 2 independents....
is it a fair poll?
So, let me get this straight...
if the 3 main political parties are equally represented,
by the 2,002 people, responding to the poll,
the poll is fair and reflects the majority of millions
Otherwise, the % only is reflective of the 2,002 respondents
2,002 people COULD NEVER conclude the likelihood of millions!
How you reason, a fair cross section, of 2,002 people,
across the country, would achieve this, is mind boggling!
The poll itself, isn't even accurately reflecting the results
It's official, the overwhelming majority of Americans
DID NOT take part in a poll and select Obama, as the best POTUS
Everyone has a right to be stupid,
but, you're just abusing that privilege!
