It's Official: Bukele will NOT Release El Salvadoran Citizen Kilmar Abrego Garcia to the United States

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

I don't understand your question??

That's because you are a liberal and therefore, stupid!

 

[Marener]

The removal TO EL SALVADOR, not "the deportation."

Now will you stop lying about that, or will you continue to lie even after being proven wrong?

The removal to El Salvador is the deportation, you dope.

Of course he can. Again from your own post:

He argued in the freakin' Supreme Court from the "gulag."

BTW, if this is a "gulag" Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn would have loved to trade gulags!

He has not had any communication with his family or lawyers since being sent to the gulag.

Does SCOTUS have any authority over El Salvador?

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

No, that was a photo op. Trying to imply he's held in hotel like settings with fruity little drinks with the umbrella's in them.

This was the photo Abrego Garcia's wife used to ID him based on a head scar and tattoo. (Top Image)

Along with some more for inside.

WW
.
.
.
.
View attachment 1101466

View attachment 1101467
View attachment 1101468
View attachment 1101469

I guess she is missing her regularly scheduled beatings.

 

[konradv]

He's not dining like that every day, sure.

But he's not dead, murdered by the rival gangs that he supposedly feared.

He is in a prison with gang members, but there is discipline in that prison, so the prison murder rate is down, as is the murder rate in neighborhoods in El Salvador.


You mean that it wasn't how the system worked under Biden.

Under Trump - which the DOJ, and thus, immigration "judges" are under - that is exactly how the system works.

He did, and he was twice ruled a gang member. Gang leader in fact.

Once the executive declared his gang a terrorist organization, no further proof was needed to deport him.

Poor deprived innocent!

No one is buying that anymore, no matter how hard the media tries to sell it.

Bottom line, SCOTUS said bring him home. Don’t tell me what lower courts said. Only days sgo
MAGA was saying they’re useless!

 

[Seymour Flops]

The removal to El Salvador is the deportation, you dope.

He has not had any communication with his family or lawyers since being sent to the gulag.

Woah.

So, the lawyer claiming to be speaking on his behalf lied?

Lied to the freakin' Supreme Court?

He'll have some 'splainin' to do!

Does SCOTUS have any authority over El Salvador?

Of course not. Neither does our president, nor our congress.

So, their ruling is meaningless, and they know it.

 

[Seymour Flops]

Bottom line, SCOTUS said bring him home.

You're deliberately lying, which you do too frequently for me to take you seriously.

 

[Carl in Michigan]

Trump refuses to release him. If Trump wanted it, it’d happen. The statement today was just one dictator covering for another.

Why do we want an El Salvadoran citizen gangster in our country

 

[Marener]

Woah.

So, the lawyer claiming to be speaking on his behalf lied?

Lied to the freakin' Supreme Court?

He'll have some 'splainin' to do!

SCOTUS didn’t see to have a problem with it.

Of course not. Neither does our president, nor our congress.

So, their ruling is meaningless, and they know it

Which emphasizes the point that Trump’s actions were illegal.

 

[Carl in Michigan]

Wow. So instead of trials, we just look for tattoos? That's amazing.

What does a gang tattoo look like?

This?

View attachment 1100573

His defense for staying in this country was that he feared going back because he was part of a gang

 

[Marener]

His defense for staying in this country was that he feared going back because he was part of a gang

That’s not true. He feared going back because a gang was extorting his family and trying to get him to join their gang.

 

[Meathead]

That’s not true. He feared going back because a gang was extorting his family and trying to get him to join their gang.

Bullshit. He joined a gang in the US. You bleeding hearts are such gullible suckers.

 

[Seymour Flops]

SCOTUS didn’t see to have a problem with it.

Of course not. Because that lawyer was speaking for Abrego Garcia, and you were wrong.

Which emphasizes the point that Trump’s actions were illegal.

Then I'm sure some fatass Democrat prosecutor in some blue city will prosecute him, just as soon as Democrats are in the WH again.

Got a plan for that?

 

[Marener]

Of course not. Because that lawyer was speaking for Abrego Garcia, and you were wrong.



Then I'm sure some fatass Democrat prosecutor in some blue city will prosecute him, just as soon as Democrats are in the WH again.

Got a plan for that?

So you’re saying it’s okay to illegally deport him because his lawyer can argue in his place before a court that has no jurisdiction?

That’s pretty ******* stupid.

 

[Seymour Flops]

So you’re saying it’s okay to illegally deport him because his lawyer can argue in his place before a court that has no jurisdiction?

No, I was responding to this lie:

He can and did.

 

[Meathead]

So you’re saying it’s okay to illegally deport him because his lawyer can argue in his place before a court that has no jurisdiction?

That’s pretty ******* stupid.

SCOTUS has no jurisdiction in El Salvador. Garcia is an El Salvadorian thug who is incarcerated in his home country. That is where he belongs.

 

[Couchpotato]

View attachment 1101508

No, he can’t challenge our government’s actions from his gulag.

You're operating from what ought to have happened not what actually happened. Once this guy was sent to El Salvador we cant force him back to the US against the wishes of the El Salvadorian government. He's a Salvadorian citizen in El Salvador we don't have any standing to tell El Salvador what it HAS to do with regard to its citizens. If the scenario were reversed, would you be on here advocating for a US citizen to be sent back to El Salvador because a Salvadorian court said so?

 

[Marener]

You're operating from what ought to have happened not what actually happened. Once this guy was sent to El Salvador we cant force him back to the US against the wishes of the El Salvadorian government. He's a Salvadorian citizen in El Salvador we don't have any standing to tell El Salvador what it HAS to do with regard to its citizens. If the scenario were reversed, would you be on here advocating for a US citizen to be sent back to El Salvador because a Salvadorian court said so?

Yes. I’m focused on what ought to happen because it ought not happen again.

 

[Marener]

SCOTUS has no jurisdiction in El Salvador. Garcia is an El Salvadorian thug who is incarcerated in his home country. That is where he belongs.

He has no criminal record. His incarceration is unjust.

 

[Couchpotato]

Yes. I’m focused on what ought to happen because it ought not happen again.

That's fine. I don't think anyone is saying (including the admin) that it should.

 

[Couchpotato]

He has no criminal record. His incarceration is unjust.

According to whom? Who?