rightnow909
Diamond Member
- Oct 5, 2021
- 4,789
- 2,713
- 1,908
I'm reading up on various questionable "verdicts" made RE several different historical deaths, like that of JFK, his brother and others.
I have reason to seriously question, if not dismiss entirely, the "official verdict" on how these people died... In other words, there is ample evidence to show that it was NOT
NOT Lee Harvey Oswald who killed JFK. That appears to be beyond question. Ditto Sirhan Sirhan, who did NOT kill his brother Bobby. SS was walking TOWARD Bobby that day, but the latter was shot from behind... bullet trajectories do not lie.
So all this time we have been brainwashed about these things... WHY?
Well, there are a lot of reasons. Bobby apparently helped cover up who was really responsible for his brother's death bc to do a truthful investigation would mean uncovering certain plans the gummit had at that time... Oswald was actually military intelligence (if you believe some sources on this subject and at this time, I do believe those ones). Oswald was actually patriotic and just pretended to be pro-communist so as to get secrets from the Russians... He was a patsy....
So anyhow, the point is that we just never know what the hell to believe... about any "news" or "history" we hear or read about... although I have figured out that cnn and msnbc are totally untrustworthy, just another branch of the DNC
our schools have always taught BS apparently, not just in this day and age...
I have reason to seriously question, if not dismiss entirely, the "official verdict" on how these people died... In other words, there is ample evidence to show that it was NOT
NOT Lee Harvey Oswald who killed JFK. That appears to be beyond question. Ditto Sirhan Sirhan, who did NOT kill his brother Bobby. SS was walking TOWARD Bobby that day, but the latter was shot from behind... bullet trajectories do not lie.
So all this time we have been brainwashed about these things... WHY?
Well, there are a lot of reasons. Bobby apparently helped cover up who was really responsible for his brother's death bc to do a truthful investigation would mean uncovering certain plans the gummit had at that time... Oswald was actually military intelligence (if you believe some sources on this subject and at this time, I do believe those ones). Oswald was actually patriotic and just pretended to be pro-communist so as to get secrets from the Russians... He was a patsy....
So anyhow, the point is that we just never know what the hell to believe... about any "news" or "history" we hear or read about... although I have figured out that cnn and msnbc are totally untrustworthy, just another branch of the DNC
our schools have always taught BS apparently, not just in this day and age...